the main difference between martin and taylor is that only expansive martins sound good...instead every taylor is awesome...is a truth no one can deny...booh yeah
Located in El Cajon, California. I've been to this factory and toured the entire thing with my school percussion class. It was so fun. I recommend Taylor Guitars.
I own a Taylor 214GE electroacoustic guitar and not only does it have the best tone and sound of all the guitars Ive known... Its the prettiest one too
How 'bout Mark Tremonti? I guess Bob Taylor's never heard of his own guy who's been, I believe it's five times, Guitar World guitarist of the year. :P
aww comon bob! you guys have Mark Tremonti playing taylors. creed went platinum 27x. im pretty sure people know who he is =p. you guys have Dave Matthews too! you can point to both of them!
now that i think about it. why doesnt Mark have a signature taylor again? =p
what about the old days when making acoustic guitars were all dont by one man? the jobs they did back then could never beat the todays machining if you ask me :P
funny i just finished watching a yamaha guitar factory and the woman cutting the top of the guitar was doing it by hand instead with a laser, the funny thing is that im sure the laser cutting is more precise and at the same time less expensive, BUT the woman cutting the wood was actually faster than the laser lol, so the processing at the yamaha factory was more artisan like BUT i trust that laser a little more at the same time, anyways american economy cant sustain itself anymore.
I've been to the Martin factory. quite the experience. I always thought of martin's as darker sounding and folk music-ish although they can make a custom for you. Taylor's are brighter and punchier especially with elixirs. Gibson acoustics also has a distinct sound but finding the right one is a pain and expensive.
IMO that's why taylor is thriving because of their consistency and pricing whilst not giving off any premium quality. kudos
@ncethngs LOL you're right by saying brighter, but punchier. Tinny and bright yes. Bass low end is punch,which is what Martin's has. That is why they call a D-28 Martin a cannon. That is why they call all Martin's cannons. Martin is the oldest Guitar company for a reason. Since 1833 says it all. Taylor can't touch Gibson. Taylor can't come close to Blueridge guitars. Taylor and Gibson can't touch my Martin HD-28, Blueridge BR-160, Morgan Monroe m-50 , or my Morgan Monroe m-15.
@bluegrasssingingman to each their own sir. based on your posts, you sound like a taylor basher to the point like they robbed you or something. i try to appreciate all sorts of brands and music and try to base my opinions that way. i know i can't change yours, so enjoy whatever you play.
I build acoustic guitars so if I were to judge between the two, early Taylor and modern-day Taylor guitars I would say the work is more polished and professional now. A perfectly made guitar will sound no better than one that has a few glue drips evident depending on the individual instrument . Early Martins, Gibsons come to mind. Today's guitars are always getting better with the innovative use of technology and hands on building. All instruments seem to get a little more shimmer as they age.
..very level headed brilliant man..w/ a passion... to make the best feeling,playing, & best sounding guitars..i think he is close to achieving that w/ acoustic instruments & from what i see of his electric line , they are pretty awesome guitars as well,, i mean he's not gonna suddenly overtake PRS,Fender,Gibson, or even G&L , but he's just getting going in that field and on the acoustic side of things he's a legend as far as i am concerned..Taylor is my fav acoustic instrument, by far..
@Archtops wow that sounds like a collector piece to me..if i were you i'd hang on to that puppy.. Do you still feel like the Taylors today are made -well and it s just a matter of advancing in tech or do you feel that back in 1979 it was a diff taylor quality that can never be reached again?
It really bothered me when I saw people saying what great work Taylor did, then seeing it was all computer operated. As disappointed as I am with that, when I heard one up close I was really impressed. They really do have a fantastic shimmering sound to them.
I received a new Taylor 214CE today and had to return it for a messed up top. Played great but the top was really messed up. I am sure that this was probably a fluke. New one will be in a few days.
@MOSKII58 The guitar had a series of 5 sanding marks in the finish just below the bridge. Each of the sanding marks was about the size of a penny. They were pretty deeply gouged into the wood and looked as if someone working on the guitar had taken a DA sander and accidentally turned it onto it side.
