bill maher, you are wrong and you know it. we the collapse happens you will lose your show, lose your mind and no will help because you are a bad person...erm...i mean a bad reptilian colossal gay deuche bottom boy
You people have practically ruined the truth movement with your nonsense about agents planting bombs in the building. The real conspiracy is the fact that our relentless militarism incites hatred, which led to 2 attacks on the WTC in 93' and 01'. So, our government exploits the attacks to engage in even MORE militarism. THAT'S the real problem. The big gear of war that goes round and round fueling itself. It's because of you goof balls that people don't listen at all anymore.
They are as a rule, obsessed with a distrust of government, have strong tendencies to assign correlations between events where none exist, and show great willingness to apply grossly uneven levels of skepticism to presented evidence, based on which side of the "argument" the evidence appears to support.
During my investigation of the 911 CT, I became interested in some of the sociological and emotional factors which contribute to a person's predisposition for embracing CT's. I noticed most CT Nuts possessed similar traits and behaviors. They typically lack any educational or life achievement, have poor to non-existent social skills, and are often quite hostile when their beliefs are questioned.
Soldiers invaded their lands, killed civilians in the Middle East (there are videos) because the USA gov brainwashed them into thinking that Arabs were responsible for the 9/11, engineers say that it' s an inside job. They want the oil, anyone who rebels is called a terrorist, Yeah there are religious fanatics but most of the terrorists are just rebels. RATE THIS UP SO PEOPLE CAN SEE THE TRUTH WE CAN SAVE LIVES, WE ARE CHANGING THIS WORLD, EVERYONE IS REBELLING. 9/11 was clearly an inside job.
@saramichealhpt 'Our government would never kill its own people, you are stupid for believing such a tail'...my reply: oh yea, then explain what operation northwoods was about....people need to wake up from their deep sleep...
@ishky5000 2 planes targeted 2 buildings and one just fell for no reason?.yeah because the tower (debris etc) what fell on to building 7 and tore all the front of the building of and fires what started cause of it what kept burning and NEVER STOPPED never happened huh?.....
This is how they divide us with these over paid puppet cowards like Maher. He will never talk or answer any question about BUILDING 7 because he want to keep collecting his checks. We need to start putting the fear into them by delivering HEADSHOTS. A blind person could tell that 9-11 was an inside job. If anyone believe the government then they don't deserve LIFE. Where are our SPECIAL UNIT TEAMS that will protect & train the citizens in cases of an out of control government?
@CanadaMan120 When the Twin towers were built, they specifically designed it so it could withstand multiple plane crashes, since they were so tall. Why did many people claim to hear explosions occur before and after the plane hit. It shouldn't have fallen because of the damages, since it was built to withstand it....
@dwgangsat Because no one bothered to maintain fireproofing etc and oh yeah, they weren't expecting a huge jumbo jet filled with fuel to crash into it. Meanwhile Ive never heard anyone claiming explosions were heard before the jet crashed except for paranoid-delusional people such as yourself. Besides WTF would they want 7 down when 1 and 2 were down.
@Velox415 Jet fuel reaches its maximum temp. of 1800 degrees when MAINTAINED(controlled burn). Regular steel doesn't begin to melt/weaken until about 2750 degrees. Now as we all saw, the smoke coming out of the building was black. That means that the fire was being deprived of oxygen, which fire needs to continue burning. So the fire still wouldn't hot enough to weaken regular steel. I didn't make the claim of early explosions....these people did...watch?v=NNS3Ir_iTkc...
@LindaStevensBZ FACT: The smoke was black showing the the fire was being starved of oxygen, so it wasn't at its most hottest. Jet fuel fire can't stay at 1800 degrees unless it's maintain, in which it wasn't, so it was no where near 2750 degrees. The fires on 911 were spread out. FACT: in 1975 on the tower caught on fire..FACT: the fires then were hotter then the ones at 911...but yet it didn't fall in 1975, but it fell on 9-11, first buildings in history to fall due to fire
@dwgangsat FACT: the 1975 fire did not involve structural damage. FACT: the fire in 1975 was not as hot as the 9-11 fires. FACT: 9-11 conspiracy theorists have loose screws.
@ToolsnFire FACT: (1975) the fires broke the windows on the 11th floor east side windows, which could of been seen pouring out these broken windows. This indicates a temperature greater than 700°C. In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C. Many explosions could be heard/seen by witness(police/ firefighters ect). and also an explosion(s) was heard in the basement moments before the plane impact...smfh
@yourass117 9-11 was a complete inside job...in order to change my mind, I want the government to just show us a plane actually hitting the Pentagon...why are the hiding the footage...
Let's try that again the way it happened - see if it comes up short
'How big lunatic do you have to be to watch 2 moderate airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV evaporating in a ball of fire that smoldered for two hours and 3 buildings came down - then think 'well if you 'that' was the cause. . .
- Jeez Bill, looks like your joke needs the Viagra
And if this jet fuel was so powerful to melt buildings how are they discovering the terrorists passports in the aftermath? And if the steel was melted by fire, why did the building that got hit second fall first? Unless they were made differently or one planes jet fuel was more powerful than the other
@bdawgz ur not taking into account the possibility that the second plane did more structural damage on impact for being the reason the second tower went down 1st
what a complete douchebag. there was no "inferno", just a small fire and a lot of smoke. the towers were actually designed to survive more than just one plane impact. also the towers didn't just "collapsed", they've been pulverized like into very small particles. that's ridiculous. it is impossible that burning jet fuel can soften steel so that the towers just collapse.
If a 757 hit the towers burned for 2 hours and compromised the core columns wich led to the collapse...MY QUESTION IS WHY IS THERE ONLY A 16 ft HOLE IN THE PENTAGON AND NO MAJOR FIRE OR GAS DUMPED IN THE SOIL???
wtc 1,2 and 3 are too big to be taken out by two plains and 2 hour long jet fuel fire. may those who lost their life rest in peace. one day we will know who really stood behind 9 11. God bless the help less countries. countries that give help look more like God himself :) and their people trust them
@RobinEH94 You ask that as if 9 -1-1 was a big mystery, Its simply really ,Bin Laden was pissed at the U.S and had his people plan the attack on us . Bin laden was pissed at the U.S for coming over at Saudi Arabia, It was a holy land for Muslims , I don have to go in much detail because you probably already know this. Now can you tell me what "really happened " at 9-1-1.
@JhosefL I was more wondering why the towers collapsed. Not that Osama Bin Laden attacked the U.S and then denied being involved in it. And then of course I didn't want to know that CIA released a faked video recording of Bin Laden admitting his involvement in the attacks. And please don't explain to me why the flight data of Flight 77 shows that the plane had a too high altitude in order to actually hit Pentagon. Just explain to me about the collapse of the two towers, please!
What's to explain? The jet fuel was burned up in minutes but the actual towers burned for a further two hours at degrees from 1500-1800 degrees which at that temp was enough to compromise the structural integrity of the steel columns by 70-80% which caused the towers to collapse.
Btw, did you know that the holocaust never happened? There were no death camps and no 6 million. At most 200,000 Jews died and the majority of the deaths were from disease.
Uh, no, the temperature reported by the NIST reached a peak of about 1800 Celsius. Where did you get that 747 number from? And no, it's not that strange. Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't mean it can never happen ever. If that's the best "proof" you can pull out of your ass then you need to troll Alex Jones' website some more and get back to me.
@SkunkyAngry You are right. I found information about the reports regarding the twin towers. The highest temperature reported was 1800°. 1800° Fahrenheit! It would be pretty strange if the highest temperature recorded in the towers were 1800° C because kerosene used in commercial airlines has a maximum temperature of about 1800° F in fire.
On the other hand. The highest temperature recorded was 1377° F in the south tower. Recorded and reported are not the same.
Lol, oh, I beg your pardon, I meant 1800 Fahrenheit. Let's play the semantics game! Once again, I have ask you where you got your numbers? The highest recorded temp? According to whom?
@JhosefL So you mean that the steel got soften which made the towers collapse and destroying the whole building? It's strange that the upper floors didn't just fall off the tower down onto the ground. And at what degree will steel start to soften?
@RobinEH94 How the hell else would the building fall down? Ok i'm confused.. So how does all of this connect to being an inside job. Wheres your hard evidence that the government made this happen . Oh wait .. no one has ever provided one.. just theories
@JhosefL Why would it fall down? Other high buildings have been able to restain fires in the past.
I do not think that this was an inside job.
There are no hard evidence that the government didn't attack their own people.
And how would someone ever be able to prove that this wasn't an act of terrorism? The ground has been build on, the debris have been destroyed and it's 10 years since the event.
