@MrZajoxxx All videos should have a link in the description that takes them to the full course on the MIT OpenCourseWare site. For this course the link is: ocw.mit.edu / 8-224S03
They are probably not enthusiastic, because right now he is talking about pretty rudimentary things. For physics/astronomy undergrad anywhere all of that information is usually one of topics that motivated them to go and study physics :P. At least was for me and quite a bit of people I know.
There are black holes as we've seen in this lecture but theoretically a white hole does exist, and it does the exact opposite of the black hole. Now this is just me thinking out loud but is it possible that the material that is sucked in through a black hole is spewed out a white hole? The WH needs material to spew out material but where would it come from? The black hole is sucking material, but into a different dimension so what does everybody think regarding my question?
@Legolas25079 - I recall when I first heard of black singularities, one of my early thoughts was, "Wow! Infinite heat and density! Is it possible that that is the origin of a big bang." I then imagined a hierarchical multiverse where each universe spawns new universes via black holes. A universe is then within a white hole's event horizon. I'm CERTAIN that I'm not the only who made such a simple leap. In Lee Smolin's cosmological natural selection theory, he proposes the same.
not bad, but not really to the level you would expect from MIT, plus the support materials could be much clearer and suitable for the web. maybe an European specialist could have done a better job...
Eimstein is the most famous fraudulent scientist in the history of science. Relativity theory is completely false. But it defends the law of energy conservation against the truth, so the fuel/energy complex promoted relativity theory to the rank of the most famous physical theory. (They are afraid of the perpetual motion machine of the first kind - properly so, it is possible). If you want to see a proof that relativity theory is false, send me an e-mail - my e-mail address is in my contact box.
We need a volunteer to explore a black hole. However due to the fact that the volunteer will be destroyed, we are sending George W Bush; since he is useless here anyways
Depends on how close the star gets. If close enough, the part of the star that is closer to the black hole might start funneling into the black hole because of the close proximity of the pair. The two would also be in orbit around each other. If it ran into a star, I'm not exactly sure what would happen.
If you don't make it to MIT don't freak. Shoot for a bunch of those top colleges. What grade are you in right now? The biggest tip I could give you is to do something interesting that no other applicants have done.
To give an example, Michio Kaku got a free ride to Harvard because he made a 2.3 million volt particle accelerator in high school. You don't need to be that grandiose, but certainly no applicants made a particle accelerator.
@hellomate639 I'm doing A-levels atm. Having my A2 finals now, hopefully I'l ace my Physics (an A*). Btw, thanks for the advice, I'l keep that in mind. =)
I'm shooting to get into University of Penn. actually lol, but I want a head start, by the way is evryone who watches this as nerdy as I am? And is there anyone who will help me understand this a little better?
He says don't worry because it's a class for seniors. I say, don't worry but don't think that it is something that you couldn't understand if you're nerdy enough (like me) to be interested in this stuff. I'm a senior in high school and have been following the subject for a while and didn't have much difficulty following this video, mainly because I've watched so many shows and looked up so much stuff.
I not only didn't get into MIT, I had the feeling they didn't even want me to drive past the campus. I am sure they don't want me watching this either.
"...not only has nobody ever found an event horizon; there is no laboratory evidence that such things exist. All reports of black holes being found are just wishful thinking - patently false ? unless you can provide the coordinates of a verified infinitely dense point-mass singularity and a verified event horizon. But there are of course, as you know, no such coordinates, because no black holes have ever been found." ~ Stephen Crothers
nope actually MIT and many other colleges are posting their courses online so that anyone and everyone who has access to a computor can learn for free
have you ever taken a college class? this is how they all are. there is no such thing as enthusiasm in a college class. you spend the hour struggling to stay awake and constantly glancing at the clock, praying to to make the hands spin faster, einstein-style
@4863440 shyt then it's all a waste of investment to fund u future generation to a such luxury educational system, you better drop it and work at mc d.
