Added: 4 years ago
From: IndyTv
Views: 9,630
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DEUCE DEUCE DUECE 

  • mouthbreather too

  • commentating is shit innit u dunno shit mate

  • Channing is a fucking legend!!!!!!!! arggg

  • ITS CALLED RANDOMIZING YOUR PLAY SO YOUR OPPONENTS CANT PUT U ON A HAND AND MAKE MISTAKES... SHHHHH DONT TELL THE DONKS

  • The commentator saying he played it wrong shows his depth of knowledge when he is talking about the Italian playing the 22. Saying he has got to cal 1500 when he has just under 4000 back. He then even says "they say your 7-1 to flop it." Come on bro THINK lol

  • you cant play aces the same way everytime, mixxing it up yo

  • Is Neil Channing part of the Hendon Mob ?

  • I love the way channing played that hand, Jesse may talking aload of shit.

  • well, last time me pre-flop with pocket aces raised and got re-raised then i raise again then he all in then i call, eventually cracked by a straight draw ...obviously u need both luck and technique

  • Having said that channing is a top player,and when your playing at that level you need to mix it up.But on the whole playing aces like i don't think is great.

  • He couldn't have been trapping on a 910 board.Someone easily could have a straight draw and giving them a free card is the last thing you should do.As it happens the turn completes a straight and if todd had qj he would only have himself to blame.Aces need to be played agressive,so you can fold them if you think your beat,

  • LOL @ all the donks without a clue screaming and whining every time someone doesn't raise, bet, bet, bet with AA like the standard ABC-donks they play with @ 0.25/0.50 every day...

    There`s a reason you play micro-stakes, but I don't expect you to understand that, or you wouldn't play micro-stakes in the first place.

  • WTF is Greekfish on about?

    *Looks down at Aces and just calls"

    "Great play! He can't raise enough to make the table fold!"

    Er... what? THATS A GOOD THING GREEKFISH YOU MUPPET.

  • he played them very well. and those of you who think there is only one way to play specific hands you better play backgammon. There was no chance he would fold with that stack size anyway if someone flopped a set.

  • SICK PLAY CHANNING U DEGENT

  • How bad did he played those aces... wow

  • I like the way he played the aces... Not agressive and no continuation bets.

    Very original Neil.

  • The thing with aces is if you limp in nearly everyone is gonna throw out the blinds and ante's so thats a pretty little pot to begin with then he was hoping someone is gonna wake up with a hand which todd did...i think he played them unorthodox but he did get the maximum value out of his hand the only reason they thought he played them bad is because he played them unusually go neil i say

  • these commentators suck ass

  • I personally do not like how he played his aces.

  • Me neither, especially at a big table like that, where you want to eliminate the field.

    And you ABSOLUTELY have to bet that flop!!!

  • elimanate the field? what are you talking about its a cash game with a big waiting list

  • Well, I wouldn't be limping A-A with all those players at the table, it only sets you up for trouble later on. In a short-handed game, maybe, but definitely not 8-handed! I say raise it up, and try to narrow down the field, so you're playing it heads up or 3-handed; it's a lot easier playing A-A that way as opposed to having 6 or 7 others in the pot with you.

  • can i ask if you would play them aces the same way in the same position every time? if your image was tight and you raise from under the gun people start to get suspious and cautious. dont get me wrong i 90% agree with you but 10% of the time i will do what neil done just to mix it up.

  • At a big table, I'd rather protect my hand. If I were in Neil's position, I definately would have raised it up.  You don't wanna just make it easy for everyone to come in the pot, which is what limping does.

  • neil channing = legend

    i don't why people here are saying he played it stupid. it just means you are retarded when it comes to poker

  • Neil is class

  • No problem, good luck at the tables.

  • that guy doesn't know how to fucking play aces. dumbass

  • Thanks for your feedback, allways appreciated when top players like you provide feedback!

  • are u being sarcastic...? I apologize if my foul language was somewhat offensive, but his play just really disturbed me cuz I've never seen anybody playing aces like that. that was not even slow playing, cuz he still wouldn't even try to value bet on the flop.

  • NC knows the risks involved in playing aces slow, sometimes it will work and sometimes it wont. From early position he knows a big raise preflop would scare off most players thats why the limp was good.

  • I love watching Neil Channing play.

  • such stupid commentators. "He's not slow playing, he's worried they made a set" yet then channing calls the all in immediately which proves he knew he was ahead.

    idiots.

  • Someone tell the commentators its called trapping!! Idiots! he knew it was a shit flop for everyone, so why bet there, check it let some italian chump think his 2's are good and wait till he sticks all his cah in! If he had bet the flop they both would have folded!

  • channing knew where he was all the way through greekfish should STFU channing is a far better player

  • DONK!!!!!!!

  • He played it fine - there are a ton of ways and lines to take which will have positive expectation. NLHM is as much of art as a science. Channing is very comfortable that he is ahead in that spot and extracts maximum value from the situation.

  • m8 u gamblin adicts r fukin fikos ul be sry lol

  • neil channing > majority of pros (and commentators lol)

  • i dont think the commentators understand how well neil chaning played that hand. put yourself in his seat throughout the hand only with the knowledge that you have pocket aces - and the fact there were so many callers to start with

  • He played that well, the fact that the retarded commentater didn't understand him is a GOOD thing, you WANT to be hard to read.

  • It was a big faat slow played trap. Nobody put him on A's. Checking the flop after the preflop "limp then weak rearaise" was superb. Mentalist

  • This man thinks he is a poker phenom, when really, he is a sub human degenerate i would destroy at nlh / plo. Derp me neil channing derrrrrrrp

  • Thanks for your valued comment, you are indeed a credit to the poker community. : )

  • as fraddstar said, he picked up a 15k pot. and at the end of the day he's the pro and we are not. yes we can critisise play however he won!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I would bet probly 3/4 of the pot on the flop and preflop wouldve raised bigger to get it heads up But bottom line is he built a $15,000 pot and was a 22 to 1 favourite to win it ! So how can we and the commentators criticise his play ?

  • You can't check the flop after that action. Period.

  • I can't think of any poker clip that better exposes how bad poker commentary can get on UK productions. Channing's play goes right over the head of Greekfish and May.

  • Neil has just won 800,000 Euros in Dublin. Nice!

  • omg how can someone play aces so bad...

  • Lucky sod getting the Aces! Awesome movie. :)

  • Superb

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more