Chinese navy foiled pirate attack in the Gulf of Aden

[lionel19651]

kill em,sink em,end of story.

[grvc44]

yes of course there is improvement in tibet for the past 60 years but in exchange for that tibetan's must follow the chinese law with out complaint or raise voice against it...their dream of freedom is bury because of that improvement but in reality the prosperity in tibet cant hide the real truth about tibetan's oppression under chinese rule.

[TonyN737]

It's about time those commies did something for good instead of evil.

Credit where credit is due, good job, China!

[myfunkychannel]

@TonyN737 lol i believe america has being doing the most evil atm

[TonyN737]

@myfunkychannel Yes, because liberating oppressed people is evil, fighting back when attacked by islamic terroristst is eeeeevil!

[kingbleah]

somali piratse and royal navy have about the same ships and size

[OfCourseImNormal]

I'd say put a single round in their outboard & watch those fuckers paddle.

[MixMeAdrink]

China should send some of their advanced submarines. Surprise those pirates when they try to hijack any ship.

[Twirly60]

No l am not Randompeeking I am English,but sick of the way the Royal Navy is run,a load Gustless politicaly correct cowards are now in Charge,it needs the Nelson Touch more than ever.

[LoQueIgnorascom]

This makes me laugh... research this :

Aaron McCollum : Gulf of Aden

Project Seagate

Cheers

[NvidiATI]

China can sent even more warships.

[bestamerica]

NvidiATI,

China can sent even more warships.

'

how china get more warships comes from

[blockagemaster]

@bestamerica

building ship is not space technology

you can be thinking that american are the only one who can build warships....

[groentesoepie]

well done

[charms71]

I am not surprised China repelled this. It's CHINA! they dont f*** around

[southchinaseadispute]

h*t*t*p://south-china-sea.blog­spot.c*o*m/

[cintulator]

Zhongguo wan sui! It is really great, that China is using her navy in very beneficial way! Like in year 1421!

[grvc44]

@cintulator and after this china will focus on bullying its neighbors in south east asia on the issue of spratly.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 listen to thevideo, even this reporter of the cnn admits that south china sea belongs to china.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight wew see how far it is from china some of the island were located 200nm inside RP special econmic zone! and the problem is china does now want this issue to be settle trough UN.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 a problem of territory should solved by looking at its history before to look at its location. china discovered s&p centuries before any other country, ancient maps can prove that.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight will history speak for it self china has no interest in in spratly even the time of emperor tzang ha. the first chinese emperor to set sail in to the indian ocean, china during that time has discovered it but they did claim the island because they are just passing by, until 1960 the phillipines were first to set up military camp in some island inside 200 nm special econmic zone followed by sout vietnam and then china...china's fascination on spratly begun after rumors of oil.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 actually, there are chinese fishermen who were there decades before 1960 and china defended their rights on those islands decades before the independence of both country in the qing dynasty and we clearly know there's no oil rumor at that time, so it might not be just for oil. btw, the UN is neutral, they can't say anything about it.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight sorry you are wrong man! china before 1960's has no territoryal claim on spratly. chinese fisherman just fish inside RP territory before china did not put even single mark in one of the island. and besides my question will be this why china does not want to settle this issue trough UN! if TIBET is not part of china as well as spratly.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 you want some example?ok, there you go: at the end of the qing dynasty,when a european fleet surveyed the area,the chinese authority protested.in 1933 when france decided to make spratly as a part of vietnam,china protested again. at the end of the ww2,japan gave back spartly to china and no one vote against it.in the 1950s,china made n-vietnam to admit the spratly belongs to china.also, as for ur question, everyone know that 90%of UN=US and we all kno that US will not give spratly to CN

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight okay if you really have balls who is that european fleet who surveyed spratlly in 1933? and which comic book did you read it? do you know how many island and reefs in that area? a chain of up to 190 islands, reefs, coral outcrops and banks! and now they are claiming new territory less than 50 miles from phillippine province of palawan! you must know that if china is number is included in top five human right violator. and now violators of international territory!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44that flet belonged to Napolean3,the french governor. hey noted about chinese fishers activity on those islands and then asked for china to include s&p as vietnam territory china just ceded vietnam to france of course that they want more territory)but china refused,if they agreed, today's s&p would belong to vietnam and china would have nothing to say.btw, what china wanted to claim is that south china sea belongs to them.if u still want to argue,i hav a ton of prove, just givme ur email

