Added: 1 year ago
From: ccslc
Views: 15,973
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thats why police departments should have police busses. Well maybe not but think of it, it would be cool to see 2 busses duking it out. lol

  • @BRAVOADD i hopr youre joking

  • Must not have wanted to drag out out his police report huh?

  • @BRAVOADD Yeah, it couldn't be because the bus weighs 10 tons and would obliterate a family blowing through a red light.

  • eh wot happened ?

  • +

    Red Light=Gas Station Doughnut

  • There was a change in jurisdiction, that's why the pursuing trooper stopped because local was going to pick it up.

  • @chuckproductionscm No, they stopped following him because of the danger. He would drive more calmly without being pursued!

  • @jfryerfresh If you listened to the radio calls you can hear another officer going to the area to pick up from where the highway patrolman was.

  • @chuckproductionscm Yes, I heard that but trust me, that's not why he stopped pursuing the suspect!

  • @jfryerfresh I work with two different police departments, and I agree with you that is a technique used by many pursuing leo's in these situations but it would be immediately picked back up by local when they arrive and the pursuit would start yet again.

  • Fucking Pussy Mormon cop!

  • and what was the end whit the scool bus driver ?

  • Smart officer!!! He did the right thing!!!

  • @gtasalova6969

    gtasalova6969, it's like a criminal with many hostages (public). They need to take a head shot before some innocent person(s) get murdered by the criminal. Shoot her/him in the back of the head as soon as they run a red light or start driving reckless. Just do it before a street hostage gets killed. The criminal has a choice to stop or attempt to murder someone on the street with there weapon, the vehicle. If they murder someone, they should get the death penalty.

  • the cop heard that there was fresh donuts at the gas station the officer had no choice he had to stop lol..

  • @firewallsniper Are you being serious or joking?

  • @TyWhite96 i am not to sure what i rote but i am sure i was having fun with whatever i wrote lol..

  • thats dumb as shit! how the fuck are you just gonna drop a pursuit like that!

  • WOW, IF IT IS REALLY THAT EASY TO RUN FROM THE COPS AT 9:47 THEN I AM GOING TO START RUNNING FROM COPS NOW ON.

  • @freeagent7Scott Ok good luck with that.

  • there is prolly another video of this with some guy crying about how he used his light to stop traffic to go to the gas station xD

  • Rules of engagement vary from state to state, in most states if it is perceived that the chase/ vehicle pursuit is or has become too dangerous a high ranking official sends the order to terminate or discontinue the pursuit. in most likely the city or county picked up the pursuit or followed the vehicle from a safe distance.

  • @acoachman88 shoot out the tires to slow the bus down then wait till it stops

  • @piglett2195 firing upon a moving vehicle isn't always allowed during a pursuit in most states and is VERY dangerous due to the possible ratchets. The guy was later caught either way.

  • do any one want to know why cop not stop bus ?? reason cop car out of gas that why cop go stop gas store lol

  • weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooowww­wwwwwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeee­eeoooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww­weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooo­oowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwee­eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooooooo­oooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww­wwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee­oooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwww­wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww fuck offffffff oh wait mute!

  • I'd rather the badguy have one point and officers zero then have a school bus going 90 mph down residential roads kill someone innocent. Good call by the officer.

  • WTF?! why did the chase end?????????!

  • woww... when the charger floor... i cum... hahaha

  • @hotwhells20 The one in this video is a crown vic not a charger.

  • @TyWhite96 WOW, anyway awsome sound!

  • @hotwhells20 look up Hennesseys fleet of vehicles if you havent done so already. Hennessey Performance . Com ....

  • @hotwhells20 sorry man, but that is a Ford 4.6L V8 that you're hearin'...not a HEMI

  • if the officer had continued the pursuit and the bus had blown through another red light striking a vehicle then the outcome would've been much worse

  • That's absolutely ridiculous that you cancel after he runs ONE red light !! Come on, that was a waste of time

  • At the end...why would the cop just stopped chasing after that guy?

  • @WolfGuy100 he's a state trooper he can't be chasing inside the city or doing traffic stops..only on highways and freeways I'm sure that the local salt lake police department took over the presuit

  • It's Obv. he needed gas..

