You want to fight a truly dangerous myth? Stop the myth that most animal testing and experimentation in any way helps humans. This Holocaust in government & company labs is responsible for the torture & murder of millions of innocent animals every year, and costs taxpayers billions of dollars. Total waste. THAT'S a dangerous myth. NOT GW.
entertaining video! my names Kimberly, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ FriendlyFlirts(.COM) __ my user ID there is Kimberly_byjcz chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
This whole thing is one big fallacy! Yes, perhaps they are hypocrits, but that doesn't make their conclusion, that global warming is dangerous and need to be stoped, any less sound. We all do the same thing. When we see something horrible we say that it's awful, and then we go back to out daily lives. So let's point the finger to ourselves as well.
There is no science behind global warming. You do realize that this was the exact opposite in the 70s right? They thought the ice age was coming. Think about it. Carbon is a cash cow. Taxing carbon and setting up a scheme to force businesses to buy carbon offsets and making the citizens feel guilty enough to buy them as well could prove to be a very lucritive, but useless way to generate income. Especially since it is hard to verify the validity our value of these said projects.
It wasn't the exact opposite in the 70's there were a few scientific papers that noted a recent cooling trend, and a few popular media outlets took that and ran with it. There were many more papers about global warming, and even many of the papers about the recent short term cooling noted that the bigger concern was was the longer term warming that had been taking place, and not the short period of cooling we experienced.
I'm not interested in debating global warming with you. I just thought I'd pass along that information, so maybe you wouldn't use that whole "opposite in the 70's" argument any more.
If you're not interested in debating you shouldn't have posted anything. From what you just said. It should be more than obvious to you that the people who study this are not scientists. They are sell outs looking for an easy buck. There are tons of papers out there, on both sides, google will always find something that matches what you want. If politicians have gotten on board, then you know it's faux science. Why would they say global warming didn't exist? They'd lose their job.
Really? Unless I want to hang out and talk about it I shouldn't have corrected his misconception? If anything I helped the guy. Now maybe next time he won't bring it up, and what he says will have more credibility since he's not also saying retarded shit that's objectively false.
"From what you just said. It should be more than obvious to you that the people who study this are not scientists."
His? You corrected my "misconception" so you say. You mean your. Grammar aside, those people are not true scientists. They are in it for the money. They are very biased in the work since it is their source of income. I don't trust a word out of anyones mouth that is paid to tell me something is a certain way. No idea why you believe it. You haven't seen any proof. The world has not heated. Weather has not gotten worse. Ice caps are still there.
"There are tons of papers out there, on both sides, google will always find something that matches what you want."
You are correct but, I'm not talking about google, and just whatever shit you can pull up on the internet, and I clarified that in my original comment, I'm talking about peer reviewed literature.
Hahah. You defenders always go on and on about peer reviewed literature. A little hint for you sir. 95% of working adults are fucking idiots. Scientists, accountants, doctors, anything. They're all morons. We all ride the coat tails of the real smart ones and argue their opinions. So please. Don't act like you or I truly know what were talking about. There are educated people on both sides that do not agree. So for you to be speaking so matter of factly is pathetic.
What's funny is I agree with some of what you say, and your defensive attitude is exactly why I didn't want to sit around and discuss global warming with anybody. Politely correcting you on one point you made does not make me a "defender". Consider it me advising you not to use that argument any more in the future as it is not correct. You can sit around and argue "they aren't real scientists" all day, but the fact remains that maybe you should abandon the whole "opposite in the 70's" argument.
You claimed that scientists thought the opposite in the 70's, and I pointed out that they did not. End of story. No other discussion necessary. You're welcome.
Haha. If you say so man. Maybe I should have started out by asking where you got your opinion of scientists not thinking the world was cooling. The media sure did. I'm sure there were scientists who agreed with them too. There's plenty of articles in google news archive. I don't see how I am wrong using that anaolgy though. They did not think the world was warming back then. And also, what happens when the world begins to cool again? And were all taxed for carbon?
I appreciate the reply. Guess you could call em that. Always some fuck mook trying to get money they don't deserve. Oh well. Again. Thanks for the reply.
"They did not think the world was warming back then."
As I mentioned before we did experience a short period of cooling back then, but there were many more papers concerning global warming, and even many of the papers about the short period of cooling acknowledged the longer, and more drastic warming.
My only point was that regardless of whether or not global warming is taking place, and is a large concern, The vast majority of the scientific community supported it then just as they do now
No, but it's what rich people say and do that makes them hypocrites, not the exception to the rule. If you're going to make a movie about it, you better be abiding by the same provisions. Doesn't take an idiot to figure that out. Maybe for some.......
I've got a question for all you Dumbocrats. If global warming is such a problem, why are "environmentalists" like Al Gore and RFK Jr still flying around in private jets?
Al Gore and RFK are not factors of scientific data. What rich people do has no significance to the realities of human influences on climate. For pin head idiots like you it is always about attacking people and never about the academics of the subject.