F*** great guitars, got 2 of them, I love their sound!!! great factory tour by the way, did it last year (on my 50th birthday, a great present I gave myself)
@settlebrrd Yeah the lowest line, the Martins that cost 300-499 are made in Mexico. Taylor is a big piece of shit. You do not know what the hell you're talking about. The only line of Martins made in Mexico is the newer DX line. I've owned a DXR1 that was made in PA. American made. That cheap Martin guitar will blow any Taylor away. in sound, construction, and playability. Take any Taylor you want. I'll put my Martin HD 28 against it any day. Taylor = country music = junk instrument = no talent.
@circusj3lly Well as a dedicated muscian, i love efficiency and quality. From this perspective, Taylor is doing something fabulous: Creating quality producs in an efficient and innovative way.
But I guess a cynic wouldn't appreciate this kind of processes. ;)
Its not hard to tell that martin has been in the game longer, martin has much more traditional ways of doing things. I love the sound of taylors, but i gotta say Im a martin man.
The best guitar for the money has got to be the Taylor 214ce Grand Auditorium. Beautiful guitar, rich sound, very versatile, and easy on the hands. All for under a grand.
@llwonderboyll It truly is a great guitar. Im sure you'll enjoy it for many years. It easily out performs other much more expensive guitars. Great choice brother!
I love how Taylors are made. Their quality is always consistent. Their necks are the best industry. I love everything about them except for how the actual guitars sound!
@sugarkang Taylor's are junk, that is why they sound like shit. It doesn't matter how they sound. When untalented country stars are using them. Maybe I shouldn't say country stars. There is no more country music today. Pop music is called country music today. Which needs to die. Just like that Child Molester, Sick piece of shit called Michael Jackson.
You can't really argue about which company is better... it's all about personal preference. This is especially directed to you TrustinYahweh, you may like Martins better, but Taylor guitars are high quality no matter your preference.
I got a Taylor GA4 a few years ago, and I am absolutely in love. My dad works at the Washington Music Center, and I played ALL kinds of acoustics when I went to work with him one day. I played Martins, Gibsons, Takamine, all kinds. When I picked up the GA4, the sound and playability basically made me melt. Don't get me wrong, the others were amazing as well, but no matter if the one I have now was machine made or handmade, it feels so personal when I play it.
I think what really counts is the materials, and the build quality. It doesn't matter if it's hand made or machine made. You can argue for either side. For example, a machine cut piece of wood WILL be more accurate, and a good hand and years of experience will be able to pick wood quality much better then a machine. Weather it's hand made or not, it only matters what the guitar is made of, and how good those materials are put together.
taylor are good acoustics but you have to pay a pretty penny to get a really good one. that being said taylor are some of the best acoustics on the market but i have seen and heard better for less.
I personally think Taylor is one of the best quality guitars out there. If you've never owned or especially never played one then don't say anything. They are great.
Hey guys, let's face it, we're basically talking "NAMES" here, and "Taylor", speaks for itself! Gibson, Martin, Fender are mainly riding on "yesteryear"! Taylor's not out too sell you his name, he's out too sell you decent guitar! And what's the problem, too hung up on "Walmart" prices & don't want too pay for quality work? Curious, do you even play? Tonal quality & playability, Taylor is synergestically designed & unparalelled in that respect, that's what sets them apart, I think! Try it!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Taylor or Martin aint that great. Martin have been rideing on there name for years and just dont make them like they used to in the pre war days and taylor use bolt on necks for god sake. Its all about money knocking out 100s every day. They both do things that in the constrution that kill the tone to makre them more durable so they can offer a life time warrenty. Gibson are the same. You are far better getting a luthier to make you one and if you can wait wayne henderson is your man
@JohnKimYay i am looking to spend £1000 on an acoustic, i want volume and warmth, would you recommend a taylor over a martin? i played a martin and want overly impressed and i didnt like the gibson j150 at all. buy what ive read here i better look at a taylor
Anyone who says one is better than the other is not true to the instrument
they say they love and cherish. Taylor has is place and has earned it for it's
excellence and like Martin will probably be around for a long , long time .
