CES 2009 52-inch 3D Display Prototype No 3D Glasses Needed

[Djedge4real]

Why would you need to buy that 3d display if you can see it in this youtube video?

[MultiEdomedo]

20 black lol

[NamelessNLS]

3D sux

[hyshyco]

@NamelessNLS 3d sux what more do you want 4d?

[KINGOUNIT]

shit i just bought on with glasses fuck!!!!!!!!!!!

[marcusstarr2000]

I don't want any 3 D TV I want a Time Machine that goes 5 days into the future for lottery results

[dmh79]

I think this is roughly the same technology used in the new Nintendo 3DS.

It only really works for the person viewing directly in front of it as you get ghosting if you view from the side.

[murder7]

what's next 3D phones? then technology is moving so fast it's ridiculous.

[DavessCZ]

@murder7 Actually yes. At the end of 2011 at the latest.

[SeedKnightSiefer]

What 3D? Its just a low res computer animation. 3D When you are physically there this is not 3D just an animation running on tv BULLSHÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍT

[imyourfather101]

@SeedKnightSiefer you do realize that your looking at this video from a monitor thats probably not capable of 3D, plus this video was not recorded in 3D. So you'd never be able to see the 3D effect unless you were actually there standing in front of the tv screen.

[Jaymoore1725]

that dice actually looked like it came out the screen at me ha.

[speedomike747]

Move 1 inch to the side and BYE BYE 3D

[KingToncek]

cool



[gh123man]

next when your walking down the street a 300in screen will project jaws and he will eat you. as everyone around u laughs you will pee yourself (back to the future anyone??)

[Zeldagigafan90210]

@gh123man In that movie, it was just a hologram, and CGI. And I'm telling you, 3D, fails, there are health risks involved with it too. To me, the 3D movies and televisions, are worth far more than the experience. I hope the trend dies, but I know it's not going to.

[camoxide]

it's nearly 2011. where's my mainstream glassesless TV? 

[gadgetboy1234]

Who's that guy talking too?

[katakisLives]

This is definitely the future! if they can get it to market (2009 seemed a little over optimistic) no one wants to wear those glasses all the time! I'd like to see how the 3D effect stands up to the one that needs the glasses, because that does look amazing.

[Jonnynator200]

They are doing it like in batman forever

[SCiWiZZ9812]

wwooooooowwww

[Ganondorf65]

What would the cost of one of these things :S

[karlosx8]

@Ganondorf65 dw about price. in about 50 years the'll be in car boot sales. i mean Flying Car, boot sales.

[jason1973tl]

This thing works by displaying two different images and using a fancy convoluted lens to throw the images separately to the different eyes. It only works from directly in front. From the sides you will see a double image. It works in much the same way the holographic stickers do.

[IfOnlyForOnce]

0:08

"3D-dimensional"

3D = 3 Dimensional

"3 Dimensional dimensional"

[Nickings07]

@IfOnlyForOnce RAS Syndrome!

[luigifan73]

@IfOnlyForOnce That's a lot of dimensions.

[remember4eva]

wouldnt a blind eye 3d tv need to show (like a paper hologram) zizagy screen from the up and down sides,so that would mean seeing from the side would only give 2d pictures but seeing from the front will let you see both side images making them 3d from the blind eye?

[mssssee]

Well he's wearing glasses xD

[rave208]

there's one where it actually jumps out in 3D

[ddeihl2]

The only 3D effect in this item is the actual distance between the LCD screens... nor more... no less... no in-between. THIS IS NOT true 3D. You MUST present a different image to each eye to be real 3D. All you see here is the constant number of "inches" between the two LCD screens. This effect here, while interesting, is a "gimmick" and would not last long with "true 3D" coming out soon.

[ShaunyBoy06]

this is an actually joke you cant call that 3d unless they flicker the images into your eyes at differnt times using the glasses tricking your brain to make it pop out, this doesnt do this its just enhanced hd! + them videos there showing you on it have obv been made for that convention pfft

[osbely]

Can we call this living in the future yet?

[marcman52]

so... whats wrong with the ol' theatre then?

[newbies4u]

cool

[thiagolevy]

I don't want any 3d I want my flying car!

[vrshowdown]

@thiagolevy i want both

[DeltaX999]

i believe they are using 2 lcd's, one of the kinda transparent and extruded some distance from the back lcd. so it does not deliver as much depth and intensity as a 3d monitor using polarization, but as he said - you dont need glasses...

[stesch00]

You can't see the 3D effect in this video because the camera used wasn't made to record in 3D. Even if it was; your screen doesn't supports 3D video.

[nils169]

3D is the future!

[isaacyagmoor]

its 3d when you are physically there dumb shit

[Cthrilla]

LOL!  BURN!

[isaacyagmoor]

me or what?

[blacknekokun]

@isaacyagmoor actually its 3D when 3 dimensions are involved, so all displays are 2D... but Anaglyphic Display TV, Polarization Display TV, Alternate-Sequencing TV or in this case Autostereoscopic Display TV don't roll off the tongue as easy as 3D TV...

I'd abstain calling anyone dumb shit if you're going to be sounding like one... at least learn what 3D really means.

[NauticalFILMS]

That's not 3D. That's like computer generation software.

[FaToRaTo]

LOL, is that a joke?

[DROMO25]

the tecnologyy rockss

[fundash]

I saw this at a movie theatre...

[irishpimp1001]

this thing is awesome i saw this at hot import nights Miami, it doesn't work as great when your standing to the side of it

[liceysta01]

wuao

[rainbow6vegaslover]

Awesome second!!!!

[hayden335]

Awesome..first