moron, did you see the record heat in texas and the rest of the country the last two years, look up texas drought, new mexico wilfires, geogia drought with 2010 2011 in the search terms, fools!
NOAA: 2010 Tied For Warmest Year on Record
According to NOAA scientists, 2010 tied with 2005 as the warmest year of the global surface temperature record, beginning in 1880. This was the 34th ...
NASA - NASA Finds 2011 Ninth Warmest Year on Record
there is a long-term decline in Arctic ice as Monckton himself actually admitted when pressed for a source on his claim that there wasn't. He is a liar.
This guys is a joke. In the future there will be a term for people who have been taken in by false scientific arguments. They will have been monck't on!
Disproving monckton: 1) Climate reacts to whatever forces it to change at the time; humans are now the MOST LIKELY dominant forcing. 2) humans have been the most likely driver since the 1970's. 3) Since the 1970's temps have risen faster than at any time since modern records began. 4) Global warming since 1995 'now significant' BBC news 5) 2010 was 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998. (WMO)
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
When in history has the masses ever been right? When? When the earth was flat? when the earth was the centre of the universe? During the inquisitions?
Looking for the government one will only find the governed.
@TruthWithinRange But it's not the masses who agree, it's the overwhelming majority of experts who have studied and are studying in the field of climatology agree that the Earth is warming and is caused by the combustion of fossil fuels.
@TheGamanic Yes they agree the earth WAS warming. Overwhelming? you been watching too much tv. reading too many newspapers. Models are not proof but examples of peoples limitations. co2 has the tiniest effect on the weather but no effect on the overall climate. there is nothing new under the sun. What is the earths temprature suposed to be? when was it at its safest? we have had parts of history proven to have higher amounts of co2 than today. When has the earth gone wrong with more heat?
@TruthWithinRange "Yes they agree the earth WAS warming"- And is now.
"Overwhelming? you been watching too much tv. reading too many newspaper"- No, I've been reading the scientific literature which shows that around 97% of experts who have published in the area agree that humans are to blame for recent warming.
"Models are not proof but examples of peoples limitations"-Explain?
"co2 has the tiniest effect on climate"- Bold claim, can you back it up with peer review evidence?
@TruthWithinRange cont. "we have had parts of history proven to have higher amounts of co2 than today"- That is true, and scientists realise that factors such as the Sun are very important. However, we know that solar activity has been decreasing when the Earth has been warming over the last few years.
"When has the earth gone wrong with more heat?"- Humans have only been on this planet for a small fraction of time, too short to feel real extremes of heat.cont.
@TheGamanic Other planets in our solar system where going through some warming in the last ten years beacuse of the Suns hot spots. Not because of co2. Human beings have been on the planet long enough to have lived through a warm period ad 900 to 1300. And human beings thrived. Go to the warm parts of this planet and tell me how life is going around there.The Vikings were killed off because of a lilltle ice age. We have had enough experiance to learn that we can adapt very well.
@TruthWithinRange "Other planets... hot spots"- I guess you are referring to the claims that show that some regions of the planets of the solar system are warming. However, only limited conclusions can be drawn from this data, since it only gives info from a few locations, and you cannot say that from this that the whole planet is warming due to the rise of a few spots. As for other humans thriving that may be so, but our situation is so different cont.
@TruthWithinRange cont. since there are so many more people on the planet and there is massive pressure on resources.
"In the 70s it was global cooling with the exact same science"- Rubbish- There was nowhere near the same level of consensus as there is now on global warming, just a few papers and an article in a magazine.
"You can BELIEVE the forms on the cave wall"- Don't bring in an esteemed philosopher to support your pseudoscientific claims
@TheGamanic 1 million earths fit into the sun. These sunspots are thousands times bigger than earth. These spots were seen from earth and were behind the warming of the other planets. Not limiting conclusions but limited minds. We don’t have a shortage of resources. We have a massive shortage of people giving a fuck and very sadistic masters. How much land do we have? How many backyards could be growing food? We have an old system trying to deal with a new and yes more populated world. cont
@TruthWithinRange "These spots were behind the warming of the other planets"- Again, there is no evidence that any planets are warming or cooling overall since we don't have enough information on them yet. Furthermore, evidence shows that solar activity has been decreasing whilst the temperature is increasing along with CO2 emissions.
"We don’t have a shortage of resources"- Clearly, balance of resources is a big issue as, but increased resources is surely better than fewer?
@TheGamanic.We have a hand full of companies trying to feed nations of lazy people. The consensus is built on models. Isn’t that pseudoscience? A model will only prove what it’s meant to. And Plato’s cave works perfectly. You will never accept the true reality as long as you are going along with the CURRENT consensus. The same consensus that put fluoride in our water? What are we arguing over global warming or climate change?Global cooling was rubbish and so is fearing our waether.
@TruthWithinRange cont. "The consensus is built on models. Isn’t that pseudoscience?"- Depends if the models are correct.
"You will never accept the true reality as long as you are going along with the CURRENT consensus"- But the majority of climatologists are not basing their claims on consensus, but empirical evidence which deniers lack
"Global cooling was rubbish and so is fearing our waether"- So if a tornado was heading straight to your house, you wouldn't fear it?
@TheGamanic And which model has been correct? The ipcc’s models were wrong. Where is this evidence? You sound just like a television. With these repeated statements. Missing all my points. Co2 levels have been higher. The earth’s climate is always changing. We might as well change the word change with climate they both mean the same thing. The earth has been through massive changes from a long warm period to a cooling. The industrial era boomed in the forties and when the weather should CONT
@TruthWithinRange Which models are you specifically referring to? As for the IPCC being wrong, it has made errors and has rectified those mistakes. That is how science is conducted. A few errors doesn't invalidate the entire theory, otherwise scientists would have abandoned AGW a long time ago in their droves. You accuse me of missing your points, but I'm not, I am refuting them.
"Co2 levels have been higher. The earth's climate is always changing"- Yes, but that doesn't cont
@TheGamanic Im refering to every model brought up untill their latest made up guess.If their method proved by the UNIVERSE to not work why so much FAITH in them now?A massive majority on the ipcc are activitsts and have no expertise in the relevent feild of climate.A few errors were talking about the unverse. These experts you speak of arnt so expert. havnt we been warned about catstraphy from the 80s 90s and still. I love the balance argument.
@TruthWithinRange "Im refering to every model brought up untill their latest made up guess"-Where have you got the evidence to suggest they are all wrong? From who, or better,which scientific paper?
"These experts you speak of arnt so expert"- Yes, those who have studied climatology for decades and hold professorships at prestigious universities are not experts but such scientific luminaries as Monckton who I might add has no scientific background expertise whatsoever, are?
@TruthWithinRange cont. mean that the change will not be damaging, as according to most experts on the subject. "
"weather should have been rising"- Don't you mean climate? There is no point talking to someone who makes such a basic error. And in fact, the global temperature has increased and there is not a single shred of evidence to show otherwise.
"The oceans put so, so much more co2 in the atmosphere then we ever can"- that may well be the case". The oceans absorb CO2 cont
@ TheGamanic Whe have we seen this balance in our climate ever. Weve talked about warm periods, ice ages. we have ice caps that at some stage in our history wernt there. what maintains this balance what on earth is ever consistant enough with a forever changing unverses for a balance. What are you talking about. what balance. Sun spots can warm up parts of the universe. does this fit in with the ballance..
So if you are aware of the influence of the ocean and co2 doesnt that dispute any.
@TruthWithinRange cont. Yes, it can become unbalanced because of sudden events, such as increased solar activity, which can unstabilise our environment. Often such events have been detrimental to the planet.
"Global warming or climate change? You can fear next year all you like. but you are proving to have no reason just faith"- You give no scientific evidence for your views, yet accuse me of being unscientific?
@TheGamanic Unstabillise our environment? From who’s perspective? How can the planet hurt the planet? When has it been stable? When?Tell me the dates that we agree we want it to be like. What temperature is the planet supposed to be?I understand the profound balance.No, i accuse you of blindly following where the social engineers lead you. Your position on this debate is proof that you have no interest in science.Your arguments have been uttered by any idiot that can watch TV or read newspapers.
@TruthWithinRange "Your position on this debate is proof that you have no interest in science"- This is coming from someone who has just regurgitated long debunked claims from deniers such as Monckton, who is not a scientist nor has a knowledge of even the basics of climate science. Yet you get your evidence from him? It's frankly laughable. Every time I have asked for a source of your claims, such as the Earth is cooling, you give nothing cont.
@TheGamanic Newspapers are very cheap and you have proven that so are their ideas. Give me one example of when the stupid masses have been right. Just one! The IPCC is corrupt and is used by men with no virtue. Who must lie and cover up the truth or make fun of any one telling the truth, claiming their information to be spam. So what is it that you fear the warming or it changing? You canot have a constantly changing atmosphere and claim the balance is in the greenhouse effect!
@TruthWithinRange cont. Unless you are being deliberately obtuse, of course I am referring to the stability needed for the survival and thriving of the human race.There is no single "supposed" ideal temperature, but a range of them.