@jkdxtr321 Well if it makes me insecure to care about grammar, then so be it. If you are where this generation is going, you can say goodbye to a bright future.
@ericplayzbass2 grammar on the net has no relation to bright future, just admit you don't care about education you just love to appear intelligent, goodbye.
I would disagree that science relies on irrefutable evidence. Science is just a field in which we try to explain the behaviors of the natural universe. Nothing is irrefutable based on the principle of uncertainty and we can never say with absolute certainty something will happen. We will always be making an inductive statement even in science because the future is never known. In all we do not know if black holes exist but it is our best guess based on our observations of the phenomena.
Clevercrony nailed it. Science has protocols and principles that set it apart from philosophy, but it is really nothing more than the practice of explaining observable phenomena.
Even though we can't see a black hole itself, we observe things in the universe that strongly point to their presence. You should finish the course before making up your mind about what it has to say. This is Lecture 1.
Absolutely, the day that we figure out everything is the day that we can talk about irrefutable evidence, except that there's too much to understand. When we get down to the level of an atom we can always go further, when we go even further we can go even further and understand even more. One thing that is irrefutable is that knowledge is limitless.
Stop using the uncertainty principle when you are not talking about small masses. Don't forget that the uncertainty of position times the uncertainty of the velocity times the mass must be greater than Planck's constant. And planck's constant is like x10^-34... When you talk about black holes, you talk about huge masses, the type of masses you cannot completely explain with quantum mechanics... But if you want to do so... we are sure that black holes exist because of the quantity of matter
that is contained in them. If you try to make probabilistic calculations of a such huge amount of matter, you will probably fall on the 99,9999999999 percent chance of presence. Because de more evidence you have, and by evidence, I mean every part of mass that is experiencing the gravitational field of a black hole. By example, the black hole at the center of our galaxy applies a force on every star in the galaxy, talk about evidence. Envery particle is taken in account using quantum physics.
To finish, you are absolutely wrong, science relies on irrefutable evidence and I'm using your argument to say that probabilistic physics are only usable with extremely small objects such as alpha and beta radiation and quantum tuneling of an alpha particle out of the center of the atom. It is like the normal distribution, you go right a little and you find 99% of probability, and this is symbolic to 100%. ( 1/3=0,33, 2/3=0,66, 3/3=0,999=1) so cut the crap and start really studying physics
Firstly, I would object to your use of the word "proven".
There is a tremendous amount of evidence that supports the existence of Black Holes. Stellar orbits around invisible foci, micro-lensing events, detection of accretion disks and X-ray jets. I wouldn't say there is a firm empirical basis for their existence.
Alan, science relies on irrefutable evidence, otherwise we have philosophically based argumentation. If you analyse epistemologically the arguments supporting the existence of black holes, you'll find unsubstantiated claims, claims made, however subtle, to suit the scientist.
If you care to Google 'Stephen Crothers black holes' you'll find evidence supporting my arguments.
Thanks for the reply and the interesting link. I checked out Stephen Crothers. It seems a shame that the way he went about presenting his research was met with such hostility.
I'm going to read up some more on it to see how SC responds to the observations/measurements I mentioned above.
Well I have no problem understand this first video but when they delve into the maths of GR and ellipsoidal analytic differential geometry of 4D spacetime than shit, I'll be lost.
when is the second edition of the text(exploring black holes: an introduction to general relativity) coming out?? i know it is supposed to be this year, but i have been waiting for some time now.
One thing I can't grasp here, is, the light used to measure certain stuff in our visible Universe, and it is considered a reliable measuring "tool"; but since light MAY be deflected by various gravitational fields that it (the light) will encounter along the way to us, how reliable these measurements they really are?
spectroscopy is what they use...different light has different waves, frequency, heat, luminosity, mass, they are very reliable measurements...not only spectroscopy but radio telescopes are also helpful and there are so many formulas to prove this.. like parallax and doppler effects with red and blue shifts too..
