This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Read The Emerson Avenger blog. U*U "religious liberals" are letting fundamentalist atheism run wild because they are unwilling to challenge the crazy anti-religious ideas of intolerant and abusive fundamentalist atheist "Humanist" U*Us, including "Humanist" U*U ministers who are obvious anti-religious bigots. . . Check out my U*U Tube videos while you are at it.
Read "Letter To A Christian Nation". Religious liberals are letting fundamentalism run wild because they are unwilling to challenge crazy religious ideas.
You're right about Unitarians and their super-liberal attitude. It wouldn't be too hard for a crazy fundamentalist group to take over a UU congregation because they try so hard to be "inclusive".
I, a man who wears skirts, can attend any UU church. BUT I will be labeled cross dresser, transvestite, because UU is INFESTED with mental "health" professionals (witchfinders/Inquisitors) and they can't tell the diff between biological determinism and social forces in causing clothing selection. NY Times May 27, 1876 p6 said women in pants under "permanent mental hallucination." Also, how does psych degree immunize its holder from "mental illness?" Real MD makes no such claim re his degree
@skirts365 Sorry to reply to a year-old statement, but while U.U. is still struggling with full acceptance, we have made great strides in welcoming transgender individuals into our congregations with love and respect for their identities. Google "Standing On The Side Of Love" and "Welcoming Congregations" for further information.
Unfortunately, the rest of your post comes across to me as incoherent, so I'm not sure how to respond to it.
@ErisRising Claim of incoherency is an evasion of issues. Psychiatric cult is present in UU. They used to claim women in pants "mentally ill," they were forced to drop that, men in skirts (as men---not "transgendered") still vulnerable due to minority status. UU won't allow airing of this discrimination because they'd lose members, & money is their first concern, therefore they aren't differentiated much from fundamentalists. See National Geographics for last 80 years men in skirts is global
I never said it is. I said UUs are intolerant of intolerance, which is a good thing, so UU "inclusiveness" wouldn't allow a crazy fundamentalist group to take over a congregation as prschuster suggested.
Is that @rkwatson sitting next to him?
kmaglion 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Read The Emerson Avenger blog. U*U "religious liberals" are letting fundamentalist atheism run wild because they are unwilling to challenge the crazy anti-religious ideas of intolerant and abusive fundamentalist atheist "Humanist" U*Us, including "Humanist" U*U ministers who are obvious anti-religious bigots. . . Check out my U*U Tube videos while you are at it.
RobinEdgar 4 years ago
Read "Letter To A Christian Nation". Religious liberals are letting fundamentalism run wild because they are unwilling to challenge crazy religious ideas.
xiner 4 years ago 11
You're right about Unitarians and their super-liberal attitude. It wouldn't be too hard for a crazy fundamentalist group to take over a UU congregation because they try so hard to be "inclusive".
prschuster 2 years ago
I, a man who wears skirts, can attend any UU church. BUT I will be labeled cross dresser, transvestite, because UU is INFESTED with mental "health" professionals (witchfinders/Inquisitors) and they can't tell the diff between biological determinism and social forces in causing clothing selection. NY Times May 27, 1876 p6 said women in pants under "permanent mental hallucination." Also, how does psych degree immunize its holder from "mental illness?" Real MD makes no such claim re his degree
skirts365 2 years ago
@skirts365 Sorry to reply to a year-old statement, but while U.U. is still struggling with full acceptance, we have made great strides in welcoming transgender individuals into our congregations with love and respect for their identities. Google "Standing On The Side Of Love" and "Welcoming Congregations" for further information.
Unfortunately, the rest of your post comes across to me as incoherent, so I'm not sure how to respond to it.
ErisRising 5 months ago
@ErisRising Claim of incoherency is an evasion of issues. Psychiatric cult is present in UU. They used to claim women in pants "mentally ill," they were forced to drop that, men in skirts (as men---not "transgendered") still vulnerable due to minority status. UU won't allow airing of this discrimination because they'd lose members, & money is their first concern, therefore they aren't differentiated much from fundamentalists. See National Geographics for last 80 years men in skirts is global
skirts365 5 months ago
@prschuster
That's silly. Confront a Unitarian with intolerance and you'll see just how "inclusive" they are.
NobleHam 5 months ago
@NobleHam I'm not sure how accepting intolerance is in the best interest of a Unitarian Universalist congregation.
ErisRising 5 months ago
@ErisRising
I never said it is. I said UUs are intolerant of intolerance, which is a good thing, so UU "inclusiveness" wouldn't allow a crazy fundamentalist group to take over a congregation as prschuster suggested.
NobleHam 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He looks like hell and he does not believe in heaven eh ? LOL He is already there, been there for a while now.
SOULESS CHAP Enjoy the afterlife jackass...
twiceover2 4 years ago
judge not less yee be judge yourself..........
chrissteel1975 4 years ago
Retard...
qwer4o 2 years ago