what a shitty, politically correct and terribly inaccurate movie. they didnt even mention that Herman Goering was Von Richthofens squadron leader and for some reason they feel the need to justify that Jewish people fought during the first World War, of course they did. this movie tries to link the first and second world wars together. minus 5*
hm, the movie sucked. i prefer das boot cause it's not a wanna be lovestory-war hollywood wannabe movie like this one. anyway, thank good i'm german. we fkn rock. no news for you, i know hrhr
If you want to talk about boring, then how about Avatar? I hated every excruciatingly boring minute of that bomb, and yet many people rave about how wonderful it is. I don't think I would watch Avatar again, not even for a $100.
Who cares if it is not historically accurate in all respects? It is for entertainment. If you want historical accuracy, then I can refer people to many good books written about the "Red Knight of the Air."
One of the worst movies about MvR ever, directors know that planes at that time were made of wood and fabric? i see some big friking dives there...no way that can happen, and also wth has a woman to do in a MvR movie?????????????
Im really a big fan of red baron since i was like 2, but not gonna watch this crappy movie
@MarsImperator2 In the American release approximately 20 minutes were cut. Maybe that's where they are? I remember seeing them in the American version, however.
@MarsImperator2 I doubt it. I have no clue what they cut. I don't think they'd cut out parts of the only pieces of the film that were at all entertaining or well-done.
true. but even 1 more minute of battle would be so satisfying^^
e.g. the scene where Voss is attacked by Brown... i wondered: where have his wingmen gone to? i guess its the scene at 1:34 where the two Albatros crash.
...and acted. This movie certainly smells! It's just not in the same league as Das Boot. But hey, watch it yourself and decide. Just make very strong coffee to keep you awake during those, all too many scenes, where Richthofen's girlfriend (?) shows up to make sure we all know that "war is hell".
This movie royally SUCKED!!! Way too much hand-wringing on the ground. Not nearly enough aerial sequences. The war seemed incidental to their boring personal lives. Obligatory "war is hell" speechifying (Richthofen a peace activist?!?!). The lead actor was not nearly charismatic enough. Brown and Richthofen chit-chatting on the ground...give me a f***ing break. I wanted to like this movie but it was a great big steaming pile of crap. Modern movies - over produced and directed and under written.
I liked the film but thought the 'baron' could of been a few years older -out of drama school!! Made worse by the lady (Lena Headey) he had an romance with was older and more experienced actor.
Good flying scenes & entertaining -worth watching :)
for those commenting about the Jewish pilot there were many Jewish Serving The German forces during World War One grow a Brain before making a comment although the character in the movie is a fictitious one he was put there to represent the many Jewish German Airmen that served the German Airforce During World War One
@carnage2681 Well blame the world for it, Germans have such negative karma from decades of resentment it's even a taboo to even make a war film about a German Hero in Germany this film was a suprise to me it was even made. I enjoyed it despite some of the cliche parts and moments. Find it better than most other WWI aviation films.
ich weiss nicht ob du blos amerikanische Filme siehst oder einfach noch nie einen deutschen historischen gesehen hast, aber der Film basiert auf Realität Holzkopf
@MarsImperator2 Ja, weil viele leute in amiland oder sonst wo anscheinend nicht wissen das der erste weltkrieg nix mit nazis zu tun hat, aber die leute kriegen ja schon gutmenschen angst wenn sie hören von einem kriegsfilm in dem deutsche die helden sind
@ chingo joder ChocolateyChocobo13 sí de las Naciones Unidas de historia , en especial la primera Guerra Mundial y seguda y esa madre no parase una llamarada joder
@TheBruno354 , nunca has disparado una pistola, una bala no toma esa ruta, una bala disparada tampoco se puede ver. una bala es instantanea, no toma toma una ruta en curva. es una llamarada. y las llamaradas de entonces no eran como las de hoy en dia. eran mas debiles y no tan fuertes de luz.
@ Que tu ChocolateyChocobo13 apoco disparado Como arma de las Naciones, Unidas , párr Empezar Una pelicula es acer pueden y mas Que Una bala mas brillante q El Sol y cuando disparas Algo Como Estas en Movimiento la bala Sigue Su Trayectoria vertical Pero Como Estas en moviendote de forma horizontal ala bala q disparastes Toma ESE EFECTO DE curbatura y ademas Como es Una pelicula pueden acer q Una bala tomo difenrentes 15 Trayectoria
@TheBruno354 una bala disparada es MUY rapida, no se puede ver. y porque no hicieron las otras balas que disparan los aviones como esa? si tu disparas una bala, estando en movimiento no va dar mucha diferencia de trayectoria! una bala se dispara a mas de mil pies por segundo de una pistola, no ba a tomar 5 segundos para llegar a su marca.
yo se como se ve una bala, yo se la diferencia de una bala y una llamarada, yo he disparado una arma de fuego en varias occaciones! esa era una llamarada!
ChocolateyChocobo13 @ mira Como es Una pelicula pueden acer q Una bala valluno mas de lo q Lenta Una vala Por normal qa ESO sele Llaman especialmente Efectospárr Ciales q El Espectador Lo Mejor ve q esta ocurriendo mar oq pecado capricho del director q SE VEA asi yq mar mas Llamativo parra o Como la Gente de mar , ¿ok? ?