Its 1:30 am. I am a highschool senior and have school tomorrow. Why am I watching this?
RearBrigadier1 2 days ago
hi, is there a way to see the homework and maybe the solution too ?
MrZajoxxx 6 days ago
@MrZajoxxx All videos should have a link in the description that takes them to the full course on the MIT OpenCourseWare site. For this course the link is: ocw.mit.edu / 8-224S03
MIT 5 days ago
I Love The Video Introduction to the Class Edmund Bertschinger It Can Increase My Knowledge
anakmudajaman 2 weeks ago
Nice Video Introduction to the Class That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 2 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video Introduction to the Class From Your
imegatrone 2 weeks ago
Your Video Introduction to the Class (Edmund Bertschinger) Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 2 weeks ago
Ah...Ah...Ah...Ah ouaiiii !!!!!!!!!!! (Mr. M)
amplitudina 3 weeks ago
i watch the 8000 level history classes and i get bored because its so easy...i to 8000 level science classes and feel like a Derp
DaytonaRoadster 1 month ago in playlist MIT Exploring Black Holes: General Relativity & Astrophysics
hm hab was geiles entdeckt haha
NoelleAileneuf431 1 month ago
black holes are really very mysterious..it's difficult to actually study it..
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
They are probably not enthusiastic, because right now he is talking about pretty rudimentary things. For physics/astronomy undergrad anywhere all of that information is usually one of topics that motivated them to go and study physics :P. At least was for me and quite a bit of people I know.
agrentum 2 months ago
@agrentum Never studied astronomy, even in high school(our course coudnt fit it in), but understood all of what he said. Pretty basic i agree.
SilentShotV 2 months ago
A black hole would boiler way through neutrino radiation, and then go nova
JonThm 4 months ago in playlist MIT Exploring Black Holes: General Relativity & Astrophysics
Just a question:
There are black holes as we've seen in this lecture but theoretically a white hole does exist, and it does the exact opposite of the black hole. Now this is just me thinking out loud but is it possible that the material that is sucked in through a black hole is spewed out a white hole? The WH needs material to spew out material but where would it come from? The black hole is sucking material, but into a different dimension so what does everybody think regarding my question?
Legolas25079 9 months ago
@Legolas25079 - I recall when I first heard of black singularities, one of my early thoughts was, "Wow! Infinite heat and density! Is it possible that that is the origin of a big bang." I then imagined a hierarchical multiverse where each universe spawns new universes via black holes. A universe is then within a white hole's event horizon. I'm CERTAIN that I'm not the only who made such a simple leap. In Lee Smolin's cosmological natural selection theory, he proposes the same.
BigMTBrain 9 months ago
@Legolas25079 - (part 2) - Oops! I meant "...when I first heard of black hole singularities..."
BigMTBrain 9 months ago
Great job MIT, education should be free to all, I'm learning so much:)
music2012 10 months ago
Wow, MIT lectures for free, I can actually learn from the best of the best rather than my third rate New Zealand university.
s0l4s7ys 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Stay away from my BLACK HOLE!
urbandenizen 11 months ago
Stay away from ny black hole!
urbandenizen 11 months ago
Hitler is informed that Edmund Berschinger stole his hairstyle........
mzedong001 1 year ago
not bad, but not really to the level you would expect from MIT, plus the support materials could be much clearer and suitable for the web. maybe an European specialist could have done a better job...
robextra0 1 year ago 2
the lecture is no doubt immense in knowledge on physics and black holes...but his class in like my highschool class...(boring).
gkcnae 1 year ago
not happy :(
sankalpag 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Eimstein is the most famous fraudulent scientist in the history of science. Relativity theory is completely false. But it defends the law of energy conservation against the truth, so the fuel/energy complex promoted relativity theory to the rank of the most famous physical theory. (They are afraid of the perpetual motion machine of the first kind - properly so, it is possible). If you want to see a proof that relativity theory is false, send me an e-mail - my e-mail address is in my contact box.
