Added: 1 year ago
From: sonicpacker
Views: 2,303
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • FAST!!!

  • An amazing pleasure right here for anybody with internet to access, and people are getting caught up in the music categories. I love YouTube.

  • All I'm saying is if this song came on the radio and someone was like "oh yeah this is a sick techno song!" and you were like "NO YOU FUCKFACE IT'S TRANCECORE DUMBASS" you'd probably get the shit beat out of you.

  • I've honestly never seen this star TASed before. Good job!

  • You are an important part. In the Super Mario 64 TAS history.

  • Nice improvement sonicpacker! It looks a lot better too.

  • Wow that was quick!

  • either way, it's a sick song ;)

  • Awesome fight strat! Half a second is a hell of an improvement for a single TAS!

  • lol at re-records :D

    very good :D

  • can you win a footrace with koopa the quick? lol

  • 69 lives and 42 stars

    sweet

  • I'm amazed, not just by the TAS but by the hardstyle. It seems to fit so perfectly with SM64 :|

  • @bahamete this isnt hardstyle XD, this is techno

  • @henno1029 No, I would say it's definitely hardstyle, though there are elements of techno [as with all hardstyle]. Meh.

  • @bahamete retards its uk hardcore

  • @bahamete

    It's not hardstyle or techno. It's trancecore. Nice try though.

  • @sonicpacker honestly, you're one of those people? who freak the fuck out over the smallest little genre differences? for fuck's sake, it's all techno, get over yourself

  • @TheFrigz

    I wasn't freaking out. Hardstyle and Techno sound nothing like this (and nothing like each other). And it's all electronic, not techno.

  • @TheFrigz

    And if you knew the differences between them, you would realize that they aren't "the smallest little genre differences." Thanks for commenting though.

  • @sonicpacker they all sound the same to me, because i don't take my music way too damn seriously.

    but to each his own, if you like nitpicking, keep nitpicking

  • @TheFrigz

    It isn't nitpicking. If you think this:

    /watch?v=3QOGoilEKhA

    sounds anything like this:

    /watch?v=prGrjXvYNHc

    then you are lacking something in the mental department.

  • @sonicpacker It is nitpicking, because only .01% of the population have sticks far enough up their asses to give a shit if they sound different. For the general public, techno is techno, and taking it past that level of categorization is just stupid and unnecessary.

  • @TheFrigz

    I don't think you get it. Techno is a specific kind of electronic music. Yet you (and most people) seem to want to call electronic music "techno." I'm guessing because it's made with technology or something. Either way, "techno" is not techno. "Techno," as you call it, is electronic music. That's not even categorizing it beyond the widest term possible. You are just blatantly incorrect by calling it techno.

  • @sonicpacker You're right, I do call it techno, and that is incorrect. So why do I do it? Because I'm using the most generally accepted term to categorize the music. See, I like it when people understand what I'm trying to say. I don't like being a pretentious douchebag. That's where we differ.

  • @TheFrigz

    Last time I checked, correctly informing the misinformed isn't being a pretentious douchebag.

  • @sonicpacker But correctly informing the misinformed about something that makes no difference and serves only to increase your superiority complex IS being a pretentious douchebag.

  • @TheFrigz

    Just because it's pointless to you does not make it pointless to others. I wasn't saying it to increase said superiority complex. I was simply correcting them because they were discussing it. You're blowing this completely out of proportion IMO, but whatever.

  • @sonicpacker I suppose you're right. I guess when people correct minor things, it bothers me. I'm not sure why. The best analogy I can think of to help explain where I'm coming from is, imagine you're on an FPS forum, and every time someone says something along the lines of "i love this new sniper!", someone else has to come in and say "SNIPER refers to a person, SNIPER RIFLE is the gun!". IDK, I just find that annoying..but either way, I enjoy the song, and I'm sorry for the argument. Nice TAS.

  • @TheFrigz

    Glad you enjoyed it =)

  • Can runman beat this? No, no he can't.

  • uhn tiss uhn tiss uhn tiss uhn tiss

  • wow, nice

  • isn't 8888 re-records really much for such short TAS?

  • @mariosunshinefaan no it's not. Brian use 22k rerecords in 29,87 in his bits tas XD.

  • @non5en5e but isn't that like 21 000 re-records too much?? i mean, if he had done it right the first time, he woudn't have needed to do it several hundred...

  • Goood work maaannn

  • how much difficult is put the original sound from the game?

  • @efraingambetero i've also been wondering that for a while now

  • SONIC HAS NOTHING ON MARIO!

  • @sonicpacker Yet you play Mario's games...?

  • Song :]

  • @TehWalruzz

    Jam the Nightclub by Dougal and Gammer

  • I bet he had 8887 and just did one more unnecessary one

  • @killer340 No way. SP never lies; No lies.

  • theres a glitch on part of the mountain that u can go up this slope

  • Wow, this is fast. And it looks much better. And for the first time in my life, this fight isnt boring. I would fav, but I'll w8 for the rest of the frames; I have the feeling eru will improve this for the 120, and hopefully snark will cooperate.

  • LOVE THE MUSIC! I remember when you sent me this through MSN. I danced like crazy to it.

  • I love it, too

  • I LOVE IT

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more