It was hillarious when hillary was on her crying tour. She cried after she lost the primary then someone in her campaign told her to do more crying, and she of course obliged ...pushing out fake tears
Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite on many grounds. Preaches ethics, but takes money from Norman Hsu. Demanded Imus be fired, but took $800K from Timbaland. Claims to be anti-war, but voted for it.
Hillary is a Necon whore, and the Necon minions have decided that she shall become the President. BUT, that you can not allow, Ron Paul should be the next one because he is a HUMAN, not a demonic evil twisted creature. Reclaim your country from the NECON NAZIS.
Yes Yes!! Thank You!! Ban Lawyers from Congress!! Why? If you look closely, their cool political demeanor is like that of lawyers in a courtroom arguing a case. To them, like Charles Schumer, they are still in a courtroom, he a prosecuter for the state. Or a defense lawyer (Hillary) sickening. Every one of the stinking sob's are lawyers. "we don't need no stinking lawyers!"
Jackie, She believes in diversity, a diverse array of opinions, a tool kit. They ought to ban lawyers from politics, especially those like her. A real fact. there is a local lawyer here in washington North Carolina and his custom license plate reads SLEAZE.
No more Bushs', no more Clintons. We need someone different. We need term limits in the Senate and Congress. Congress should be two 2-year terms and the senate should be ONE 4-year term. The Presidency should be scaled back to one 4-year term. Campaign comtributions should be limited to $100.00. Time to get the corporate fossils and aging hippy socialists the hell out of Washington D.C.
Jackie Mason was funny many years ago now he needs a home and needs too stop dying his hair it is screwing with his brain. Too bad the borish belt is gone!
big "L" for you fucker. dont listen to him if you dont like him. you tube "koky120", it will have a picture of you getting fucked by a muslim with no lube and your head being sawed off, ignorant fuck.
Jackie. I used to think you were one of the funniest guys in America. Your political stuff is getting boring. Give it to the Republicans equally and maybe I'll start laughing again. L'chaim.
Mrs Clinton is not a pathological liar - she knows exactly when she is lying and she very carefully calculates her lies to manipulate situations and people to her personal benfit, regardless of how it might hurt others.
She is definitely pathologically selfish. In other words, she is a sociopath, an egomaniac, and a megalomaniac.
I know nothing about you, but yes, I bet you'd be a better president than either Obama or Hillary. Why? You haven't sold you soul to get there. I've always though we needed a national presidential lottery, where the "winner" serves their 4 years and goes the fuck home.
Can we agree that pretty much ALL politicians are lairs then? However, not all lairs get us into a conflict that cost billions of dollars and thousands of lives. Say what you want about Hillary, but she's no war-monger.
You've smacked Hillary real good, Jackie! Thank you for telling the truth when very few people want to listen and hear the truth! Please visit my web site: hillnoshesgottogo(dot)com and see what a WASP in South Florida has done to portray Hillary as a Braying Jenny (a female jackass!) Shalom, Dayna
Jackie - I think you are the unsung sex symbol of America. I sing your body electric. The greatest aphrodisiac is between the ears, and you've got plenty! ;>)
Hillary's the definition of a social chameleon, i wouldn't be surprised if she had the forked tongue to go along with it, if you know what i'm saying. ;)
Heaven forbid that you actually use your brain to respond instead of resorting to hyperbole and name-calling... Then again, that is all the Right has so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Shalom.
1)The phrase "illegal occupation" is used because it is accurate. The invasion was illegal in terms of international law(Iraq never attacked the US) and immoral(Bush lied about everything). 2) What "bothers" me is the loss of lives so that the American oil industry can make money; It is armed robbery. 3) "Islamo-fascism" is an oxymoron created by those who know nothing of Islam or fascism. 4) I support fighting the REAL terrorists, like Bin Laden, who Bush has allowed to run free.