  • that was the biggest waste of my time

  • I know some cities have a no chase policy? IDK if salt lake is one of those though.

  • what the hell was that??????????????????

  • i bet the kids on the bus were scared shitless

  • @TyWhite96 Dude -.- it night time why would kids be on that bus going to school at night??? GET a brain a some one stole tha bus #Dumbass

  • @lawdog53 Before calling someone a dumbass you should really think about the fact that sport events are held at night and buses transport the players back to the school at NIGHT. Obviously you haven't been in school for a long time.

  • @TyWhite96 I havent been to school and im 13 yeah ok sure waterver u say.. atleast im geting myself a education and being a cop when i get older loser goodl uck

  • @TyWhite96 why would there be kids on a stolen bus at 5:30 in the morning, when they're still at home either sleeping or getting ready for school?

  • @chpman2013 IDK why the hell is everybody such an ass these days?

  • @TyWhite96 I was just bein' logical

  • @chpman2013 there is only the driver

  • he just wanted to stop for a doughnut break

  • Like to see this guy come to Georgia and see what the Georgia State Patrol would have done. I can promise you that that red light wouldnt have stopped that chase

  • @jbcurlee21 yeah that would be the same with the Oklahoma Highway Patrol they would not stop for nothing unless the bus was stopped and the idiot was in handcuffs.

  • they terminated because of danger. plus it was a trooper. he probably didnt know the city streets and they way the bus was going, its way too dangerous to pursue for a property crime.

  • @mdiggymac Yeah I agree bro.

  • good job :))))

  • You know it's a good police chase when a car passes you in the fast lane xD ( 2:36 )

  • That sucks. Nothing more irritating thank being told to terminate. Thanks for sharing.

  • I can see police stop because he pull over to petrol station for fill up fuel on police car! LMAO!

  • Remind me to drive a school bus next time I wanna elude police... lol

  • Did he get away

  • @1:51 sudden stop

  • Who the fuck runs from the cops with a bus? I guess he could not find a cement truck......

  • good call

  • good call at that time to stop the chase before someone got killed

  • he fuckin got away i sat here ten minuites to see u drag this dirtbag out and ulet him get away well fuck u

  • Wow, who steals a bus?

  • when the chase goes into a busy city and they are speeding..... they have to call it off, it is too dangerous and worse things could happen to people on bicycles or foot

  • Well, I probably would've terminated... but definitely would have followed it blacked out or something...

  • In the Great State of Texas you Sure as Hell Can Shoot out tires =)

  • Awesome dispatcher!!! Wow!

    

  • Salt Lake City has a no chase policy. I'm not sure if it applies to the UHP.

  • Hell, I wouldn't let a red light in light traffic stop me if he rammed my buddy...

  • why is the officer not pursuing the bus till it stops/is stopped? when the bus runs the red light he calls the pursuit off??

  • @CSILCPD I used to be a Sheriff's Deputy, the Trooper here called off the chase for public safety. When in a pursuit you operate with the public's safety in mind. In theory, if you stop chasing something it will stop running. So if he called off the chase the bus will stop driving so erraticly.

  • @DVA1492 ok thank you for the information, but wouldn´t it be better to stay behind him with bigger distance so that you can arrest him if he stops?

    or mabye use a air unit or different patrol cars just reporting the position of the errant driver

  • @CSILCPD It all just depends. They were chasing the school bus initially for a hit-and-run and he also hit one car while the Trooper was chasing and he tried to get the Trooper to run into the back of him. Apparently he didn't care who he hit. Maybe the air unit wasn't available, I have no idea. I personally wouldn't have called off the chase YET. I would of waited until we had more units following him and if he didn't chase his behavior at all, I also would of called off the chase.

  • @CSILCPD My only guess is it's not worth chasing him on those smaller surface streets with the way he was driving. They can obviously identify a bus later on when they find him later :P

  • @CSILCPD because with a pursuit like that it's very dangerous for citizens and officers involved. the police wait for a helicopter to show up and it watches the suspect until he stops then the police move in. Usually when the police are chasing someone they drive recklessly to escape but as soon as the police back off the suspect will calm down and not drive so crazy.