@RobinEH94 Yeah lets just take all this evidence about Osama Bin laden and his terrorist network and just throw it into the trash. Since Everything the government tell us is not true. Of course people in the internet who make up conspiracy has got to be true.. Cause people on the internet don't lie. Think about it
@RobinEH94 Al Qaida in formed the 90s as an extremist terrorist group and Bin laden was its leader.Even before 9/11 Bin Laden took credit for planning the attacks on several US military installations as well as other attacks . This was also when the friction between the US and the Taliban started as the Taliban was openly supporting Al Qaida...Bin Laden also claimed responsibility. Investigations also showed that the terrorists who carried it out had ties back to Al Qaida. (character limit)
crazy people ? This man says it takes 2 hours for an airplane from which big part of the jet fuel burned out of the bulidings, to bring the towers down at nearly free fall speed !! But hey it was on tv so we have to take it for real ...By the way mister funny man what happened to building 7 ?? I don't know you mister Maher but i bet you're as Jewish as Silverstein!! did he call you??
Bill Maher sits there with a photo showing explosions blowing the WTC apart.
It seems Bill Maher has finally reached the same level as Penn & Teller. Just another propaganda spewing traitor who has sold out his country, planet and the human race.
lol, ol maher is a dumbfuck, yeh heat from the billion gallon airplane melted the steel, temperatures ranging round 78000 degress cause the steel to bend, thus floors started 2 collaspe and shot out debris that hit 7, causing her to go hours later, and santa cause shot an inaccurate as fuck rpg that killed the same seals that killed bin laden, oh shit, issues in pakaistan now!!! lmao, u ediots will never see the truth until u look up at the sky and see a big nuke falling on ur hometown
That's really cute Billy M...but you forgot to mention that 2 planes knocked down 3 towers...but NIST is now saying that building 7 fell from sympathy....it is a new law....Newton's Law of Sympathy..it states when 7 buildings stand together for many years they form a kinship. So when 2 of them fall, a 3rd can fall from feeling bad for the others. It's true..it really is..NIST said so.
Yep, Popular Mechanics has proven Building 7 was in fact built entirely of playing cards. The building of the WTC caused an unforeseen shortage of construction materials produced by acme domino co. Engineers redesigned plans to complete Building 7. Shock waves from the explosives used to destroy the WTC caused the cards to begin falling many hours before the total collapse. SEE, IT WASN'T AN INSIDE JOB!
You mean Popular Mechanics which receives 95% of it's advertising budget from the Military Industrial Complex and has Benny Chertoff writing 911 lies so his brother Micheal can keep his new job caused from 911..you mean Popular Mechanics the one owned by Hearst, the INVENTORS of "yellow journalism." Yea, just believe the EXACT opposite of everything they say and you will have the truth thanks.
@BoBsPfhorever77 i dont know man, for me 9/11 is like buying a waterproof camera and after using for some time underwater it breaks. did the waterproof coating fail? or did something else break?
seriously, both ways are possible. if you like your theory best its okay, dont just go spouting it like its a fact.
Over 1600 architects and engineers conclude the 3 WTC buildings were a controlled demolition. Bill Maher is a talk-show host. I'll believe architects, engineers, physicists any day over Denier Maher. He probably still believes in "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.
@Kill0Your0TV That's a lie actually, and it's been exposed and debunked many times. Some of the people on the list were quite surprised, some of them weren't even in relevant fields
@FreeTheWorker What has been debunked many times? Where did you get that? The 1600 architects and engineers are all on the website. Stop with the bullshit.
@Kill0Your0TV You're the one spreading bullshit. A lot of those people aren't even architects and engineers and a lot of them don't support your position and some have been quite surprised to be found on such a list. You're doing the same thing the FAN does, you're just taking a bunch of names and putting them on a list if they even sound like they might possibly in any way support your asinine position, even when they don't.
@Kill0Your0TV Again you little list is bullshit you're like the Dover creationists saying there were 800 scientists who believed in intelligent design while there were more biologist by the name of Steve who rejected it.
The "ten's of thousands" are all the engineers and architects in the world minus your "1600+". Don't be talking about 'gullible' without looking in the mirror for a VERY long time. If I looked I could find 1600 people who think Obama is the AntiChrist, with more proof than your engineers have about 9/11.
@RetSquid Bla bla bla. Sure you can. There is much more proof 911 was an inside job than OBL and his 19 cave-dweller hijackers did it. You'd have to be retarded to believe that fairytale. If the shoe fits...
@Kill0Your0TV why don't you name me 10 of your architects, 12 of your structural engineers, 8 of your ari traffic controllers. If you can do that. Ill be impressed. But chances are your a brainwashed trolling zombie that hates Jews because you have nothing else to do with your life than blame society for your problems like a coward. It has been 10 years since 9/11, if you and your smelly colleges are so brilliant how come you haven't broke the story yet moran?
There is a difference between conspiracies that are based on scientific and sociopolitical evidence and some dumb shit a paranoid bunch of half-wits you've come across decided to think up. The absoluteness in your completely ridiculous statement is absurd. 9/11 isn't even a conspiracy at the level we are thinking of here, it is a basic appeal to plausible science, the sociopolitics (conspiracy part) is actually plausible as well considering that the U.S. has a history of using such tactics.
@COYI1895 Occam's razor, applied to this scenario, would definitely favor controlled explosives, as the contrary argument is much more complex and much less scientifically plausible. These buildings don't collapse under their own weight at free-fall speed, it's just not plausible.
@c23am I seriously think Occam's Razor favors that planes flew into the buildings and that thermal expansion made the metal expand, causing the bolts to come loose and causing the weight of the structure to topple it.
Steel is an excellent conductor of heat, so if my theory is right bolts should have started coming loose at about the same time, and there should be a lot of cross beams that were only slightly warped.
Well what do you know, there were, and one of them is the 9/11 cross.
Do you really think engineers don't consider that in design plans? I agree with you about thermal expansion (cos that's basic science) but even if bolts came loose, so what? That doesn't in any miniscule way explain how both buildings (plus one NOT hit by a plane) were pulverized after falling perfectly at near FREE-FALL speed in an imploding manner all of a sudden. Look at ALL of the evidence, explosions were blowing people away at basement level b4 the buildings fell. Occam's razor=THERMITE
@c23am Of course they do, but that list isn't legitimate, it's a collection of names only some of which actually back your theory.
And no, Thermite doesn't add up, we all saw planes crash into the towers, we all saw burning jet fuel and smoke, people felt the heat radiating off the walls steel is an excellent conductor of heat so the heat was distributed throughout the structure at a fairly regular rate, the bolts came loose and you can see that in the wreckage your theory is bullshit.
Have you read what I wrote? Your theory, which doesn't explain any more than very minor structural damage relies on planes hitting buildings, building number 7 (we didn't see a plane hit it because no plane did hit it!) fell at near free-fall speed just like the twin towers, your theory doesn't account for building number 7. Do you realize (this requires researching EVIDENCE) that the pools of molten steel still present weeks after 9/11 were HOTTER than the temp that aviation fuel burns at.
@c23am No what I presented explains the whole thing. Steel is an excellent conductor of heat and weakens at a few hundred degrees, the burning jet fuel was near the heat of the sun that heat was being transferred throughout the skeleton of the structure which caused beams to buckle under the weight of the structure and caused bolts to come loose. The damage and heat at the top caused it to be the first part to collapse and the building came down exactly as would be expected if what I say is true
@FreeTheWorker Arrgh there's no point in this continuing as you clearly havn't grasped what even happened that day, let alone the materials science required to understand the physics and it seems that you don't know how to read the sentence 'building number 7 was not hit by a plane, yet collapsed at near free-fall speed just like the the twin towers'. You are free to beLIEve whatever you like, that is your right, I really don't care anymore. Merry xmas: youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
@c23am There's not much point in continuing when you clearly believe anything that backs your fantastic contrarian hypothesis even though it's been debunked. You're not much different from FAN or a Creationist.
I'm not talking about building 7 I'm talking about the WTC, I know it may seem amazing to you that a jet flying into a skyscraper can structurally weaken it, and the notion that heat makes metal expand and weakens the integrity of steel may seem absurd to you.
You can't separate the WTC7 collapse from the collapse of the twin towers, because they fell in the exact same manner, identical to the manner in which buildings brought down by explosives fall. How can I be like a creationist when I have nothing but science on my side (as opposed to blind faith in authority, the same authority that gave billions to banks when that made no difference to the economy), the scientific stuff you speak of was all isolated to a tiny fraction of the entire building(!)