@TheBruno354 mi argumento final es este: no es una bala, es una llamarada. es simple y logico. no tiene que ver nada con los efectos especiales. porque tuvo que dispararle con una pistola, que no tiene metralladoras montadas al avion? porque no uso esas? la respuesta es obvia y simple: era una llamarada! no me digas que estoy equivocada, llevo dos anos en las fuerzas armadas de inglaterra, yo se la diferencia de una bala y una llamarada! y por ultima APRENDE A ESCRIBIR EL ESPANOL!!!
@ChocolateyChocobo13 para empezar no soy yo el que escribe feo no el youtube cambia lo que escribo, tambien el que sea una llamarada o una bala que importa otro puede decir que es un lanzapapas de todos modos deriba un zeppelin y no uso las ametralladoras del avion porque el zeppelin estaba de lado del avion y si eres del ejercito britanico cual es su arma estandar actual
@TheBruno354 la arma usada por nosotros de el SAS es la C8 carbine, y la rifle de asalto G3. los SAS somos las fuerzas aereas especiales. (Special Air Service) somos lo mismo que los marines de los estados unidos.
I cracks me up how they make WWI biplanes and triplanes fly like modern day fighter craft... If they actually attempted those moves then their wings would fly off or their engines would stall! I wish they would make actually make an authentic movie like the Blue Max again.
@omega856 i didn't notice any especially unrealistic maneuvers. Those bi-planes were much more maneuverable than you think. In many ways they we're actually much MORE maneuverable than the planes flown in WWII.
The only thing I noticed was a long, hard dive by an Albatross D. Va that would have most likely shorn it's bottom wing off. That plane was notoriously unstable in a dive.
@Ironzealot7531 Excuse me? Obviously you havent seen a real biplane in action before. The Nieuport in particular was prone to structural collapse as well as others in a steep dive. There is a reason why planes were switched from biplanes to monoplanes. Their engines also wouldnt allow them to go as fast as is shown in the movie. Like I said, see the movie "The Blue Max" that actually shows REAL WWI planes in action and compare the two.
@omega856 I've seen the blue max, and like i said about this trailer other than the speed, nothing struck me as particularly unrealistic.
Planes of this age we're quite floaty thanks to the tremendous lift generated by their multiple wings. Some of them (like the Camel or the Dr I) could also turn 180 degrees on a dime. Which is something no WWII era plane could do. The principle failure of these planes was their limited speed and high altitude flight capabilities.
If you want authentic, watch "The Blue Max" with George Peppard...
its hard to imagine the Albratros DIII doing 6 or 700 mphs diving through clouds...machine guns need to be slowed down too...and the planes are way way too wiggly ...top speed was only 80 to 90 mph in a dog fight...Im bummed...I need authentic...
They're Barrage Baloons. An Aerial protection against low-flying aircraft, they are supposed to catch on the wings of enemy planes, and snap the wings off. They were also used in the Battle of Britain, but recieved the most use in WW1.
@NHSActor That actually wasn't a barrage balloon. It was an observation kite-balloon which was widely used by both sides in W W I. Observers were suspended in a basket underneath to spot for artillery. They were dangerous to attack as they were important enough to heavily defend with aircraft and anti-aircraft guns. Despite this danger Willy Coppens the Belgian Ace shot down something like 35 of them. If attacked they would be quickly winched down or the observers would jump out in parachutes.
@MrCcragg27 Leonardo da Vinci invented the parachute. German pilots used parachutes toward the end of W W I. I believe kite-balloon observers used them throughout the war.
MrDiehard666, i believe the red baron was great but the nazis were a fascist group, the wermacht were just german's military, he didnt do anything wrong, he was just another guy fighting for his country.
@Rell323 lol... You're True. You gotta understand about other people, they don't know much of history... I found a comment saying" Why do Nazis Fly Old Wooden Planes". Well That dude must have failed his history!
What are you a moron? You have the wrong war pal. Read and learn, before you open your yap about something which you know absolutely nothing about! The next thing that you will be doing is making comments about George Washington's service in the American civil war!
i agree, the side is irrevlevant. i mean people always bunch the nazis and the wermacht into one. the nazis were a political party, the wermacht were just the army, the were conscripted, they had no choice. i am aware that this is ww1, but the same principles still stand. he was given orders and he did them well, nobody can dispute that
its sad that richtofen never really got the fame he deserved just because people believe he fought on the wrong side. he was the most amazing fighter pilot to ever live.
He didn´t get the fame he deserved? I'm pretty sure everybody knows the Red Baron. As a matter of fact, I think he may be the most well know fighter pilot in history.
Thouroughly enjoyed the film. Not 100% there, but at this point, i'm glad it was not flyboys and MvR was not like Darth Vader in a red TIE Advanced lol.
It was almost certainly an Aussie on the ground shot the Red Baron, based on the nature of the wound and the amount of time Richthofen continued to fly after Brown shot at him and banked away. I was disappointed in this movie. It could have been done a lot better. Check out my Red Baron song in the "BicyclingGuitarist" channel here on YouTube. The lyrics and images are historically accurate and the song rocks. I wrote it on a bicycle (not kidding about that!)
@al28283 What are you saying no to? That the evidence indicates the Baron was shot down from the ground and not by Brown? That I wrote a song about the Red Baron? I've studied this subject for forty years, and while we may never be certain the facts are as I state them.