  • @CSILCPD because if he is willing to run a 2ton bus through a red light then he is very desperate. he could kill someone at the next light luckily no one was coming then.

  • Comment removed

  • @CSILCPD well, he's actually handing it off to the city cops since that is their jurisdiction...and he doesn't want to keep the suspect agitated by continuing to chase him

  • @chpman2013 so if the state trooper stopped chasing him and the city cops did...how would that keep him from being agitated? Your explination makes no sense lol

  • @Hbryant188 because the suspect is in a fight or flight state of mind, and he's determined to get away from the pursuing trooper anyway he can..(ie, the instances of where he tries to "brake-check" the trooper by slamming on the brakes to make him crash, and another instance when he clipped that k-9 unit)....the city cops (or county cops) would get him later on...but between the time the trooper terminated the chase and the time the city cops would get on him, the dude was alone

  • Comment removed

  • Well. That was anti-climatic...

  • @dancinmike2004 Nice try at sounding wise and scholarly, but the word is 'climactic'. LOL

  • Well then you must be right. In this school did they teach you about run on sentences? Site a reference instead of using the because I said so mentality. Your refusal to site any source shows you're full of it. Yeah I am sure that's the reason he didn't get the job. If anyone with your mentatlity can get on the job, which i highly doubt you really are a cop, then anyone can. What department do you work for?

  • I quote, ""The burden of proof " that your talking about is using deadly force against the individual however it does not apply towards using deadly force on vehicle."

    So if a suspect that you're pursuing in Utah were to open fire on you from the vehicle, you're not allowed to shoot out the tires? You can only aim at the suspect? For being a LEO on the job for 7 years you don't sound too smart. Amazing as it sounds, Utah law isn't the law everywhere else in the US.

  • Look up this case. Roosevelt police officer T.J. Bird was justified in using deadly force while trying to arrest Gary M. Wheeler following a brief vehicle pursuit.

    Well apparently you're wrong. Police in Utah are allowed to use deadly force at a vehicle. Show a case that says officers in Utah are not allowed to fire their weapons at vehicle tires. You make all these claims but have submitted zero proof of your statements. I am not a cop in Utah. I'd kill myself before I moved there!

  • @golapd Shooting at a driver in a vehicle is not the same as shooting out the tires of w vehicle... Yes you can shoot at a suspect in a vehicle that may cause you or another person harm... NO you cannot shoot out the tires to stop a vehicle from moving. Those are two COMPLETELY different things. Your case shows nothing. After going to school for Law Enforcement and being one for seven years now I would think I would know what you can an cannot do as a police officer.

  • @yellowfungis Google this story: UPDATE: Carolina Beach Police shoot out suspect's tire. This is from my state. Does the state of Utah not consider a vehicle a deadly weapon? You seem pretty adamant that the courts in Utah have clearly stated that officers are prohibited from shooting out a suspects tires in ALL cases. Please reference a court case that this precedent has been stipulated in the state of Utah.

  • @golapd I never said that all states are the same way I said MOST states so get your facts right. Shooting at a moving vehicle from a moving vehicle is not smart because there are too many factor involved. Im not a cop in Utah, Im a cop in Minnesota. The statutes are written with almost the same wording for authorized use of deadly force. Court precedents are set and that is how the law is then defined followed by those decisions.

  • @golapd cops make split second choices that doesn't mean they always make the right ones (im not saying your example was wrong). you still didn't give a a court case. I can show you news stories and videos of cops doing things they are not supposed to but they still do. Long story short this is how im going to end this discussion. Laws are different in some places.

  • @yellowfungis You can stop the discussion I don't care. The clear fact is you're wrong. State law doesn't state police can not shoot out the tires of a moving vehicle. The actual departmental policy determines whether or not an officer can discharge his firearm at a moving vehicle (tire) or not. No court in Minnesota or any state in the country would side with a defendant if an officer were to shoot the tires out of a vehicle that was about to run over a citizen or fellow officer. NONE!