You are an idiot who seeks to find a place above being an asshole.
So what you're sayin is one person using enough electricity to power 232 homes for a full month is ok because he's rich? I think you forget the whole. Let me break it down for you this way. There are 300 million people in America. Elites make up about 1% of our population. That is 3,000,000 people. If each of these 3 million people did the same thing Al Gore is doing (232 x 3,000,000) you could double our population for the amount they use. Do you still think it's ok just because they're rich?
so all that one has to do to waste all the energy they want to and escape your criticism is to be a democrat, or rich enough to buy "carbon offsets" which are the equivalent of medieval indulgences.
obama's cap and trade will increase costs to energy manufacturers, and those costs will hit hardest the lower classes for whom energy is a higher share of their expenses. obama is hoping the result would be the nationalization of energy.
it's like we always say, the greens are red inside.
The passive-solar house absorbs winter sunlight, warming the interior walkways and. Geothermal heat pumps circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground. A 25,000 US gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof urns; wastewater from sinks, toilets, and showers cascades into underground purifying tanks and is funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is used to irrigate the landscaping around the four-bedroom home. Bush's Ranch-Surprised?
Brill O'Reilly: "Come ON PEEP-O! Al Gore's Got the Bela Lugosi Hair Cut!!!" OK we've heard that your research crew is shit, and we all know you got a pea for your b-rain!
that douche bag who said "being hipocritical is a charm of being an American", I want to kill him. probobly never will because I hate the west coast. but oh well.
ok, the fact that we have studied less than 1/1000000000 of the world's climate patterns and Al Gore can SOMEHOW come up with this extreme statement, and no one in the upper echilon (sp?) of society questions this? interesting.
lol, fox accusing someone of being hypocritical, thats like the double rittberger of hypocrisy! and its no exaggeration, and its very american to tell the public one thing and do the other, to deceive the public, to prove to your fellow members of the elite how much you are in control of the dumbed down masses, that is the sport of it, push the limits, pull something crazy, inhuman, criminal of and see if the people swallow it, and so far the americans have done an amazing job of swallowing
Well, this is the danger of getting all emotional and political over this or that "cause." My solution? I don't CARE about global warming. So I can drive what I like, fly where I like, and live it up - all with a clear conscience.
I'm glad they pointed out Ed Begley's lack of hypocrisy. Although, I wonder if his lifestyle choices have contributed to the lame state of his acting career?
Dumb fucking morons. Only brain dead Christian hillbillies would confuse hypocrisy and scientific data. Fox News, as a corporate mouth piece, has only this bullshit to put out. The science has no equation that involves hypocrisy. Math and science is not discussed in this clip of bullshit for brain dead morons now is it?
I grew up near the Amish so I've seen how people can thrive in a lifestyle that's very earth-friendly (whatever that means). Until enviros including Ed Bagley are willing to live lives like that they have no business pointing at me while screaming how I should live mine.
Still waiting for that massive worldwide starvation that was supposed to occur when the planet it a population of 6 billion. Oh that's right, that was just one of their lies...
ScubaSteve1974 you dead on with that post. the "Amish can thrive in a lifestyle that's very earth-friendly" {your words} because there is another world that surrounds them that has a massive army that stands ready to do violence on their part to protect them from enemies both domestic and foreign. I am for building more nuclear plants, more oil refineries, and drill in ANWAR, and off the coast of Calf, and Kennedy's east coast Mass.
I LOVE it...being hypocritical as a NEWS channel? Does that mean that you cover BOTH sides of an issue? Go figure. Ha. At least they aren't consistant...like how CNN, MSNBC, and all the major networks are liberal ALL THE TIME! Ha...
I'm NOT. Y would I risk having some edu-crat undermine my parenting skills? Now if people like you were smart, you'd focus on the pollution aspect of the environment, rather than engage in the cult of "Earth-worshiping".
So, what caused the global warming that took us out of the last ice age 10,000 or so years ago? All those cave man fires? The earth is in constant flux due to it's orbit and rotational wobble. While I don't doubt that man contributes to the problem, we are certainly not the cause.
And carbon offsets? Puh-lease! Yep, let me send Al some of my money because I drove my car to work today so he can pay his electric bill which is 20 times higher than the average household. Gimme a break!
And I suppose it must be Martians driving SUVs that are causing global warming on Mars. I mean, what is more believable, that humans cause global warming or that the temperature of the sun causes it? Well said, dcaleman.
I got two words for yall, Carbon offsets, they fix everything... HA now if that doesnt prove the hollywood and live Earth concert crap to be hypocrytical than i dont know what will. Carbon offsets? Come on. pathetic. i hope yall caught my sarcasm in the beggining...
global warming is bullshit, just like global cooling and the ozone holes. It takes very little effort to find the truth. CO2 isnt the problem, people arnt the problem, the problem is the retarded worshippers of al gore. enviromentalism is the new religion, it brooks no dissent and cannot be disproven no matter what data presents
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
Anyone who follows this "hypocrisy" red herring and makes it the issue instead of global destruction by bad stewards of the earth, is an asshole. Fox News is pure garbage for the brain dead hillbillies of this nation. Rupert Murderdoch hates one man, one vote. He hates the US Constitution and he takes pride in promoting Bush's campaign to take the largest oil field left in the middle east.