lol, what a lovely revision of modern history, iraq attacked kuwait, who in turn asked for our assistance, we accepted, perfectly legal. iraq attempted to assassinate a US president, illegal and shamefully ignored by clinton. iraq broke the terms of the ensuing surrender agreement, military enforcement perfectly legal, try getting your news from someone other htan your imam and jon stewart
1)Bush II's invasion of Iraq was utterly illegal by international law(this is uncontroversial, read the literature on the subject)that's why his handlers felt the need for the lies about WMD's and the link to Bin Laden. 2)Disagreeing with Bush's policy of armed Robbery on a national scale does not make me Muslim, it makes me human. Shalom.
i've read all sides of the argument, unfortunately, it was legal due to the fact that saddam signed a treaty, then broke it, period. there were no lies about wmd's, and it was afghanistan that was linked to bin laden. gezhundheit
Nonsense. 1)The UN security council never approved the invasion, therefore it's illegal. 2)The US has broken international law more than any other nation: invasions(Iraq), coups(Iran, Chile), bombing of civilians(Laos and Cambodia), etc for DECADES. Should WE be invaded then? 3)If bush isn't a liar, then where are the god-damn nukes?
There is no such thing as "International Law". So now you learned something new today. PS: The United Nation is a joke and is nothing more than a debating society.
Again, nonsense. 1)"International Law" refers to the system of treaties between nations. Denying this is like denying the existence of gravity. 2)The UN charter clearly explains the difference between justified self-defense and wars of aggression. I merely expect us to follow a treaty we signed 50 years ago. 3)Any weakness of the UN is primarily due to the US(and it's proxy states) flouting this and other treaties when it suits them. If we ignore the law, then how can we criticize others?
Are you actually arguing that because the US broke EVERY SINGLE treaty with the Indians that it's morally or legally acceptable to do it now? In anything you're proving my point that the US is the worst "rogue state" of them all!
maybe so but try living someplace else and see how you like it. I heard the other day sombody in Egypt made a negative remark on an internet blog about the Egyptian president. He was sent to prison for 4 years. Think Paris Hilton has it rough?
1)I lived in Prague for 8 years, so I know about living abroad. 2)As an American, it is not only my right, but my responsibility to point out instances when my country crosses the line. Turning off our brains is a crime against everything this country stands for. 3)Yes, Egypt is a hell-hole, which is why we should stop propping up their corrupt dictatorship as we have for decades. Do you think the Egyptian people are greateful that we supply the weapons that keep them down?
The US took a stand and invoked it's right previously granted by your precious and impotent UN years earlier and chose to actually enforce said treaty as opposed to khofi and pals sending more angry letters to saddam to wallpaper his bathroom with. The US is ACCUSED of doing all those things, and when it is so it is accused from a platform of opinion rather than fact,
and your laughable act of defining WMD's as only "goddamn nukes" shows you know nothing more than what talking point are posted on the "hate america" groups like moveondotorg's websites.
There's more to managing a nation than asking the UN what to do every step you take. The UN had more than a decade to enforce the first Iraqi surrender it's way, and chose to do nothing about the attempted assassination. nations have responsibilities to the UN yes, but more importantly they have to maintain their own sovereignty. Exactly how many decades of angry letter writing is enough before any actual action is taken?
3)Invading a country that has never attacked you has nothing to do with sovereignty and everything to do with criminality. Shall I list all the nations we have invaded illegally or supported dictatorships? Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, Brazil, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Panama, Granada, Libya, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Iran, Iraq, Greece, Turkey, etc. And American like you have the gall the wonder why we are hated? Open your damn eyes man!
3) again, since you have no concept of recent history, iraq invades kuwait, declares intention to own everything from egypt to pakistan, kuwait and others ask for assistance, we give it, surrender agreement reached, surrender agreement breeched, weekend at saddam's II gets underway.
Hitler never (one small instance excepted) invaded the US, were we wrong to help europe then? You're listing of countries is laughable, without even thinking hard I can remember Panama's president waving a machete and declaring war on the US, and Libya firing on USN ships and citizens on airliners.