@c23am What WTC7 collapse? Oh you mean building 7. I can see how this is confusing for you, an internally collapsing structure is similar to an imploding structure. Has it ever occurred to you that the reason they were similar is because inwardly collapsing buildings do that? Your arguments are just like those of creationists you even troll out fake experts to back your position.
Look the official version of the collapse adds up in every way, your version makes next to no sense.
Yeah I really don't care about this any more, all I ever try and do with these things is raise awareness of important issues that should mean something to people, and I was never being unscientific in this case (which negates your 'creationism' behavior comment). If you get in trouble or face hardship of some kind in the future from being wrong then that's your burden/problem, people have to follow their own heart and mind, even if it leads them to doom.
@c23am Most creationists don't think they're being unscientific either, nor do the folks who believe FAN garbage, but they buy off on testimonials and junk pseudo science all the same.
@FreeTheWorker Dude, I have more scientific training than you could imagine, I wont even state how many years I've spend studying the sciences (not to mention the history and philosophy of science) at university. Creationists don't think they're being scientific (which is the antithesis of blind faith), they think they're being mathematically accurate when presented with a book full of mythological ambiguities with historical significance. I'm strictly against dogmatism, but also naive realism!
@c23am I'm sure you're a regular Einstein, so what field of science do you have training in? And yeah bro, creationists are plenty convinced of their scientific credentials and the scientific accuracy of their arguments, only a hand full of the big name creationists are knowingly lying, and the same can be said for FAN, and the same can be said for you 9/11 truthers.
Your controlled demolition theory is based on faulty science. Whatever else you believe, true or false, that one thing is BS.
@FreeTheWorker Tell me something, what do '9/11 truthers' have to gain from being activists and standing up for their understanding of a highly significant event? They have everything to lose and nothing to gain from it, therefore it takes a highly convincing analysis of the situation and the greater sociopolitical terrain in order to rouse ones conscience in such a way. Finding thermite by-products at ground zero, pools of metal hotter than the temp aviation fuel burns at, it's all there.
@c23am The same as any conspiracy theory, you get wrapped up in something and can't consider that you may have been wrong, it's good for your ego and it lets you feel like you're part of some insider knowledge, and it'd be fine if you didn't invoke junk science. I'm sure many of the things you truthers believe is true, with all the corruption in our system I wouldn't doubt it, but this whole controlled demolition thing is a load of nonsense it's been debunked and real scientists look down on it.
Well thanks for your opinion, you seem highly hypocritical in that you call others dogmatic and think they get an ego hit out of it whereas you don't question your own BS (belief system) and think you are exclusively right about this, which is highly arrogant and prematurely conclusive at best. I am completely open to contrary scientific evidence in formulating a perspective, however, I'm just not convinced at all (I wish I was) by 'official explanations', it seems like misinformation.
@c23am No I'm calling you dogmatic because you're promoting junk science which real scientists have debunked, you aren't a skeptic c23 you don't know what skepticism is, you uncritically believe all this 9/11 conspiracy garbage without applying the proper scrutiny to what you believe and your demolition theory just doesn't hold up to scrutiny. You know what the documentary shows how people like you operate, there's really no point in even trying. If it weren't 9/11 it's be the Illuminati.
I don't think it takes a genius to realize that many suspicious things happened that day, I can't imagine a building like that, designed to withstand so much more, falling at free-fall speed without controlled explosives. And building number 7 (not hit by a plane) also fell at free-fall speed, c-mon, was I born yesterday? Sorry but I am not brainwashed by the government media and I actually research things before making a judgement. I feel sorry for American's, they have Stockholm syndrome.
You all deserve to lose your freedom... Since your a bunch of Naive ninnies who probably "are" actually on mental drugs... I do just fine without them... In spite of the fact I live in a world governed by criminals... I guess you all subscribe to ignorance is bliss whereas I subscribe to the truth will set you free... Happy heads in the sand people... Good work... Don't let the facts get in the way of your ignorant bliss...
The Government offered no evidence they actually destroyed the evidence... Your calling a whole lot of highly educated people nut jobs there big buddy...engineers and architects for 911 truth... Go there and read then comment... then post your credentials... so we can see who is in actual fact more credible.. Because apparently your know more about controlled demos than the top demo experts in the States...
Respond to this video... Go to engineers and architects for 911 truth... Do your "real" research then respond otherwise your just full of yourselves... Brainwashed eh? PFFT ... Anyone who believes 911 is anything but controlled demolition is either rightfully scared of the people who did it or is really really dumb... Or just plain ignorant... Or they really don't want to know the truth... the latter of which is understandable since the truth really does suck...
@COYI1895 Your a bunch of follower idiots who can't take the truth because if you had half a brain you would actually do some research instead of just "Thinking" you know what your talking about... I said it before and I will say it again Bill says what he says out of fear not out of fact... The tops demolition experts in the USA say it is impossible to be anything but controlled demolition... But oh you guys are smarter then they are right?
Maher obviously hasn't done 2 minutes of research on the subject or he would know better. He totally "demolished" his own credibility with this mindless rant.
Hey bill love your shit. But you would have to be stupid to think that 3 buildings could all fall perfectly from planes. Science has already stated that jet fuel does not reach temperatures hot enough to melt steel. So who is stupid?
@TheMattwalls84 Melt steel? It only had to weaken the steel. How in the world could conspiracists sneak into a building and plant explosives and some other flammable stuff w/o people knowing? The TWC were always occupied with employees, security and many others.
@COYI1895 Or how about the FACT that the government took all the evidence away immediately which is in and of itself a completely criminal act... making the government probably NIST criminally liable... Oh and somehow this was all A-OK Because they didn't want to upset the families victims... If my family were victims I would be upset that they destroyed the evidence... SInce we have established that the government committed on crime why is it so hard to believe the rest of it is a crime???
@COYI1895 Yeah funny how the worlds top demo experts say it is impossible for a building to fall through the greatest path of resistance in no less than 18 seconds like in all three buildings in 911 and no way is it possible for jet fuel to melt steel under any circumstance... And how all through history no steel concrete building has ever fallen due to any amount of fire... Or how NIST lied their faces off for the same reason Bill did... Because they will lose their jobs... pretty simple..
@honeybadgertrix This is nonsense... Two planes hit a building in a completely imperfect manner... Yet Three buildings fall in what amounts to perfectly controlled demolition... But we are supposed to believe against all odds that was the planes ..... Obviously you have done no research whatsoever into this... Sorry but belief does not count as fact... Your wrong about controlled demolition... Even popular mechanic admitted it does "look" exactly like controlled demo. He just won't admit it is.
Bill Maher is not a professional... got to ae911truth.. There are 1600 engineers and architects who all agree that the official story is a load of crap... So to all of you that wish to believe santa claus still exists... go right ahead with your childish belief systems... However one day you will understand why you should have listened to someone other than Bill Maher... Bill says what he is told to say otherwise he loses his position... period... end of story...
Bill Maher is not a professional... got to ae911truth.. There are 1600 engineers and architects who all agree that the official story is a load of crap... So to all of you that wish to believe santa claus still exists... go right ahead with your childish belief systems... However one day you will understand why you should have listened to someone other than Bill Maher... Bill says what he is told to say otherwise he loses his position... period... end of story...
to people who STILL in 2011 think that the 9/11 conspiracy is some crazy story, consider this. There is a name for such events - that is how common they are. They are called FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS, go look up the term. Then go look up OPERATION NORTHWOODS, a false flag operation planned in the USA just a few decades ago. Now cut out the whole "America wouldn't do this to its own people!" argument - because clearly it would.
??Dont anyone notice that this sounds stupid: "That was only Osamas terrorists who hijacked two airplanes and planted some bombs in the twin towers without anyone noticed it"??.
I guess planes with fuel causes multiple explosion too huh. Explain the explosions please. Scientists have not proven truthers wrong, they in fact avoid it all and say truthers are crazy.