@al28283 You don't have to. I offer it freely. Some people like it. My new band has a better version of it than the one I posted solo, but we haven't recorded it yet. It rocks, and as I say, the lyrics are historically accurate and the images used in my YouTube video are also historically correct.
What do you think he was doing when he was shot? He was dogfighting with Roy Brown. That's why many people believe it was Brown who shot him down. Modern research now proves that it was a very lucky shot from the Australian.
there was no brit in the air at the time the red baroon was chasing a canadian pilot there was a brit on the ground with a machinegun and the australian when he flew past they both fired ofcourse the brit fired a lot more bullets and the baron landed then died and the brit got the credit up till 1960 when they examined the bullet more closely and it was a different caliber to the machinegun it was a 3o3 caliber bullet meaning the only one that coulda done it was the australian.
Close. He was shot from the ground by an Australian machine gun crew, using a Lewis machine gun. This weapon uses the same .303 calibre ammunition as the Empire-used Lee-Enfield rifles, as well as the Vickers machine gun on the Sopwith Camel. The trajectory of the fatal bullet shot was shown to have only been possible if fired from the ground, and eyewitness reports credited the Australian machinegun crew. A friend of mine is the grandson of one of the machine gun crew.
I know my history, it was an Australian. And don't tell me I'm wrong for I have numerous books and documents stating that it was an Aussie that shot the Baron down. Also, I am now even more sure due to Jollygreenslugg saying he knows the grandson of the crew.
same round exactly the same round , I am American who loves both the Aussies and the British . Completely neutral on this one . Jolly is 100% right . All the weapons that "could" have fired the fatal shot . Used a bullet of exactly the same type
the british machineguns did use 3o3 ammo but based on the position the bullet penetrated the red barons body the only one it could have been was the aussie.
thats how they figured it out.
i find it weird since the americans actually celebrate shooting down the red baron yet there where no americans in the somme.
@AlienFirefox Ok you are confusing me a little . In one post you say British in this one aussies . I was merely stating that all possible weapons involved used exactly the same ammo . Americans by and large are not taught history very well . I am fortunate in my father taught me how to apply critical thinking . I don't really celebrate the death of Von Richtofen , but my opinion is better him then another one of the fine allies that shared the defense of the ideals our three nations share .
The movement of the planes is too snappy in these clips -- the G-forces these would generate in real life would tear the airframes of those old wood and canvas jobs to pieces (not to mention knock the pilots out in seconds). Guess they have to keep things moving quickly for the Nintendo crowd.
That said, the planes LOOK great. Good research went into this.
Yep. The Hurricane comes to mind as a "canvas" job (stretched over metal tubing, like the Fokker designs).
The Mosquito, too, although this was really more a "wooden wonder" than a "canvas job".
That said, control surfaces (ailerons, elevators, rudder) on most warplanes -- even those of otherwise "all-metal construction" -- were canvas-skinned right up to the dawn of the Jet Age. IIRC, this was an anti-icing and/or ease-of-handing measure (no fly-by-wire in those days!)
Oh yes, you are right at 100% infact the real secret of that tactic was to hit it in the hydrogen reserve storages........ take into account that this kind of attack were successful 1 every 50...... so as you can see you had to be very skillfull....... and lucky!!!!!
because they were filed with hydrogen and the spark initiated an explosion, and btw it was a flare, they used rockets and flares. ok rockets and flares very good. it is obvious from the motion picture what method was used. mmmmm.......yes
"I have heard that this movie was screwed up and is really going to suck (according to some IMDB users)"... so far.. according to some of those reviewers... every movie in the world sucks.. i havent seen a sigle positive review in the movies ive check there...
i uploaded the complete red baron movie cmon guys watch it on my chanel
SuperLuigy8 2 hours ago
Wow fantastic video. ;)
mraiwa1000 1 month ago
Very tight they did a fantastic job at the visual effects
ryantheram719 2 months ago
Almost (but not quite) as bad a film as Flyboys!
googleisshittoss 3 months ago
you idiots there is no title for this song. this is the one and only source of the song
onehundredand37 5 months ago
name of song???
FanNach16 5 months ago
The Movie is good .He one the first only like to Watch the SMURF .
pijodi 5 months ago
This music is a fucking war crime
Salguine 5 months ago 2
This video is basically all the good parts of the movie. Seriously, don't bother seeing it. It's awful.
lolivampire 6 months ago
@lolivampire that's what I heard so far. Still I'm working myself up to watch this movie sometime soon.
Lethkul 5 months ago
coool~~綏氣啦!!>0<
PJ20030 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a shitty, politically correct and terribly inaccurate movie. they didnt even mention that Herman Goering was Von Richthofens squadron leader and for some reason they feel the need to justify that Jewish people fought during the first World War, of course they did. this movie tries to link the first and second world wars together. minus 5*
fallschirmjager0000 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch.~'Movies,`.Online'`"Here~'~
ＷＷＷ.ＷＡＴＣＨＦＵＬＬＭＯＶＩＥＳ５.ＴＫ
COPY.;;THE::,URL`,,ABOVE`'`
GermanScruggs 8 months ago
German Movies FTW!
