Added: 5 years ago
From: GPStang06
Views: 12,840
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • shorter forwards but pretty much the same back...

  • i've owned 3 89 gts, a 97 cobra, and now a 95 gt with a 347 stroker and I've driven many cars from these to mach 1s to new edge saleens, etc but never driven an 05+. that being said it seems the stock shifter is already short handle-length wise (very different from the stangs I've driven where the stock shifter looks like a truck shifter compared to the short throws) however there is a noticable difference in shift throw length which is the main concern anyways. steeda has a good shifter...

  • MGW for the Win

  • you should have gone with hurst. The difference between the tri-ax and the hurst shifter is like knight and day.

  • Just like "knight" and day?

  • I'm assuming you're speaking of the hurst talking about the 05 up mustangs because I used to have a hurst in one of my old 89 GTs and was better than stock but nowhere near as good as the steeda triax in my old cobra or the pro 5.0 I have in my current 95 gt. I also drove a couple other cars with hursts and they just don't measure up to the latter two in my honest opinion...

  • @bluesteal0 Why? No one likes to downgrade. Like my boy Dimora said, MGW.

  • ther is a significant diference. I need one of those!

  • Cool

  • very useful video

  • k thanks

  • They are very very close but they are made by seperate companies.

  • isn't the Pro5.0 and the Tri-Ax the same?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more