Your grasp of history is pathetic. 1)Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and declaration of war as part of the Axis powers justified war on Germany. 2) Noriega, another US puppet dictator, waving a machete is grounds for war? The US invasion killed as many civilians as the Chinese killed in Tienanmen Square. 3)The connection between Libya and a bombing was never confirmed. The illegal US attack killed hundreds of civilians in Tripoli.
Are you comparing us with the communist chinese your pathetic.And for your information after pearl harbor hitler declared war on the united states.For you to compare us with the commun ist chinese shows where your coming from
1)The comparison is between two states that engage in the illegal murder of civilians. The Difference is that when the Chinese do it, it's considered a crime, but when we do it a a short time later, it's considered a noble act. For a law or principle to be valid, it must apply to everyone. 2)The validity of WWI is not in question here.
The international community saw the invasion of Kuwait as naked aggression and authorized an international response. The treaty was not signed with the US but with the Security Council and he was punished accordingly. The fact that you characterize the current invasion as "weekend at Saddam II" absolutely disgusting. What kind of person jokes about the deaths of over 500,000 civilians and 3,000 Americans?
It was the US that asked the UN to "mediate" the matter, with language specifically granting the US the right to enforce it, odd how you're leaving out the willing participation of 3 dozen other countries in both wars, doesn't seem like an illegal incursion would have so many willing participants.
I don't know what's more laughable, you're whining about the US not having cause for war even after war was declared (panama) or acts of war were committed (shipping explosives intended for use against allies and blockading us ships), or the fact that you've been nailed as just another self loathing liberal.
Oh golly, i forgot about the whole rule stating that you can only use humor in describing the iraq war if you're writing doonesbury or an episode of the daily show or some other lowest common denominator lib drivel critical of bush or republicans. Pffft, I don't care how many candle light vigils you attend, you're being hypersensitive on the issue doesn't make you anymore right than my insensitivity makes me wrong.
now quick, run to moveondotorg and cut and paste some more lib talking points. make sure you include some haughty phrases like "your ___ is ____" and mention a line from maya angelou to make you appear more literate, sensitive, enlightened, touchy feely, whatever, then sign of with something like "gefiltefish" to prove your a jew, too.
yeah, i'm anti-semitic, that's why i subscribe to "theultimatejew", have his vids favorited, and leave comments like "you are my favorite joo, apart from my aunt" on his page, congratulations though, i was expecting the racist accusations to surface long ago, as you libs usually do with any white, male that disagrees with you, especially one from the south.
Again ,you are confused. It's one thing to use humor to criticize an illegal and doomed policy, but it's something else to make jokes about the killing itself, another example of your moral blindness.
or the fact that you dismiss wmd's because "they is old", they were still supposed to be destroyed, and they can still be used to hurt people. I've got a rusty knife from the 1800's, pretty sure it would still be considered a weapon by anyone's standard.
Are you being intentionally stupid? The point was that the (American-supplied) WMD's already there were being MONITORED before the invasion and were subsequently lost afterward. Of course they were dangerous, that's why we needed to keep them under control. God knows who has them now.
thanks for following the lib whiner formula to a "t", complete with third grade insults, condescension, and more manipulation of data for "truthiness", not everything found was on the known list, some of what was on the records was found to be gone upon arrival,
3 dozen is more than just "a few meaningless pacific islands", if any joke i made is about the "killing itself" then so is any other made in opposition (hooray for the lib double standard!). I've tried responding to your arguments, only to receive "but but but but but it was old gas" or "but but but but panama is tiny, we should have ignored the declaration of war" in response.
all of this is moot on this vlog however, cuz nothing here changes the fact that Hillary is nothing more than a carpetbagging snake in the grass and her supporters can succinctly be described as "gullible".
Please try and respond to my arguments and not the voices in your head. 1)If arguing against mass murder and the needless loss of American soldiers is whining, then I guess I'm guilty. 2)I don't loathe myself, I loathe morons like you and Bush who think talking about war makes your "tough" or "manly", without any serious thought to the consequences.
(Once more, with feeling...) The first gulf war was waged on behalf of the Kuwaiti government and was therefore legal, which explains the international cooperation. The current occupation is patently illegal and the UN has said so, which is why we're going it alone, except for a few meaningless pacific islands. The British have pulled out because they have finally realized this as well.