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight you know why china protested about the occupation of france in 1933 on the grounds that france occupied 9 island on which chinese fisherman can be found there. but after 1945 china choose to 2 island perhaps only the inhabitable island! the phillipines has claim only 8 island inside its territory, china's fume over spratly begun because of rumors of oil, with out oil like the malampaya natural gas there will be no tention.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 in 1933, not only china protested but they also put the whole area under their control. also, i dont know where u hear the myth that china only chose 2 islands since that the whole area has always been under their administration since the mid-qing dynasty till very late. btw, s&p is not only about oil, its also about the rich resources for fishing.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight sorry to tell you but china has occupy 2 major island inside RP territory! the only inhabitable island like the pag asa island under the Phl hands. there are about 90.000 island south china(west phl sea) until european mariner richard spratly discovered almost all of the island, it was not china or vietnam.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 in case that you dont know, none of these islands is inside of china's rp. go take a look on qing china's administration map, it clearly showed that the WHOLE area is under their control. also, dont you feel ridiculous just by saying that china only claimed 2 islands? what would you do if you were china? would you seriously only claim TWO islands out of over 100?

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight what i said is that china has occupy 2 major island inside the phl territory, it is just simple china does nor follow international law on maritime border which they approve( UN member nation including china) and besides qings china administration map is not accurately surveyed the entire vast majority of island in the spratly... wit out richard spratly china wouldn't know anything how large it is on a modern map scale.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 china is not dumb, their fishers neither, as i said they are there for centuries, so it's so normal that they drawed the majority of the area on their map. also, i dont know what u mean by international law, cuz if "international laws" are not respected, the UN would have the right to make an intervention, but we all know that they didnt.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight china does not want the UN to intervene so they are not bringing the issue to UN if phl is violating their territory china is the one who protest against it. but they are not because they now that they are the one who violates it.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 its not up to china to decide un's interventions, if un laws are not respected, they have the right to intervene, its that simple.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight just simply understand the situation. i i discover a place near china that have never explore before would china allow me to take it as my territory? of course not! that's why everything mas be settle in THe UN not base on inaccurate map created just to make false claim in an area that was not inhabited by chinese.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 if you can prove that this land belong to you, then china must give it to you, the problem is, you cant totally prove it.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight china are hungry for territory if tibet was not given to its people(tibetan) much more on me..did you get it? and china are not known humanitarian since the victory of military manian lider mau tze tong!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 tibet belongs to china for over 700 years so i dont know why it would suddenly disappear from the chinese map and china will not be recognized as humanitarian as long as the us controls everything.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight sorry but that claim is base on comic book, the world knows that tibet is an anarchy and not part of china with the dalai lama as a spiritual leader!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 nope, go look at history, chinese dynasty yuan is the 1st to administrate tibet, then every dynasty that followed yuan administrated tibet till china become a republic when the british occupied illegally tibet and tibet was never in anarchy, the dalai lama you said was more a slave owner than a spiritual leader. and how did the world learned that tibet does not belong to china? form the mouth of dalai lama who's not happy to lose his power. and most historian believe that tibet is china

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight in history....ask any tibetan! about their nationality and they will say they are not chinese until now tibet is crying for independence against cummunist freak china.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 i went to tibet and asked the true tibetans, all of them said that they live fine under communist china. the majority of tibetans who wants independence from china are those who grown outside of china. they were brainwashed by the West education without actually knowing what's truly happening in their homeland.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight hahaha i dont think you have truth in your words! let the tibetan people speak with out intimedation of arrest and torture like what happen in their last protest were chinese soldier fall in line beating tibetan monks.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 you can believe whatever you want, and duh, i didnt asked "how do you live under communist china to "a tibetan, I asked something much more discrete. by the way, i didnt asked random tibetans i met in Lhasa's streets, the tibetans i asked are my family's friends.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight so now you ask tibetan close to your family! hmmm i wonder what will be the difference if you talk about close people on a matter of household story and national issue?