Hate death and destruction. It is what the culture of the Klan has always been about.
Hypocrisy has no scientific consideration. The mixing of the two issues - climate science and hypocritical rich people, is done for one purpose, to get asshole uneducated Christian evangelicals to sit in front of Fox News on TV and think they are righteous and more informed than those Fox News demonizes for taking a stand for saving the earth for future generations.
"Fuck the earth, fuck future generations. Live it up now and don't give a shit about what you leave behind for your children."
Hey people wake up... a millionaire artist cannot be an activist at the same time, 'cause he 'll lose film/music industry favor... So most of them will agree that something is going wrong but never will they blame their favorite homeland/"stock"land... or portray any activism as a means to an end... WAKE UP!
If the head of NASA says it is real and the White House says it is "not science." Who do you believe? The White House has never been absolutely wrong before... right? Remember WMDs? Remember, "they will greet us as victors? Remember, "there will be no quagmire?"
I am a chemical engineer who did course work in Global CLIMATE CHANGE at Iowa State University. I have thought for a long time that Hollywood is hypocritical about this. I guess they hope that by convincing enough people that something should be done, that they hope to be "carbon neutral"??? LOL. Anyhow, as a chemical engineer who studied these things, my vote is that global climate change is real.
We all need to look to the sky at night for the answers, when we understand the sun&stars ,then and only then can we make informed decitions on matters that will change the world forever.
HUH do u no what global warming means "is the earth getting warmer dam right it is.
Is it gloabal warming,i think not." Global warming means the Earth is getting warmer and look to the stars are u a trekky or some shit think b4 u speak
why dont you all just realize that hey this is on fox which is predominately republican and their stance on global warming=it doesnt exist nor is it serious ugh who gives a fuck global warming or no we should at least be a less wasteful country and yes that goes for celebs too whoever is caught up in the celeb hype anyway get a life first then get into theirs.
Come on Fox...leave this to Hollywood Access or something...and wow, Fox pointing the hypocritical finger, laughable. Celebrities are hypocrites...like we didnt know this already. They are also humans, humans are hypocritical at some point in time in their life. Get over it.
Did i say it wasn't hypocritical? Im just pointing out the irony in Fox pointing the finger at celebs and how they should do this and that because of global warming, when they endlessly run stories of how global warming is a myth. Why waste time running stories on what people should do when you dont believe they should be doing it in the first place. And the whole "outing" of celebs...like i said leave that Hollywood Access and talk about real news.
I don't think Fox was saying that celebs should be doing this and that, it's merely the fact that celebs tell us what we should do yet don't do any of it and actually end up doing much more "harm" than we do
whats wrong with someone who enjoys flying. ok, stop all recreational activities if they harm the environment! no more fun allowed! the fun police have arrived.
why fox calls its self a "news" network is beyond me. this isn't news, this is a story about someones opinion. I wonder how differn't our country would be if every story like this was replaced by one that matters.
Yeah, I agree we should stick to real news like Dan Rather and Marla Mapes dealing with Bushs National Guard records..you know, they did have a reliable source. Hmm...did CBS report that Rather lied, or was it Fox?? HMMMM..you libs do have short memories
Don't worry hyppies, I'll buy a huge SUV to get rid of all the petrolium in the world faster so that we can get to the new energy source of the future.
That's a homophobic term. Please, let's not use homophobic terminology. Someday soon gay marriage will be legal and using the term "homo" will be illegal.
Gore's scam is evil genius. Create a wild, UNPROVABLE idea in the guise of helping the world, get people to listen to it and then PAY to $top something that isn't even real, while personally profiting from it.
No wonder Clinton & Gore made a killing from bailing ENRON out of bankruptcy in the 90's, then unleashed them on the public to suck away billions in scam stock offerings. The suckers on the left never had a clue. They still don't.
There is plenty of scientific evidence that GW is happening and that humans are a direct cause of it. There is proof from different sourcesthat have been there for millions of years are sampled so we can see what CO2 levels were a long time ago.There are two cars for every person in the world.lets say that about 3 billion are all pumping carbon monoxide and other chemicals into the atmosphere CONSTANTLY. Don't you think that that is going to be a little bit of a problem? And that's just cars.
Wow that's the dumbest shit I've ever heard. Look it up. Estimated to be 1.2 billion vehicles on earth - in the year 2030! Hmm. 6.5 billion people, divided by less than 1 billion vehicles.
NO THERE ARE NOT TWO CARS FOR EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD.
Well I heard somewhere that there is a large amount of cars in the world. The fact is that Global Warming is a real problem and people are experiencing it firsthand.