@mikelovesvero i've seen a video straght from osama bin laden saying the 100% proof and evidence, isnt that enough? check it out, dont forget to put 3 w in the begining i cant do it cuz youtube wont let me, but check this out, in the youtube sear look up this, Osama/Usama Bin Laden On 9/11 and there is the truth, he even talks about iraq, the thing is, is that there is more and more proof about what really happend, and people are sick of edited not real video,s you can thanks those dumb asses
Its career suicide 2 question 9/11 being orchestrated by Zionist. After the truthers on RT i questioned it myself went on a fact gathering mission & with each coincidence I believed it more & more. There was motive, gains, mysterious explosions, deaths of witnesses, leaked info. etc.. Murdoch found tapping 9/11 victims Larry Silverstein making a 7 bill profit from the collapses with a detailed specified insurance policy. Do ur own research for once and make up your own mind, I now believe.
you people are ignorant if you believe otherwise these people are lying they are paid good to lie especially Bill Mayer he works for ABC that station alone is paid to tell americans what they want us to know or what they want us to believe maybe you pricks should study history a little and you will begin to understand that 9/11 is not the first attack on us by our own government it is not a conspiracy when it is backed by fact even in the video Bill has posted on his show shows explosions BTW
I find it funny how you truthers have no theories of your own. You just watched or read what one other person concluded and decided it fit what you believe. You guys offer no evidence, just links to other crazies who have theories. You guys give us links that have been disproven by peer reviewed scientist. In order for what you guys say to be true every scientist, independant media source, and entire government would have to be in on it which is highly unlikely in the digital age.
@itsMinuteMaid It was next to a tower that was over twice its height...that collapsed spewing all sorts debris as well as large columns all over the south face of 7 WTC. Did you see the huge gorge at the lower south side of tower 7? That building was in bad shape and even firefighters had a feeling it was gonna collapse before it did. Nothing conspiracy there.
@GunsNRosesbitches Tower 7 was not next to the North or South towers and in fact was several hundred feet away. The other building's that were actually right in front of the North and South towers sustained less damage than did tower 7 which was further away. Furthermore, tower 7 did not sustain severe structural damage from debris as concluded by NIST and the main [stated] cause of its fall was by mere effects of fire damage.
@itsMinuteMaid Lets do the math...Tower 1 was 1,362 feet tall and 7 WTC was 300 feet away. Yea, that is definitely close enough to spew all the debris all over the south face of 7 WTC. And contrary to what conspiracy theorists say, tower 7 did sustain serious damage on its lower south east level. There was a gap in the building destroyed...it was halfway through its width. Its design also made it very vulnerable to collapse.
The structural damage on its bottom south east corner was pretty bad plus raging fires weakened the steel significantly. Those two factors caused a chain reaction that literally pummeled the building. One Liberty Plaza was farther away than 7 WTC and it withstood some heavy damage on its west side but it did not collapse because it did not catch fire, thus no worries for weakened steel. Even if it did have fire, it did not have all its columns on the exterior. 7 WTC was a whole diff story.
@maleavail Is it safe to say conspiracy theorists brainwashed you worse than the catholic church did to its people? It certainly looks like that. I don't like how you and all other conspiracy theorists walk around with big egos, thinking you know everything and how to solve the world's problems, while deflecting anything that goes against your theories. In fact, I dislike anyone who is not open minded and not willing to be flexible with their views. Conspiracy theorists are so close-minded
@GunsNRosesbitches I am open minded to things that make sense... The Government has lied and withheld evidence... These two things are facts... They also acted criminally when they destroyed the evidence... This also is a fact not a theory... So tell me what is exactly so compelling about anything the government says since they have proven they are lying criminals? Hello I would love to hear your open minded response to this because I would be so relieved if 911 was Just Bin Laden....
@GunsNRosesbitches PFFT ... Denialism ...You cannot handle the truth... You don't have to be an engineer to know that it was controlled demolition... Bill has to say what he says otherwise he will get fired... SImple as that... Sorry but it is 100% impossible for those buildings to have fallen in the manner claimed... Do your research instead of talking out of your rectum ... Mr... I love Guns and Roses... Immature music satisfies and immature mine...
bill maher, you are wrong and you know it. we the collapse happens you will lose your show, lose your mind and no will help because you are a bad person...erm...i mean a bad reptilian colossal gay deuche bottom boy
gooty64 4 days ago
@gooty64
You people have practically ruined the truth movement with your nonsense about agents planting bombs in the building. The real conspiracy is the fact that our relentless militarism incites hatred, which led to 2 attacks on the WTC in 93' and 01'. So, our government exploits the attacks to engage in even MORE militarism. THAT'S the real problem. The big gear of war that goes round and round fueling itself. It's because of you goof balls that people don't listen at all anymore.
itzahazylife 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CONTINUATION...
They are as a rule, obsessed with a distrust of government, have strong tendencies to assign correlations between events where none exist, and show great willingness to apply grossly uneven levels of skepticism to presented evidence, based on which side of the "argument" the evidence appears to support.
That is the REAL STORY of Truthers.
LindaStevensBZ 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
During my investigation of the 911 CT, I became interested in some of the sociological and emotional factors which contribute to a person's predisposition for embracing CT's. I noticed most CT Nuts possessed similar traits and behaviors. They typically lack any educational or life achievement, have poor to non-existent social skills, and are often quite hostile when their beliefs are questioned.
CONTINUED...
LindaStevensBZ 6 days ago
Soldiers invaded their lands, killed civilians in the Middle East (there are videos) because the USA gov brainwashed them into thinking that Arabs were responsible for the 9/11, engineers say that it' s an inside job. They want the oil, anyone who rebels is called a terrorist, Yeah there are religious fanatics but most of the terrorists are just rebels. RATE THIS UP SO PEOPLE CAN SEE THE TRUTH WE CAN SAVE LIVES, WE ARE CHANGING THIS WORLD, EVERYONE IS REBELLING. 9/11 was clearly an inside job.
saramichealhpt 1 week ago 2
@saramichealhpt 'Our government would never kill its own people, you are stupid for believing such a tail'...my reply: oh yea, then explain what operation northwoods was about....people need to wake up from their deep sleep...
dwgangsat 1 week ago
@dwgangsat
i just said that the American governent WOULD kill its people, in fact I stated that the 9/11 is an inside job.
saramichealhpt 1 week ago
@saramichealhpt dude.....i was agreeing with you
dwgangsat 1 week ago
@dwgangsat
Oh, ok. Sorry.
saramichealhpt 1 week ago
@saramichealhpt lol...it's ok, you straight
dwgangsat 1 week ago
@dwgangsat
Thanks lol.
saramichealhpt 1 week ago
@saramichealhpt Your mamma was clearly an inside job asshat!!!
EvilStar109 6 days ago
@EvilStar109
You have an appropriate name: ''EvilStar109''. You can't even write properly. Face it people woke up, now drink bleach bitch <3.
saramichealhpt 6 days ago
@saramichealhpt What part of "Go fuck yourself" don't you understand?
EvilStar109 6 days ago
This is the first time i have ever agreed with Bill Maher
CoolStorieBabe 2 weeks ago
these people are the ones ruining america. they go against everything about the government whether it was good or bad.
TheShootTruth10 2 weeks ago
2 planes targeted 2 buildings and one just fell for no reason?...and yet i still wonder why its still a conspiracy...
ishky5000 1 month ago
@ishky5000 2 planes targeted 2 buildings and one just fell for no reason?.yeah because the tower (debris etc) what fell on to building 7 and tore all the front of the building of and fires what started cause of it what kept burning and NEVER STOPPED never happened huh?.....
UKDannyBoyy91 1 week ago
Even 1500F fires coupled with the severe structural damage was more than enough to bring down the towers.
Every FDNY Chief would agree with that.
Only CT NutJobs on YT tend to disagree.
LindaStevensBZ 1 month ago
tool
EPIIIX 1 month ago
This is how they divide us with these over paid puppet cowards like Maher. He will never talk or answer any question about BUILDING 7 because he want to keep collecting his checks. We need to start putting the fear into them by delivering HEADSHOTS. A blind person could tell that 9-11 was an inside job. If anyone believe the government then they don't deserve LIFE. Where are our SPECIAL UNIT TEAMS that will protect & train the citizens in cases of an out of control government?
DjMenniz 1 month ago
No your Gov. wouldnt lie to you.Maher is a fool.
IMA60SKID 1 month ago
@CanadaMan120 When the Twin towers were built, they specifically designed it so it could withstand multiple plane crashes, since they were so tall. Why did many people claim to hear explosions occur before and after the plane hit. It shouldn't have fallen because of the damages, since it was built to withstand it....
dwgangsat 1 month ago
@dwgangsat Because no one bothered to maintain fireproofing etc and oh yeah, they weren't expecting a huge jumbo jet filled with fuel to crash into it. Meanwhile Ive never heard anyone claiming explosions were heard before the jet crashed except for paranoid-delusional people such as yourself. Besides WTF would they want 7 down when 1 and 2 were down.
Velox415 1 month ago
@Velox415 Jet fuel reaches its maximum temp. of 1800 degrees when MAINTAINED(controlled burn). Regular steel doesn't begin to melt/weaken until about 2750 degrees. Now as we all saw, the smoke coming out of the building was black. That means that the fire was being deprived of oxygen, which fire needs to continue burning. So the fire still wouldn't hot enough to weaken regular steel. I didn't make the claim of early explosions....these people did...watch?v=NNS3Ir_iTkc...
dwgangsat 1 month ago
@dwgangsat
Steel is pretty mushy under load at 1800F. Steel has virtually no strength at 2750F.