"Give me one example of when the stupid masses have been right"- yet you forget that climatologists don't base their views on non-experts (unlike most deniers like yourself) but on empirical evidence!
@TheGamanic What do they agree on? That it’s changing? No shit. We have a long way to go if society is still producing men like youself. You are practising dogma. Now you are just repeating the forms on the walls. your daft to believe the majority agree. Just look up men like Richard Lindzen or Ian Pilmer to prove that you have been led astray. Men with your beliefs will be happy in the Orwellian state they are providing on the medium of your stupidity. The earth’s climate has never been stable
@TruthWithinRange Your empty rhetoric is ineffective, empty of facts ( I know it is hard for you). You bring up the one or two of the dying breed of climate "skeptics", and I don't deny there are some who are highly qualified, but it is strange that you don't have the same level of skepticism for their claims as others. This exemplifies that you aren't infact a "truth seeker" but just someone who wants evidence to support his suppositions
@TheGamanic And human beings thrive in the warmth. The earth has no overall climate. You can visit Antarctica and the amazon in one day to prove that. I feel sorry for any human being living in fear. Especially if they cannot tell me what it is they fear a warming planet or a forever changing one. All you have been doing is repeating your fav slogans. It’s time to step out of the cave and acknowledge the reality. That you are a liar, and are pretending to give a fuck by supporting a tax.
@TruthWithinRange cont. "And human beings thrive in the warmth"- "Warmth" is very broad, relative term. In relation to absolute zero, - 50 degress celsius is "warm". Clarification is needed in a scientific discussion.
"The earth has no overall climate"- Antarctica and the Amazon are biomes.
"I feel sorry for any human being living in fear"- I feel sorry for any human being who denies logic but claims rational superiority.
@TruthWithinRange cont. the effects of warming and whether I support a tax is different to whether the planet is actually warming and this is caused by man, even you must see that?
@TheGamanicI’m calling you liar calming that you have read any of the scientific literature, while repeating slogans I’ve heard brain dead newspaper readers repeat. You’d be claiming white superiority in Nazi Germany Due to the pseudoscience and propaganda. Yes i know they are biomes but they make up the climate, these are the mediums. When you claim the earth temperature rising will be bad, from who’s perspective are you speaking? It cannot be the planet?.
@TruthWithinRange It shall present a threat to fragile ecosystems and humankind.
"But when I use warmth I’m being broad?"- If you want to be scientific and thus prove your point, you need to provide a range of temperatures of what "warmth" actually entails.
"-We thrive in warmer weather"- Not necessarily, of course it depends on how warm, but even an increase of a few degrees can have a great effect, for example, on sea levels, rendering many parts of the global uninhabitable
@TheGamanic But when I use warmth I’m being broad?We thrive in warmer weather. No grey areas about that! Broad?You’re the one referring to it on a global scale and being separate from universal events.Like our rotating and orbiting earth, sun spots and shift in the unverse.Co2 levels have been higher naturally. Co2 levels follow warming. And the earth temperature has stopped warming. Been cooling for ten years. My rhetoric is based on holistic rationality.Yours on out dated dualistic though.
@TruthWithinRange cont. If I am ignorant of the truth, then how can I be liar, if I am, as you claim, just repeating false information which I believe to be true? I am not lieing in that case. On the other land, if I am lieing about all this and do agree with you but argue the other way, I am not ignorant of the truth. I can't be both, so make your mind up.
@TheGamanic All my information comes from the only information anyone serious about understanding the climate would come across.Co2 follows warming. I could send link after link. but what is the point. Keep lying to yourself that you know what is going on. Trying to get away with crap, pretending to really have done any research. You know what I’m talking about you haven’t looked into it at all. Co2 aint no pollutant. it does not drive climate. It has stopped warming you fool.
@TruthWithinRange "All my information comes from the only information anyone serious about understanding the climate would come across"- So, other ignorant fucks like yourself then in the pockets of Big Oil?
"-Co2 follows warming. I could send link after link. but what is the point"- Typical tactic used by someone who doesn't wanted to disclose evidence they know is shitty
"Keep lying to yourself that you know what is going on"- Yes,because I really want a global disaster
@TheGamanic You are bad quality. As I said good luck with agenda 21. You know you talk shit and you need that slap on your mouth. Your brain sits in your dark skull and has never seen the outside world. Matter is in our minds. You will never understand how reality works because you are a coward. You haven’t looked into both sides. The truth is here. the real sceince is being heard It’s becoming clear that you were fools. Global warming or Climate change? What do you call it?
@TruthWithinRange I call troll. You clearly haven't listened to anything I have said. For someone who presents himself as intellectually superior, you make far too many sweeping generalisations and wild assumptions about someone you haven't met. I have looked at the other side, otherwise I wouldn't be able to debunk morons such as yourself. You claim objectivity, but you are so far from it that it is laughable
@TheGamanic It has been cooling for ten years! It’s over for you lot but you won’t stop believing and its getting us into trouble. Do you know what agenda 21 is?? You claim humans caused the warming therefore making the universe.. What? Broken? So we want earth to be at some chosen temperatures from some chosen models. Keep dreaming. You are a victim of supraliminal propaganda. Climate change or global warming?
@TruthWithinRange cont. "Climate change or global warming?"- Climate change I find is a better term since global warming gives the impression that everywhere on the globe will warm simultaneously to the same degree, which is misleading.
"So what temperature is earth supposed to be?"-As mentioned before,there is no exact temperature.
"Have you ever considered the effect of clouds"-No, me nor any other climatologist in the entire world has thought of clouds effecting weather...
@TheGamanic You will never understand. You’re a kid talking shit… you have been led astray. There is no logic in your arguments. Stop wasting my time with your TV slogans.
@TheGamanic I truly believe any one claiming nature has nothing to do with our atmosphere needs a slap on the mouth. AGW is fluoride in the warter.its FUCKING BULLSHIT! Carbon tax is why you are doing what you are told. Enjoy your out dated views of our life on earth. Fear the change all you want. you have no virtue, this is clear for you are trying to get away with the bare minimum. You ignorance has brought the westerns world Trojan horse. Agenda 21 Good luck with it
@TheGamanic the universe and facts are not your side. These dialogs between us prove that all you have is faith. News paper headlines have and never will be valid. You are the denier! you are the denier of facts and reality.
@TruthWithinRange so they would help, but increased warming means that they can store less C02 and so increase the problem. But anyway, the Earth is like a balance; it has stayed relatively constant for billions of years, hence even a relatively small change can have a big effect.
@ TheGamanic So if you are aware of the influence of the ocean and co2 doesnt that dispute any sign of balance. I understand the true balance in the universe you are confused. Global warming or climate change? You can fear next year all you like. but you are proving to have no reason just faith. you sound like a newspaper headline. You know only what you have been allowed to beleive. 2+2= 5
@TheGamanic So what temperature is earth supposed to be? Have you ever considered the effect of clouds? Your mind is very limited and you come across like a man still in his adolescence. Either way your convictions are! You have been led a stray little man. And if you are the integrity of this new urban faith then the social engineers have done it again.
@TruthWithinRange "Your mind is very limited and you come across like a man still in his adolescence"- This claim may be true; however, it does not in any way bolster your own flailing "argument", my pseudo-intellectual friend
@TheGamanic weather should have been rising the information was showing that it was cooling. The oceans and dying vegetation put so, so much more co2 in the atmosphere then we ever can. Witch decade of humans reserved the right to fear their climate? And you are right I would fear a tornado but I’m not the one assuming we can have an effect on the climate. Are you fearing warming or changing weather
@TheGamanic In the 70s it was global cooling with the exact same science.It seems the climate will not fit with their models.Do you know how much co2 is put into our atmosphere from the ocean or dying vegetation?And a majority of our landscapes are green and the planet blue. Did you know warter was brought here by astroids?If you scream somthing loud enough and long enough the people will believe it. do you know who said that?.You can BELIEVE the forms on the cave wall.While ill KNOW the truth
It's not scientists who are fabricating data. kleptocrats and politicians exploit data for their own betterment. Politicians will twist any source of data to further their agenda endorsed by the plutocracy. Most people will blindly believe whatever the kleptocrats tell us through biased mainstream media due to the false portrayal of legitimate credentialism they inherently claim to possess. How can we be so arrogant to declare that we are the underlying source/cause of global warming? Shameful..
Regardless, the only people who would oppose protecting nature or carbon reduction are a. "conservatives" wanting to beat the "liberals," regardless of reason or cost b. inbred anti-intellectual cretins who think driving their Hummers or dumping fuel in the river doesn't have any negative impact, or are too involved in their miserable lives to enjoy nature c. self-serving assholes invested in oil
supposing for a moment that thousands of scientists around the world are fabricating data to back some mysterious "liberal agenda," what is this "liberal agenda"? Presumably it's something about protecting the planet, cutting carbon emissions, I don't know
Noticed that you can't reply to many who support Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley? How telling. Also, how the political right despises class divide yet sucks this guy's semen. What ever!
Monkton is a proven liar and a fraud who baffles people's minds with bullshit. Don't believe a word this prancing peacock says.
Just some of his lies: he was a science advisor to Thatcher (LIE), he's discovered a cure for AIDS (!), He advised Thatcher to use biological warfare against the Argentinians during the war (which not only contravenes international agreements, but is a LIE).
