are u here to get pleasure? I would love to help u! i have perfect body: beautiful face, slender body, long hair and perfect legs! u would like it? i'm dreaming about sex with a real man! real passionate guy who will fuck me so i couldn't walk for a week! :) u will get satisfation from my show! and u will come back for more! :) Muah! come visit me at - FriendlyFlirts _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Gabriella-ebta chat soon on cam :) mzclo
Another assumption: that news article should present both sides of a story. Now, to demonstrate that is a bad assumption: this assumption presumes there is no objective good and bad, truth and lie, but rather that all are just opinions. This is a very deep and hurtful assumption. However, if we were to use it we should, for example, let a pedophile be interviewed when reporting an abuse case - after all, we should learn the other side of the story, right?
Another question would be how to make sure that the whole concept of news quality is not biased or colored with the political/philosophical convictions of the site creators - or majority of users? After clicking around this site I have a feeling it is leaning to the left/liberal side. Good example is the religion section which contains no mention of what goes on in (amongst other things) Catholicism or Islam in Europe.
The question is... how does this system handle stories with PR spin? Even the more "reliable" sources can be tainted by references and social memes spawned by huge PR companies.
This has been flagged as spam show
are u here to get pleasure? I would love to help u! i have perfect body: beautiful face, slender body, long hair and perfect legs! u would like it? i'm dreaming about sex with a real man! real passionate guy who will fuck me so i couldn't walk for a week! :) u will get satisfation from my show! and u will come back for more! :) Muah! come visit me at - FriendlyFlirts _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Gabriella-ebta chat soon on cam :) mzclo
siaukia 3 years ago
Another assumption: that news article should present both sides of a story. Now, to demonstrate that is a bad assumption: this assumption presumes there is no objective good and bad, truth and lie, but rather that all are just opinions. This is a very deep and hurtful assumption. However, if we were to use it we should, for example, let a pedophile be interviewed when reporting an abuse case - after all, we should learn the other side of the story, right?
AndyBrandt 3 years ago
Another question would be how to make sure that the whole concept of news quality is not biased or colored with the political/philosophical convictions of the site creators - or majority of users? After clicking around this site I have a feeling it is leaning to the left/liberal side. Good example is the religion section which contains no mention of what goes on in (amongst other things) Catholicism or Islam in Europe.
AndyBrandt 3 years ago
The question is... how does this system handle stories with PR spin? Even the more "reliable" sources can be tainted by references and social memes spawned by huge PR companies.
UnpopularPropaganda 3 years ago