FACTS...use them.
LindaStevensBZ 1 month ago
@LindaStevensBZ FACT: The smoke was black showing the the fire was being starved of oxygen, so it wasn't at its most hottest. Jet fuel fire can't stay at 1800 degrees unless it's maintain, in which it wasn't, so it was no where near 2750 degrees. The fires on 911 were spread out. FACT: in 1975 on the tower caught on fire..FACT: the fires then were hotter then the ones at 911...but yet it didn't fall in 1975, but it fell on 9-11, first buildings in history to fall due to fire
dwgangsat 1 month ago
@dwgangsat due to fire, i think you're missing the fact that a fucking comercial plane crash into it!
pepelant 1 month ago
@dwgangsat FACT: the 1975 fire did not involve structural damage. FACT: the fire in 1975 was not as hot as the 9-11 fires. FACT: 9-11 conspiracy theorists have loose screws.
ToolsnFire 2 weeks ago
@ToolsnFire FACT: (1975) the fires broke the windows on the 11th floor east side windows, which could of been seen pouring out these broken windows. This indicates a temperature greater than 700°C. In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C. Many explosions could be heard/seen by witness(police/ firefighters ect). and also an explosion(s) was heard in the basement moments before the plane impact...smfh
dwgangsat 2 weeks ago 2
@Velox415 watch?v=wUXGhLrDqb0....the twin towers and building 7 are the first buildings in history to have ever fallen due to fire...
dwgangsat 1 month ago
This is probably the only thing on which I agree with him
yourass117 1 month ago
@yourass117 9-11 was a complete inside job...in order to change my mind, I want the government to just show us a plane actually hitting the Pentagon...why are the hiding the footage...
dwgangsat 1 month ago
Let's try that again the way it happened - see if it comes up short
'How big lunatic do you have to be to watch 2 moderate airliners packed with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV evaporating in a ball of fire that smoldered for two hours and 3 buildings came down - then think 'well if you 'that' was the cause. . .
- Jeez Bill, looks like your joke needs the Viagra
:b
MrSmackdab 2 months ago
And if this jet fuel was so powerful to melt buildings how are they discovering the terrorists passports in the aftermath? And if the steel was melted by fire, why did the building that got hit second fall first? Unless they were made differently or one planes jet fuel was more powerful than the other
bdawgz 2 months ago
@bdawgz ur not taking into account the possibility that the second plane did more structural damage on impact for being the reason the second tower went down 1st
flybri74 2 months ago
@flybri74 before i state my comment, are u agreeing with the official 9-11 report...
dwgangsat 2 months ago
There are just as many inconsistancies in the official story as there are in the theories
bdawgz 2 months ago
what a complete douchebag. there was no "inferno", just a small fire and a lot of smoke. the towers were actually designed to survive more than just one plane impact. also the towers didn't just "collapsed", they've been pulverized like into very small particles. that's ridiculous. it is impossible that burning jet fuel can soften steel so that the towers just collapse.
Filbob21 2 months ago
what about building 7?
quez76 2 months ago
I win
JhosefL 2 months ago
If a 757 hit the towers burned for 2 hours and compromised the core columns wich led to the collapse...MY QUESTION IS WHY IS THERE ONLY A 16 ft HOLE IN THE PENTAGON AND NO MAJOR FIRE OR GAS DUMPED IN THE SOIL???
jayone451 2 months ago
wtc 1,2 and 3 are too big to be taken out by two plains and 2 hour long jet fuel fire. may those who lost their life rest in peace. one day we will know who really stood behind 9 11. God bless the help less countries. countries that give help look more like God himself :) and their people trust them
mn12330 2 months ago
This guy is an idiot. Look at the evidence then make a conclusion.
JoeFosh0 2 months ago
@JoeFosh0 Dude the evidence is there. ! And there is no hard evidence suggesting that it was an inside job. And the big question would be Why?
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL Really? Please tell me why the towers collapsed.
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 You ask that as if 9 -1-1 was a big mystery, Its simply really ,Bin Laden was pissed at the U.S and had his people plan the attack on us . Bin laden was pissed at the U.S for coming over at Saudi Arabia, It was a holy land for Muslims , I don have to go in much detail because you probably already know this. Now can you tell me what "really happened " at 9-1-1.
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL I was more wondering why the towers collapsed. Not that Osama Bin Laden attacked the U.S and then denied being involved in it. And then of course I didn't want to know that CIA released a faked video recording of Bin Laden admitting his involvement in the attacks. And please don't explain to me why the flight data of Flight 77 shows that the plane had a too high altitude in order to actually hit Pentagon. Just explain to me about the collapse of the two towers, please!
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94
What's to explain? The jet fuel was burned up in minutes but the actual towers burned for a further two hours at degrees from 1500-1800 degrees which at that temp was enough to compromise the structural integrity of the steel columns by 70-80% which caused the towers to collapse.
Btw, did you know that the holocaust never happened? There were no death camps and no 6 million. At most 200,000 Jews died and the majority of the deaths were from disease.
SkunkyAngry 2 months ago
@SkunkyAngry The hottest temperature registered in the towers were 747,2° Celsius. Iron melts at 1500° Celsius. This made the towers collapse?
1945. A B-25 Mitchell bomber crashed into the empire state building. That building didn't collapse.
1991. One Meridian Plaza burned for nineteen hours and destroyed eight floors. It did not collapse.
Isn't it very strange that the twin towers were the first two steel-framed high-rise buildings to collapse due to fire in history?
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94
Uh, no, the temperature reported by the NIST reached a peak of about 1800 Celsius. Where did you get that 747 number from? And no, it's not that strange. Just because something hasn't happened before doesn't mean it can never happen ever. If that's the best "proof" you can pull out of your ass then you need to troll Alex Jones' website some more and get back to me.
SkunkyAngry 2 months ago
@SkunkyAngry You are right. I found information about the reports regarding the twin towers. The highest temperature reported was 1800°. 1800° Fahrenheit! It would be pretty strange if the highest temperature recorded in the towers were 1800° C because kerosene used in commercial airlines has a maximum temperature of about 1800° F in fire.
On the other hand. The highest temperature recorded was 1377° F in the south tower. Recorded and reported are not the same.
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94
Lol, oh, I beg your pardon, I meant 1800 Fahrenheit. Let's play the semantics game! Once again, I have ask you where you got your numbers? The highest recorded temp? According to whom?
SkunkyAngry 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 Dude the fire didn't have to melt the steel in order for the tower it fall.. It only had to soften it.
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL So you mean that the steel got soften which made the towers collapse and destroying the whole building? It's strange that the upper floors didn't just fall off the tower down onto the ground. And at what degree will steel start to soften?
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 How the hell else would the building fall down? Ok i'm confused.. So how does all of this connect to being an inside job. Wheres your hard evidence that the government made this happen . Oh wait .. no one has ever provided one.. just theories
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL Why would it fall down? Other high buildings have been able to restain fires in the past.
I do not think that this was an inside job.
There are no hard evidence that the government didn't attack their own people.
And how would someone ever be able to prove that this wasn't an act of terrorism? The ground has been build on, the debris have been destroyed and it's 10 years since the event.
Watch "Loose Changes". It's pretty interesting.
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 Watch "The 9/11 mastermind" on Natgeo also pretty interesting.
JhosefL 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 Yeah lets just take all this evidence about Osama Bin laden and his terrorist network and just throw it into the trash. Since Everything the government tell us is not true. Of course people in the internet who make up conspiracy has got to be true.. Cause people on the internet don't lie. Think about it
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL Please send me a message with the links to the evidence about Osama Bin Laden and his terrorist network.
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 Read your history books .
JhosefL 2 months ago
@JhosefL I don't have any history books. So please tell me about the evidence.
RobinEH94 2 months ago
@RobinEH94 Al Qaida in formed the 90s as an extremist terrorist group and Bin laden was its leader.Even before 9/11 Bin Laden took credit for planning the attacks on several US military installations as well as other attacks . This was also when the friction between the US and the Taliban started as the Taliban was openly supporting Al Qaida...Bin Laden also claimed responsibility. Investigations also showed that the terrorists who carried it out had ties back to Al Qaida. (character limit)
JhosefL 2 months ago
right on bill maher. someone who isn't delusional.
cyberwaffles 3 months ago
Fuck Bill Maher.
hunnyluvs69 3 months ago
crazy people ? This man says it takes 2 hours for an airplane from which big part of the jet fuel burned out of the bulidings, to bring the towers down at nearly free fall speed !! But hey it was on tv so we have to take it for real ...By the way mister funny man what happened to building 7 ?? I don't know you mister Maher but i bet you're as Jewish as Silverstein!! did he call you??
costasp2382 3 months ago
Bill is a massive moron.
dan32749 3 months ago
Bill Maher sits there with a photo showing explosions blowing the WTC apart.