There is NO better than the other but more likely which fits the bill better to the players liking . It's all preference ... Old style =Martin Or Modern style = Taylor
@JohnKimYay martin and taylor are both very high quality guitars. Taylors have a higher/brighter sound where as Martins have a lower/more earthy tone. Both are great it all depends on what music you are playing
@JohnKimYay they are prob just Martin SNOBS!! lol i love Taylor & my dream is to own a high# model (8 0r 9 series electric acoustic w/ blender sys) also i want a jumbo / maple.. Taylors are amoung the best. i like Santa Cruz and Larivee' as well.. regards..
@JohnKimYay Martin's are better, BUT that's if you like a more balanced gutiar with warm tone, if you like a brighter tone for more open strumming, then get a Taylor. (Sorry for replying to a two year old comment, but it's the truth.
Well, I own a Martin 12 string and a Taylor 6 string. Both bought new. The Taylor had to have a neck reset and the bridge was actually coming off and it had to be re-set - twice!.The Martin had to have bridge work as the hi Es were not picked up loud enough by the undersadle pick up. Both issues were downers and a major piss off but all that aside, both are awesome guitars and it's strictly a matter of personal taste as to which is "better".
I had a Taylor- nice guitar but it got nicked. I missed it for a while but then came across a guy with an old '72 Epi FT147 in need of a refret. It cost me a fraction of the Taylor but is the greatest acoustic guitar I have ever had. I would not change it for the best guitar Taylor could make.Hard to say what makes one guitar so magical - one you never want to put down - the tone wood, overall feel, and that indefinable 'playability'.
i just got a new taylor 214ce and love it the way i look at it i like martins to but i like the looks of taylors alot more martins are just to plain the only thing i dont like about taylor is they dont come with a tuner the electronics are great if you can hear it through the amp while you are playing a taylor
Its kinda good that companies don't give tuners and other electronics best they're usually low-quality and break. Then you have to spend money to buy a new one after you already bought the one that came with the guitar.
Taylors are good live guitars and they can cut really well in an amp or through a PA system. That is about it. By the way. the new Martin 1 series guitars have the Bob Fishman Aero system in it. Check em out.
Agreed. Martins blow Taylors out of the water. Martins have something called tone and warmth. Taylors too me are WAY too tinny and flat (no def). It all depends on your style 2 as we know. I like the warm tones, not bright.
Martin has been around since 1833 my friend. That is 175 years and 6 generations of guitar innovating. Taylor wishes they had that kind of innovation. Martin is the better guitar by far as far as my ears tell me. But, I like the warmer sound. Taylors are brighter in tone. It is all in what ya play.
I own three Taylors (514ce, 750, and ns34ce) and two Martins (D-35 and 000-1).
All are teriffic guitars.
But I'm most fond of my 514ce. It is the warmest steel string I own because of its cedar & mahogany tone woods. It's also extremely even in it's tonal balance and is incredibly versatile. It sounds equally good playing finger style or being strummed.
It's okay to prefer one brand over another...we all have our preferences. But I would disagree that Martin = warmer sound across the board.
This has been flagged as spam show
the main difference between martin and taylor is that only expansive martins sound good...instead every taylor is awesome...is a truth no one can deny...booh yeah
freakymalik 1 month ago
Located in El Cajon, California. I've been to this factory and toured the entire thing with my school percussion class. It was so fun. I recommend Taylor Guitars.
ThatBoiCam1 2 months ago
Dave Matthews!
TheAlexkru 5 months ago
I own a Taylor 214GE electroacoustic guitar and not only does it have the best tone and sound of all the guitars Ive known... Its the prettiest one too
DiadeAngelTV 5 months ago
ALVAREZ YAIRI WOO WOO
LetItRock420 6 months ago
@LetItRock420 100% hand made baby no machines no lazers pew pew. . . just a bunch of proud Japanese making bad ass guitars.
