Rachmaninoff - Etude-tableau Op.33 No.7 in E-flat major

[ctbozzzz]

I learned this song and I am amazed at how easy Ashkenazy makes it sound!

[mrnanovideos]

In my book it's written as no. 6! ?

[ProkofievRules]

I really really like this little etude. It's fun!

[mziel53]

Terrible sound of the piano.

[705JRC]

@mziel53 I agree, it's so bright and strident.

[MyLordLoke]

Vladimir Ashkenazy is an awesome pianist!

[blackness1747]

wow, really great job in bringing out the ending

[sigsoundfan]

some say it's no.4, some no.6, some no.7..... but the most important thing is that it's the "etude in e flat major" :)

[morvensky]

Ashkenazy is my favorite interpreter of the Etudes .

[GorgonTheMagicMan]

@morvensky He is the best PERIOD.

[bcbdaggtrf75]

this IS no.6, some misunderstanding here

[KoshiyamaCharlotte]

somehow, in my book its written no.7

but in paranthese they write no.4

a bit confusing hahaha.

[Kalen1457]

I thought this was no.6? According to my book it is.

[konzolmester]

The book is wrong look up at wikipedia

I had it wrong too in my complete rachmaninov discs too.

[Kalen1457]

Where is the 4th one op.33? I thought that and the 5th of yours were the same.

[konzolmester]

It is because a fourthone never existed. But it seems people re arranged the Numbers and that is why this is seven and not six. I will re arrange as soon as I can. Thanks for telling thou.

[konzolmester]

I re correct that. wikipedia says the fouth etude exist and its in A-minor. Never heard it thou.

[Mtoutex]

Rachmanninov decided to change the order of his etude-tableaux. so the fourth op.33 is now the sixth op.39, in A minor!

[youvebeensmoked]

it does. ive played it. its cool.

[CodyNelsonMusic]

@konzolmester

The 4th became the a-minor from the Op. 39 set.

[PhysiqueQuantique]

@konzolmester Opus Post-humus.

[looney1023]

@konzolmester

the a minor one does exist, but is rarely performed because it was revised and is now op. 39 no 6 (little red riding hood)

so it exists, even though it doesnt, and it is 2 pieces at the same time.

makes perfect sense!

[alexface211]

Opus 33 No. 4 is in fact Opus 39 No. 6; it was transferred.

[Spiritakis]

@konzolmester

I think Ovchinnikov is one of the few who recorded the original version of this no. 4. These days its revision as Op. 39 No. 6 is much better known.

Anyway, thanks a lot for sharing all those Rachmaninoff etudes with Ashkenazy. Much appreciated.

[georgecziffra]

Op. 33 no. 4 was omitted from this set and including in Op. 39 as no. 6. Apparently Rachmaninov decided not to change the numbers in the set.

[andrew190495]

@konzolmester It is very likely that Wikepedia is wrong. Wikepedia can be edited by anybody at anytime. The book and the CD would have been proof-read by the producers.

[medievil212]

@konzolmester hey acording to my book is no 4

[fxcknaruto]

Rachmaninoff sure plays some good Rachmaninoff. My favorite Rachmaninoff etude right here.

[vysehrad]

The pianist is Ashkenazy, not Rachmaninoff, though.

[fxcknaruto]

I know that now, this is from the complete Rachmaninoff piano works (the 6 disc one) by Ashkenazy. He does my favorite interpretation of PC #3 next to Bronfman.

[cattleman6420012000]

Such deep interpretations.I love his Rachmaninov.

[konzolmester]

And hes just as good in Chopin. You can find it on my channel.

[fxcknaruto]

He does the best Barcarole. Near made me cry. :)