These are racist attacks by FOX News against some of our greatest environmental leaders in our country. What FOX doesn't understand is that rich people buy carbon credits, so that makes it okay that they use as much electricity, power and gas as they use. I read on the internet that buying carbon credits can solve the global warming problem. That's why Al Gore buys them.
I love how liberals always pull out the term "racist" when they know they don't have a real argument - even when using it makes absolutely no sense. Figure 1: The post by "obamaforprez2008".
so fox is more worried about bitching about celeb's then who killed the electric car i dont see bill o'riley grilling general motors about why they haven't brought back the EV-1 to greatly reduce oil dependance The EV-1 1996-2001 it's 2007 now
The EV1 costs over 300 dollars a month to lease and only gets 40 miles of highway driving on a full charge. Plus, what do you think is burned to produce the electricity to charge those cars? Happy dreams and rainbows?
The EV1 is not a long term solution. Plus Bill O'Reilly CONSTANTLY questions the oil companies and even had some general managers on his show.
This has been flagged as spam show
Most celebrities are liberal so you already know they are full of shit.
trucker5933 7 months ago
yeah, that's FOX News for you
Zareste 8 months ago
Bandwagon fallacy. Stick to the script.
ANASTASIACHAVEZVLOG 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You want to fight a truly dangerous myth? Stop the myth that most animal testing and experimentation in any way helps humans. This Holocaust in government & company labs is responsible for the torture & murder of millions of innocent animals every year, and costs taxpayers billions of dollars. Total waste. THAT'S a dangerous myth. NOT GW.
duck24x 1 year ago
Comment removed
7XFM 2 years ago
Environmentalism = win.
Hypocrisy = fail.
Vegannibal 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Happy2BNRoundRock 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
entertaining video! my names Kimberly, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ FriendlyFlirts(.COM) __ my user ID there is Kimberly_byjcz chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
labattspimp 3 years ago
This whole thing is one big fallacy! Yes, perhaps they are hypocrits, but that doesn't make their conclusion, that global warming is dangerous and need to be stoped, any less sound. We all do the same thing. When we see something horrible we say that it's awful, and then we go back to out daily lives. So let's point the finger to ourselves as well.
balvarez01 3 years ago
There is no science behind global warming. You do realize that this was the exact opposite in the 70s right? They thought the ice age was coming. Think about it. Carbon is a cash cow. Taxing carbon and setting up a scheme to force businesses to buy carbon offsets and making the citizens feel guilty enough to buy them as well could prove to be a very lucritive, but useless way to generate income. Especially since it is hard to verify the validity our value of these said projects.
bweazel 2 years ago
Their is much science to global warming. Please go do some research before you continue to shame yourself.
balvarez01 2 years ago
It wasn't the exact opposite in the 70's there were a few scientific papers that noted a recent cooling trend, and a few popular media outlets took that and ran with it. There were many more papers about global warming, and even many of the papers about the recent short term cooling noted that the bigger concern was was the longer term warming that had been taking place, and not the short period of cooling we experienced.
SamTay04 2 years ago
I'm not interested in debating global warming with you. I just thought I'd pass along that information, so maybe you wouldn't use that whole "opposite in the 70's" argument any more.
SamTay04 2 years ago
If you're not interested in debating you shouldn't have posted anything. From what you just said. It should be more than obvious to you that the people who study this are not scientists. They are sell outs looking for an easy buck. There are tons of papers out there, on both sides, google will always find something that matches what you want. If politicians have gotten on board, then you know it's faux science. Why would they say global warming didn't exist? They'd lose their job.
bweazel 2 years ago
Really? Unless I want to hang out and talk about it I shouldn't have corrected his misconception? If anything I helped the guy. Now maybe next time he won't bring it up, and what he says will have more credibility since he's not also saying retarded shit that's objectively false.
"From what you just said. It should be more than obvious to you that the people who study this are not scientists."
Really? How's that?
SamTay04 2 years ago
His? You corrected my "misconception" so you say. You mean your. Grammar aside, those people are not true scientists. They are in it for the money. They are very biased in the work since it is their source of income. I don't trust a word out of anyones mouth that is paid to tell me something is a certain way. No idea why you believe it. You haven't seen any proof. The world has not heated. Weather has not gotten worse. Ice caps are still there.
bweazel 2 years ago
"There are tons of papers out there, on both sides, google will always find something that matches what you want."
You are correct but, I'm not talking about google, and just whatever shit you can pull up on the internet, and I clarified that in my original comment, I'm talking about peer reviewed literature.