Check out greenman3610's videos, and potholer54's videos for the evidence, and decide for yourselves.
Also Google "A scientist replies to Christopher Monckton" and "Abraham Presentation" to see a point by point analysis and refutation by a respected Climatologist.
Yet another faux political scientist. Total bollocks as usual. Global warming isn't a liberal agenda, it's scientific fact. But, go ahead "sheep" listen to someone politically motivated instead of REAL scientists.
@Snagglepussify Like the 30,000 PLUS scientists who have signed the document disputing global warming alarmist message? I'll trust them over the East Anglia "scientists" who fudged the data to produce the desired result. There's LOTS of scientific data that disputes "global warming," but many choose to ignore this and instead throw out insulting terms like "deniers" and try to liken those who have a healthy skepticism to Holocaust deniers. Always resort to emotions when your facts are faulty.
@sarxpoker Wow! There was?! Could that have been during The Ice Age perhaps? Is this an argument? What a terribly unintelligent statement. I'm a Brit living in the US & I thought all the nut-jobs were all over here. It saddens me to hear such tosh from a fellow Brit. You might try reading a book one day.
@Delphinus72 I have to add: When did scientists start signing documents disputing anything? Doesn't that sound alarmingly political to you? Science (by definition) is ever changing & evolves constantly. No real scientist would ever attest to such a thing (almost everything is possible).
Sadly America has become politically divided on issues which should unite us. It saddens me that the likes of Limbaugh carries political weight when, truth be known, he's just about making a (mega) buck. :(
@Snagglepussify Since when do scientists ever claim "the debate is over." Such a statement goes completely against the scientific method. There is lots of data that disputes global warming. The University of Illinois climate science website shows that while ice levels have decreased in the northern polar region, it's also increased in the south. ANY "scientist" who claims "the debate is over" or fudges the data (e.g. East Anglia) is a charlatan with a political agenda.
@Delphinus72 - Interesting but an unconvincing rebuttal. East Anglia CRU seems to the be all & end all for you. If you've not changed your view since this "scandal" and the 2 years of predicted & unprecedented, climatically changed weather that's followed then, nobody will convince you otherwise. Are you aware that The Pentagon accepts MAN MADE climate change as fact? And are analyzing where the potential conflicts will occur as a result?
I'm done with this conversation/debate. Good luck.
@Snagglepussify So you're willing to afford scientist the convenience of claiming "the debate is over," declare victory, and label anyone who dares display a healthy skepticism as comparable to "racists" and "Holocaust deniers." Very interesting. So any data or evidence that disputes the theory (i.e. "accepted fact") should be disregarded as "inconvenient facts." BTW, this is the same Pentagon leadership that ignored polls of military members showing a large majority opposed DADT repeal.
@Snagglepussify You're the one who made the comment, "East Anglia CRU seems to be all & end all for you." when I only mentioned that once in all my comments as an EXAMPLE of so-called "climate scientists" who violate the scientific method, sacrificed their objectiveness, and allowed political agenda to influence their "science." The problem is the whole "global warming" movement is one big self-licking ice cream cone that is melting, not b/c of the climate, but because of their own hot air.
Another thing, about the polar ice caps. If they DON'T melt eventually, what do people think will happen? That that gigantic piece of fuckin ice is just going to STAY THERE forever? Yes, by logic, of COURSE it has to melt! If there was ever a climate change drastic enough in the past to CREATE such a floating Titanic-Sinker in the first place, then we have to believe that theres going to be another climate change to take it away. The Ice Age was natural. And so is this.
If "Lord Monckton" really is a lord, why does the House of Lords deny that he is or has ever been one?
Because everyone is out to get "Lord" Monckton. EVERYONE!! He's not insane: each and every individual and group in the world is working against him! From the mass-polluting mining companies of the world, like BHP, to the Australian Green Party. They're all sitting in a room somewhere together, pretending the planet is polluted and lying about whether he's a lord.
@jantiification Oh experts publish. Is that your rule or did you get that from 'Expert' authority. What do you know about say 'theoristics' never heard of it ?, that's because there are no papers published yet. Does that mean if I say I'm the formost expert on Theoristics in Oz, I know s*it because nothings published ? And I AM the formost expert on it. I reiterate, If I spend 20 years studying other expert data, does that mean I am still not an expert in the subject ?
@jantiification So who gave him the title of expert ?, certainly not him. Expert in what ? a bloody good expert in researching the facts. As far as I'm aware he doesn't claim to be an 'expert' in climatology. He is an expert in researching facts. So if a librarian spends 5 years researching climate from expert text, notes, papers, peer reviews etc, she's not qualified to speak on the subject just because she aint a climatologist ? Again this is a stupid arguement
Well, living here in crumbling oz, I tend to rely on a real scientist like Professor Bob Carter. Why dont you all watch '7 torpedoes' as he has all the data
@jantiification . You don't have to be an expert to read data on graphs and talk to scientist and tour the data facilities and use his brain. Why would he publish a peer review on climate if he is not a climatologist ? thats a stupid answer.
It's like the question Wittgenstein posed to his friend: Why did people believe the Sun revolved around the earth? Because it looks that way. So what would it look like if the Earth revolved around the Sun? If temperature were increasing anyway, as well as carbon, how could you tell the difference? If you're an academic climate modeller, of course you would want to say that's it's because of the carbon. That's how you get your next grant. In reality, climate just changes.
What the fuck are these English words supposed to convey, "...the transmissions from Mothership Europe are fading in it's demise and now you're starting to take them in an ever more robotic like obedience than before from China..." Is this even English, "...casting the runts of society back to the left and insignificant!"
Gibberish. You are a clown; a weak, poorly educated, self deluded and racist clown. You leave me no wonder why Europe is fucked.
Just a thought .. If carbon dioxide levels are out of controll is that not favorable for plants population and grown that intern breath more oxegen balancing us out ? We should stop "real" toxic pollution and stop funding projects like cloud seeding and geo engineering imo Carbon Tax may very well = Geo Engineering justification. Forgive 3rd world countries of the debt they can never repay and end world hunger by sharing our resources more equitably
Scientist have found evidence that the Antarctica used to be green at one point. They have also found evidence that the Earth has gone through about 5 ice ages already. So global warming is probably just a normal part of the seasonal changes.The Earth heats up and cools down every 2000 years. This guys probably right.
You can't change the minds of the ignorant. This guy trusts that the water he drinks, the food he eats, the medicine he takes are all safe because they have been conclusively proven by scientists to be safe. The same quality of scientists overwhelmingly believe that we are having an impact and that 1/2000th is actually a hell of a lot given the delicate balance of the atmosphere.
@LillabetteHane Good heavens, you honesty think that you're better than me?
That's adorable.
You know nothing about me. Unlike you, I actually went to university and learned to spell and use grammar correctly.
"Indoor types," sweet Jesus! After work, I go to my boxing gym. I box. You little faggot. I smash little faggots just like you every Tuesday and Thursday,
Also, I'm not european, I'm polynesian. You doopy fag.
does anyone wanna bet me that by the time they die the planet will still be the same. lol and maybe its not man mad maybe the planet is just evolving. lmfao
The problem is we might have the the climatologist society, telling us these so called scientific facts but ask yourself who they're employed by? The global elite control how politics governing bodies operate, aswel as scientific governing bodies and the media. We cannot trust mainstream information. I mean they changed global warming to climate change lol and the East Anglian doucuments released stated 'Hide The Decline" we are going through climate changes but its not man made.
People, you don't even realise we've had the same thing we're going through right now before for centuries. We had a period of global climate warming before during the Medieval times and a "Little Ice Age " that started in the 16th century or so, Climate change has always been happening, getting warmer and cooler. It's a way of getting your money certainly. For People who don't like fear mongering and conspiracies you certainly let your government and higher classes drag you into enough of it.
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Oh, don't we? Tell me, did you learn all that at high school, or you rather needed some help from the likes of Monckton to collect that extensive knowledge about climate? (it is a sarcasm, could not help it) Did you ever hear about Richard Alley or Wallace Smith Broecker? Go check them and read from actual scientists instead of making a fool of yourself. You may prefer seeking for them on YouTube, though - will do anyhow. No need to answer - I will not be here to read it.
What are you blabbering on about? You actually defending the Climate Change scam or something?
It's just blindingly common sense that if the climate has been through periods of climate change over the centuries, so much so that it was enough to create a Little Ice Age then obviously it isn't Man Made Carbon Emissions.
The sun is becoming hotter. Lots of things come into play, we need CO2 for plants and trees to grow and these idiots want to reduce it drastically? Morons!
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Yes this is true but what about the fact that the increasing output of greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution correlate exactly with the rising global temperatures? Is this just a coincidence? Why cant we just believe the 96+ percent of climate change scientists who believe that A: Global warming is happening and B: is human induced. Or are all these independent scientists part of some conspiracy as well.
Well, I can only blame the sun for that my friend, and now I know that the sun has been increasing its activity, that does explain the warming to me, I now know that the Sun is going into hibernation as stated by Scientists just recently, I'm guessing the temperatures will get colder while that happens.