You idiot and when did we annex them?The more you post the more you show your incompatance.And the more you show how much you hate this country.Your list of countries is a joke and so is your intellect
1)it's interesting that you attack my MOTIVES instead of the facts I present. In fact I love this country, which is why I try to speak the truth. 2)The list of countries I offered where we illegally invaded or supported brutal dictatorships is uncontroversial and hardly a secret. Read a book.
2)Define WMD's however you like, but the fact remains that NONE were there, precisely as the UN inspection system predicted. Again, if any had been found Bush would put them on TV morning noon and night. Instead he conveniently changes his justification to "Spreading democracy", all the while Americans die so that EXXON can get oil contracts with the new government, on the orders of the White House.
ok, we'll assume for the sake of argument that there weren't any, no chemicals used for making weapons (which were found), no artillery shells capable of carrying bio/chem weapons (found again) and various other violations, the fact remains that Hussein told everyone he had them, nor would he allow verification either way of their existance.
it's the equivalent of walking into a bank with a backpack full of bacon, claiming it's a bomb, and walking out with money, no you didn't have a bomb, but you still committed a crime.
1) Yes, there were some common chemicals that COULD be used to make weapons in the future, but that wasn't the US claim. 2)There was no nuclear production whatsoever, despite Rice's "mushroom cloud" lie. (You're thinking of North Korea) 2)There was no missile delivery systems. 3)The chemical components were there since the 1980's when Reagan SOLD them to Hussein, so why invade now? 4)Yes,he played briknsmanship, but it was understood that this was bluffing to save face in the Arab world.
Your ignorance is truly shocking. 1)"Angry letters"? Since Gulf War I, the UN enacted economic sanctions that crippled the Iraqi economy and rendered it militarily impotent, which is why NONE of his neighbors felt threatened. The "No-Fly-zones" acted as a shield for the Kurds in the north. The UN policy of diplomacy and indirect action was working.
Good lord Jackie, who gives a shit about how phony Hillary is (and she certainly is!) when we are engaged in an illegal occupation that has killed thousands of American patriots and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi women and children. Forest for the trees, my friend. Shalom.
Mark Levin calls her Hillary Rotten Clinton, so I borrowed from him, but from now on I will call her HITLERY. You describe her 100% correctly; she's a shrill, phony, immoral, anti-semitic, socialist, greedy, opportunist.. Furthermore, Hitlery's a carpet bagger scum and needs to be in prison..
who the hell is advising hillary that these different voices are a good idea? is rosie o'donnell one of her advisors? we'll know next time hillary speaks to an asian crowd with a 'ching chong' accent.
Jackie, alot of credit for being one in Hollywood who doesn't go along with everyone else out there. You need a political anyalysis show of your own. Good job!
veriteez: Jackie has his own national talk show every sunday nite 7-9pm est on talk radio network call in at 800 449 8255 or hear it on jackiemasondotcom
Hillary is a very talented voice artist. We should be proud of her! Her elegant hand inside a cheeky chappy, perched on her graceful lap and she'd be unbeatable in variety. What's Tony Blair up to?
Not the point I was trying to make. I wanted to take political party out of the equation. In any case, I was just showing where my logic stood. Nothing more. And as I said, all that should matter to you is that you're happy with how you vote. Pursuit of happiness, after all.
Hillary is a Black, Jew, White Southern Redneck, Christian / half Pakistani. According to which audience she has. Kudos on the accent, that was great ! LOL :)
I'm sure there could be some things I could disagree with about Hillary, but since I don't like Hillary either, I don't care to find out what those things could be.
Badnarik's a libertarian. But did I really throw my vote away? If the two main people to choose from were Kerry or Hillary and Bush was a small third party member, would you still have voted for Bush? I'll let you settle down from such a scary thought before answering. LOL But that's how I saw Bush v Kerry.
I voted for Michael Badnarik. But you see, you're proud of your vote and that's how America should work. To vote FOR someone. Someone you want to see lead. It's your voice and you owned it.
