Clash of Worlds : Britain and Palestine Part 6

[wownouser]

The last sentence in this part should be quoted by every British TV anchor before another report on the "inhuman" Israelies toturing the Arabs. What was is that the old Arab said? something like - you think now it's bad (with the jews)? it's nothing compared with what it was with the Brits. How cruel they were... what would have the British media say about that?

[POlNTMAN]

7:10 - this dude looks like a monkey lol

[rachterry]

And you can find other such quotes by the "brilliant" Ilan Pappe. Here is one more:

"Indeed the struggle is about ideology, not about facts. Who knows what facts are? We try to convince as many people as we can that our interpretation of the facts is the correct one, and we do it because of ideological reasons, not because we are truthseekers. (Ibid)"

[rachterry]

More quotes of Pappe's own sick mind: There is no historian in the world who is objective. I am not as interested in what happened as in how people see what's happened. ("An Interview of Ilan Pappé," Baudouin Loos, Le Soir [Bruxelles],Nov. 29, 1999)

I admit that my ideology influences my historical writings...(Ibid)

[rachterry]

Ilan Pappe has long been discredited even by his own words. He admits that his "history" is not based as much on facts as on how he wants to perceive them: " My [pro-Palestinian] bias is apparent despite the desire of my peers that I stick to facts and the 'truth' when reconstructing past realities. I view any such construction as vain and presumptuous.

[rachterry]

This article, Triple Cross: How Britain Created the Arab-Israel conflict was also published in OpedNews, a very liberal web-site, a left wing.

This article is not about right or left, but about right and wrong!

To dismiss this article because it was published in a "right wing" web-site, is ludicrous to say the least. If you don't read it because it was published in a right wing, you miss out at the end.

[THEMISTOCLESS]

ORD VINGATE used the bible as a warirer hanbook

he set up the ""GIDIONS"" the first rangers

[11stroke]

This series is by far the best I've seen. Thanks for posting.

[rachterry]

This series is loaded with distortions, inaccuracies. Google and read this article published today:

Triple Cross: How Britain Created the Arab-Israel Conflict

[Tagemandbagem]

By The American Thinker a right-wing conservative website often quoted by Rush Limbaugh. Yes, they sound completely unbiased and credible.

[rachterry]

This article, Triple Cross: How Britain Created the Arab-Israel conflict was also published in OpedNews, a very liberal web-site, a left wing.

This article is not about right or left, but about right and wrong!

To dismiss this article because it was published in a "right wing" web-site, is ludicrous to say the least. If you don't read it because it was published in a right wing, you miss out at the end.

[Tagemandbagem]

I did read the article and it is hysterically innaccurate and biased. She makes sweeping generalisations about the British press being "unfair...dishonest...and vindictive" against Israel but cannot quote one single instance to back up her claims. She even says SKY NEWS 'defames and maligns' Israel, that would be the SKY NEWS owned by Rupert Murdoch, the sister channel of FOX NEWS in the U.S.. Completely ridiculous.

[rachterry]

I guess you are out of touch with reality. The BBC recently admitted its ditortions and inaccuracies. And it the same with the British Independent, the guardian and SkyNews. Just Google about it. Go to HonestReporting to read about it. And your video is quite informative, thanks. I still found few a few minor omissions and inaccuracies, as well.

[Tagemandbagem]

I said SKY NEWS, not the BBC.

[rachterry]

Sky News also has its biases, no doubt! Go to HonestReprotings.

[rachterry]

If you Google BBC admits bias you will find 111,000 entries.

[Tagemandbagem]

If I google 'Unicorn' I get 3,790,000, that doesn't mean they exist.

[rachterry]

You are simply being sa here..