I mean, as bad as warming might feel now, it was much hotter during the Medieval global warming before it went into it's colder period, and that was pre-industrial.
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Well why did the sun choose the industrial revolution as a date to start warming? I don't think its a coincidence that the earths temperatures are rising right on par with the increase of greenhouse gases. Tobacco lobbies argued that lung cancer was around before cigarettes in order to discredit the health findings just as you are arguing that global warming was happening before substantial greenhouse emissions.
@IAMLelouchVBritannia its not a matter of oppinion, but a matter of fact, and the fat is that the temperatures on earth have been rising while the sun is in its cooling period... most of the studdies done, point to climat gasses
That's your opinion, I however don't see it that way, a lot of scientiest find "CO2 emissions heating the planet up" as very dubious too. It's a debatable issue, so breeds opinion. it doesn't however make it fact.
It kind of freaks me out how Climate change has brought about an opinonated cult.
Even at the time of hearing the CO2 emissions story I've been consistently skeptical.
No we're going into a hibernation period, that will inevitable cool the earth down like it did before.
@axelinaustralia The globall temperature was rising BEFORE the industrial revolution, ignoramus, and it's been FALLING since 1982.Get your data straight or don't say anything
@Richard482 How a bout Professor Bob Carter in '7 torpedoes' or don't you watch what a REAL scientist has to say and SHOW you the DATA sourced from specialists and doctorates in the field. Or perhaps your like Greg Combett who, if he said the sky was blue, I'de have to go outside and check it. Gomighty, what does it take for anyone to believe real data from real scientists using real measurements with real satelites.
@jackolan76 I'd never heard of Greg Combett before you mentioned him. I'm still waiting for a link to your source of information showing that global average temps have been fallng since 1982. A graph would be good.
@jackolan76 Where are you getting the data that global temperature has been falling for 30 years from? The internationally reknowned expert on climatology, Lord Monckton?
Of course, it still is in parts. The enviroment in that sense was changed because man made it that way. Chopped the trees down just like how they do with rain forrests.
Trees and Plants feed on Carbon Dioxide and give us oxygen, Photosynthesis does matter, so cutting down trees in my opinion is never much of very good idea. But Carbon Dioxide doesn't do much in terms of making the planet warmer. The Sun determines the warmth the planet the most, obviously.
@IAMLelouchVBritannia whether the sun contributes the lions share of the planets warmth may not necessarily count for much, for if the climate is a sensitively balanced system a little more (or less) CO2 in the atmosphere may be enough to make it switch to a different state
WMO: "In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998." and "Over the ten years from 2001 to 2010, global temperatures have averaged 0.46°C (0.83°F) above the 1961-1990 average, and are the highest ever recorded for a 10-year period since the beginning of instrumental climate records". "Arctic sea-ice cover in December 2010 was the lowest on record" .
@LillabetteHane Amazing. Look, it's quite clear that there's nothing you could explain to me. Nothing. Your laughable sense of superiority is matched only by your painful wilful ignorance and your staggering incoherency.
I don't think you appreciate just how retarded your grammar, spelling and punctuation makes you appear. I see five errors in punctuation in your first paragraph alone. The first sentence of your last paragraph literally makes no sense at all.
You are in no position to educate me, certainly not using the English language.
@LillabetteHane Who is trying to, "disprove his species?" What are you talking about?
A response to your ad-hominem argument: my politics are by most measures largely libertarian. My issue with ‘Lord’ Monckton is that his position will have a direct impact on me. This is the overwhelmingly consensus of the scientific community.
The masses are the democratic dream.
You know what? Fucking spell correctly and use remotely sound grammar before excluding yourself from the “moronity.”
The significance is that anyone belonging to a privileged minority that most benefits from and then defends the status quo almost always does so at the expense of the majority.
even if the earth's temperature hasn't increased enough to cause warning since industrialization we should still be researching alternative technologies to what we have now, because fossil fuels will run out eventually..
This has been flagged as spam show
moron, did you see the record heat in texas and the rest of the country the last two years, look up texas drought, new mexico wilfires, geogia drought with 2010 2011 in the search terms, fools!
NOAA: 2010 Tied For Warmest Year on Record
According to NOAA scientists, 2010 tied with 2005 as the warmest year of the global surface temperature record, beginning in 1880. This was the 34th ...
NASA - NASA Finds 2011 Ninth Warmest Year on Record
livingproofof 1 day ago
there is a long-term decline in Arctic ice as Monckton himself actually admitted when pressed for a source on his claim that there wasn't. He is a liar.
dasGagaTier 2 weeks ago
It really sheds a very poor light on RT that airtime is given to this proven charlatan and liar.
dasGagaTier 2 weeks ago
This guys is a joke. In the future there will be a term for people who have been taken in by false scientific arguments. They will have been monck't on!
sefindeblow 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Disproving monckton: 1) Climate reacts to whatever forces it to change at the time; humans are now the MOST LIKELY dominant forcing. 2) humans have been the most likely driver since the 1970's. 3) Since the 1970's temps have risen faster than at any time since modern records began. 4) Global warming since 1995 'now significant' BBC news 5) 2010 was 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998. (WMO)
checkyoursources 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From: Phil Jones
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
Cheers
Phil”
ChristopherMonckton5 3 weeks ago
Outstanding acting.
dimcoin 1 month ago
When in history has the masses ever been right? When? When the earth was flat? when the earth was the centre of the universe? During the inquisitions?
Looking for the government one will only find the governed.
TruthWithinRange 1 month ago
@TruthWithinRange But it's not the masses who agree, it's the overwhelming majority of experts who have studied and are studying in the field of climatology agree that the Earth is warming and is caused by the combustion of fossil fuels.
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic Yes they agree the earth WAS warming. Overwhelming? you been watching too much tv. reading too many newspapers. Models are not proof but examples of peoples limitations. co2 has the tiniest effect on the weather but no effect on the overall climate. there is nothing new under the sun. What is the earths temprature suposed to be? when was it at its safest? we have had parts of history proven to have higher amounts of co2 than today. When has the earth gone wrong with more heat?
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TruthWithinRange "Yes they agree the earth WAS warming"- And is now.
"Overwhelming? you been watching too much tv. reading too many newspaper"- No, I've been reading the scientific literature which shows that around 97% of experts who have published in the area agree that humans are to blame for recent warming.
"Models are not proof but examples of peoples limitations"-Explain?
"co2 has the tiniest effect on climate"- Bold claim, can you back it up with peer review evidence?
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. "we have had parts of history proven to have higher amounts of co2 than today"- That is true, and scientists realise that factors such as the Sun are very important. However, we know that solar activity has been decreasing when the Earth has been warming over the last few years.
"When has the earth gone wrong with more heat?"- Humans have only been on this planet for a small fraction of time, too short to feel real extremes of heat.cont.
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic Other planets in our solar system where going through some warming in the last ten years beacuse of the Suns hot spots. Not because of co2. Human beings have been on the planet long enough to have lived through a warm period ad 900 to 1300. And human beings thrived. Go to the warm parts of this planet and tell me how life is going around there.The Vikings were killed off because of a lilltle ice age. We have had enough experiance to learn that we can adapt very well.
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange "Other planets... hot spots"- I guess you are referring to the claims that show that some regions of the planets of the solar system are warming. However, only limited conclusions can be drawn from this data, since it only gives info from a few locations, and you cannot say that from this that the whole planet is warming due to the rise of a few spots. As for other humans thriving that may be so, but our situation is so different cont.
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. since there are so many more people on the planet and there is massive pressure on resources.
"In the 70s it was global cooling with the exact same science"- Rubbish- There was nowhere near the same level of consensus as there is now on global warming, just a few papers and an article in a magazine.
"You can BELIEVE the forms on the cave wall"- Don't bring in an esteemed philosopher to support your pseudoscientific claims
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic 1 million earths fit into the sun. These sunspots are thousands times bigger than earth. These spots were seen from earth and were behind the warming of the other planets. Not limiting conclusions but limited minds. We don’t have a shortage of resources. We have a massive shortage of people giving a fuck and very sadistic masters. How much land do we have? How many backyards could be growing food? We have an old system trying to deal with a new and yes more populated world. cont
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange "These spots were behind the warming of the other planets"- Again, there is no evidence that any planets are warming or cooling overall since we don't have enough information on them yet. Furthermore, evidence shows that solar activity has been decreasing whilst the temperature is increasing along with CO2 emissions.
"We don’t have a shortage of resources"- Clearly, balance of resources is a big issue as, but increased resources is surely better than fewer?
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic.We have a hand full of companies trying to feed nations of lazy people. The consensus is built on models. Isn’t that pseudoscience? A model will only prove what it’s meant to. And Plato’s cave works perfectly. You will never accept the true reality as long as you are going along with the CURRENT consensus. The same consensus that put fluoride in our water? What are we arguing over global warming or climate change?Global cooling was rubbish and so is fearing our waether.
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. "The consensus is built on models. Isn’t that pseudoscience?"- Depends if the models are correct.