It seems Bill Maher has finally reached the same level as Penn & Teller. Just another propaganda spewing traitor who has sold out his country, planet and the human race.
premaddonalert 3 months ago
@premaddonalert Amen, buddy. Bill Maher is just another willfully ignorant fool on TV.
There's an easy cure. Turn off the TV. Cut the cable.
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago
lol, ol maher is a dumbfuck, yeh heat from the billion gallon airplane melted the steel, temperatures ranging round 78000 degress cause the steel to bend, thus floors started 2 collaspe and shot out debris that hit 7, causing her to go hours later, and santa cause shot an inaccurate as fuck rpg that killed the same seals that killed bin laden, oh shit, issues in pakaistan now!!! lmao, u ediots will never see the truth until u look up at the sky and see a big nuke falling on ur hometown
trap4dafu2k0fit 3 months ago
That's really cute Billy M...but you forgot to mention that 2 planes knocked down 3 towers...but NIST is now saying that building 7 fell from sympathy....it is a new law....Newton's Law of Sympathy..it states when 7 buildings stand together for many years they form a kinship. So when 2 of them fall, a 3rd can fall from feeling bad for the others. It's true..it really is..NIST said so.
thisisfunny88 4 months ago
Yep, Popular Mechanics has proven Building 7 was in fact built entirely of playing cards. The building of the WTC caused an unforeseen shortage of construction materials produced by acme domino co. Engineers redesigned plans to complete Building 7. Shock waves from the explosives used to destroy the WTC caused the cards to begin falling many hours before the total collapse. SEE, IT WASN'T AN INSIDE JOB!
premaddonalert 4 months ago
You mean Popular Mechanics which receives 95% of it's advertising budget from the Military Industrial Complex and has Benny Chertoff writing 911 lies so his brother Micheal can keep his new job caused from 911..you mean Popular Mechanics the one owned by Hearst, the INVENTORS of "yellow journalism." Yea, just believe the EXACT opposite of everything they say and you will have the truth thanks.
thisisfunny88 4 months ago
Comment removed
BoBsPfhorever77 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoBsPfhorever77
WATCH THIS
/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU
Watch at 6:00.... Wiki ,Deborah Palfrey, that is how she died
ALL the other deaths are weird , but there is no proof that there deaths are from the coverup
BUT that single death is enough to persuade me
judge for yourself
and if you still believe some guy in a cave did it, go die you ignorant tard
nigdean789 4 months ago
@BoBsPfhorever77 i dont know man, for me 9/11 is like buying a waterproof camera and after using for some time underwater it breaks. did the waterproof coating fail? or did something else break?
seriously, both ways are possible. if you like your theory best its okay, dont just go spouting it like its a fact.
BattousaiHBr 3 months ago
Over 1600 architects and engineers conclude the 3 WTC buildings were a controlled demolition. Bill Maher is a talk-show host. I'll believe architects, engineers, physicists any day over Denier Maher. He probably still believes in "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.
AE911Truth,org
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV That's a lie actually, and it's been exposed and debunked many times. Some of the people on the list were quite surprised, some of them weren't even in relevant fields
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@FreeTheWorker What has been debunked many times? Where did you get that? The 1600 architects and engineers are all on the website. Stop with the bullshit.
AE911Truth,org
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago 2
@Kill0Your0TV You're the one spreading bullshit. A lot of those people aren't even architects and engineers and a lot of them don't support your position and some have been quite surprised to be found on such a list. You're doing the same thing the FAN does, you're just taking a bunch of names and putting them on a list if they even sound like they might possibly in any way support your asinine position, even when they don't.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@FreeTheWorker And where did you get that information from? Source? Or are you just making it up as you go along?
All 1600+ architects and engineers are verified on the website. Deal with it.
AE911Truth,org
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV Again you little list is bullshit you're like the Dover creationists saying there were 800 scientists who believed in intelligent design while there were more biologist by the name of Steve who rejected it.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FreeTheWorker All 1600+ architects and engineers are verified on the website petition. Deal with it.
AE911Truth,org
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago 6
@Kill0Your0TV
How about the ten's of thousands of architects and engineers who believe your 1600+ are completely nuts?
RetSquid 3 months ago
@RetSquid Where are these "ten's of thousands"? Have a link to that? Of course you don't, you gullible fool. Stick your head in the sand some more.
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV
The "ten's of thousands" are all the engineers and architects in the world minus your "1600+". Don't be talking about 'gullible' without looking in the mirror for a VERY long time. If I looked I could find 1600 people who think Obama is the AntiChrist, with more proof than your engineers have about 9/11.
RetSquid 3 months ago
@RetSquid Bla bla bla. Sure you can. There is much more proof 911 was an inside job than OBL and his 19 cave-dweller hijackers did it. You'd have to be retarded to believe that fairytale. If the shoe fits...
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV
Yeah, right. Have fun with your delusions.
RetSquid 3 months ago
@RetSquid You have fun with your TV shows and football. Go back to sleep.
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV
I don't watch either one. You keep watching CT videos on here and thinking it was all a secret plan to do....whatever the secret plan was for...
RetSquid 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV I bet that tin foil hat is getting really uncomfortable.
antigravitydawgz 3 months ago
@antigravitydawgz I bet the dunce cap on your head is getting tight.
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV you are debunked. dismissed.
JamesIsViolet 3 months ago
@Kill0Your0TV why don't you name me 10 of your architects, 12 of your structural engineers, 8 of your ari traffic controllers. If you can do that. Ill be impressed. But chances are your a brainwashed trolling zombie that hates Jews because you have nothing else to do with your life than blame society for your problems like a coward. It has been 10 years since 9/11, if you and your smelly colleges are so brilliant how come you haven't broke the story yet moran?
Sumoto999 3 months ago
Comment removed
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago
There's a conspiracy theory vid that claims the south park creators are the REAL shooters at columbine high school.
I'm not joking about that.
This is how retarded conspiracy theorists are. Stop giving them so much credit by arguing with to them.
granolanutpunch 4 months ago
There is a difference between conspiracies that are based on scientific and sociopolitical evidence and some dumb shit a paranoid bunch of half-wits you've come across decided to think up. The absoluteness in your completely ridiculous statement is absurd. 9/11 isn't even a conspiracy at the level we are thinking of here, it is a basic appeal to plausible science, the sociopolitics (conspiracy part) is actually plausible as well considering that the U.S. has a history of using such tactics.
c23am 4 months ago
@COYI1895 Occam's razor, applied to this scenario, would definitely favor controlled explosives, as the contrary argument is much more complex and much less scientifically plausible. These buildings don't collapse under their own weight at free-fall speed, it's just not plausible.
c23am 4 months ago in playlist George Carlin
@c23am Buddy you said it! Exactly to the point .... Good job!
maleavail 4 months ago
@c23am I seriously think Occam's Razor favors that planes flew into the buildings and that thermal expansion made the metal expand, causing the bolts to come loose and causing the weight of the structure to topple it.
Steel is an excellent conductor of heat, so if my theory is right bolts should have started coming loose at about the same time, and there should be a lot of cross beams that were only slightly warped.
Well what do you know, there were, and one of them is the 9/11 cross.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
Do you really think engineers don't consider that in design plans? I agree with you about thermal expansion (cos that's basic science) but even if bolts came loose, so what? That doesn't in any miniscule way explain how both buildings (plus one NOT hit by a plane) were pulverized after falling perfectly at near FREE-FALL speed in an imploding manner all of a sudden. Look at ALL of the evidence, explosions were blowing people away at basement level b4 the buildings fell. Occam's razor=THERMITE
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am Of course they do, but that list isn't legitimate, it's a collection of names only some of which actually back your theory.
And no, Thermite doesn't add up, we all saw planes crash into the towers, we all saw burning jet fuel and smoke, people felt the heat radiating off the walls steel is an excellent conductor of heat so the heat was distributed throughout the structure at a fairly regular rate, the bolts came loose and you can see that in the wreckage your theory is bullshit.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
Have you read what I wrote? Your theory, which doesn't explain any more than very minor structural damage relies on planes hitting buildings, building number 7 (we didn't see a plane hit it because no plane did hit it!) fell at near free-fall speed just like the twin towers, your theory doesn't account for building number 7. Do you realize (this requires researching EVIDENCE) that the pools of molten steel still present weeks after 9/11 were HOTTER than the temp that aviation fuel burns at.