henrykay01 1 year ago
What other universe? WHAT'S A BLACKHOLE? Speculative upperclass crap. I CAN"T WAIT!!!
ghostinthemean 1 year ago
This prof looks like Sheldon
arthas702 1 year ago 2
@arthas702 That is so what I was thinking1
alexistheboss15 1 year ago
@SaintCog thank u man
levozan 1 year ago
We need a volunteer to explore a black hole. However due to the fact that the volunteer will be destroyed, we are sending George W Bush; since he is useless here anyways
ArcyTheFurryArcanine 1 year ago 7
Hey! I've heard Riccardo Giaconi lecture. Pretty cool just to see him mentioned like he is here.
hellomate639 1 year ago
what would happen if a star which is larger in mass than a black hole comes accross it..?
samtomatai 1 year ago
@samtomatai
Depends on how close the star gets. If close enough, the part of the star that is closer to the black hole might start funneling into the black hole because of the close proximity of the pair. The two would also be in orbit around each other. If it ran into a star, I'm not exactly sure what would happen.
hellomate639 1 year ago
Whats the deal with the quality?? Why is it so poor?
tenthmay 1 year ago
Anyone know where I can get "free" audio lectures of this?
AntiPrep789 1 year ago
Comment removed
EricF14 2 years ago
Brilliant lecture! Hopefully I can make it to MIT. :D
ShimmerArc 2 years ago 3
@ShimmerArc
If you don't make it to MIT don't freak. Shoot for a bunch of those top colleges. What grade are you in right now? The biggest tip I could give you is to do something interesting that no other applicants have done.
To give an example, Michio Kaku got a free ride to Harvard because he made a 2.3 million volt particle accelerator in high school. You don't need to be that grandiose, but certainly no applicants made a particle accelerator.
Be shocking.
hellomate639 1 year ago
@hellomate639 I'm doing A-levels atm. Having my A2 finals now, hopefully I'l ace my Physics (an A*). Btw, thanks for the advice, I'l keep that in mind. =)
ShimmerArc 1 year ago
I'm shooting to get into University of Penn. actually lol, but I want a head start, by the way is evryone who watches this as nerdy as I am? And is there anyone who will help me understand this a little better?
AntiPrep789 2 years ago
@AntiPrep789 No need to worry you would normally be a Graduate student or at least a Sr, in a physics program before you took a class like this.
harvellt 2 years ago
Comment removed
strawberrytoot 1 year ago
@AntiPrep789
Yes, and proud to be nerd =D
strawberrytoot 1 year ago
@AntiPrep789
He says don't worry because it's a class for seniors. I say, don't worry but don't think that it is something that you couldn't understand if you're nerdy enough (like me) to be interested in this stuff. I'm a senior in high school and have been following the subject for a while and didn't have much difficulty following this video, mainly because I've watched so many shows and looked up so much stuff.
hellomate639 1 year ago
I not only didn't get into MIT, I had the feeling they didn't even want me to drive past the campus. I am sure they don't want me watching this either.
Stormy1241 2 years ago 5
lol
oneitasee 2 years ago
Ay! Madre De Dios! It's like I got into MIT!
BrutusBlackest 2 years ago 5
how many other classes are students like these taking in the semester/year?
cddisk123 2 years ago
Even if I don't get in I'll always watch these lectures. :)
ironclownfish 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
"...not only has nobody ever found an event horizon; there is no laboratory evidence that such things exist. All reports of black holes being found are just wishful thinking - patently false ? unless you can provide the coordinates of a verified infinitely dense point-mass singularity and a verified event horizon. But there are of course, as you know, no such coordinates, because no black holes have ever been found." ~ Stephen Crothers
SkunkHunt 2 years ago
wahahaoahahaohaoaaoahaoaoa
I'm not alumni :3
lordennis01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man... a exciting topic of black holes... and this dude is dry as a... well.
etherjoe505 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This must me an ad for MIT
parousia555 2 years ago
nope actually MIT and many other colleges are posting their courses online so that anyone and everyone who has access to a computor can learn for free
travwg33 2 years ago 4
I can't stand the student's -apparent - lack of interest. Specially with such a nice teacher.. it's the first day.. show a little more enthusiasm!!