LetItRock420 6 months ago
How 'bout Mark Tremonti? I guess Bob Taylor's never heard of his own guy who's been, I believe it's five times, Guitar World guitarist of the year. :P
Songwriter4God 7 months ago
aww comon bob! you guys have Mark Tremonti playing taylors. creed went platinum 27x. im pretty sure people know who he is =p. you guys have Dave Matthews too! you can point to both of them!
now that i think about it. why doesnt Mark have a signature taylor again? =p
cerebrix 8 months ago
@cerebrix And Alter Bridge is like, one of the most musical bands around today! :D
Songwriter4God 7 months ago
what about the old days when making acoustic guitars were all dont by one man? the jobs they did back then could never beat the todays machining if you ask me :P
markdocker 9 months ago 5
@markdocker look at the maton factory. all the good ones are still being done by hand
JordanGuitar11 2 months ago
funny i just finished watching a yamaha guitar factory and the woman cutting the top of the guitar was doing it by hand instead with a laser, the funny thing is that im sure the laser cutting is more precise and at the same time less expensive, BUT the woman cutting the wood was actually faster than the laser lol, so the processing at the yamaha factory was more artisan like BUT i trust that laser a little more at the same time, anyways american economy cant sustain itself anymore.
petelebu 9 months ago
I've been to the Martin factory. quite the experience. I always thought of martin's as darker sounding and folk music-ish although they can make a custom for you. Taylor's are brighter and punchier especially with elixirs. Gibson acoustics also has a distinct sound but finding the right one is a pain and expensive.
IMO that's why taylor is thriving because of their consistency and pricing whilst not giving off any premium quality. kudos
ncethngs 10 months ago
@ncethngs LOL you're right by saying brighter, but punchier. Tinny and bright yes. Bass low end is punch,which is what Martin's has. That is why they call a D-28 Martin a cannon. That is why they call all Martin's cannons. Martin is the oldest Guitar company for a reason. Since 1833 says it all. Taylor can't touch Gibson. Taylor can't come close to Blueridge guitars. Taylor and Gibson can't touch my Martin HD-28, Blueridge BR-160, Morgan Monroe m-50 , or my Morgan Monroe m-15.
bluegrasssingingman 8 months ago
@bluegrasssingingman to each their own sir. based on your posts, you sound like a taylor basher to the point like they robbed you or something. i try to appreciate all sorts of brands and music and try to base my opinions that way. i know i can't change yours, so enjoy whatever you play.
ncethngs 8 months ago
Fantabulous....Thank you Bob!
rickbolduc707 11 months ago
You say you have noone you can refer to as being an age old Taylor player,I disagree,You have Suzanne Vega for a start!
gitarman1961 11 months ago
I build acoustic guitars so if I were to judge between the two, early Taylor and modern-day Taylor guitars I would say the work is more polished and professional now. A perfectly made guitar will sound no better than one that has a few glue drips evident depending on the individual instrument . Early Martins, Gibsons come to mind. Today's guitars are always getting better with the innovative use of technology and hands on building. All instruments seem to get a little more shimmer as they age.
Archtops 1 year ago
..very level headed brilliant man..w/ a passion... to make the best feeling,playing, & best sounding guitars..i think he is close to achieving that w/ acoustic instruments & from what i see of his electric line , they are pretty awesome guitars as well,, i mean he's not gonna suddenly overtake PRS,Fender,Gibson, or even G&L , but he's just getting going in that field and on the acoustic side of things he's a legend as far as i am concerned..Taylor is my fav acoustic instrument, by far..
MOSKII58 1 year ago
Inspirational!
I have an early hand made 1979 Taylor "Lemon Grove" 655 12-String in Mahogany.
I feel toward it as one would a vintage pre-war Martin D-41!
Archtops 1 year ago
@Archtops wow that sounds like a collector piece to me..if i were you i'd hang on to that puppy.. Do you still feel like the Taylors today are made -well and it s just a matter of advancing in tech or do you feel that back in 1979 it was a diff taylor quality that can never be reached again?