SamTay04 2 years ago
Hahah. You defenders always go on and on about peer reviewed literature. A little hint for you sir. 95% of working adults are fucking idiots. Scientists, accountants, doctors, anything. They're all morons. We all ride the coat tails of the real smart ones and argue their opinions. So please. Don't act like you or I truly know what were talking about. There are educated people on both sides that do not agree. So for you to be speaking so matter of factly is pathetic.
bweazel 2 years ago
What's funny is I agree with some of what you say, and your defensive attitude is exactly why I didn't want to sit around and discuss global warming with anybody. Politely correcting you on one point you made does not make me a "defender". Consider it me advising you not to use that argument any more in the future as it is not correct. You can sit around and argue "they aren't real scientists" all day, but the fact remains that maybe you should abandon the whole "opposite in the 70's" argument.
SamTay04 2 years ago
You claimed that scientists thought the opposite in the 70's, and I pointed out that they did not. End of story. No other discussion necessary. You're welcome.
SamTay04 2 years ago
Haha. If you say so man. Maybe I should have started out by asking where you got your opinion of scientists not thinking the world was cooling. The media sure did. I'm sure there were scientists who agreed with them too. There's plenty of articles in google news archive. I don't see how I am wrong using that anaolgy though. They did not think the world was warming back then. And also, what happens when the world begins to cool again? And were all taxed for carbon?
bweazel 2 years ago
I'm going to try to make this my last comment :P, but I do want to answer of couple of your questions.
"Maybe I should have started out by asking where you got your opinion of scientists not thinking the world was cooling."
That's why I brought up peer reviewed literature, to distinguish between the actual scientific papers of the period, and popular media crap.
"The media sure did."
I'm aware of that, I guess you could call them the Al Gores of their day. ;).
SamTay04 2 years ago
I appreciate the reply. Guess you could call em that. Always some fuck mook trying to get money they don't deserve. Oh well. Again. Thanks for the reply.
bweazel 2 years ago
"They did not think the world was warming back then."
As I mentioned before we did experience a short period of cooling back then, but there were many more papers concerning global warming, and even many of the papers about the short period of cooling acknowledged the longer, and more drastic warming.
My only point was that regardless of whether or not global warming is taking place, and is a large concern, The vast majority of the scientific community supported it then just as they do now
SamTay04 2 years ago
Anyways. I guess you're right. It is pointless. Thanks for the quasi-debate ; )
bweazel 2 years ago
the far left is pushing the whole hoax in order to have energy nationalized, just as they are trying to nationalize the entire health sector.
ellwyn 2 years ago
Yeah. God forbid that we actually give all human beings the basic tools we need for survival, including healthcare.
Doesn't "pro-life" mean that we respect innocent life, including the life of the sick and needy? Or is life only sacred for those who can afford it?
balvarez01 2 years ago
No, but it's what rich people say and do that makes them hypocrites, not the exception to the rule. If you're going to make a movie about it, you better be abiding by the same provisions. Doesn't take an idiot to figure that out. Maybe for some.......
veriteez 4 years ago
I've got a question for all you Dumbocrats. If global warming is such a problem, why are "environmentalists" like Al Gore and RFK Jr still flying around in private jets?
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago 13
Al Gore and RFK are not factors of scientific data. What rich people do has no significance to the realities of human influences on climate. For pin head idiots like you it is always about attacking people and never about the academics of the subject.
You are an idiot who seeks to find a place above being an asshole.
Good luck
dirtclan 4 years ago
So what you're sayin is one person using enough electricity to power 232 homes for a full month is ok because he's rich? I think you forget the whole. Let me break it down for you this way. There are 300 million people in America. Elites make up about 1% of our population. That is 3,000,000 people. If each of these 3 million people did the same thing Al Gore is doing (232 x 3,000,000) you could double our population for the amount they use. Do you still think it's ok just because they're rich?
bweazel 2 years ago
so all that one has to do to waste all the energy they want to and escape your criticism is to be a democrat, or rich enough to buy "carbon offsets" which are the equivalent of medieval indulgences.
obama's cap and trade will increase costs to energy manufacturers, and those costs will hit hardest the lower classes for whom energy is a higher share of their expenses. obama is hoping the result would be the nationalization of energy.
it's like we always say, the greens are red inside.
ellwyn 2 years ago
The passive-solar house absorbs winter sunlight, warming the interior walkways and. Geothermal heat pumps circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground. A 25,000 US gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof urns; wastewater from sinks, toilets, and showers cascades into underground purifying tanks and is funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is used to irrigate the landscaping around the four-bedroom home. Bush's Ranch-Surprised?
caymanpeg 4 years ago 3
Brill O'Reilly: "Come ON PEEP-O! Al Gore's Got the Bela Lugosi Hair Cut!!!" OK we've heard that your research crew is shit, and we all know you got a pea for your b-rain!
Why do we care what you say?
XAM89AX 4 years ago
Barbra Streisand should be able to filter all of the pollutants with her giant proboscis!!
SADplayer 4 years ago 4
that douche bag who said "being hipocritical is a charm of being an American", I want to kill him. probobly never will because I hate the west coast. but oh well.
GetOwnedByMicrosoft 4 years ago
ok, the fact that we have studied less than 1/1000000000 of the world's climate patterns and Al Gore can SOMEHOW come up with this extreme statement, and no one in the upper echilon (sp?) of society questions this? interesting.