(or maybe I'm too high on caffeine&sugar)
corneliaomir 2 years ago 12
@corneliaomir
have you ever taken a college class? this is how they all are. there is no such thing as enthusiasm in a college class. you spend the hour struggling to stay awake and constantly glancing at the clock, praying to to make the hands spin faster, einstein-style
4863440 2 months ago
@4863440 shyt then it's all a waste of investment to fund u future generation to a such luxury educational system, you better drop it and work at mc d.
jkdxtr321 2 months ago
@jkdxtr321 Nice grammar, dude.
ericplayzbass2 1 month ago in playlist MIT Exploring Black Holes: General Relativity & Astrophysics
@ericplayzbass2 pls it makes no diff, as long as i get the message across
jkdxtr321 3 weeks ago
@jkdxtr321 I guess, but wouldn't you want to sound intelligent rather than like a mentally handicapped Neanderthal?
ericplayzbass2 3 weeks ago
@ericplayzbass2 no, I'm not insecure like you.
jkdxtr321 3 weeks ago
@jkdxtr321 Well if it makes me insecure to care about grammar, then so be it. If you are where this generation is going, you can say goodbye to a bright future.
ericplayzbass2 1 week ago
@ericplayzbass2 grammar on the net has no relation to bright future, just admit you don't care about education you just love to appear intelligent, goodbye.
jkdxtr321 1 week ago
who uses aol anymore lol
fredlazr 2 years ago 2
I would've thought that an MIT course on black holes would garner a larger student body. Guess not...lol
richmond436 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well black holes are necessary for the self of the humans.
PhilipisDirect 2 years ago
Well, I bet it is rather difficult to get into MIT. ;)
midnightblue80 2 years ago 4
I would disagree that science relies on irrefutable evidence. Science is just a field in which we try to explain the behaviors of the natural universe. Nothing is irrefutable based on the principle of uncertainty and we can never say with absolute certainty something will happen. We will always be making an inductive statement even in science because the future is never known. In all we do not know if black holes exist but it is our best guess based on our observations of the phenomena.
clevercrony 2 years ago 4
Clevercrony nailed it. Science has protocols and principles that set it apart from philosophy, but it is really nothing more than the practice of explaining observable phenomena.
Even though we can't see a black hole itself, we observe things in the universe that strongly point to their presence. You should finish the course before making up your mind about what it has to say. This is Lecture 1.
Cosmodot256 2 years ago 2
Absolutely, the day that we figure out everything is the day that we can talk about irrefutable evidence, except that there's too much to understand. When we get down to the level of an atom we can always go further, when we go even further we can go even further and understand even more. One thing that is irrefutable is that knowledge is limitless.
2882890 2 years ago
Stop using the uncertainty principle when you are not talking about small masses. Don't forget that the uncertainty of position times the uncertainty of the velocity times the mass must be greater than Planck's constant. And planck's constant is like x10^-34... When you talk about black holes, you talk about huge masses, the type of masses you cannot completely explain with quantum mechanics... But if you want to do so... we are sure that black holes exist because of the quantity of matter
Eachonset630 2 years ago 3
that is contained in them. If you try to make probabilistic calculations of a such huge amount of matter, you will probably fall on the 99,9999999999 percent chance of presence. Because de more evidence you have, and by evidence, I mean every part of mass that is experiencing the gravitational field of a black hole. By example, the black hole at the center of our galaxy applies a force on every star in the galaxy, talk about evidence. Envery particle is taken in account using quantum physics.