"You will never accept the true reality as long as you are going along with the CURRENT consensus"- But the majority of climatologists are not basing their claims on consensus, but empirical evidence which deniers lack
"Global cooling was rubbish and so is fearing our waether"- So if a tornado was heading straight to your house, you wouldn't fear it?
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic And which model has been correct? The ipcc’s models were wrong. Where is this evidence? You sound just like a television. With these repeated statements. Missing all my points. Co2 levels have been higher. The earth’s climate is always changing. We might as well change the word change with climate they both mean the same thing. The earth has been through massive changes from a long warm period to a cooling. The industrial era boomed in the forties and when the weather should CONT
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange Which models are you specifically referring to? As for the IPCC being wrong, it has made errors and has rectified those mistakes. That is how science is conducted. A few errors doesn't invalidate the entire theory, otherwise scientists would have abandoned AGW a long time ago in their droves. You accuse me of missing your points, but I'm not, I am refuting them.
"Co2 levels have been higher. The earth's climate is always changing"- Yes, but that doesn't cont
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic Im refering to every model brought up untill their latest made up guess.If their method proved by the UNIVERSE to not work why so much FAITH in them now?A massive majority on the ipcc are activitsts and have no expertise in the relevent feild of climate.A few errors were talking about the unverse. These experts you speak of arnt so expert. havnt we been warned about catstraphy from the 80s 90s and still. I love the balance argument.
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TruthWithinRange "Im refering to every model brought up untill their latest made up guess"-Where have you got the evidence to suggest they are all wrong? From who, or better,which scientific paper?
"These experts you speak of arnt so expert"- Yes, those who have studied climatology for decades and hold professorships at prestigious universities are not experts but such scientific luminaries as Monckton who I might add has no scientific background expertise whatsoever, are?
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. mean that the change will not be damaging, as according to most experts on the subject. "
"weather should have been rising"- Don't you mean climate? There is no point talking to someone who makes such a basic error. And in fact, the global temperature has increased and there is not a single shred of evidence to show otherwise.
"The oceans put so, so much more co2 in the atmosphere then we ever can"- that may well be the case". The oceans absorb CO2 cont
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@ TheGamanic Whe have we seen this balance in our climate ever. Weve talked about warm periods, ice ages. we have ice caps that at some stage in our history wernt there. what maintains this balance what on earth is ever consistant enough with a forever changing unverses for a balance. What are you talking about. what balance. Sun spots can warm up parts of the universe. does this fit in with the ballance..
So if you are aware of the influence of the ocean and co2 doesnt that dispute any.
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. Yes, it can become unbalanced because of sudden events, such as increased solar activity, which can unstabilise our environment. Often such events have been detrimental to the planet.
"Global warming or climate change? You can fear next year all you like. but you are proving to have no reason just faith"- You give no scientific evidence for your views, yet accuse me of being unscientific?
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic Unstabillise our environment? From who’s perspective? How can the planet hurt the planet? When has it been stable? When?Tell me the dates that we agree we want it to be like. What temperature is the planet supposed to be?I understand the profound balance.No, i accuse you of blindly following where the social engineers lead you. Your position on this debate is proof that you have no interest in science.Your arguments have been uttered by any idiot that can watch TV or read newspapers.
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange "Your position on this debate is proof that you have no interest in science"- This is coming from someone who has just regurgitated long debunked claims from deniers such as Monckton, who is not a scientist nor has a knowledge of even the basics of climate science. Yet you get your evidence from him? It's frankly laughable. Every time I have asked for a source of your claims, such as the Earth is cooling, you give nothing cont.
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic Newspapers are very cheap and you have proven that so are their ideas. Give me one example of when the stupid masses have been right. Just one! The IPCC is corrupt and is used by men with no virtue. Who must lie and cover up the truth or make fun of any one telling the truth, claiming their information to be spam. So what is it that you fear the warming or it changing? You canot have a constantly changing atmosphere and claim the balance is in the greenhouse effect!
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. Unless you are being deliberately obtuse, of course I am referring to the stability needed for the survival and thriving of the human race.There is no single "supposed" ideal temperature, but a range of them.
"Give me one example of when the stupid masses have been right"- yet you forget that climatologists don't base their views on non-experts (unlike most deniers like yourself) but on empirical evidence!
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic What do they agree on? That it’s changing? No shit. We have a long way to go if society is still producing men like youself. You are practising dogma. Now you are just repeating the forms on the walls. your daft to believe the majority agree. Just look up men like Richard Lindzen or Ian Pilmer to prove that you have been led astray. Men with your beliefs will be happy in the Orwellian state they are providing on the medium of your stupidity. The earth’s climate has never been stable
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange Your empty rhetoric is ineffective, empty of facts ( I know it is hard for you). You bring up the one or two of the dying breed of climate "skeptics", and I don't deny there are some who are highly qualified, but it is strange that you don't have the same level of skepticism for their claims as others. This exemplifies that you aren't infact a "truth seeker" but just someone who wants evidence to support his suppositions
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic And human beings thrive in the warmth. The earth has no overall climate. You can visit Antarctica and the amazon in one day to prove that. I feel sorry for any human being living in fear. Especially if they cannot tell me what it is they fear a warming planet or a forever changing one. All you have been doing is repeating your fav slogans. It’s time to step out of the cave and acknowledge the reality. That you are a liar, and are pretending to give a fuck by supporting a tax.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. "And human beings thrive in the warmth"- "Warmth" is very broad, relative term. In relation to absolute zero, - 50 degress celsius is "warm". Clarification is needed in a scientific discussion.
"The earth has no overall climate"- Antarctica and the Amazon are biomes.
"I feel sorry for any human being living in fear"- I feel sorry for any human being who denies logic but claims rational superiority.
Let's tackle one issue at a time cont.
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. the effects of warming and whether I support a tax is different to whether the planet is actually warming and this is caused by man, even you must see that?
"That you are a liar"- Lying about what exactly?
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanicI’m calling you liar calming that you have read any of the scientific literature, while repeating slogans I’ve heard brain dead newspaper readers repeat. You’d be claiming white superiority in Nazi Germany Due to the pseudoscience and propaganda. Yes i know they are biomes but they make up the climate, these are the mediums. When you claim the earth temperature rising will be bad, from who’s perspective are you speaking? It cannot be the planet?.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange It shall present a threat to fragile ecosystems and humankind.
"But when I use warmth I’m being broad?"- If you want to be scientific and thus prove your point, you need to provide a range of temperatures of what "warmth" actually entails.
"-We thrive in warmer weather"- Not necessarily, of course it depends on how warm, but even an increase of a few degrees can have a great effect, for example, on sea levels, rendering many parts of the global uninhabitable
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic But when I use warmth I’m being broad?We thrive in warmer weather. No grey areas about that! Broad?You’re the one referring to it on a global scale and being separate from universal events.Like our rotating and orbiting earth, sun spots and shift in the unverse.Co2 levels have been higher naturally. Co2 levels follow warming. And the earth temperature has stopped warming. Been cooling for ten years. My rhetoric is based on holistic rationality.Yours on out dated dualistic though.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. "Co2 levels have been higher naturally"- Yes, well done.
"Co2 levels follow warming"- Source for claim please?
"And the earth temperature has stopped warming"- Ditto
"-Been cooling for ten years"- Yet again...
"I truly believe any one claiming nature has nothing to do with our atmosphere needs a slap on the mouth"-This is a strawman since I didn't say this.
"You ignorance"-You have called me ignorant and a liar many times; but they are mutually exclusive
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. If I am ignorant of the truth, then how can I be liar, if I am, as you claim, just repeating false information which I believe to be true? I am not lieing in that case. On the other land, if I am lieing about all this and do agree with you but argue the other way, I am not ignorant of the truth. I can't be both, so make your mind up.
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic All my information comes from the only information anyone serious about understanding the climate would come across.Co2 follows warming. I could send link after link. but what is the point. Keep lying to yourself that you know what is going on. Trying to get away with crap, pretending to really have done any research. You know what I’m talking about you haven’t looked into it at all. Co2 aint no pollutant. it does not drive climate. It has stopped warming you fool.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange "All my information comes from the only information anyone serious about understanding the climate would come across"- So, other ignorant fucks like yourself then in the pockets of Big Oil?
"-Co2 follows warming. I could send link after link. but what is the point"- Typical tactic used by someone who doesn't wanted to disclose evidence they know is shitty
"Keep lying to yourself that you know what is going on"- Yes,because I really want a global disaster
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. to happen where millions of lives & livelihoods are endangered!
"It has stopped warming you fool.It has been cooling for ten years!"-If I had a pound for every unsubstantiated assertion...
"You claim humans caused the warming therefore making the universe.. What"-You might want to rephrase this, it is nonsenical.
"You are a victim of supraliminal propaganda"-Big words, trying to impress? Unfortunately they don't cover the cracks in your shoddy argument
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic You are bad quality. As I said good luck with agenda 21. You know you talk shit and you need that slap on your mouth. Your brain sits in your dark skull and has never seen the outside world. Matter is in our minds. You will never understand how reality works because you are a coward. You haven’t looked into both sides. The truth is here. the real sceince is being heard It’s becoming clear that you were fools. Global warming or Climate change? What do you call it?