GetOwnedByMicrosoft 4 years ago
lol, fox accusing someone of being hypocritical, thats like the double rittberger of hypocrisy! and its no exaggeration, and its very american to tell the public one thing and do the other, to deceive the public, to prove to your fellow members of the elite how much you are in control of the dumbed down masses, that is the sport of it, push the limits, pull something crazy, inhuman, criminal of and see if the people swallow it, and so far the americans have done an amazing job of swallowing
random0815 4 years ago
could you show us a few examples please? because if not, your arguement is no diffrent than their's.
GetOwnedByMicrosoft 4 years ago
Well, this is the danger of getting all emotional and political over this or that "cause." My solution? I don't CARE about global warming. So I can drive what I like, fly where I like, and live it up - all with a clear conscience.
I'm glad they pointed out Ed Begley's lack of hypocrisy. Although, I wonder if his lifestyle choices have contributed to the lame state of his acting career?
JackBlair2 4 years ago 3
Dumb fucking morons. Only brain dead Christian hillbillies would confuse hypocrisy and scientific data. Fox News, as a corporate mouth piece, has only this bullshit to put out. The science has no equation that involves hypocrisy. Math and science is not discussed in this clip of bullshit for brain dead morons now is it?
dirtclan 4 years ago
Christian?
Excuse me, I'm Catholic and majoring in an honours physical science program, so don't tell me that my religion conflicts with scientific fact.
Bias conflicts with scientific fact. You're from the left wing, you should know that.
Flamesfan7 4 years ago 4
celebrities are assholes
auburntigersfan 4 years ago 3
Better than Queen Al Gore.
Flamesfan7 4 years ago
Global Warming Swindle Interview Pt1 8:43
oreolvrs 4 years ago
Celebrities & Fox are doing great things for our society! ha ha ha...
GrippingTheJuice 4 years ago
I grew up near the Amish so I've seen how people can thrive in a lifestyle that's very earth-friendly (whatever that means). Until enviros including Ed Bagley are willing to live lives like that they have no business pointing at me while screaming how I should live mine.
Still waiting for that massive worldwide starvation that was supposed to occur when the planet it a population of 6 billion. Oh that's right, that was just one of their lies...
ScubaSteve1974 4 years ago
ScubaSteve1974 you dead on with that post. the "Amish can thrive in a lifestyle that's very earth-friendly" {your words} because there is another world that surrounds them that has a massive army that stands ready to do violence on their part to protect them from enemies both domestic and foreign. I am for building more nuclear plants, more oil refineries, and drill in ANWAR, and off the coast of Calf, and Kennedy's east coast Mass.
Tritonnl 4 years ago 2
I LOVE it...being hypocritical as a NEWS channel? Does that mean that you cover BOTH sides of an issue? Go figure. Ha. At least they aren't consistant...like how CNN, MSNBC, and all the major networks are liberal ALL THE TIME! Ha...
SamuraiJack79 4 years ago
Yes being hypocritical is very charming!
todosbien 4 years ago
The sun is getting hotter, wow. It's not your hairspray.
jwb0711 4 years ago
F*** the environment! I rather live well than be burden by this minor nuisance. USA! Go "Buy American"! :P
dswynne 4 years ago
It probably won't affect you in this lifetime. Hope you don't have kids.
AnotherSexyLoli 4 years ago
I'm NOT. Y would I risk having some edu-crat undermine my parenting skills? Now if people like you were smart, you'd focus on the pollution aspect of the environment, rather than engage in the cult of "Earth-worshiping".
dswynne 4 years ago
I heard that Al Gore's mansion is heated by his own flatulence.
JewishRage 4 years ago
So, what caused the global warming that took us out of the last ice age 10,000 or so years ago? All those cave man fires? The earth is in constant flux due to it's orbit and rotational wobble. While I don't doubt that man contributes to the problem, we are certainly not the cause.
And carbon offsets? Puh-lease! Yep, let me send Al some of my money because I drove my car to work today so he can pay his electric bill which is 20 times higher than the average household. Gimme a break!
dcaleman 4 years ago
Those fucking cavemen!! I knew it!!
JewishRage 4 years ago
And I suppose it must be Martians driving SUVs that are causing global warming on Mars. I mean, what is more believable, that humans cause global warming or that the temperature of the sun causes it? Well said, dcaleman.
norsemustang 4 years ago
I got two words for yall, Carbon offsets, they fix everything... HA now if that doesnt prove the hollywood and live Earth concert crap to be hypocrytical than i dont know what will. Carbon offsets? Come on. pathetic. i hope yall caught my sarcasm in the beggining...
csireton22 4 years ago
global warming is bullshit, just like global cooling and the ozone holes. It takes very little effort to find the truth. CO2 isnt the problem, people arnt the problem, the problem is the retarded worshippers of al gore. enviromentalism is the new religion, it brooks no dissent and cannot be disproven no matter what data presents
msqtube 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
honzajss 4 years ago
Anyone who follows this "hypocrisy" red herring and makes it the issue instead of global destruction by bad stewards of the earth, is an asshole. Fox News is pure garbage for the brain dead hillbillies of this nation. Rupert Murderdoch hates one man, one vote. He hates the US Constitution and he takes pride in promoting Bush's campaign to take the largest oil field left in the middle east.