"but i think that nobody voted FOR kerry as much as voted AGAINST the republicans"
That was the Democrats stance for the election. "Vote out Bush". I don't believe Kerry had zero substance, but what difference would've that made? Substance or not, the message was "Vote out Bush". I wanted Bush out, but I wasn't gonna vote for someone that wasn't giving me a reason to vote FOR him.
Jackie - In plain English,I think you are very sexy. I would like to know what your favorite position is. (smile) All in good fun. You are irresistible! Thanks for the Vlog!
...but nakedjanet, who could vote against a man with the brilliance to invent the internet??!! Nothing any politician says shocks me anymore. Perhaps TRUTH emitting from a politicians lips might do the trick. Apologies for the overt cynicism.
YEAH! Preach on Jackie! I'm glad I'm not the only one that feels this way. Hillary is a chameleon that will change to match whatever group she is currently whoring herself to for their votes.
Wow. This guy is good at rambling on and on, pulling accusations out of his tuckus. He makes a lot of deragatory statements about Hillary and her personality and record, expecting you to take his word for it without facts to back it up. His excuse could be that it is comedy, but that would imply his efforts were to be funny. What's his motive? There are bigger phonies who commit worse crimes than the dems he lambasts. Like Bush and his Co. Just saying.
You might try doing a search of Jackie Mason (google, wiki, etc.) He is an OLD SCHOOL comedian on par with some of the greats-- He is the ORIGINAL "politically incorrect" comedian, and gave Ed Sullivan the finger in 1962. (before such things were common on Television)
I concede he did not actually give the finger to Ed Sullivan, but we all knew what he meant, and WE knew it was a joke, too bad Ed did not, would have saved Jackie Mason a lawsuit over it.
"There are bigger phonies who commit worse crimes than the dems he lambasts."
So, are you saying you're jealous of the Repubs for being able to commit crimes better than your party? To justify your own party's misdeed like this, it's kinda like Bush and Co are your role models.
Well Janet, this is one time when I do hope I am VERY wrong! I didn't think Kerry had a PRAYER's chance, yet it really was a very close race! So if nearly ONE HALF of the country was stupid enough to elect that phony, it doesn't portend well for the 08 election.
Thanks Jackie! As we get closer to 2008 who knows what new strategies politicians are going to drum up. It's like watching a circus clowns with mediocre talent.
Great, Jackie, just great. You've really got her pegged. Incisive and very very funny. Hilary is an embarrassment to every self respecting New Yorker.
You're right there! I didn't think she had a prayer's chance of winning the NY Senate seat, I was wrong there, twice! And an embarrassment to any New Yorker all the more as she WASN'T a New Yorker to begin with!
If you want to do some research in order to blast the global warming myth, check out youtuber "bumpy111", an Ohio State professor; and/or the BBC movie "The Great Global Warming Swindle"
Hillary says what EVER is politically expedient. If she THINKS it will serve her political ambitions, she'll say it. Re her many war positions, early on she said, & I quote, that the intel her husband got was the same that Bush had, that it was NECESSARY. How she can now say anything different is laughable at best, & frankly, tragic at the worst. Tragic to think she actually has a good shot at getting in the white house.
hav'ent seen enough of the ladie, but i will take your word for it. i liked your other blogs. the one i agreed with was the one about gun control. keep well
Jackie Mason needs to Shut the Fuck Up. Jewish smuck!
rednecksissy 1 year ago
It was hillarious when hillary was on her crying tour. She cried after she lost the primary then someone in her campaign told her to do more crying, and she of course obliged ...pushing out fake tears
rddaos 2 years ago
cute vid
282416 3 years ago
funny.....what a great ountry..Be even greater when we have Hillary in the White House!
williamlorigan 4 years ago
JACKIE MASON is a fraud!!! If that book of his, "SCHMUCKS" was really about ALL the frauds and low lifes in America it would be too heavy to pick up.
squeekycheese 4 years ago
Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite on many grounds. Preaches ethics, but takes money from Norman Hsu. Demanded Imus be fired, but took $800K from Timbaland. Claims to be anti-war, but voted for it.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
Now, this man rocks,and his combination in between humour and facts are great.
wallenz 4 years ago 3
Hillary is a Necon whore, and the Necon minions have decided that she shall become the President. BUT, that you can not allow, Ron Paul should be the next one because he is a HUMAN, not a demonic evil twisted creature. Reclaim your country from the NECON NAZIS.
wallenz 4 years ago
Bravo, Jackie Mason!
