This was a black civilization. See My Uploads for more details. You will see such things as the original state of the mummy of Thutmose the 1st with coarse wooly hair in a published 1930s book by Sir W M Flinders Petrie. He's now bald
Or The coal black grandmother of Hatshepsut (always coal in art), who is rarely shown and only spoken of. See why Can anyone invision a black civilization
There was water erosion on the Sphinx's head too. It doesn't look like it since they carved the lion's head into a man's. The world totally flooded, people. Science and religion can agree on that. The Sphinx is proof that our "recorded history" is false. The powers that be would bury the whole Giza plateau if they could.
i work solid surfaces(i.e. granite, marble, etc.) the top part of the statue is all colored the same. as the sun hits it, and weathering occurs it fades. Now, if you look closley, there are 3 types of stones used to make this, not one peice of rock, like everyone thinks. The weathering patterns are the same in most places except the bottom. if i was trying to hide a secret in the statue, i would add onto the statue to keep people further and further away.
Thanks for your comments. I am not sure what you mean by 3 types of stone to make the Sphinx, not one piece of rock. It is pretty well established that the Sphinx was carved on one solid piece from the bedrock. The layers are different, but they are part of the bedrock. Can you elaborate on your comment?
Well, i DO believe that the statue was originally carved from the bed of rock that it lay on now. But anyone who knows stone will tell you, after ages and ages and ages of weathering, you have to fix or 'add on' to stone to keep its original form. At the base of the statue, it appears to be 2 other types of stone. im no 'expert' but it seems as tho this has been added onto and not recarved as sooooo many believe. I feel if it was recarved, it would be documented by someone, somewhere, somehow.
i agree - definitely re carved but I would say much earlier than that. The head is too small for the body and the Egyptians were rather good at building so I doubt they'd get that wrong!!
Can anyone invision a black civilization
This was a black civilization. See My Uploads for more details. You will see such things as the original state of the mummy of Thutmose the 1st with coarse wooly hair in a published 1930s book by Sir W M Flinders Petrie. He's now bald
Or The coal black grandmother of Hatshepsut (always coal in art), who is rarely shown and only spoken of. See why Can anyone invision a black civilization
shariefwat 1 year ago
There was water erosion on the Sphinx's head too. It doesn't look like it since they carved the lion's head into a man's. The world totally flooded, people. Science and religion can agree on that. The Sphinx is proof that our "recorded history" is false. The powers that be would bury the whole Giza plateau if they could.
tisdue 1 year ago
This is beautiful. Thank You!
13Lovechild 2 years ago
i work solid surfaces(i.e. granite, marble, etc.) the top part of the statue is all colored the same. as the sun hits it, and weathering occurs it fades. Now, if you look closley, there are 3 types of stones used to make this, not one peice of rock, like everyone thinks. The weathering patterns are the same in most places except the bottom. if i was trying to hide a secret in the statue, i would add onto the statue to keep people further and further away.
screwbank 2 years ago
Thanks for your comments. I am not sure what you mean by 3 types of stone to make the Sphinx, not one piece of rock. It is pretty well established that the Sphinx was carved on one solid piece from the bedrock. The layers are different, but they are part of the bedrock. Can you elaborate on your comment?
hajidolly 2 years ago
Well, i DO believe that the statue was originally carved from the bed of rock that it lay on now. But anyone who knows stone will tell you, after ages and ages and ages of weathering, you have to fix or 'add on' to stone to keep its original form. At the base of the statue, it appears to be 2 other types of stone. im no 'expert' but it seems as tho this has been added onto and not recarved as sooooo many believe. I feel if it was recarved, it would be documented by someone, somewhere, somehow.
screwbank 2 years ago
I would say the head was recarved...My question would be when? It may have been recarved in the last 2 or 3 hundred years..
clnmyjts 2 years ago 3
i agree - definitely re carved but I would say much earlier than that. The head is too small for the body and the Egyptians were rather good at building so I doubt they'd get that wrong!!
kelfax 2 years ago
the head wasnt recarved, the body has been added onto!!!!! think about it....
screwbank 2 years ago
Thanks for the new theory to think about..
I`ll definitly give this idea a lot of thought..
I`m open to about any idea thrown at me. I never really gave the theory of a add on...cool idea...LOL
clnmyjts 2 years ago
That is a good question. Its still a mystery, isn't it?
hajidolly 2 years ago
Ha, your first comment lol:-D
UB40Forever01 3 years ago