MOSKII58 1 year ago
It really bothered me when I saw people saying what great work Taylor did, then seeing it was all computer operated. As disappointed as I am with that, when I heard one up close I was really impressed. They really do have a fantastic shimmering sound to them.
anon540 1 year ago
I received a new Taylor 214CE today and had to return it for a messed up top. Played great but the top was really messed up. I am sure that this was probably a fluke. New one will be in a few days.
truebluefliplover 1 year ago
@truebluefliplover so whats your point?? what was so messed up at least clue us in to what you are talking about..
MOSKII58 1 year ago
@MOSKII58 The guitar had a series of 5 sanding marks in the finish just below the bridge. Each of the sanding marks was about the size of a penny. They were pretty deeply gouged into the wood and looked as if someone working on the guitar had taken a DA sander and accidentally turned it onto it side.
truebluefliplover 1 year ago
F*** great guitars, got 2 of them, I love their sound!!! great factory tour by the way, did it last year (on my 50th birthday, a great present I gave myself)
theredseasharks 1 year ago
All I'll say is many Martin guitars are made in Mexico now, and the quality has really suffered! Taylor is first class all the way.
settlebrrd 1 year ago
@settlebrrd Yeah the lowest line, the Martins that cost 300-499 are made in Mexico. Taylor is a big piece of shit. You do not know what the hell you're talking about. The only line of Martins made in Mexico is the newer DX line. I've owned a DXR1 that was made in PA. American made. That cheap Martin guitar will blow any Taylor away. in sound, construction, and playability. Take any Taylor you want. I'll put my Martin HD 28 against it any day. Taylor = country music = junk instrument = no talent.
bluegrasssingingman 8 months ago
Just got an 850 dollar taylor guitar for 730. steal of a deal and a beauty of a guitar.
o2bchunk 1 year ago
bought 1 yesterday! this looks awesome that i actually own a guitar made in this fabulous way!!!
Powerslider 1 year ago
@Powerslider you mean by machines? i wouldnt exactly call that "fabulous"
circusj3lly 1 year ago
@circusj3lly Well as a dedicated muscian, i love efficiency and quality. From this perspective, Taylor is doing something fabulous: Creating quality producs in an efficient and innovative way.
But I guess a cynic wouldn't appreciate this kind of processes. ;)
Powerslider 1 year ago
Its not hard to tell that martin has been in the game longer, martin has much more traditional ways of doing things. I love the sound of taylors, but i gotta say Im a martin man.
guitarpro45 1 year ago
The best guitar for the money has got to be the Taylor 214ce Grand Auditorium. Beautiful guitar, rich sound, very versatile, and easy on the hands. All for under a grand.
Donalmighty1 1 year ago
@Donalmighty1 I hope so, I've got one waiting in lay-away. It really does seem like a good guitar, i couldn't find anything i didn't like about it!
llwonderboyll 1 year ago
@llwonderboyll It truly is a great guitar. Im sure you'll enjoy it for many years. It easily out performs other much more expensive guitars. Great choice brother!
Donalmighty1 1 year ago
@llwonderboyll i actually have that exact guitar and i like it more than most of the 2000-3000 dollar guitars i've played.
THESHORTONE100 1 year ago
Martin is better!
guitarist247 1 year ago
Taylor are the most magical playing experience imaginable.
crashstrat 1 year ago 2
I love how Taylors are made. Their quality is always consistent. Their necks are the best industry. I love everything about them except for how the actual guitars sound!
sugarkang 1 year ago
@sugarkang Taylor's are junk, that is why they sound like shit. It doesn't matter how they sound. When untalented country stars are using them. Maybe I shouldn't say country stars. There is no more country music today. Pop music is called country music today. Which needs to die. Just like that Child Molester, Sick piece of shit called Michael Jackson.
