Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
"That energy, is a vibrational frequency" That is a nonsensical statement. I cant even correct the spelling in this, because 'vibrational' isn't even a word. For something to vibrate it has to exist. What is vibrating Mr Edwards? How do your know this? An energy doesn't simply exist simply because you claim some undisclosed energy field is vibrating. Did you happen to fall asleep on a sex toy and have a nice dream?
skepticoz 4 months ago
@skepticoz Vibrational is an adjective, honey.
thelandofbrandy 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from kevhast
This has been flagged as spam show
@thelandofbrandy ¨Vibrational is an adjective, honey¨. I guess youre right there. Itś not commonly used in that context. The real problem, is the way frequency is used as a noun, to describe an objective entity which nobody has offered to identify. A ´frequency´ is not an object like a brick, but a property of some other physical phenomenon, such as electromagnetic waves. Electrons can vibrate and those vibrations can have a frequency. Whats doing the vibrating for Mr Edwards?
skepticoz 6 days ago
Itś also a common trick of new-age language, to bootstrap a phenomenon by implying itś existence, then couching it in pseudo-scientific terms. We may speak about electromagnetic waves as an existing phenomenon (which we KNOW exists), which have a measurable property called frequency. A ¨vibrational frequency¨ is not an objective entity in itś own right. Itś an attempt to bootstrap a phenomenon using scientific jargon, supplanting the word for a property (frequency) to objectify it.
skepticoz 6 days ago
I think I'm gonna be Judith Lucy when I grow up.
phoebea8 6 months ago 2
@phoebea8 i think she would say 'don't" !
SovereignBeing 5 months ago