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 why would tibetans be my family's friends if they have been mistreat by chinese people?

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight its not the chinese people who mistreat tibetans its your goverment! with the help of the chinese controlled state media for cover up.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 how can the chinese government mistreat tibetans without engaging their people? our media covered everything? why dont you say YOUR media invented everything?

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight sorry to tell you that chinese state media organisation is one of the worse in the globe for being bias! and aside from during the rally of tibetans few years ago china did not allow UN human rights watchdog to investigate.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 go read books like the CIA secret war in tibet or listen to the british reporter john pilger or even to watch those videos: watch?v=uSQnK5FcKas AND

watch?v=EVdx3Qh5Ct8 NOW we will see who got the true bias medias.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight haha CIA secret war? the issue on tibet is way back since chinese kingdom is still not united! and what is the difference between a CIA secret war in tibet and chinese sponsor genocide in darfur sudan?

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 CIA secret war is the title of a book. it says how tibetans were mentally trained to believe things that are against China.if they can easily manipulate tibetans, then maybe they can also easily brainwash you.btw, if you think that china is only han, you are very wrong.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight yes because they are not chinese they are tibetan exist long ago sothe CIA is responsible for freeing their minds from the chinese who raped thier natural resources and destroy their farmland as a result of mining the tibetans cant complain about it any complain will put them in jail...and your media will invent story against tibetan complainants!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 the cia is far away from being a trustful organization. i bet that your media didnt even went to tibet to report and that cia invented everything.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight does CIA exist since the time of qin shen wang? mao tze tong knows that tibetans are tibetans thats why he invade.... the conspiracy of your media and govt hides the real story of torture in 2008 china did not allow foreign investigators from UN human rights watch dog after a group of tibetan appear in from of the un deligation and show their torture marks.

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 un human rights watch dog? you mean people who work for the us right? wtf torture in 2008? go watch these videos to see who's the true liars: watch?v=uSQnK5FcKas AND watch?v=EVdx3Qh5Ct8 btw, wtf does cia have to do with qin shi huang?

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight i watch it and i found it with chinese conspiracy in china criticizing the state media for being a lap dog of goverment and biased will put you on jail. and second like i said before cia's participation in tibet is a no issue since tibetan are tibetan live with out hope and choice for self determination, china always dictate how life their going to be...not tibetan.!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 tibet always have its own way to govern and to do things till 1959 when china decides to make them follow chinese laws like any other part of china. what's weird about tibet is that they are the only one who think that china is trying to make a cultural genocide. the manchoria doesnt think so, nor mongolia nor anywhere else in china.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight but tibet will always fail to govern itself as long as china exist or after china exhaust all of tibet's natural resources!

[ThePegasusknight]

@grvc44 if you compare today tibet`s situation to what it was 50 years ago, you would see that there are huge improvements. in 1960: the tibet governor is Chinese in 2010: he`s tibetan. in 1960: religion is almost not tolerated in2010: china do everything they can to improve the monk`s life. stop at only looking at the result, look at the progress.

[grvc44]

@ThePegasusknight reserved in the region. but the worse thing is they dont want to settle the issue under UN sponsorship!

[Twirly60]

Good work by chinese navy,the west is to cowardy,because its run by crooked people,where do you think all the Randsom Money ends up,in our Banks,well its not in Africa is it,want too stop them then nuke them

[cr9527]

to Twirly60

The west has been in that region patrolling for decades, what drug are you on? What possible benefit does the west have in allowing their merchant ships to get hijacked?

[randompeeking35]

@Twirly60 He said its the 1st time in centuries china has sent their ships to join the forces !..and the west usually put the hostages safety first priority and then figure out the solutions..unlike china they are inexperienced and normally dont give the damn about no human lives thats why...im guessing ur chinese?!..

[garythegit]

@randompeeking35 That's such bollocks. Chinese inexperience has made them even more cautious than the West. Did you not follow what happened to that Chinese tanker? After all that tough language, they paid up! It's the Russians and Indians who are trigger happy right now. The latter sank some fishing boats last year thinking they were pirates, and we all know about the Russian's attitude towards 'prisoners'...