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am No what I presented explains the whole thing. Steel is an excellent conductor of heat and weakens at a few hundred degrees, the burning jet fuel was near the heat of the sun that heat was being transferred throughout the skeleton of the structure which caused beams to buckle under the weight of the structure and caused bolts to come loose. The damage and heat at the top caused it to be the first part to collapse and the building came down exactly as would be expected if what I say is true
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@FreeTheWorker Arrgh there's no point in this continuing as you clearly havn't grasped what even happened that day, let alone the materials science required to understand the physics and it seems that you don't know how to read the sentence 'building number 7 was not hit by a plane, yet collapsed at near free-fall speed just like the the twin towers'. You are free to beLIEve whatever you like, that is your right, I really don't care anymore. Merry xmas: youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am There's not much point in continuing when you clearly believe anything that backs your fantastic contrarian hypothesis even though it's been debunked. You're not much different from FAN or a Creationist.
I'm not talking about building 7 I'm talking about the WTC, I know it may seem amazing to you that a jet flying into a skyscraper can structurally weaken it, and the notion that heat makes metal expand and weakens the integrity of steel may seem absurd to you.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
You can't separate the WTC7 collapse from the collapse of the twin towers, because they fell in the exact same manner, identical to the manner in which buildings brought down by explosives fall. How can I be like a creationist when I have nothing but science on my side (as opposed to blind faith in authority, the same authority that gave billions to banks when that made no difference to the economy), the scientific stuff you speak of was all isolated to a tiny fraction of the entire building(!)
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am What WTC7 collapse? Oh you mean building 7. I can see how this is confusing for you, an internally collapsing structure is similar to an imploding structure. Has it ever occurred to you that the reason they were similar is because inwardly collapsing buildings do that? Your arguments are just like those of creationists you even troll out fake experts to back your position.
Look the official version of the collapse adds up in every way, your version makes next to no sense.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
Yeah I really don't care about this any more, all I ever try and do with these things is raise awareness of important issues that should mean something to people, and I was never being unscientific in this case (which negates your 'creationism' behavior comment). If you get in trouble or face hardship of some kind in the future from being wrong then that's your burden/problem, people have to follow their own heart and mind, even if it leads them to doom.
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am Most creationists don't think they're being unscientific either, nor do the folks who believe FAN garbage, but they buy off on testimonials and junk pseudo science all the same.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@FreeTheWorker Dude, I have more scientific training than you could imagine, I wont even state how many years I've spend studying the sciences (not to mention the history and philosophy of science) at university. Creationists don't think they're being scientific (which is the antithesis of blind faith), they think they're being mathematically accurate when presented with a book full of mythological ambiguities with historical significance. I'm strictly against dogmatism, but also naive realism!
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am I'm sure you're a regular Einstein, so what field of science do you have training in? And yeah bro, creationists are plenty convinced of their scientific credentials and the scientific accuracy of their arguments, only a hand full of the big name creationists are knowingly lying, and the same can be said for FAN, and the same can be said for you 9/11 truthers.
Your controlled demolition theory is based on faulty science. Whatever else you believe, true or false, that one thing is BS.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@FreeTheWorker Tell me something, what do '9/11 truthers' have to gain from being activists and standing up for their understanding of a highly significant event? They have everything to lose and nothing to gain from it, therefore it takes a highly convincing analysis of the situation and the greater sociopolitical terrain in order to rouse ones conscience in such a way. Finding thermite by-products at ground zero, pools of metal hotter than the temp aviation fuel burns at, it's all there.
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am The same as any conspiracy theory, you get wrapped up in something and can't consider that you may have been wrong, it's good for your ego and it lets you feel like you're part of some insider knowledge, and it'd be fine if you didn't invoke junk science. I'm sure many of the things you truthers believe is true, with all the corruption in our system I wouldn't doubt it, but this whole controlled demolition thing is a load of nonsense it's been debunked and real scientists look down on it.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
Well thanks for your opinion, you seem highly hypocritical in that you call others dogmatic and think they get an ego hit out of it whereas you don't question your own BS (belief system) and think you are exclusively right about this, which is highly arrogant and prematurely conclusive at best. I am completely open to contrary scientific evidence in formulating a perspective, however, I'm just not convinced at all (I wish I was) by 'official explanations', it seems like misinformation.
c23am 4 months ago
@c23am No I'm calling you dogmatic because you're promoting junk science which real scientists have debunked, you aren't a skeptic c23 you don't know what skepticism is, you uncritically believe all this 9/11 conspiracy garbage without applying the proper scrutiny to what you believe and your demolition theory just doesn't hold up to scrutiny. You know what the documentary shows how people like you operate, there's really no point in even trying. If it weren't 9/11 it's be the Illuminati.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
@c23am My mistake this is the Bill Maher video not the BBC documentary. Oh well, listen to Alex Jones some more.
FreeTheWorker 4 months ago
I don't think it takes a genius to realize that many suspicious things happened that day, I can't imagine a building like that, designed to withstand so much more, falling at free-fall speed without controlled explosives. And building number 7 (not hit by a plane) also fell at free-fall speed, c-mon, was I born yesterday? Sorry but I am not brainwashed by the government media and I actually research things before making a judgement. I feel sorry for American's, they have Stockholm syndrome.
c23am 4 months ago in playlist George Carlin
You all deserve to lose your freedom... Since your a bunch of Naive ninnies who probably "are" actually on mental drugs... I do just fine without them... In spite of the fact I live in a world governed by criminals... I guess you all subscribe to ignorance is bliss whereas I subscribe to the truth will set you free... Happy heads in the sand people... Good work... Don't let the facts get in the way of your ignorant bliss...
maleavail 4 months ago
Truthers and their absurd CT have about as much import as a Bigfoot sighting these days.
LOL!
LindaStevensBZ 4 months ago
Truthers get your paxil
Bcm80 4 months ago in playlist Conspiracy Theorist 911 Truth/Lies Media Collusion
AE911 is just a scam organization created to suck some money from the clueless or curious.
Go into my favs and watch Gage the founder, proving with his boxes, the 911 CD CT.
Can anyone imagine the howls of ridicule if a Govt or FDNY Engineer put forth such a stupid demonstration?
LOL!
Matters not to the CT Nuts. They gobble and swallow everything that nurses their CT fairy tale.
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
The Government offered no evidence they actually destroyed the evidence... Your calling a whole lot of highly educated people nut jobs there big buddy...engineers and architects for 911 truth... Go there and read then comment... then post your credentials... so we can see who is in actual fact more credible.. Because apparently your know more about controlled demos than the top demo experts in the States...
maleavail 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Go to engineers and architects for 911 truth... Do your "real" research then respond otherwise your just full of yourselves... Brainwashed eh? PFFT ... Anyone who believes 911 is anything but controlled demolition is either rightfully scared of the people who did it or is really really dumb... Or just plain ignorant... Or they really don't want to know the truth... the latter of which is understandable since the truth really does suck...
maleavail 5 months ago
@COYI1895 Your a bunch of follower idiots who can't take the truth because if you had half a brain you would actually do some research instead of just "Thinking" you know what your talking about... I said it before and I will say it again Bill says what he says out of fear not out of fact... The tops demolition experts in the USA say it is impossible to be anything but controlled demolition... But oh you guys are smarter then they are right?
maleavail 5 months ago
the smartest thing Bill Maher has ever said
martymcfett 5 months ago
Maher obviously hasn't done 2 minutes of research on the subject or he would know better. He totally "demolished" his own credibility with this mindless rant.
73849309378 5 months ago
@73849309378 You just discredited any intelligence you have with your comment.
rpsmith014 5 months ago
Hey bill love your shit. But you would have to be stupid to think that 3 buildings could all fall perfectly from planes. Science has already stated that jet fuel does not reach temperatures hot enough to melt steel. So who is stupid?
TheMattwalls84 5 months ago
@TheMattwalls84 Melt steel? It only had to weaken the steel. How in the world could conspiracists sneak into a building and plant explosives and some other flammable stuff w/o people knowing? The TWC were always occupied with employees, security and many others.