bluegrasssingingman 8 months ago
I have a personal preferance for Gibson but taylor and marting and Godin are extremely good guitars as well as washburn
Denvermorgan2000 2 years ago
Toyota should hire Bob Taylor to help with quality control. You may not like the way Taylors sound, but the consistency is incredible.
emr3413 2 years ago 2
You can't really argue about which company is better... it's all about personal preference. This is especially directed to you TrustinYahweh, you may like Martins better, but Taylor guitars are high quality no matter your preference.
avaschein 2 years ago
I got a Taylor GA4 a few years ago, and I am absolutely in love. My dad works at the Washington Music Center, and I played ALL kinds of acoustics when I went to work with him one day. I played Martins, Gibsons, Takamine, all kinds. When I picked up the GA4, the sound and playability basically made me melt. Don't get me wrong, the others were amazing as well, but no matter if the one I have now was machine made or handmade, it feels so personal when I play it.
avaschein 2 years ago
maton guitars are the best !
pasha355 2 years ago
I think what really counts is the materials, and the build quality. It doesn't matter if it's hand made or machine made. You can argue for either side. For example, a machine cut piece of wood WILL be more accurate, and a good hand and years of experience will be able to pick wood quality much better then a machine. Weather it's hand made or not, it only matters what the guitar is made of, and how good those materials are put together.
PotentialFreedom 2 years ago 2
My problem with Taylor is they're charging handmade prices for CNC built guitars.
darkknight91 2 years ago 2
taylor are good acoustics but you have to pay a pretty penny to get a really good one. that being said taylor are some of the best acoustics on the market but i have seen and heard better for less.
brandon5pennies 2 years ago
i play a taylor what i bought for about 2000 and it is brill
rambotyler 2 years ago
I personally think Taylor is one of the best quality guitars out there. If you've never owned or especially never played one then don't say anything. They are great.
christianlovesllamas 2 years ago
Hey guys, let's face it, we're basically talking "NAMES" here, and "Taylor", speaks for itself! Gibson, Martin, Fender are mainly riding on "yesteryear"! Taylor's not out too sell you his name, he's out too sell you decent guitar! And what's the problem, too hung up on "Walmart" prices & don't want too pay for quality work? Curious, do you even play? Tonal quality & playability, Taylor is synergestically designed & unparalelled in that respect, that's what sets them apart, I think! Try it!
natsway 2 years ago 2
I have one of the first two Taylors to be sold on the east coast. It's a 1979 or 1980 model 710. Start the bidding.
kensho3 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Taylor or Martin aint that great. Martin have been rideing on there name for years and just dont make them like they used to in the pre war days and taylor use bolt on necks for god sake. Its all about money knocking out 100s every day. They both do things that in the constrution that kill the tone to makre them more durable so they can offer a life time warrenty. Gibson are the same. You are far better getting a luthier to make you one and if you can wait wayne henderson is your man
tenshinage77 2 years ago
everyone whos saying all this crap about martin being better, probably never owned a taylor. so dont judge
JohnKimYay 2 years ago 17
@JohnKimYay i am looking to spend £1000 on an acoustic, i want volume and warmth, would you recommend a taylor over a martin? i played a martin and want overly impressed and i didnt like the gibson j150 at all. buy what ive read here i better look at a taylor
strabbs1 1 year ago
@JohnKimYay AMen
CarsonsGuitarLesson 1 year ago
@JohnKimYay
Anyone who says one is better than the other is not true to the instrument
they say they love and cherish. Taylor has is place and has earned it for it's
excellence and like Martin will probably be around for a long , long time .
There is NO better than the other but more likely which fits the bill better to the players liking . It's all preference ... Old style =Martin Or Modern style = Taylor
It would Not surprise me that some have BOTH .
jsm355 1 year ago
Comment removed
8mrt7 1 year ago
Comment removed
8mrt7 1 year ago
@JohnKimYay martin and taylor are both very high quality guitars. Taylors have a higher/brighter sound where as Martins have a lower/more earthy tone. Both are great it all depends on what music you are playing
paleofwater 1 year ago
@JohnKimYay they are prob just Martin SNOBS!! lol i love Taylor & my dream is to own a high# model (8 0r 9 series electric acoustic w/ blender sys) also i want a jumbo / maple.. Taylors are amoung the best. i like Santa Cruz and Larivee' as well.. regards..
