“Have you heard of the ‘Loch Ness Monster’ in Scotland? ‘Nessie,’ for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur. -Biology 1099 , Accelerated Christian Education, 1995.
Now this is a text book that I would Have issue with.
@ptango101 Issues I have with textbooks are the lies they present that support evolution. Things that have been proven wrong LONG ago.
Now, you have issue with the textbook you pointed out because it DOESN'T support your evolution theory. Not because it's been proven wrong, but because it doesn't support your particular evolutionary assumptions.
Our Seminar #3 talks more to that point, and shows how many thousands of credible eye-witnesses say they saw what looks to be a plesiosaur.
@creationliberty No! I have an issue with that text book because it is using the Loch Ness monster as evidence for it's claims. It's that simple. Do you believe in the lock Ness monster? Do you think it's a valid piece of evidence?
"Now, you have issue with the textbook you pointed out because it DOESN'T support your evolution theory" And you want this to be real to prove your creation theory. Is crypto-zoology one of the creation sciences now?
“Have you heard of the ‘Loch Ness Monster’ in Scotland? ‘Nessie,’ for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur. -Biology 1099 , Accelerated Christian Education, 1995.
Now this is a text book that I would Have issue with.
ptango101 3 months ago
@ptango101 Issues I have with textbooks are the lies they present that support evolution. Things that have been proven wrong LONG ago.
Now, you have issue with the textbook you pointed out because it DOESN'T support your evolution theory. Not because it's been proven wrong, but because it doesn't support your particular evolutionary assumptions.
Our Seminar #3 talks more to that point, and shows how many thousands of credible eye-witnesses say they saw what looks to be a plesiosaur.
creationliberty 3 months ago
@creationliberty No! I have an issue with that text book because it is using the Loch Ness monster as evidence for it's claims. It's that simple. Do you believe in the lock Ness monster? Do you think it's a valid piece of evidence?
"Now, you have issue with the textbook you pointed out because it DOESN'T support your evolution theory" And you want this to be real to prove your creation theory. Is crypto-zoology one of the creation sciences now?
ptango101 3 months ago