PurSkillNoMercy 11 months ago
this is a great video of red Baron :)
Mikuma100 11 months ago
Flyboys is much better
MrBozomax 11 months ago
@MrBozomax ooo really? thats not glowing praise then...
ebag10 10 months ago
@MrBozomax That ain't saying much.
Salguine 5 months ago
This video contains all the scenes worth watching from the movie.
lolivampire 11 months ago 8
why didnt i see this yet? i must see it!
radioguysbrother 1 year ago
I WANT THIS MUSIC
mattiatorX 1 year ago
hm, the movie sucked. i prefer das boot cause it's not a wanna be lovestory-war hollywood wannabe movie like this one. anyway, thank good i'm german. we fkn rock. no news for you, i know hrhr
rheinsand 1 year ago
Please get this on cable TV so millions can see it.
Boelcke1916 1 year ago
If you want to talk about boring, then how about Avatar? I hated every excruciatingly boring minute of that bomb, and yet many people rave about how wonderful it is. I don't think I would watch Avatar again, not even for a $100.
Boelcke1916 1 year ago
Who cares if it is not historically accurate in all respects? It is for entertainment. If you want historical accuracy, then I can refer people to many good books written about the "Red Knight of the Air."
Boelcke1916 1 year ago
This is such a cool movie. Can we get it on pay-per-view, Sundance, HBO or Showtime?
Boelcke1916 1 year ago
One of the worst movies about MvR ever, directors know that planes at that time were made of wood and fabric? i see some big friking dives there...no way that can happen, and also wth has a woman to do in a MvR movie?????????????
Im really a big fan of red baron since i was like 2, but not gonna watch this crappy movie
jabo109 1 year ago
0:43 0:48 1:33 can't find these scenes in the movie :-/ where have they gone?
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2 In the American release approximately 20 minutes were cut. Maybe that's where they are? I remember seeing them in the American version, however.
mattiatorX 1 year ago
@mattiatorX
oh thats bad! they cut 20 minutes of battle?
the movie would have been a way better with all these battle scenes
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2 I doubt it. I have no clue what they cut. I don't think they'd cut out parts of the only pieces of the film that were at all entertaining or well-done.
mattiatorX 1 year ago
@mattiatorX
true. but even 1 more minute of battle would be so satisfying^^
e.g. the scene where Voss is attacked by Brown... i wondered: where have his wingmen gone to? i guess its the scene at 1:34 where the two Albatros crash.
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
Comment removed
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
This reminds me of sly 3 in the championship with the baron
Moorten10 1 year ago
the film was awsome!
jumpstyleTiGeR 1 year ago
Great looking VFx dynamics, lighting, et.
sbecker3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
like watching this 100 % edition regarding this movie from av a tz.net remove spaces
dinewansdsdsdwala 1 year ago
00:07 ?!
Burakx 1 year ago
whats the name of song? any one please??
Graffitinyc1 1 year ago
omg thats alot whats hapening to my yard
Pjbeauprejr 1 year ago
...and acted. This movie certainly smells! It's just not in the same league as Das Boot. But hey, watch it yourself and decide. Just make very strong coffee to keep you awake during those, all too many scenes, where Richthofen's girlfriend (?) shows up to make sure we all know that "war is hell".
Zebred2001 1 year ago
This movie royally SUCKED!!! Way too much hand-wringing on the ground. Not nearly enough aerial sequences. The war seemed incidental to their boring personal lives. Obligatory "war is hell" speechifying (Richthofen a peace activist?!?!). The lead actor was not nearly charismatic enough. Brown and Richthofen chit-chatting on the ground...give me a f***ing break. I wanted to like this movie but it was a great big steaming pile of crap. Modern movies - over produced and directed and under written.
Zebred2001 1 year ago
@Zebred2001 Absolutely!!!
musicologo1able 1 year ago
awesome
ja0129 1 year ago
德國空軍出擊,飛翔吧!我德意志的雄鷹!把那些罪有應得的英法聯軍全部殺光!
GERMANCHINESE 1 year ago
DER ROTE BARON :DDDD
ajtheperson 1 year ago
Have you seen the original movie by Roger Corman?
gorozon 1 year ago
The flare hitting the balloon is still one of my favorite CGI shots of the past few years...
dlfitch 1 year ago
I liked the film but thought the 'baron' could of been a few years older -out of drama school!! Made worse by the lady (Lena Headey) he had an romance with was older and more experienced actor.
Good flying scenes & entertaining -worth watching :)
obdsystems 1 year ago
Yeah this song is awesome! What theck is it called!?!?!?!?!
McGR0WL 1 year ago
i like the part where the guy shot down the other guy and there was music
F18paperjet 1 year ago
"The Allies Win.
A3QPVOT 1 year ago
This is so badass and awesome. The music is epic.
Notawesomeatall7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carnage2681 and
for those commenting about the Jewish pilot there were many Jewish Serving The German forces during World War One grow a Brain before making a comment although the character in the movie is a fictitious one he was put there to represent the many Jewish German Airmen that served the German Airforce During World War One
AVCG 1 year ago
This is so awesome. It's like a collection of all the parts of The Red Baron that didn't put me to sleep. :D
lolivampire 1 year ago
Oh we must have a Jewish Pilot there so nobody could think its a Nazi Movie .......Stupid
carnage2681 1 year ago
@carnage2681 Well blame the world for it, Germans have such negative karma from decades of resentment it's even a taboo to even make a war film about a German Hero in Germany this film was a suprise to me it was even made. I enjoyed it despite some of the cliche parts and moments. Find it better than most other WWI aviation films.