Eachonset630 2 years ago 3
To finish, you are absolutely wrong, science relies on irrefutable evidence and I'm using your argument to say that probabilistic physics are only usable with extremely small objects such as alpha and beta radiation and quantum tuneling of an alpha particle out of the center of the atom. It is like the normal distribution, you go right a little and you find 99% of probability, and this is symbolic to 100%. ( 1/3=0,33, 2/3=0,66, 3/3=0,999=1) so cut the crap and start really studying physics
Eachonset630 2 years ago 3
another universe? mind=blown
phalluses 2 years ago
A very nice guy, but black holes have never been proven to exist. Black holes are rationalised concepts devoid of any empirical basis.
Meshwork123 2 years ago
Firstly, I would object to your use of the word "proven".
There is a tremendous amount of evidence that supports the existence of Black Holes. Stellar orbits around invisible foci, micro-lensing events, detection of accretion disks and X-ray jets. I wouldn't say there is a firm empirical basis for their existence.
AlanKey86 2 years ago
Alan, science relies on irrefutable evidence, otherwise we have philosophically based argumentation. If you analyse epistemologically the arguments supporting the existence of black holes, you'll find unsubstantiated claims, claims made, however subtle, to suit the scientist.
If you care to Google 'Stephen Crothers black holes' you'll find evidence supporting my arguments.
Mesh
Meshwork123 2 years ago
Thanks for the reply and the interesting link. I checked out Stephen Crothers. It seems a shame that the way he went about presenting his research was met with such hostility.
I'm going to read up some more on it to see how SC responds to the observations/measurements I mentioned above.
AlanKey86 2 years ago
Then why are you watching/commenting on this video?
Timdotz 2 years ago
wow. now this is a bloody good vid collection.
thank you . thank you, thank you
0rgazim 2 years ago
nice i guess
kaffy834 2 years ago
Well I have no problem understand this first video but when they delve into the maths of GR and ellipsoidal analytic differential geometry of 4D spacetime than shit, I'll be lost.
Event3Horizon 2 years ago 3
I have so many questions...
epaphio 2 years ago
Yeah me too. I was thinkin of doing a pHd in physics...now i'll start to think again
blondiebeach 2 years ago
A long time ago I used to think that I was smart. Now after watching this video I realize that I am retarted. :(
brightscience 3 years ago 63
Not retarded :) just still "in learning" like ther est of humanity :)
spannerchops 2 years ago 3
nope, retarded :( same
Kirbyking 2 years ago
@brightscience lol :)
fiorivera22 1 year ago
@brightscience lolololololololololololol...almost fell off my chair.
coodaman 1 year ago
@brightscience human intelligence is an incredible thing.
OptikBlast 3 months ago
the grand old man in general relativity John Wheeler passed away in April 13, 2008
black0jackass 3 years ago
Bertschinger's awesome!
starrynightuk 3 years ago
when is the second edition of the text(exploring black holes: an introduction to general relativity) coming out?? i know it is supposed to be this year, but i have been waiting for some time now.
AntaresInScorpius 3 years ago
One thing I can't grasp here, is, the light used to measure certain stuff in our visible Universe, and it is considered a reliable measuring "tool"; but since light MAY be deflected by various gravitational fields that it (the light) will encounter along the way to us, how reliable these measurements they really are?
adorianvlad 3 years ago
Hmmm, its been explained at around min 46 lecture 2
adorianvlad 3 years ago
spectroscopy is what they use...different light has different waves, frequency, heat, luminosity, mass, they are very reliable measurements...not only spectroscopy but radio telescopes are also helpful and there are so many formulas to prove this.. like parallax and doppler effects with red and blue shifts too..
fredlazr 2 years ago 4
skip the first 20:00,just intro stuff
SaintCog 3 years ago 74
@SaintCog Thank you
lozleigh 1 year ago
@SaintCog Noooo skip the first 24:05
yendb 5 months ago 2