Not only wise, sharp, funny...but politically smart as well.
He nailed Missus Clinton.
MLalah 4 years ago 2
Jackie Mason is the greatest.
zaqwert777 4 years ago 2
You know the ones that they don't agree with what he does.
djchillman 4 years ago
I've never laughed so much! Great job. Funny as hell with those accents.
BlindEyeJones 4 years ago 2
Yes Yes!! Thank You!! Ban Lawyers from Congress!! Why? If you look closely, their cool political demeanor is like that of lawyers in a courtroom arguing a case. To them, like Charles Schumer, they are still in a courtroom, he a prosecuter for the state. Or a defense lawyer (Hillary) sickening. Every one of the stinking sob's are lawyers. "we don't need no stinking lawyers!"
magicbrainman 4 years ago
wmd's?who knew! katrina?who knew! who lies?not hillary at least she admitted how she voted.
bush is the one who lied! and you know he and his cronies profited!
edfishwalsh 4 years ago
Jackie, She believes in diversity, a diverse array of opinions, a tool kit. They ought to ban lawyers from politics, especially those like her. A real fact. there is a local lawyer here in washington North Carolina and his custom license plate reads SLEAZE.
magicbrainman 4 years ago
Rock on, Mr. Mason! Cracking me UP!
SuzieF2 4 years ago
No more Bushs', no more Clintons. We need someone different. We need term limits in the Senate and Congress. Congress should be two 2-year terms and the senate should be ONE 4-year term. The Presidency should be scaled back to one 4-year term. Campaign comtributions should be limited to $100.00. Time to get the corporate fossils and aging hippy socialists the hell out of Washington D.C.
clayp72 4 years ago
Jackie Mason was funny many years ago now he needs a home and needs too stop dying his hair it is screwing with his brain. Too bad the borish belt is gone!
Franziasack 4 years ago
Love ya Jackie! Your the best. 5/5
ConservativeVoiceUSA 4 years ago
Jackie Mason is a sad lonely loser
koky120 4 years ago
big "L" for you fucker. dont listen to him if you dont like him. you tube "koky120", it will have a picture of you getting fucked by a muslim with no lube and your head being sawed off, ignorant fuck.
andrew197553 4 years ago
Jackie. I used to think you were one of the funniest guys in America. Your political stuff is getting boring. Give it to the Republicans equally and maybe I'll start laughing again. L'chaim.
bapyou 4 years ago
HAHAHA...so many positions for Hilary Clinton and still Bill has'nt nailed her...Jackie is great!!!!!
mikeicannevaro 4 years ago
Carybriel,
Mrs Clinton is not a pathological liar - she knows exactly when she is lying and she very carefully calculates her lies to manipulate situations and people to her personal benfit, regardless of how it might hurt others.
She is definitely pathologically selfish. In other words, she is a sociopath, an egomaniac, and a megalomaniac.
UC15 4 years ago
I know nothing about you, but yes, I bet you'd be a better president than either Obama or Hillary. Why? You haven't sold you soul to get there. I've always though we needed a national presidential lottery, where the "winner" serves their 4 years and goes the fuck home.
fried2styles 4 years ago
Excellent! Thank you.