GypsyMofakka 5 months ago
@TheMattwalls84 there are more facotrs than jet fuel please dont try to use 'science' while being totally ignorant to it.
honeybadgertrix 5 months ago
@TheMattwalls84 you ;D yes i did not melt the steel but it weakened it
Truthfulkill 5 months ago
@COYI1895 Or how about the FACT that the government took all the evidence away immediately which is in and of itself a completely criminal act... making the government probably NIST criminally liable... Oh and somehow this was all A-OK Because they didn't want to upset the families victims... If my family were victims I would be upset that they destroyed the evidence... SInce we have established that the government committed on crime why is it so hard to believe the rest of it is a crime???
maleavail 5 months ago
@COYI1895 Yeah funny how the worlds top demo experts say it is impossible for a building to fall through the greatest path of resistance in no less than 18 seconds like in all three buildings in 911 and no way is it possible for jet fuel to melt steel under any circumstance... And how all through history no steel concrete building has ever fallen due to any amount of fire... Or how NIST lied their faces off for the same reason Bill did... Because they will lose their jobs... pretty simple..
maleavail 5 months ago
@maleavail when you demolish a building you demolish it from the bottom, imploding it in upon itself. you dont demolish it from the top down...
honeybadgertrix 5 months ago
@honeybadgertrix This is nonsense... Two planes hit a building in a completely imperfect manner... Yet Three buildings fall in what amounts to perfectly controlled demolition... But we are supposed to believe against all odds that was the planes ..... Obviously you have done no research whatsoever into this... Sorry but belief does not count as fact... Your wrong about controlled demolition... Even popular mechanic admitted it does "look" exactly like controlled demo. He just won't admit it is.
maleavail 5 months ago
Bill Maher is not a professional... got to ae911truth.. There are 1600 engineers and architects who all agree that the official story is a load of crap... So to all of you that wish to believe santa claus still exists... go right ahead with your childish belief systems... However one day you will understand why you should have listened to someone other than Bill Maher... Bill says what he is told to say otherwise he loses his position... period... end of story...
maleavail 5 months ago
Bill Maher is not a professional... got to ae911truth.. There are 1600 engineers and architects who all agree that the official story is a load of crap... So to all of you that wish to believe santa claus still exists... go right ahead with your childish belief systems... However one day you will understand why you should have listened to someone other than Bill Maher... Bill says what he is told to say otherwise he loses his position... period... end of story...
maleavail 5 months ago
to people who STILL in 2011 think that the 9/11 conspiracy is some crazy story, consider this. There is a name for such events - that is how common they are. They are called FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS, go look up the term. Then go look up OPERATION NORTHWOODS, a false flag operation planned in the USA just a few decades ago. Now cut out the whole "America wouldn't do this to its own people!" argument - because clearly it would.
TheUFOnetwork 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
??Dont anyone notice that this sounds stupid: "That was only Osamas terrorists who hijacked two airplanes and planted some bombs in the twin towers without anyone noticed it"??.
mcksvnssn1 5 months ago
No September 11th Was Not An Inside Job.
That was only Osamas terrorists who hijacked two airplanes and planted some bombs in the twin towers without anyone noticed it.
The airplanes crashed.
Two hours later bombs exploded and the building collapsed.
And this is still an COMEDIAN SHOW.
mcksvnssn1 5 months ago
Well that settles it, if bill says so...I guess lmfao...wonder what he thinks about project gunrunner and the christmas day bomber???
alphakraker 5 months ago
Bill Maher has more intelligence than the collective minds of every 9/11 conspiracy theorist ever.
AHippoNamedFred 5 months ago
I guess planes with fuel causes multiple explosion too huh. Explain the explosions please. Scientists have not proven truthers wrong, they in fact avoid it all and say truthers are crazy.
mikelovesvero 5 months ago
@mikelovesvero i've seen a video straght from osama bin laden saying the 100% proof and evidence, isnt that enough? check it out, dont forget to put 3 w in the begining i cant do it cuz youtube wont let me, but check this out, in the youtube sear look up this, Osama/Usama Bin Laden On 9/11 and there is the truth, he even talks about iraq, the thing is, is that there is more and more proof about what really happend, and people are sick of edited not real video,s you can thanks those dumb asses
TheMattd546 5 months ago
I guess p
mikelovesvero 5 months ago
Its career suicide 2 question 9/11 being orchestrated by Zionist. After the truthers on RT i questioned it myself went on a fact gathering mission & with each coincidence I believed it more & more. There was motive, gains, mysterious explosions, deaths of witnesses, leaked info. etc.. Murdoch found tapping 9/11 victims Larry Silverstein making a 7 bill profit from the collapses with a detailed specified insurance policy. Do ur own research for once and make up your own mind, I now believe.
MsAgnosticatheist 5 months ago
you people are ignorant if you believe otherwise these people are lying they are paid good to lie especially Bill Mayer he works for ABC that station alone is paid to tell americans what they want us to know or what they want us to believe maybe you pricks should study history a little and you will begin to understand that 9/11 is not the first attack on us by our own government it is not a conspiracy when it is backed by fact even in the video Bill has posted on his show shows explosions BTW
NoLiMiTs197 5 months ago
I find it funny how you truthers have no theories of your own. You just watched or read what one other person concluded and decided it fit what you believe. You guys offer no evidence, just links to other crazies who have theories. You guys give us links that have been disproven by peer reviewed scientist. In order for what you guys say to be true every scientist, independant media source, and entire government would have to be in on it which is highly unlikely in the digital age.
serpentrk 5 months ago
google this son of a bitch under the name of zionist
thoku4u 5 months ago
Tower 7 wasn't hit by any plane...
itsMinuteMaid 6 months ago 2
@itsMinuteMaid It was next to a tower that was over twice its height...that collapsed spewing all sorts debris as well as large columns all over the south face of 7 WTC. Did you see the huge gorge at the lower south side of tower 7? That building was in bad shape and even firefighters had a feeling it was gonna collapse before it did. Nothing conspiracy there.
GunsNRosesbitches 6 months ago
@GunsNRosesbitches Tower 7 was not next to the North or South towers and in fact was several hundred feet away. The other building's that were actually right in front of the North and South towers sustained less damage than did tower 7 which was further away. Furthermore, tower 7 did not sustain severe structural damage from debris as concluded by NIST and the main [stated] cause of its fall was by mere effects of fire damage.
itsMinuteMaid 6 months ago
@itsMinuteMaid Lets do the math...Tower 1 was 1,362 feet tall and 7 WTC was 300 feet away. Yea, that is definitely close enough to spew all the debris all over the south face of 7 WTC. And contrary to what conspiracy theorists say, tower 7 did sustain serious damage on its lower south east level. There was a gap in the building destroyed...it was halfway through its width. Its design also made it very vulnerable to collapse.
GunsNRosesbitches 6 months ago
The structural damage on its bottom south east corner was pretty bad plus raging fires weakened the steel significantly. Those two factors caused a chain reaction that literally pummeled the building. One Liberty Plaza was farther away than 7 WTC and it withstood some heavy damage on its west side but it did not collapse because it did not catch fire, thus no worries for weakened steel. Even if it did have fire, it did not have all its columns on the exterior. 7 WTC was a whole diff story.
GunsNRosesbitches 6 months ago 10
@GunsNRosesbitches Keep lying to yourself buddy.... closing your eyes results in what?
maleavail 5 months ago
@maleavail Is it safe to say conspiracy theorists brainwashed you worse than the catholic church did to its people? It certainly looks like that. I don't like how you and all other conspiracy theorists walk around with big egos, thinking you know everything and how to solve the world's problems, while deflecting anything that goes against your theories. In fact, I dislike anyone who is not open minded and not willing to be flexible with their views. Conspiracy theorists are so close-minded
GunsNRosesbitches 5 months ago
@GunsNRosesbitches I am open minded to things that make sense... The Government has lied and withheld evidence... These two things are facts... They also acted criminally when they destroyed the evidence... This also is a fact not a theory... So tell me what is exactly so compelling about anything the government says since they have proven they are lying criminals? Hello I would love to hear your open minded response to this because I would be so relieved if 911 was Just Bin Laden....
maleavail 5 months ago
@GunsNRosesbitches PFFT ... Denialism ...You cannot handle the truth... You don't have to be an engineer to know that it was controlled demolition... Bill has to say what he says otherwise he will get fired... SImple as that... Sorry but it is 100% impossible for those buildings to have fallen in the manner claimed... Do your research instead of talking out of your rectum ... Mr... I love Guns and Roses... Immature music satisfies and immature mine...
maleavail 5 months ago
Bravo Bill !
LindaStevensBZ 6 months ago
@triphip2 it was though....
waternotch 6 months ago
"watch on live tv two planes hit the world trade center" Yeh Bill cause All that was on LIVE TV.... What a dumbass....
triphip2 6 months ago
corprate media.......... always brainwashing people..
mixfight12 6 months ago