MOSKII58 1 year ago
@JohnKimYay They are different.
MELLSBAD 10 months ago
@JohnKimYay Martin's are better, BUT that's if you like a more balanced gutiar with warm tone, if you like a brighter tone for more open strumming, then get a Taylor. (Sorry for replying to a two year old comment, but it's the truth.
Songwriter4God 7 months ago
@JohnKimYay
Well, I own a Martin 12 string and a Taylor 6 string. Both bought new. The Taylor had to have a neck reset and the bridge was actually coming off and it had to be re-set - twice!.The Martin had to have bridge work as the hi Es were not picked up loud enough by the undersadle pick up. Both issues were downers and a major piss off but all that aside, both are awesome guitars and it's strictly a matter of personal taste as to which is "better".
WhiteLakeDan 5 months ago
I had a Taylor- nice guitar but it got nicked. I missed it for a while but then came across a guy with an old '72 Epi FT147 in need of a refret. It cost me a fraction of the Taylor but is the greatest acoustic guitar I have ever had. I would not change it for the best guitar Taylor could make.Hard to say what makes one guitar so magical - one you never want to put down - the tone wood, overall feel, and that indefinable 'playability'.
zthetha 2 years ago
Taylor Guitars are the best guitars in the world!!! THE BEST!!!
markowalski 2 years ago 2
not a chance. Martin baby!
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
i just got a new taylor 214ce and love it the way i look at it i like martins to but i like the looks of taylors alot more martins are just to plain the only thing i dont like about taylor is they dont come with a tuner the electronics are great if you can hear it through the amp while you are playing a taylor
wvangler93 3 years ago
Its kinda good that companies don't give tuners and other electronics best they're usually low-quality and break. Then you have to spend money to buy a new one after you already bought the one that came with the guitar.
markowalski 2 years ago
Taylors are good live guitars and they can cut really well in an amp or through a PA system. That is about it. By the way. the new Martin 1 series guitars have the Bob Fishman Aero system in it. Check em out.
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
Martins are better. I do like Taylors though, but the electronics are terrible.
rockisdead1946 3 years ago
Agreed. Martins blow Taylors out of the water. Martins have something called tone and warmth. Taylors too me are WAY too tinny and flat (no def). It all depends on your style 2 as we know. I like the warm tones, not bright.
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
Agreed!
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
It's like the Ford Vs. Chevy argument. It's all about preference. I prefer the Taylor, but my music partner prefers the Martin.
hannah1219 3 years ago
True
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
with all due respect, martin is the best in the market...1833 whew!
longliveboazania 3 years ago
Well, they are most certainly one of the oldest, that's the truth.
ichalz 3 years ago 2
*The oldest
stratlover13 2 years ago
Martin has been around since 1833 my friend. That is 175 years and 6 generations of guitar innovating. Taylor wishes they had that kind of innovation. Martin is the better guitar by far as far as my ears tell me. But, I like the warmer sound. Taylors are brighter in tone. It is all in what ya play.
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
I own three Taylors (514ce, 750, and ns34ce) and two Martins (D-35 and 000-1).
All are teriffic guitars.
But I'm most fond of my 514ce. It is the warmest steel string I own because of its cedar & mahogany tone woods. It's also extremely even in it's tonal balance and is incredibly versatile. It sounds equally good playing finger style or being strummed.
It's okay to prefer one brand over another...we all have our preferences. But I would disagree that Martin = warmer sound across the board.
markpalmermusic 2 years ago
yep
TrustinYahweh 2 years ago
try a Huss & Dalton; you may change your mind, I did.
JuLesinator 3 years ago
Taylor is my favorite guitar company, and this video explanes why.
taylor410ce 3 years ago 3
5 stars!!!!
TAYLOR the Best!!!
victorolden 3 years ago 17