TheoreticalBullshit vs Matt Slick (Part 4)

[sluggdiddyyddidgguls]

TRUTH EXISTS WITHOUT A MIND, ITS JUST CALLED REALITY THEN. MINDS ATTEMPT TO FIND THE TRUTH BUT OFTEN CORRUPT THE TRUTH if anything they are a barrier to finding the truth because they are prone to being mislead by things like irrational thinking and misinterpretation. SO WITHOUT MINDS, REALITY IS truth AND TRUTH IS MEANINGLESS because all that exists is true simply because all that exists is what it is still because what else could it be without a mind to ponder about it? FUCK YOU SLICK.

[ThieleM]

Can slick answer a question?

This is one dishonest guy.....

[Hopeful71]

Wow, I can't figure out if Slick is unaware of his false premise or is aware and tries all his rhetorical BS to avoid attention being called to it.

Very "slick"

[IzzyBunneh]

notice how TBS is staying strickly on subject, and keeps stopping matt from trying to change the topic, and how at the end of every answer matt goes onto to try and change the subject again by stating his conclusions, "atheist cannot account for logic! atheism is not sound" again and again, he's trying to rile TBS up to get him to respond to those statements so he can change the subject, TBS doesn't fall for it, great job! :)

[Theftz22]

I am really impressed by TB right now, to play Slick's game of semantics at this real time pace and not get flustered or confused is so hard. Slick constantly re-words the same refuted answers and tries to sneak around questions, props to TB for being able play his game.

[drgodsauce]

Take a drink every time Slick say atheism can't account for logic!

[TwistedLemniscate]

@drgodsauce thanks, I'm drunk

[martiangrundy]

Matt Slick is just a slightly more intelligent, more obscurantist, and obfuscatory version of Shockofgod.

The way he keeps ducking and dodging, and then just asserting, and insulting "ATHEISTS", is truly pathetic and downright dishonest.

How the fuck T Bullshit manages to keep his cool is quite remarkable.

Slick is a fucking giant arsehole.

[FonduFyre]

Matt Slick is so full of shit in this exchange. "Why don't you just admit that I'm right?" Because your argument sucks. He acts like such a huge giddy douchebag.

[SeedsofJoy]

Wow, the first 53 seconds demonstrate Slick to be a complete and utter asshole.

[WayOfTheBastard]

wow Matt Slick is a total psychopath. The way he never answers the questions, his off the cuff random attacks at "atheists twits".

[slipcurve]

"Other atheists this, other atheists that.. I've debated with atheists and they said this and that and boy were they stupid"

NOT INTERESTED. Stick to the debate Slick. The need for obfuscation and personal tales of intellectual heroism is a sign of weakness (not that Slicks arguments stand on their own anyway).

[willie661]

God falls under the god category. That is gold. I could not stop laughing for 5 minutes.

[jocylean]

Matt Slick gets very mad when things don't go his way.

[opengates777]

@jocylean

Are you having a laugh woman ? Bull S... HAS PUT HIS HEAD WHERE HE CAN'T REACH IT.

[MasterDebator809]

Does anybody else think Matt Slick seems like a serious psychopath?

[powerinstars6]

Matt S continues to say, "no this is not fallacy of division; no this is not this" but he *cannot* demonstrate HOW it's NOT a fallacy. Even to his "Christians can account for logic" relies on fallacy of 1) begging the question and 2) fallacy of appeal to unqualified authority. 1a)how does he know what's written in the Bible is what he thinks it is? 2a)Bible's authority is questionable, much less to place trust in.

[johngeetar]

but but but... the christian worldview CAN account for logical absolutes!!! but but but... the christian worldview CAN account for logical absolutes!!! but but but... the christian worldview CAN account for logical absolutes!!! but but but... the christian worldview CAN account for logical absolutes!!! PATHETIC

[martiangrundy]

OHHH I see Matt, so it comes down to the bible AGAIN. YAWN! YAWN!

I've been through this TAG now a good number of times, and I really don't think He even knows himself, but I'm sorry I can only understand what is going on if Matt Slick is dishonest.

I can find no way around this.

[Tcrowaf]

"Atheists can't account for logical absolutes and Christians can." Say they were having a debate in ancient Greece about the cause of lightning. TBS says he doesn't know where they come from, Slick says Zeus did it. Since TBS couldn't account for lightning does that prove Zeus?

[ClumsyRoot]

"God falls under the God category." LOL! Priceless.

[InLucidReverie]

It's hard to debate with Slick when he keeps saying the same things, even after you show that they are invalid. It's like intellectual charlatan way of saying "Yes it is...yes it is...yes it is...yes it is...yes it is..." ad nauseum.

[Dvalinor]

Just like his discussion with Dillahunty, the laughter of defeat appeared!

[PinkProgram]

O.o is this guy serious?

[Scr3amingN1nja47]

Slick is cracking

[Englishdosser86]

I hated the way Slick kept side-stepping on answers and capping off with 'Atheists can not account for this' and 'Atheism is flawed'. To someone that couldn't follow the debate, they would probably just believe him.

[bendlor]

@Englishdosser86 Theres a difference between not following and not accepting the truth. Does not following make it wrong? No. Its right till you can disprove it.

[Englishdosser86]

@bendlor My point was that he was not addressing the issues raised by TBS. This was made more annoying by his repeated affirmations that he was right.

And on a side note, something is not 'right till you can disprove it.' It is 'not right' until you can prove otherwise.

[Droptopcadillac]

Why an atheist would want this conversation to see the light of day is illogical.

Slick destroyed atheism,period.

[iwantenlightenment]

Wow, a profound comment there from one of YT's most eloquent, intelligent and perspicacious Young Earth Creationists.

How many accounts are you up to now?

[OneHariSeldon]

Not really, TBS basically debunked Slicks argument in several ways. Slick continually failed to legitimately rebut he just kept sidestepping and talking about things besides what TBS was just speaking, he went on a totally irrelevant rants, or recited something that totally ignored what TBS said while trying to force a new topic. It's a common tactic unfortunately for slick he's using it to avoid defeat, assert victory, change subject, it's diversionary, basically slicks weaseling his way out.

[urbanelf]

Matt doesn't even know what Scott is talking about. Argh.

[darkmojojojo]

This was an awesome. Too bad Slick weaseled out of so many questions.