Luminahawke 1 year ago
@carnage2681 Dumbass.
Nassault630 1 year ago
@carnage2681
ich weiss nicht ob du blos amerikanische Filme siehst oder einfach noch nie einen deutschen historischen gesehen hast, aber der Film basiert auf Realität Holzkopf
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2 Tja du esel, dann hättest mal den abspann lesen sollen wo drin steht das die figur empfunden ist.
by the way studiere ich geschichte, also habe wohl etwas mehr ahnung als du
carnage2681 1 year ago
@carnage2681
ernsthaft?
ok stimmt^^
dann find ich das auch ganz schön lächerlich
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2 Ja, weil viele leute in amiland oder sonst wo anscheinend nicht wissen das der erste weltkrieg nix mit nazis zu tun hat, aber die leute kriegen ja schon gutmenschen angst wenn sie hören von einem kriegsfilm in dem deutsche die helden sind
nen wunder das das bei das Boot nicht so ist
carnage2681 1 year ago
Comment removed
NoobSnoopy 1 year ago
its a great movie
mrford70 1 year ago
Were there woman flying in some of those battle scenes?
MaxWriter 1 year ago
Stupid gay racist.
GamePlayPower 1 year ago
This movie looks awesome. Will it be in Real 3D like Avatar?
SUPERBURRITO 1 year ago
@SUPERBURRITO no it is awesome but it isn´t 3D it is normal film but it´s great
eclairika 1 year ago
@SUPERBURRITO it was released before Avatar so it's very unlikely. It's also not mainstream enough as Clash of Titans to have a rushed 3D adaptation.
Lethkul 1 year ago
@SUPERBURRITO By the way.. to me The Red Baron is much better than Avatar!
welsamz 1 year ago
Short distance dogfights in flying boxes mad of wood and cloth, you have to be mad to do this!
CptSlamtastic 1 year ago
This was EPIC. Great music, great scenes.
Notawesomeatall7 1 year ago
what is this called?
mancity4ever13 1 year ago
@mancity4ever13 A comment.
urna55 1 year ago
oh my junkers j1 gets bad shot to the pilot :/
colaland96 1 year ago
con una balita jode a un zeppelin entero, joder y los aviones son muy primityvos
TheBruno354 1 year ago
@TheBruno354 era en la primera guerra mundial (estudia la historia) , y no era una bala, era una llamarada.
ChocolateyChocobo13 1 year ago
@ chingo joder ChocolateyChocobo13 sí de las Naciones Unidas de historia , en especial la primera Guerra Mundial y seguda y esa madre no parase una llamarada joder
TheBruno354 1 year ago
@TheBruno354 , nunca has disparado una pistola, una bala no toma esa ruta, una bala disparada tampoco se puede ver. una bala es instantanea, no toma toma una ruta en curva. es una llamarada. y las llamaradas de entonces no eran como las de hoy en dia. eran mas debiles y no tan fuertes de luz.
ChocolateyChocobo13 1 year ago
@ Que tu ChocolateyChocobo13 apoco disparado Como arma de las Naciones, Unidas , párr Empezar Una pelicula es acer pueden y mas Que Una bala mas brillante q El Sol y cuando disparas Algo Como Estas en Movimiento la bala Sigue Su Trayectoria vertical Pero Como Estas en moviendote de forma horizontal ala bala q disparastes Toma ESE EFECTO DE curbatura y ademas Como es Una pelicula pueden acer q Una bala tomo difenrentes 15 Trayectoria
TheBruno354 1 year ago
@TheBruno354 una bala disparada es MUY rapida, no se puede ver. y porque no hicieron las otras balas que disparan los aviones como esa? si tu disparas una bala, estando en movimiento no va dar mucha diferencia de trayectoria! una bala se dispara a mas de mil pies por segundo de una pistola, no ba a tomar 5 segundos para llegar a su marca.
yo se como se ve una bala, yo se la diferencia de una bala y una llamarada, yo he disparado una arma de fuego en varias occaciones! esa era una llamarada!
ChocolateyChocobo13 1 year ago
ChocolateyChocobo13 @ mira Como es Una pelicula pueden acer q Una bala valluno mas de lo q Lenta Una vala Por normal qa ESO sele Llaman especialmente Efectospárr Ciales q El Espectador Lo Mejor ve q esta ocurriendo mar oq pecado capricho del director q SE VEA asi yq mar mas Llamativo parra o Como la Gente de mar , ¿ok? ?
TheBruno354 1 year ago
@TheBruno354 mi argumento final es este: no es una bala, es una llamarada. es simple y logico. no tiene que ver nada con los efectos especiales. porque tuvo que dispararle con una pistola, que no tiene metralladoras montadas al avion? porque no uso esas? la respuesta es obvia y simple: era una llamarada! no me digas que estoy equivocada, llevo dos anos en las fuerzas armadas de inglaterra, yo se la diferencia de una bala y una llamarada! y por ultima APRENDE A ESCRIBIR EL ESPANOL!!!