  • @golapd I went to school and discussed this very same thing in a class I know what most states can and cant do for this because we talked about it because we had some eager kid who though he was gonna be a cop asked the same question and tried to debate it to the end that he was right. That same guy is currently working as mall security because he couldn't get a job.

  • Shooting a car tire is using deadly force. An officer discharing his firearm is designated as using deadly force. This code makes no mention of it being against the law for an officer to discharge his weapon at a vehicle. Show me that law.

  • @golapd Call your local police department and tell them that they will get a chuckle out of it

  • @golapd the courts will beg to differ

  • (i) the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a felony offense involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death or serious bodily injury; or  (ii) the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of death or serious bodily injury to the officer or to others if apprehension is delayed; or

    In these situations officers are permitted to use deadly force. That includes shooting out tires moron!

  • @golapd You can believe that all you want but it has to be directed towards the suspect you are trying to capture. Courts have defined it that way and what the court says goes. You obviously are not a police officer because if you asked one they would know that. Believe me if it was allowed to shoot out tires in pursuits I would have done it along time ago.

  • Where does it say in that section that an officer can not shoot out the tires of a vehicle evading police?

  • 76-2-404. Peace officer's use of deadly force. (1) A peace officer, or any person acting by his command in his aid and assistance, is justified in using deadly force when: (a) the officer is acting in obedience to and in accordance with the judgment of a competent court in executing a penalty of death under Subsection 77-18-5.5(3) or (4);

  • Why stop after the light?? That makes all that freeway chasing for NOTHING!! If there are no kids on that bus,shoot the tires out that muthafukka!

  • @19914568 In most states it is against the law for police to shoot out the tires because it is dangerous and has a chance of ricochet. The officer would be fired if they did. That is the reason they created stop sticks (spike strips) however it isn't always easy and it is also very dangerous for an officer to deploy them especially when its a school bus.

  • @yellowfungis Who gives a fuck. that bus is endangering innocent people! I'd shoot the sukka right in the tires for real!!

  • @19914568 Well the officers care because they want to keep there job and if the bus or cop would have hit someone while chasing through the busy city streets the department would get a lot of heat from the public who dont understand police work.

  • @yellowfungis It wouldn't be against the law but potentially against department policy. Those are two different things.

  • @golapd Yes it would be against the Law. The State is the one who authorizes the police powers and in most states it would be against the state statute (Law) to use deadly force in that situation.

  • @yellowfungis Stats laws do not spell out each scenario that an officer may use deadly force. If an offier feels his or a fellow officers life or a private citizens life is in danger they can use deadly force. The only burden of proof is for them to explain that imminent danger. If they do that successfully they are cleared. There are no state laws that say police officers can not shoot out tires. If you think there are, you're a moron!

  • @yellowfungis Stats laws do not spell out each scenario that an officer may use deadly force. If an offier feels his or a fellow officers life or a private citizens life is in danger they can use deadly force. The only burden of proof is for them to explain that imminent danger. If they do that successfully they are cleared. There are no state laws that say police officers can not shoot out tires. If you think there are, you're an idiot!

  • @golapd you sir are in fact wrong... Utah Code Title: 76 Chapter: 2 Section: 404 Peace officer's use of deadly force... you can go look it up if the situation does not fall under any of those categories they can NOT use deadly force and will be punished. "The burden of proof " that your talking about is using deadly force against the individual  however it does not apply towards using deadly force on vehicle. Some states allow it but Utah is not one of them the courts will not accept it.

  • @yellowfungis (b) effecting an arrest or preventing an escape from custody following an arrest, where the officer reasonably believes that deadly force is necessary to prevent the arrest from being defeated by escape; and

  • Weak.

  • There's an easy solution to that problem... If there are no children aboard, then shoot the bus's tires out. Thats what I would have done. At the drop of a hat I might add.

  • @ewtng In most states it is against the law for police to shoot out the tires because it is dangerous and has a chance of ricochet. The officer would be fired if they did. That is the reason they created stop sticks (spike strips) however it isn't always easy and it is also very dangerous for an officer to deploy them especially when its a school bus.

  • why did he stop

  • @Ksvoronos Because a bus running red lights is not good, he terminated so the guy would slow down.

  • fark sent me here

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more