I believe there is some inconsistence around 16'50. In fact, if Vil is amplified by the suggested value (or by any other), it will not reach the desired Vol (which is lower than Vil). Besides amplification, some other operations are needed and they could have been mentioned...
Yeah, you need to do a translation in voltage space, such that 0 is the center between the thresholds (before scaling), and a translation back again. AIUI, that'd just be a matter of adding voltage sources around the amplifier (be sure to check the polarities).
omg i am lerning plus im in the 7 grade
theElijahchannel3 1 month ago
hmz ich bin blond
ReinaKeraoq423 2 months ago
World class!
agapitoflores001 3 months ago
love this lecture
Stanford0416 6 months ago
I wish I'd had this guy for EE. MIT studerts are very fortunate.
chuckjls 7 months ago
good initiative
MrRexvex 1 year ago
excellent
the best way to learn is starting with the easiest examples
carucho007 1 year ago
G they mixed 4 courses into 1 ?
we have Circuits I & II
then Electronics I & II
This is crazy !
Tadeleh 2 years ago
Vipp *(min amp) = Vopp
pp=peak to peak
Snoguube 3 years ago
I believe there is some inconsistence around 16'50. In fact, if Vil is amplified by the suggested value (or by any other), it will not reach the desired Vol (which is lower than Vil). Besides amplification, some other operations are needed and they could have been mentioned...
ultra7178 3 years ago
> some other operations are needed
Yeah, you need to do a translation in voltage space, such that 0 is the center between the thresholds (before scaling), and a translation back again. AIUI, that'd just be a matter of adding voltage sources around the amplifier (be sure to check the polarities).
jonaskoelker 3 years ago
t = 37:20,
"I'll just give you a couple moments to 'savor' this moment in your 002 life" - Anant Agarwal
mwdavis 3 years ago 13