ChocolateyChocobo13 1 year ago
@ChocolateyChocobo13 para empezar no soy yo el que escribe feo no el youtube cambia lo que escribo, tambien el que sea una llamarada o una bala que importa otro puede decir que es un lanzapapas de todos modos deriba un zeppelin y no uso las ametralladoras del avion porque el zeppelin estaba de lado del avion y si eres del ejercito britanico cual es su arma estandar actual
TheBruno354 1 year ago
@TheBruno354 la arma usada por nosotros de el SAS es la C8 carbine, y la rifle de asalto G3. los SAS somos las fuerzas aereas especiales. (Special Air Service) somos lo mismo que los marines de los estados unidos.
ChocolateyChocobo13 1 year ago
whats the name of the song seems like a great movie gonna download it
nikimetal123 1 year ago
Bullcrap.
In no point in this movie does he serve a pizza.
And where's Snoopy?
Oh well, I don't think I saw Uwe Boll anywhere near this, but I could be wrong....
bar1scorpio 1 year ago
the name of song?
AppleGuru94 1 year ago
I just saw the movie today. It was pretty awesome. It showed the human side of him. Not just the killer.
redwa11er 1 year ago
It's now streaming on Netflix if anyone wants to check it out.
PaulSebert 1 year ago
I cracks me up how they make WWI biplanes and triplanes fly like modern day fighter craft... If they actually attempted those moves then their wings would fly off or their engines would stall! I wish they would make actually make an authentic movie like the Blue Max again.
omega856 1 year ago
@omega856 i didn't notice any especially unrealistic maneuvers. Those bi-planes were much more maneuverable than you think. In many ways they we're actually much MORE maneuverable than the planes flown in WWII.
The only thing I noticed was a long, hard dive by an Albatross D. Va that would have most likely shorn it's bottom wing off. That plane was notoriously unstable in a dive.
Ironzealot7531 1 year ago
@Ironzealot7531 Excuse me? Obviously you havent seen a real biplane in action before. The Nieuport in particular was prone to structural collapse as well as others in a steep dive. There is a reason why planes were switched from biplanes to monoplanes. Their engines also wouldnt allow them to go as fast as is shown in the movie. Like I said, see the movie "The Blue Max" that actually shows REAL WWI planes in action and compare the two.
omega856 1 year ago
@omega856 I've seen the blue max, and like i said about this trailer other than the speed, nothing struck me as particularly unrealistic.
Planes of this age we're quite floaty thanks to the tremendous lift generated by their multiple wings. Some of them (like the Camel or the Dr I) could also turn 180 degrees on a dime. Which is something no WWII era plane could do. The principle failure of these planes was their limited speed and high altitude flight capabilities.
Ironzealot7531 1 year ago
lol its funny to see how those crappy double winged planes can turn so fast xD
NoobSnoopy 1 year ago
Imagine being half sunk in the trenches' mud and see a squadron of biplanes descending from the skies like a plague of locusts.
No wonder the British used brown pants.
Nobodywantsme 1 year ago
Where can i get a copy of this?
supressorgrid 1 year ago
In my opinion a horrible glorifaction of WW1.
Shrimpo1919191919 1 year ago
Cp bra goooooood red baron my idol
99Jakis 1 year ago
Really Epic trailer!
Too bad I didnt like the movie as much I liked the trailer.
And I have the same qestion that have been asked before:
Does anyone know the name of the music used in the video?
KillerCobra89 1 year ago
Really Epic trailer!
Too bad I didnt like the movie as much I liked the trailer.
And I have the same qestion that have been asked before:
Does anyone know the name of the music used in the video?
KillerCobra89 1 year ago
Shame I heard the film wasn't that good. The dogfights look pretty well done, if a tad unrealistic.
mattiatorX 1 year ago
If you want authentic, watch "The Blue Max" with George Peppard...
its hard to imagine the Albratros DIII doing 6 or 700 mphs diving through clouds...machine guns need to be slowed down too...and the planes are way way too wiggly ...top speed was only 80 to 90 mph in a dog fight...Im bummed...I need authentic...
billyjoebobway 1 year ago
whoever thought that was a zepplin is really not quite right with facts
BenjiVee95 1 year ago
i love that movie. the effects are soooo good too
theHUNTERvideos 1 year ago
grande filme!!!!
catboss666 1 year ago
Great video! It's a nice movie and I like the battle scenes though they're few and short.
Can someone tell me what music it is? Loooooooove it!
Feael 1 year ago
80 kills wow that's like... 3 tactical nukes
coolpopo 1 year ago
Cool Trailer.
redfeettube 1 year ago
that looked like the crappiest zeppelin ever. it wasnt even a zeppelin.
firelord276 1 year ago
They're Barrage Baloons. An Aerial protection against low-flying aircraft, they are supposed to catch on the wings of enemy planes, and snap the wings off. They were also used in the Battle of Britain, but recieved the most use in WW1.
NHSActor 1 year ago 2
@NHSActor They were used to spot artillery as well if I am not mistaken.
vetitoe362 1 year ago
@vetitoe362 in the early part of the war yes. but then aircraft were introduced
balongaboy 1 year ago
@vetitoe362 I think those are different types of balloons.
buildingeverything 1 year ago
@NHSActor That actually wasn't a barrage balloon. It was an observation kite-balloon which was widely used by both sides in W W I. Observers were suspended in a basket underneath to spot for artillery. They were dangerous to attack as they were important enough to heavily defend with aircraft and anti-aircraft guns. Despite this danger Willy Coppens the Belgian Ace shot down something like 35 of them. If attacked they would be quickly winched down or the observers would jump out in parachutes.