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange I call troll. You clearly haven't listened to anything I have said. For someone who presents himself as intellectually superior, you make far too many sweeping generalisations and wild assumptions about someone you haven't met. I have looked at the other side, otherwise I wouldn't be able to debunk morons such as yourself. You claim objectivity, but you are so far from it that it is laughable
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic It has been cooling for ten years! It’s over for you lot but you won’t stop believing and its getting us into trouble. Do you know what agenda 21 is?? You claim humans caused the warming therefore making the universe.. What? Broken? So we want earth to be at some chosen temperatures from some chosen models. Keep dreaming. You are a victim of supraliminal propaganda. Climate change or global warming?
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange cont. "Climate change or global warming?"- Climate change I find is a better term since global warming gives the impression that everywhere on the globe will warm simultaneously to the same degree, which is misleading.
"So what temperature is earth supposed to be?"-As mentioned before,there is no exact temperature.
"Have you ever considered the effect of clouds"-No, me nor any other climatologist in the entire world has thought of clouds effecting weather...
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic You will never understand. You’re a kid talking shit… you have been led astray. There is no logic in your arguments. Stop wasting my time with your TV slogans.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange As I expected, no evidence for your claims. Oh well...
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic I truly believe any one claiming nature has nothing to do with our atmosphere needs a slap on the mouth. AGW is fluoride in the warter.its FUCKING BULLSHIT! Carbon tax is why you are doing what you are told. Enjoy your out dated views of our life on earth. Fear the change all you want. you have no virtue, this is clear for you are trying to get away with the bare minimum. You ignorance has brought the westerns world Trojan horse. Agenda 21 Good luck with it
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic the universe and facts are not your side. These dialogs between us prove that all you have is faith. News paper headlines have and never will be valid. You are the denier! you are the denier of facts and reality.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange so they would help, but increased warming means that they can store less C02 and so increase the problem. But anyway, the Earth is like a balance; it has stayed relatively constant for billions of years, hence even a relatively small change can have a big effect.
TheGamanic 4 weeks ago
@ TheGamanic So if you are aware of the influence of the ocean and co2 doesnt that dispute any sign of balance. I understand the true balance in the universe you are confused. Global warming or climate change? You can fear next year all you like. but you are proving to have no reason just faith. you sound like a newspaper headline. You know only what you have been allowed to beleive. 2+2= 5
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic So what temperature is earth supposed to be? Have you ever considered the effect of clouds? Your mind is very limited and you come across like a man still in his adolescence. Either way your convictions are! You have been led a stray little man. And if you are the integrity of this new urban faith then the social engineers have done it again.
TruthWithinRange 3 weeks ago
@TruthWithinRange "Your mind is very limited and you come across like a man still in his adolescence"- This claim may be true; however, it does not in any way bolster your own flailing "argument", my pseudo-intellectual friend
TheGamanic 3 weeks ago
@TheGamanic weather should have been rising the information was showing that it was cooling. The oceans and dying vegetation put so, so much more co2 in the atmosphere then we ever can. Witch decade of humans reserved the right to fear their climate? And you are right I would fear a tornado but I’m not the one assuming we can have an effect on the climate. Are you fearing warming or changing weather
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
@TheGamanic In the 70s it was global cooling with the exact same science.It seems the climate will not fit with their models.Do you know how much co2 is put into our atmosphere from the ocean or dying vegetation?And a majority of our landscapes are green and the planet blue. Did you know warter was brought here by astroids?If you scream somthing loud enough and long enough the people will believe it. do you know who said that?.You can BELIEVE the forms on the cave wall.While ill KNOW the truth
TruthWithinRange 4 weeks ago
thak you for telling the truth
geopyt 1 month ago
watch?v=9K74fzNAUq4&feature=related Monkton is pretty well destroyed by this guy!
Strange0ne 1 month ago
It's not scientists who are fabricating data. kleptocrats and politicians exploit data for their own betterment. Politicians will twist any source of data to further their agenda endorsed by the plutocracy. Most people will blindly believe whatever the kleptocrats tell us through biased mainstream media due to the false portrayal of legitimate credentialism they inherently claim to possess. How can we be so arrogant to declare that we are the underlying source/cause of global warming? Shameful..
nistyboy32 1 month ago
Words of ignorance....
Nevawake 2 months ago in playlist Climate Change Hoax
This has been flagged as spam show
Regardless, the only people who would oppose protecting nature or carbon reduction are a. "conservatives" wanting to beat the "liberals," regardless of reason or cost b. inbred anti-intellectual cretins who think driving their Hummers or dumping fuel in the river doesn't have any negative impact, or are too involved in their miserable lives to enjoy nature c. self-serving assholes invested in oil
jjbinks3 2 months ago
Comment removed
jjbinks3 2 months ago
supposing for a moment that thousands of scientists around the world are fabricating data to back some mysterious "liberal agenda," what is this "liberal agenda"? Presumably it's something about protecting the planet, cutting carbon emissions, I don't know
jjbinks3 2 months ago
This guys eyes really bulge out, his face looks like his neck is being squeezed really hard.
Riiye 2 months ago
i love Sacha. How does he nail these accents?
Staate00 3 months ago
F these Carbon Tax Warmongers!
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
Does no one realise this is an actual person. He's part of the UKIP party.
god0fgod 3 months ago
Who IS this bellend?
TheEditingShop 3 months ago
Thumbs up if Reddit brought you here
fatsdom 3 months ago
@fatsdom Did we not have a talk about this behaviour?
jogz699 3 months ago
@fatsdom stop this shit now
hot4belgians 3 months ago
Does no one realize this is Sacha Boran Cohen?
600159mer 3 months ago 13
@600159mer
You believe this is Sacha Boran Cohen?
Are you really that stupid?
AmericanPatriot2008 1 month ago
guys you know this guy is mass trolling right? lol its sasha baran cohen
Snodgers3rdclass 3 months ago
@Snodgers3rdclass you know that you are the one that got trolled right? do some research before believing what you see on the internet
Zamborgarr 3 months ago
@Zamborgarr I was hoping someone would say something about this, you just been trolled.
Snodgers3rdclass 3 months ago
Lord Christopher Monckton IS BORAT!!! VERY NICEE
alahbalah 3 months ago
You stupid people, this dude is a comedian. Don't take him seriously!
LustX 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Monckton has been exposed as a LIAR and a FRAUD:
Google:
1- Viscount Monckton, another fallen idol of climate denial
2- Realclimate - Monckton makes it uu
3- desmogblog - Christopher Monckton
Monckton is a lacky of the Koch brothers. These 2 men are primarily responsible for the entire denialism movement.
Google:
climatesciencewatch - Koch Industries multibillionaire Koch brothers bankroll attacks on climate change science and policy
sunamori6765 3 months ago
Noticed that you can't reply to many who support Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley? How telling. Also, how the political right despises class divide yet sucks this guy's semen. What ever!
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
Monkton is a proven liar and a fraud who baffles people's minds with bullshit. Don't believe a word this prancing peacock says.
Just some of his lies: he was a science advisor to Thatcher (LIE), he's discovered a cure for AIDS (!), He advised Thatcher to use biological warfare against the Argentinians during the war (which not only contravenes international agreements, but is a LIE).
Check out greenman3610's videos, and potholer54's videos for the evidence, and decide for yourselves.
FantasmaBAnco 4 months ago
Also Google "A scientist replies to Christopher Monckton" and "Abraham Presentation" to see a point by point analysis and refutation by a respected Climatologist.
Monckton is a LIAR! Don't believe a word he says.
FantasmaBAnco 4 months ago
Just some guardian reading types having an excuse for a little meet up and flight around the world
ukipwarrior 4 months ago
The climate cult is hard to fight. Cultists are irrational.
raderator 4 months ago
learn some science? hhahahaha sheep
BabcockdaSolution 5 months ago
Despicable liar. That is you Mr Monckton. Go and learn some science.
Webofscience 5 months ago
watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q
guberskank 5 months ago
Yet another faux political scientist. Total bollocks as usual. Global warming isn't a liberal agenda, it's scientific fact. But, go ahead "sheep" listen to someone politically motivated instead of REAL scientists.
Snagglepussify 5 months ago
@Snagglepussify Like the 30,000 PLUS scientists who have signed the document disputing global warming alarmist message? I'll trust them over the East Anglia "scientists" who fudged the data to produce the desired result. There's LOTS of scientific data that disputes "global warming," but many choose to ignore this and instead throw out insulting terms like "deniers" and try to liken those who have a healthy skepticism to Holocaust deniers. Always resort to emotions when your facts are faulty.
Delphinus72 4 months ago
@Delphinus72 Try a more recent scientific consensus instead of one from 2008.
ucsusa.org/ssi/climate-change/scientific-consensus-on
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
@Snagglepussify do you not belive that we had a ice age years ago? long before we descoverd oil.
sarxpoker 4 months ago
@sarxpoker Wow! There was?! Could that have been during The Ice Age perhaps? Is this an argument? What a terribly unintelligent statement. I'm a Brit living in the US & I thought all the nut-jobs were all over here. It saddens me to hear such tosh from a fellow Brit. You might try reading a book one day.