Hate death and destruction. It is what the culture of the Klan has always been about.
dirtclan 4 years ago
Hey Dumbocrat! Explain why "environmentalists" fly around in private jets and drive around in SUVs! Well?
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago 9
Hypocrisy has no scientific consideration. The mixing of the two issues - climate science and hypocritical rich people, is done for one purpose, to get asshole uneducated Christian evangelicals to sit in front of Fox News on TV and think they are righteous and more informed than those Fox News demonizes for taking a stand for saving the earth for future generations.
"Fuck the earth, fuck future generations. Live it up now and don't give a shit about what you leave behind for your children."
dirtclan 4 years ago
Hey people wake up... a millionaire artist cannot be an activist at the same time, 'cause he 'll lose film/music industry favor... So most of them will agree that something is going wrong but never will they blame their favorite homeland/"stock"land... or portray any activism as a means to an end... WAKE UP!
Antonis1977Gr 4 years ago
I said not "do as I do" but do as I say!
Frink2006 4 years ago
If the head of NASA says it is real and the White House says it is "not science." Who do you believe? The White House has never been absolutely wrong before... right? Remember WMDs? Remember, "they will greet us as victors? Remember, "there will be no quagmire?"
barbarossa0067 4 years ago
I am a chemical engineer who did course work in Global CLIMATE CHANGE at Iowa State University. I have thought for a long time that Hollywood is hypocritical about this. I guess they hope that by convincing enough people that something should be done, that they hope to be "carbon neutral"??? LOL. Anyhow, as a chemical engineer who studied these things, my vote is that global climate change is real.
barbarossa0067 4 years ago
Fox will do anything to obscure the issues.
JamCamp06 4 years ago
Is the earth getting warmer dam right it is.
Is it gloabal warming,
i think not.
We all need to look to the sky at night for the answers, when we understand the sun&stars ,then and only then can we make informed decitions on matters that will change the world forever.
bublegum21 4 years ago
HUH do u no what global warming means "is the earth getting warmer dam right it is.
Is it gloabal warming,i think not." Global warming means the Earth is getting warmer and look to the stars are u a trekky or some shit think b4 u speak
Rigerdaby 4 years ago
i love it! celebrities are all flakes...why would anyone give creedence to anything that comes out of hollywood?
teflonmagnet 4 years ago
lol investigative journalism at it's finest
steainsy 4 years ago
why dont you all just realize that hey this is on fox which is predominately republican and their stance on global warming=it doesnt exist nor is it serious ugh who gives a fuck global warming or no we should at least be a less wasteful country and yes that goes for celebs too whoever is caught up in the celeb hype anyway get a life first then get into theirs.
rXc12388 4 years ago
and another thing...isnt this the same Fox New that constantly reported that Global Warming is a hoax...i hate the news, period.
ares713 4 years ago
Come on Fox...leave this to Hollywood Access or something...and wow, Fox pointing the hypocritical finger, laughable. Celebrities are hypocrites...like we didnt know this already. They are also humans, humans are hypocritical at some point in time in their life. Get over it.
ares713 4 years ago
ares713, are you an apologist for celebrities? when hypocrisy is this gross it should be exposed.
teflonmagnet 4 years ago
Did i say it wasn't hypocritical? Im just pointing out the irony in Fox pointing the finger at celebs and how they should do this and that because of global warming, when they endlessly run stories of how global warming is a myth. Why waste time running stories on what people should do when you dont believe they should be doing it in the first place. And the whole "outing" of celebs...like i said leave that Hollywood Access and talk about real news.
ares713 4 years ago
I don't think Fox was saying that celebs should be doing this and that, it's merely the fact that celebs tell us what we should do yet don't do any of it and actually end up doing much more "harm" than we do
SomeGuy0000 4 years ago
isnt hypocrecy part of being an american,
lol, just kiddin, but cmon, is it really that shoking that celebrities say anything to look good, like "i hate global warming"
laughinsilence 4 years ago
Here Here
nowareman 4 years ago
Hollywood sucks!
Gomer2012 4 years ago
whats wrong with someone who enjoys flying. ok, stop all recreational activities if they harm the environment! no more fun allowed! the fun police have arrived.