Zebred2001 1 year ago
@Zebred2001 except parachutes werent invented yet.
MrCcragg27 1 year ago
@MrCcragg27 Leonardo da Vinci invented the parachute. German pilots used parachutes toward the end of W W I. I believe kite-balloon observers used them throughout the war.
Zebred2001 1 year ago
@Zebred2001
dravec72 1 year ago
It was a barrage ballon.
wagawagawoo 1 year ago
@firelord276 umm... that's an observation balloon buddy
Ironzealot7531 1 year ago
Idk what this dudes name was but he was a German ace with 280 kills, baron only had 80
highflyer157 1 year ago
Where do you get that information, are you thinking about WWII or WWI, Baron von Richthofen was WWI
MrProductionsEpic 1 year ago
What is the name of the soundtrack bro? (the one in the beginning )
GentlemanGhost1 1 year ago
Videogame.
TankUni 1 year ago
@chrisrogerrabbit, agreed.
coingod 1 year ago
MrDiehard666, i believe the red baron was great but the nazis were a fascist group, the wermacht were just german's military, he didnt do anything wrong, he was just another guy fighting for his country.
kere98 2 years ago
Uh, this is WW1. Nazis were WW part Deaux.
Rell323 2 years ago 14
part deux non deaux lol
Jimderkaisser 1 year ago
@Rell323 Those who would become high ranking Nazis fought in WW1, they weren't called Nazis but they had it in them to become them.
mrceebees14 1 year ago
@Rell323 lol... You're True. You gotta understand about other people, they don't know much of history... I found a comment saying" Why do Nazis Fly Old Wooden Planes". Well That dude must have failed his history!
welsamz 1 year ago
Ooooouuuchh kere98! That comment hurt! Fascist Nazis in WW1......do us a favour and buy a history book!
machierl 2 years ago 5
What are you a moron? You have the wrong war pal. Read and learn, before you open your yap about something which you know absolutely nothing about! The next thing that you will be doing is making comments about George Washington's service in the American civil war!
soutache 2 years ago 3
@kere98 Due, get your facts right. There were no Nazis in ww1.
coingod 1 year ago
@kere98 EPIC FAIL
xpeperx 1 year ago
i agree, the side is irrevlevant. i mean people always bunch the nazis and the wermacht into one. the nazis were a political party, the wermacht were just the army, the were conscripted, they had no choice. i am aware that this is ww1, but the same principles still stand. he was given orders and he did them well, nobody can dispute that
MrDiehard666 2 years ago
its sad that richtofen never really got the fame he deserved just because people believe he fought on the wrong side. he was the most amazing fighter pilot to ever live.
MrDiehard666 2 years ago
@MrDiehard666
He didn´t get the fame he deserved? I'm pretty sure everybody knows the Red Baron. As a matter of fact, I think he may be the most well know fighter pilot in history.
Cactus32 2 years ago 3
he is, im not disputing that hes extremly well known. but its more infamy than fame that people seem to talk about him in.
MrDiehard666 2 years ago
@Cactus32 the only one better than the Baron is Erich Hartmann, the world's most prestigious ace
milesismyname 1 year ago
@milesismyname Yeah, in his BF 109G!
SgtHail 1 year ago
Thouroughly enjoyed the film. Not 100% there, but at this point, i'm glad it was not flyboys and MvR was not like Darth Vader in a red TIE Advanced lol.
Europe does it better it seems....
scylaros 2 years ago
looks fucking awesome...cool music!
chiefmegadeth 2 years ago 2
It was almost certainly an Aussie on the ground shot the Red Baron, based on the nature of the wound and the amount of time Richthofen continued to fly after Brown shot at him and banked away. I was disappointed in this movie. It could have been done a lot better. Check out my Red Baron song in the "BicyclingGuitarist" channel here on YouTube. The lyrics and images are historically accurate and the song rocks. I wrote it on a bicycle (not kidding about that!)
BicyclingGuitarist 2 years ago
@BicyclingGuitarist no
al28283 1 year ago
@al28283 What are you saying no to? That the evidence indicates the Baron was shot down from the ground and not by Brown? That I wrote a song about the Red Baron? I've studied this subject for forty years, and while we may never be certain the facts are as I state them.
BicyclingGuitarist 1 year ago
@BicyclingGuitarist no to listening to your song
al28283 1 year ago
@al28283 You don't have to. I offer it freely. Some people like it. My new band has a better version of it than the one I posted solo, but we haven't recorded it yet. It rocks, and as I say, the lyrics are historically accurate and the images used in my YouTube video are also historically correct.
BicyclingGuitarist 1 year ago
@BicyclingGuitarist ok
al28283 1 year ago
movies bullshit
the red baron was never shot down in a dog fight
he was in fact shot in the chest from an australian rifleman with a 3o3 caliber rifle
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
What do you think he was doing when he was shot? He was dogfighting with Roy Brown. That's why many people believe it was Brown who shot him down. Modern research now proves that it was a very lucky shot from the Australian.
iankiller1 2 years ago
wrong mate
there was no brit in the air at the time the red baroon was chasing a canadian pilot there was a brit on the ground with a machinegun and the australian when he flew past they both fired ofcourse the brit fired a lot more bullets and the baron landed then died and the brit got the credit up till 1960 when they examined the bullet more closely and it was a different caliber to the machinegun it was a 3o3 caliber bullet meaning the only one that coulda done it was the australian.