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
Comment removed
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
@Delphinus72 I have to add: When did scientists start signing documents disputing anything? Doesn't that sound alarmingly political to you? Science (by definition) is ever changing & evolves constantly. No real scientist would ever attest to such a thing (almost everything is possible).
Sadly America has become politically divided on issues which should unite us. It saddens me that the likes of Limbaugh carries political weight when, truth be known, he's just about making a (mega) buck. :(
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
@Snagglepussify Since when do scientists ever claim "the debate is over." Such a statement goes completely against the scientific method. There is lots of data that disputes global warming. The University of Illinois climate science website shows that while ice levels have decreased in the northern polar region, it's also increased in the south. ANY "scientist" who claims "the debate is over" or fudges the data (e.g. East Anglia) is a charlatan with a political agenda.
Delphinus72 4 months ago
@Delphinus72 - Interesting but an unconvincing rebuttal. East Anglia CRU seems to the be all & end all for you. If you've not changed your view since this "scandal" and the 2 years of predicted & unprecedented, climatically changed weather that's followed then, nobody will convince you otherwise. Are you aware that The Pentagon accepts MAN MADE climate change as fact? And are analyzing where the potential conflicts will occur as a result?
I'm done with this conversation/debate. Good luck.
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
@Snagglepussify So you're willing to afford scientist the convenience of claiming "the debate is over," declare victory, and label anyone who dares display a healthy skepticism as comparable to "racists" and "Holocaust deniers." Very interesting. So any data or evidence that disputes the theory (i.e. "accepted fact") should be disregarded as "inconvenient facts." BTW, this is the same Pentagon leadership that ignored polls of military members showing a large majority opposed DADT repeal.
Delphinus72 4 months ago
@Delphinus72 I didn't say any of that, are you debating yourself now? & "Done" means done!
Snagglepussify 4 months ago
@Snagglepussify You're the one who made the comment, "East Anglia CRU seems to be all & end all for you." when I only mentioned that once in all my comments as an EXAMPLE of so-called "climate scientists" who violate the scientific method, sacrificed their objectiveness, and allowed political agenda to influence their "science." The problem is the whole "global warming" movement is one big self-licking ice cream cone that is melting, not b/c of the climate, but because of their own hot air.
Delphinus72 4 months ago
As Spider Robinson pointed out -- we're overdue for an ice age -- when was it due. . oh, round about when the Industrial Age began!
NatandGeorge 5 months ago
Another thing, about the polar ice caps. If they DON'T melt eventually, what do people think will happen? That that gigantic piece of fuckin ice is just going to STAY THERE forever? Yes, by logic, of COURSE it has to melt! If there was ever a climate change drastic enough in the past to CREATE such a floating Titanic-Sinker in the first place, then we have to believe that theres going to be another climate change to take it away. The Ice Age was natural. And so is this.
CoonEyed 5 months ago 2
We live in a world where people lie about CLIMATE TEMPERATURE...
..CLIMATE TEMPERATURE?!?!?!???!!
CoonEyed 5 months ago
Was that a bit of Russian brown nosing I saw there?
theholytaco 6 months ago
Here's a conspiracy for you:
If "Lord Monckton" really is a lord, why does the House of Lords deny that he is or has ever been one?
Because everyone is out to get "Lord" Monckton. EVERYONE!! He's not insane: each and every individual and group in the world is working against him! From the mass-polluting mining companies of the world, like BHP, to the Australian Green Party. They're all sitting in a room somewhere together, pretending the planet is polluted and lying about whether he's a lord.
arthurneddysmith 6 months ago
Comment removed
arthurneddysmith 6 months ago
@jantiification Oh experts publish. Is that your rule or did you get that from 'Expert' authority. What do you know about say 'theoristics' never heard of it ?, that's because there are no papers published yet. Does that mean if I say I'm the formost expert on Theoristics in Oz, I know s*it because nothings published ? And I AM the formost expert on it. I reiterate, If I spend 20 years studying other expert data, does that mean I am still not an expert in the subject ?
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jantiification I note the words 'has been GIVEN' the title of expert' that sez it all from put downers.
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jantiification So who gave him the title of expert ?, certainly not him. Expert in what ? a bloody good expert in researching the facts. As far as I'm aware he doesn't claim to be an 'expert' in climatology. He is an expert in researching facts. So if a librarian spends 5 years researching climate from expert text, notes, papers, peer reviews etc, she's not qualified to speak on the subject just because she aint a climatologist ? Again this is a stupid arguement
jackolan76 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch potholer54's video series "Monckton Bunkum", which exposes all the nonsense the good Lord is telling to the gullible wannabe-skeptics.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
Christopher! You have no idea.
samshep70 6 months ago
Well, living here in crumbling oz, I tend to rely on a real scientist like Professor Bob Carter. Why dont you all watch '7 torpedoes' as he has all the data
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jackolan76 crumbling oz?
scottpastry 6 months ago
@jantiification . You don't have to be an expert to read data on graphs and talk to scientist and tour the data facilities and use his brain. Why would he publish a peer review on climate if he is not a climatologist ? thats a stupid answer.
jackolan76 6 months ago
Monckton's misrepresentation of data explained. The first of 5 vids
watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=channel_video_title
Richard482 6 months ago
It's like the question Wittgenstein posed to his friend: Why did people believe the Sun revolved around the earth? Because it looks that way. So what would it look like if the Earth revolved around the Sun? If temperature were increasing anyway, as well as carbon, how could you tell the difference? If you're an academic climate modeller, of course you would want to say that's it's because of the carbon. That's how you get your next grant. In reality, climate just changes.
mlawren7 1 second ago
mlawren7 6 months ago
Q. How many climate scientists does it take to change a light bulb?
A. None. They just sit in the dark and change the findings.
A. No idea, but I'm sure the answer can be found with with computer modelling.
A. A consensus.
A. They already made us change the light-bulbs.
A. Depends how badly they need tenure.
mlawren7 6 months ago
Did Monckton have anything to do with the the Copenhagen Conference failing?
AharonMaster 6 months ago
@LillabetteHane Have fun with Greece.
What the fuck are these English words supposed to convey, "...the transmissions from Mothership Europe are fading in it's demise and now you're starting to take them in an ever more robotic like obedience than before from China..." Is this even English, "...casting the runts of society back to the left and insignificant!"
Gibberish. You are a clown; a weak, poorly educated, self deluded and racist clown. You leave me no wonder why Europe is fucked.
sgm2005fu 6 months ago
@LillabetteHane Europe is history. China and Asia is my future.
I would very much like to meet you in violent confrontation.
sgm2005fu 6 months ago
@LillabetteHane Bullshit, you ridiculous and effete lying poser. You should be embarrassed, you horrid and antisocial handbrake on humanity.
sgm2005fu 6 months ago
Just a thought .. If carbon dioxide levels are out of controll is that not favorable for plants population and grown that intern breath more oxegen balancing us out ? We should stop "real" toxic pollution and stop funding projects like cloud seeding and geo engineering imo Carbon Tax may very well = Geo Engineering justification. Forgive 3rd world countries of the debt they can never repay and end world hunger by sharing our resources more equitably
Deathbladewarrior 6 months ago
i wonder if its all weather warfare
shuminahdingydong 6 months ago
Scientist have found evidence that the Antarctica used to be green at one point. They have also found evidence that the Earth has gone through about 5 ice ages already. So global warming is probably just a normal part of the seasonal changes.The Earth heats up and cools down every 2000 years. This guys probably right.
456882 7 months ago
Until they stop spraying CHEMTRAILS, they can stop telling me about how bad man is.
There's no way a little car can compete with all the spray from those CHEMTRAILS in the sky.
In fact, I don't think all the cars can compete with all the criss-crossing CHEMTRAILS that they pollute our skies with.
He's right.
biozamadotcom 7 months ago
LORD does not equal EXPERT. Quality journalism, RT.
19bjh89 7 months ago
@19bjh89 Oh so his peerage makes him a moron or at the least not expert in anything ?, clear thinking at it's worst.
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jackolan76 monkton is a liar and continually misinterprets scientific data. he is far from an expert.
scottpastry 6 months ago
You can't change the minds of the ignorant. This guy trusts that the water he drinks, the food he eats, the medicine he takes are all safe because they have been conclusively proven by scientists to be safe. The same quality of scientists overwhelmingly believe that we are having an impact and that 1/2000th is actually a hell of a lot given the delicate balance of the atmosphere.
Silvern1 7 months ago
@LillabetteHane Good heavens, you honesty think that you're better than me?
That's adorable.
You know nothing about me. Unlike you, I actually went to university and learned to spell and use grammar correctly.