EJ25WRX 4 years ago
why fox calls its self a "news" network is beyond me. this isn't news, this is a story about someones opinion. I wonder how differn't our country would be if every story like this was replaced by one that matters.
thomasandr 4 years ago
Yeah, I agree we should stick to real news like Dan Rather and Marla Mapes dealing with Bushs National Guard records..you know, they did have a reliable source. Hmm...did CBS report that Rather lied, or was it Fox?? HMMMM..you libs do have short memories
floatpool 4 years ago
What ever happened to the global cooling theory? That's it drink up the Gore koolaid
BassProNate 4 years ago
wasn't the world also flat? one theory being wrong doesn't mean another one isn't right.
thomasandr 4 years ago
Hahah carbon credits... see what Al Gore did what a nut
opinion56 4 years ago
Don't worry hyppies, I'll buy a huge SUV to get rid of all the petrolium in the world faster so that we can get to the new energy source of the future.
rachdingue 4 years ago
Nice
Neuman357 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING EVER!!! BUT I LOVE MY MOM AND DON'T WANT TO TAKE ANY CHANCES!
If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours"
imsosorry2 4 years ago
ignore this: u will die: i have blonde hair brown eyes u have till 8:45 if u read.. u will die unless u post to 15 vid im sorry i had to do it too
imsosorry2 4 years ago
you are homo!
EJ25WRX 4 years ago
That's a homophobic term. Please, let's not use homophobic terminology. Someday soon gay marriage will be legal and using the term "homo" will be illegal.
obamaforprez2008 4 years ago
FUCK REPUBLICANS
ibidman 4 years ago
I think its funny that fox news is getting on other people's cases for being hypocritical.
which is not to say that alot of celebrities are hypocritical
dancingtree 4 years ago
Gore's scam is evil genius. Create a wild, UNPROVABLE idea in the guise of helping the world, get people to listen to it and then PAY to $top something that isn't even real, while personally profiting from it.
No wonder Clinton & Gore made a killing from bailing ENRON out of bankruptcy in the 90's, then unleashed them on the public to suck away billions in scam stock offerings. The suckers on the left never had a clue. They still don't.
Zile77 4 years ago
There is plenty of scientific evidence that GW is happening and that humans are a direct cause of it. There is proof from different sourcesthat have been there for millions of years are sampled so we can see what CO2 levels were a long time ago.There are two cars for every person in the world.lets say that about 3 billion are all pumping carbon monoxide and other chemicals into the atmosphere CONSTANTLY. Don't you think that that is going to be a little bit of a problem? And that's just cars.
CDClock 4 years ago
Wow that's the dumbest shit I've ever heard. Look it up. Estimated to be 1.2 billion vehicles on earth - in the year 2030! Hmm. 6.5 billion people, divided by less than 1 billion vehicles.
NO THERE ARE NOT TWO CARS FOR EVERY PERSON IN THE WORLD.
retard.
icyhotgas 4 years ago
Well I heard somewhere that there is a large amount of cars in the world. The fact is that Global Warming is a real problem and people are experiencing it firsthand.
CDClock 4 years ago
Al gore is a hypocrite.Period.
Iluvcats4 4 years ago
come to my channel and watch the halo 3 new campaign from e3 07 and comment!
virush2 4 years ago
These are racist attacks by FOX News against some of our greatest environmental leaders in our country. What FOX doesn't understand is that rich people buy carbon credits, so that makes it okay that they use as much electricity, power and gas as they use. I read on the internet that buying carbon credits can solve the global warming problem. That's why Al Gore buys them.
obamaforprez2008 4 years ago
I love how liberals always pull out the term "racist" when they know they don't have a real argument - even when using it makes absolutely no sense. Figure 1: The post by "obamaforprez2008".
TheSilhouette 4 years ago
my god...how sorry i feel for you...al gore buys carbon offsets from himself....
edgorsuch 4 years ago
Is hypocrisy a reason to dismiss the argument? Every cop is a lawbreaker, every priest is a sinner.
greenpinkyellow 4 years ago
I really hate agreeing with fox. But on this one, no contest.
du2vye 4 years ago
Watch our videos at LooseNutsComedy.
Just laugh why don't ya.
LooseNutsComedy 4 years ago
Babs and Rosie make me want to puke...forked tongues
Crackerscat1 4 years ago
Hollywood, ugghh..... These people have the world as their stage and all they seem to do is park their private planes on it.
veriteez 4 years ago
so fox is more worried about bitching about celeb's then who killed the electric car i dont see bill o'riley grilling general motors about why they haven't brought back the EV-1 to greatly reduce oil dependance The EV-1 1996-2001 it's 2007 now
voyager1985 4 years ago
The EV1 costs over 300 dollars a month to lease and only gets 40 miles of highway driving on a full charge. Plus, what do you think is burned to produce the electricity to charge those cars? Happy dreams and rainbows?
The EV1 is not a long term solution. Plus Bill O'Reilly CONSTANTLY questions the oil companies and even had some general managers on his show.
RadioGManWCUA 4 years ago
Basically, it's like this: "You shouldn't be driving SUVs, but don't you dare pick on my mansion or private jet!"
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
Nice work! You should do a full show on this...
linuxcurious 4 years ago