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
Close. He was shot from the ground by an Australian machine gun crew, using a Lewis machine gun. This weapon uses the same .303 calibre ammunition as the Empire-used Lee-Enfield rifles, as well as the Vickers machine gun on the Sopwith Camel. The trajectory of the fatal bullet shot was shown to have only been possible if fired from the ground, and eyewitness reports credited the Australian machinegun crew. A friend of mine is the grandson of one of the machine gun crew.
Jollygreenslugg 2 years ago
it was a brit firing a mg mate not an aussie
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
I know my history, it was an Australian. And don't tell me I'm wrong for I have numerous books and documents stating that it was an Aussie that shot the Baron down. Also, I am now even more sure due to Jollygreenslugg saying he knows the grandson of the crew.
iankiller1 2 years ago
im not saying it wasnt the aussie that sht him down im saying it wasnt done with a machinegun it was done with a 3o3 rifle round
a rifle not a machinegun
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
same round exactly the same round , I am American who loves both the Aussies and the British . Completely neutral on this one . Jolly is 100% right . All the weapons that "could" have fired the fatal shot . Used a bullet of exactly the same type
dirtyhlbly 2 years ago
based on the evidence your wrong there.
the british machineguns did use 3o3 ammo but based on the position the bullet penetrated the red barons body the only one it could have been was the aussie.
thats how they figured it out.
i find it weird since the americans actually celebrate shooting down the red baron yet there where no americans in the somme.
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
@AlienFirefox Ok you are confusing me a little . In one post you say British in this one aussies . I was merely stating that all possible weapons involved used exactly the same ammo . Americans by and large are not taught history very well . I am fortunate in my father taught me how to apply critical thinking . I don't really celebrate the death of Von Richtofen , but my opinion is better him then another one of the fine allies that shared the defense of the ideals our three nations share .
dirtyhlbly 2 years ago
i never stated it was the brits
it was an aussie that shot the red baron down
reread my post.
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
It did not suck , its a great movie . But if you want something more accurate better watch a documentary , after all this is a movie :)
chashavko 2 years ago
The Fokker!
Bluemerlin32 2 years ago
I got to see this film...omg its awsome! Thanks for posting
radionut63 2 years ago
what music pls?
Nucleum100 2 years ago
The movement of the planes is too snappy in these clips -- the G-forces these would generate in real life would tear the airframes of those old wood and canvas jobs to pieces (not to mention knock the pilots out in seconds). Guess they have to keep things moving quickly for the Nintendo crowd.
That said, the planes LOOK great. Good research went into this.
ChopstickBrando 2 years ago
You know, some rather successful fighter planes of WW II were still "wood and canvas jobs"...
DevSolar 2 years ago
Yep. The Hurricane comes to mind as a "canvas" job (stretched over metal tubing, like the Fokker designs).
The Mosquito, too, although this was really more a "wooden wonder" than a "canvas job".
That said, control surfaces (ailerons, elevators, rudder) on most warplanes -- even those of otherwise "all-metal construction" -- were canvas-skinned right up to the dawn of the Jet Age. IIRC, this was an anti-icing and/or ease-of-handing measure (no fly-by-wire in those days!)
ChopstickBrando 2 years ago
He flew a triplane, not a biplane.
newmanbeatbox 2 years ago
Actually, most of his kills were made in Albatros II and III type fighters -- these were biplanes.
ChopstickBrando 2 years ago
He flew a biplane. But as WW I went on he flew a "modern" triplane.
JimKnopf88 2 years ago
Great work man:) 5/5!
Duchovicius 2 years ago
Did he just shot a BLIMP with a handgun lmao!!!!
AWACStunderhead 2 years ago
No it wasn't an ordinary hundgun, it was a special type of single-shot granade luncher designed for special purposes during the World War I.
su345za45 2 years ago
wow sounds cool, but how can u destroy a BLIMP with a single grenade shot? its like throwing a knife into Elephant
AWACStunderhead 2 years ago
Oh yes, you are right at 100% infact the real secret of that tactic was to hit it in the hydrogen reserve storages........ take into account that this kind of attack were successful 1 every 50...... so as you can see you had to be very skillfull....... and lucky!!!!!
su345za45 2 years ago
because they were filed with hydrogen and the spark initiated an explosion, and btw it was a flare, they used rockets and flares. ok rockets and flares very good. it is obvious from the motion picture what method was used. mmmmm.......yes
JRussoBuffaloNY 2 years ago
the German air force kiked butt in ww1!!!
300spartansrule 2 years ago 3
great movie. buit there are scnees in here that arent in the movie :S and they look good
Rommel5055Returns 2 years ago
Do a barrel role.
Fedorov567 2 years ago
"I have heard that this movie was screwed up and is really going to suck (according to some IMDB users)"... so far.. according to some of those reviewers... every movie in the world sucks.. i havent seen a sigle positive review in the movies ive check there...
el0chino 2 years ago