"Indoor types," sweet Jesus! After work, I go to my boxing gym. I box. You little faggot. I smash little faggots just like you every Tuesday and Thursday,
Also, I'm not european, I'm polynesian. You doopy fag.
sgm2005fu 7 months ago
does anyone wanna bet me that by the time they die the planet will still be the same. lol and maybe its not man mad maybe the planet is just evolving. lmfao
dedseason 8 months ago
The problem is we might have the the climatologist society, telling us these so called scientific facts but ask yourself who they're employed by? The global elite control how politics governing bodies operate, aswel as scientific governing bodies and the media. We cannot trust mainstream information. I mean they changed global warming to climate change lol and the East Anglian doucuments released stated 'Hide The Decline" we are going through climate changes but its not man made.
olnusdecimus 8 months ago
@olnusdecimus 'Hide The Decline"
true, "peer reviewed" papers from academics who play politics with scientific research have far LESS cred than this guy.
He's right.
biozamadotcom 7 months ago
Lord Monckton isn't afraid of the EU commissars .
DickCabezaLtd 8 months ago
People, you don't even realise we've had the same thing we're going through right now before for centuries. We had a period of global climate warming before during the Medieval times and a "Little Ice Age " that started in the 16th century or so, Climate change has always been happening, getting warmer and cooler. It's a way of getting your money certainly. For People who don't like fear mongering and conspiracies you certainly let your government and higher classes drag you into enough of it.
IAMLelouchVBritannia 8 months ago 11
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Oh, don't we? Tell me, did you learn all that at high school, or you rather needed some help from the likes of Monckton to collect that extensive knowledge about climate? (it is a sarcasm, could not help it) Did you ever hear about Richard Alley or Wallace Smith Broecker? Go check them and read from actual scientists instead of making a fool of yourself. You may prefer seeking for them on YouTube, though - will do anyhow. No need to answer - I will not be here to read it.
Margolpsbiegh 7 months ago
@Margolpsbiegh
What are you blabbering on about? You actually defending the Climate Change scam or something?
It's just blindingly common sense that if the climate has been through periods of climate change over the centuries, so much so that it was enough to create a Little Ice Age then obviously it isn't Man Made Carbon Emissions.
The sun is becoming hotter. Lots of things come into play, we need CO2 for plants and trees to grow and these idiots want to reduce it drastically? Morons!
IAMLelouchVBritannia 7 months ago
@Margolpsbiegh Richard Alley is the CEO of a f*cking printing company -WTF would he know about climate.
jackolan76 6 months ago
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Yes this is true but what about the fact that the increasing output of greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution correlate exactly with the rising global temperatures? Is this just a coincidence? Why cant we just believe the 96+ percent of climate change scientists who believe that A: Global warming is happening and B: is human induced. Or are all these independent scientists part of some conspiracy as well.
axelinaustralia 7 months ago
@axelinaustralia
Well, I can only blame the sun for that my friend, and now I know that the sun has been increasing its activity, that does explain the warming to me, I now know that the Sun is going into hibernation as stated by Scientists just recently, I'm guessing the temperatures will get colder while that happens.
I mean, as bad as warming might feel now, it was much hotter during the Medieval global warming before it went into it's colder period, and that was pre-industrial.
IAMLelouchVBritannia 7 months ago
@IAMLelouchVBritannia Well why did the sun choose the industrial revolution as a date to start warming? I don't think its a coincidence that the earths temperatures are rising right on par with the increase of greenhouse gases. Tobacco lobbies argued that lung cancer was around before cigarettes in order to discredit the health findings just as you are arguing that global warming was happening before substantial greenhouse emissions.
axelinaustralia 7 months ago
@axelinaustralia
I don't know, the sun goes through warming and cooling cycles. And now we're going through a cooling cycle I can only expect it's going to get cooler.
I'm arguing for an historicial fact, it's up for people to make up their own minds, I've made mine up.
IAMLelouchVBritannia 7 months ago
@IAMLelouchVBritannia its not a matter of oppinion, but a matter of fact, and the fat is that the temperatures on earth have been rising while the sun is in its cooling period... most of the studdies done, point to climat gasses
Lindholmer5k 7 months ago
@Lindholmer5k
That's your opinion, I however don't see it that way, a lot of scientiest find "CO2 emissions heating the planet up" as very dubious too. It's a debatable issue, so breeds opinion. it doesn't however make it fact.
It kind of freaks me out how Climate change has brought about an opinonated cult.
Even at the time of hearing the CO2 emissions story I've been consistently skeptical.
No we're going into a hibernation period, that will inevitable cool the earth down like it did before.
IAMLelouchVBritannia 7 months ago
@axelinaustralia The globall temperature was rising BEFORE the industrial revolution, ignoramus, and it's been FALLING since 1982.Get your data straight or don't say anything
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jackolan76 "it's been FALLING since 1982" I'd like to know where you get your data from? Perhaps you could message me a link to your source?
Richard482 6 months ago
@Richard482 How a bout Professor Bob Carter in '7 torpedoes' or don't you watch what a REAL scientist has to say and SHOW you the DATA sourced from specialists and doctorates in the field. Or perhaps your like Greg Combett who, if he said the sky was blue, I'de have to go outside and check it. Gomighty, what does it take for anyone to believe real data from real scientists using real measurements with real satelites.
jackolan76 6 months ago
@jackolan76 I'd never heard of Greg Combett before you mentioned him. I'm still waiting for a link to your source of information showing that global average temps have been fallng since 1982. A graph would be good.
Richard482 6 months ago
@jackolan76 Where are you getting the data that global temperature has been falling for 30 years from? The internationally reknowned expert on climatology, Lord Monckton?
TheGamanic 6 months ago
@TheGamanic check out a channel called the Steaming Toad for a video on the esteemed Lord.
steamingtoad 6 months ago
@steamingtoad not bad :)
TheGamanic 6 months ago
@jackolan76
Data please.
samuelognenis 6 months ago
Comment removed
mlawren7 6 months ago
@IAMLelouchVBritannia britain was once covered by forests. now there's almost none left
presumably as u understand the environment so well, u could explain the affect this sort of thing has (or doesn't have) on the earths climate
[ reasonable level of detail is okay, should u choose to oblige ]
lancsFrogger 5 months ago
@lancsFrogger
Of course, it still is in parts. The enviroment in that sense was changed because man made it that way. Chopped the trees down just like how they do with rain forrests.
Trees and Plants feed on Carbon Dioxide and give us oxygen, Photosynthesis does matter, so cutting down trees in my opinion is never much of very good idea. But Carbon Dioxide doesn't do much in terms of making the planet warmer. The Sun determines the warmth the planet the most, obviously.
IAMLelouchVBritannia 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IAMLelouchVBritannia whether the sun contributes the lions share of the planets warmth may not necessarily count for much, for if the climate is a sensitively balanced system a little more (or less) CO2 in the atmosphere may be enough to make it switch to a different state
lancsFrogger 5 months ago
WMO: "In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998." and "Over the ten years from 2001 to 2010, global temperatures have averaged 0.46°C (0.83°F) above the 1961-1990 average, and are the highest ever recorded for a 10-year period since the beginning of instrumental climate records". "Arctic sea-ice cover in December 2010 was the lowest on record" .
checkyoursources 9 months ago
@LillabetteHane Amazing. Look, it's quite clear that there's nothing you could explain to me. Nothing. Your laughable sense of superiority is matched only by your painful wilful ignorance and your staggering incoherency.
You are an intellectual peasant.
sgm2005fu 9 months ago
@LillabetteHane Good lord, is this your grown-up voice?
I don't think you appreciate just how retarded your grammar, spelling and punctuation makes you appear. I see five errors in punctuation in your first paragraph alone. The first sentence of your last paragraph literally makes no sense at all.
You are in no position to educate me, certainly not using the English language.
sgm2005fu 9 months ago
@LillabetteHane Who is trying to, "disprove his species?" What are you talking about?
A response to your ad-hominem argument: my politics are by most measures largely libertarian. My issue with ‘Lord’ Monckton is that his position will have a direct impact on me. This is the overwhelmingly consensus of the scientific community.
The masses are the democratic dream.
You know what? Fucking spell correctly and use remotely sound grammar before excluding yourself from the “moronity.”
sgm2005fu 9 months ago
Comment removed
sgm2005fu 9 months ago
@LillabetteHane I'm sure he's also a mammal.
The significance is that anyone belonging to a privileged minority that most benefits from and then defends the status quo almost always does so at the expense of the majority.
sgm2005fu 9 months ago
LORD MONCKTON IS G! HE IS THE MAN
burnsie999 9 months ago
even if the earth's temperature hasn't increased enough to cause warning since industrialization we should still be researching alternative technologies to what we have now, because fossil fuels will run out eventually..
NewarkWilder1 9 months ago
He is actually telling the Truth, but he is a KNIGHT OF MALTA not telling the WHOLE Truth..search : Lord Monckton Knight of Malta
He is a Papal Cointelpro
kroikye 9 months ago
man, I hate humans.
sethzky77 10 months ago
See a new documented YT critique of Monckton's habitual LIES by an Australian science journalist:
Monckton Bunkum Part 1 - Global cooling and melting ice
/watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 2 - Sensitivity
/watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 3 - Correlations and Himalayan glaciers
/watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo&feature=related
It's absolutely devastating & fully documented.
Monckton is a typical SCAM artist making a lot of money promoting Oil & Coal.
goog2k 10 months ago
haha they still preach global warming? i trought the church of global warming was debunked a long time ago.
Evilfisher 10 months ago