Notice the way the man on the left says "this is an on the record session" making it clear that this will be available to the public. It also means they have off the record sessions where they say what they really think.
Yeah, CFR is non-partisan... pft! as long as you accept all anti-American, anti-sovereignty subjects for global government! Oh and you'll have to set aside all human truths and precepts from God's Natural Law, Law of Nations and other centuries old triflings such as Magna Carta, Posse Comitatus, Nuremburg Trials etc!
Brzezinski is a grand architect of the elites plan for global governance. It is quite obvious he takes great pride and joy from knowing he is so high up in the power structure.
The introduction by "Jim" Hoge Jr. was long winded and boring. "Bigs" suggestions have some merit in reform for NATO, but the voting structure would lead to EU politics dominating the organization to a greater extent.
Jim Hoge does describe the lack of contribution of Europe that "abstractly" bothers Mr. Brzezinski. Lack of European contribution to its defence automatically draws the US into contributing to solving local security issues, leaving anti-US, EU leaders to gain political points.
Where the distinguished speaker's treatment of the subjects falls short is Afghanistan and the suspiciously unanimous reliance on a poll indicating that the regular Afghans want us there. In fact, Mr. Brzezinski questioned himself the quality of such poll, but then backtracked quickly. So, if this poll is just a WMD-type of excuse, life cannot be good. An indication of what's what will come from the decision of our NATO partners in Europe to withdraw or not.
Notice the way the man on the left says "this is an on the record session" making it clear that this will be available to the public. It also means they have off the record sessions where they say what they really think.
roland20002000 1 month ago in playlist Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski
Yeah, CFR is non-partisan... pft! as long as you accept all anti-American, anti-sovereignty subjects for global government! Oh and you'll have to set aside all human truths and precepts from God's Natural Law, Law of Nations and other centuries old triflings such as Magna Carta, Posse Comitatus, Nuremburg Trials etc!
anyusmoon1 1 year ago
the CIA is taliban!
gulagcasino 1 year ago
wath a BS
gulagcasino 1 year ago
Brzezinski is a grand architect of the elites plan for global governance. It is quite obvious he takes great pride and joy from knowing he is so high up in the power structure.
Marspyramids 1 year ago
@Marspyramids Ad hominem
bsimpson505 1 year ago
The introduction by "Jim" Hoge Jr. was long winded and boring. "Bigs" suggestions have some merit in reform for NATO, but the voting structure would lead to EU politics dominating the organization to a greater extent.
Jim Hoge does describe the lack of contribution of Europe that "abstractly" bothers Mr. Brzezinski. Lack of European contribution to its defence automatically draws the US into contributing to solving local security issues, leaving anti-US, EU leaders to gain political points.
ideameus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Lack of European contribution to its defence"
In what way?
smoochym 1 year ago
Britain and America are more integrated in defence matters than probably any other countries in the world.
smoochym 1 year ago
The audio is terrible.
joe361 2 years ago 2
Where the distinguished speaker's treatment of the subjects falls short is Afghanistan and the suspiciously unanimous reliance on a poll indicating that the regular Afghans want us there. In fact, Mr. Brzezinski questioned himself the quality of such poll, but then backtracked quickly. So, if this poll is just a WMD-type of excuse, life cannot be good. An indication of what's what will come from the decision of our NATO partners in Europe to withdraw or not.
viafCh 2 years ago
seriously...you'd think that Rockefeller's money could at least buy some color correction. still good to hear from brzezinski though.
MrKilgour 2 years ago
Brzezinski has supported the taliban doing 1970 to weaken the soviets.
satberlin 2 years ago
wooow did you JUST fgure that out?
CheeezMaster 2 years ago
@satberlin The Taliban didn't exist in the 1970s.
joe361 2 years ago
the color hue is terrible, they have purple skin
melnick1985 2 years ago
@melnick1985 It's because THEY ARE LIZARD MEN AHHHHH NWO NWO NWO AHAHAHAH
bsimpson505 1 year ago