1DRock37167 4 years ago
Can we agree that pretty much ALL politicians are lairs then? However, not all lairs get us into a conflict that cost billions of dollars and thousands of lives. Say what you want about Hillary, but she's no war-monger.
fried2styles 4 years ago
You've smacked Hillary real good, Jackie! Thank you for telling the truth when very few people want to listen and hear the truth! Please visit my web site: hillnoshesgottogo(dot)com and see what a WASP in South Florida has done to portray Hillary as a Braying Jenny (a female jackass!) Shalom, Dayna
HILL NO! SHE'S GOT TO GO! TM
hillnoshesgottogo 4 years ago
hey! what's wrong with wasps? lol, props though, haven't heard that one in a while.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Jackie - I think you are the unsung sex symbol of America. I sing your body electric. The greatest aphrodisiac is between the ears, and you've got plenty! ;>)
brooklyneze 4 years ago
Hillary's the definition of a social chameleon, i wouldn't be surprised if she had the forked tongue to go along with it, if you know what i'm saying. ;)
MattyPasta 4 years ago
We love you Jackie! Keep them coming.
JordanCrowderFilms 4 years ago
Heaven forbid that you actually use your brain to respond instead of resorting to hyperbole and name-calling... Then again, that is all the Right has so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Shalom.
fried2styles 4 years ago
1)The phrase "illegal occupation" is used because it is accurate. The invasion was illegal in terms of international law(Iraq never attacked the US) and immoral(Bush lied about everything). 2) What "bothers" me is the loss of lives so that the American oil industry can make money; It is armed robbery. 3) "Islamo-fascism" is an oxymoron created by those who know nothing of Islam or fascism. 4) I support fighting the REAL terrorists, like Bin Laden, who Bush has allowed to run free.
fried2styles 4 years ago
lol, what a lovely revision of modern history, iraq attacked kuwait, who in turn asked for our assistance, we accepted, perfectly legal. iraq attempted to assassinate a US president, illegal and shamefully ignored by clinton. iraq broke the terms of the ensuing surrender agreement, military enforcement perfectly legal, try getting your news from someone other htan your imam and jon stewart
wytkracka 4 years ago
1)Bush II's invasion of Iraq was utterly illegal by international law(this is uncontroversial, read the literature on the subject)that's why his handlers felt the need for the lies about WMD's and the link to Bin Laden. 2)Disagreeing with Bush's policy of armed Robbery on a national scale does not make me Muslim, it makes me human. Shalom.
fried2styles 4 years ago
i've read all sides of the argument, unfortunately, it was legal due to the fact that saddam signed a treaty, then broke it, period. there were no lies about wmd's, and it was afghanistan that was linked to bin laden. gezhundheit
wytkracka 4 years ago
Nonsense. 1)The UN security council never approved the invasion, therefore it's illegal. 2)The US has broken international law more than any other nation: invasions(Iraq), coups(Iran, Chile), bombing of civilians(Laos and Cambodia), etc for DECADES. Should WE be invaded then? 3)If bush isn't a liar, then where are the god-damn nukes?
fried2styles 4 years ago
There is no such thing as "International Law". So now you learned something new today. PS: The United Nation is a joke and is nothing more than a debating society.
TKOtonite 4 years ago
Again, nonsense. 1)"International Law" refers to the system of treaties between nations. Denying this is like denying the existence of gravity. 2)The UN charter clearly explains the difference between justified self-defense and wars of aggression. I merely expect us to follow a treaty we signed 50 years ago. 3)Any weakness of the UN is primarily due to the US(and it's proxy states) flouting this and other treaties when it suits them. If we ignore the law, then how can we criticize others?
fried2styles 4 years ago
oh stop it! Treaties are broken all the time, just ask the American Indian.
TKOtonite 4 years ago
Are you actually arguing that because the US broke EVERY SINGLE treaty with the Indians that it's morally or legally acceptable to do it now? In anything you're proving my point that the US is the worst "rogue state" of them all!
fried2styles 4 years ago
maybe so but try living someplace else and see how you like it. I heard the other day sombody in Egypt made a negative remark on an internet blog about the Egyptian president. He was sent to prison for 4 years. Think Paris Hilton has it rough?
TKOtonite 4 years ago
1)I lived in Prague for 8 years, so I know about living abroad. 2)As an American, it is not only my right, but my responsibility to point out instances when my country crosses the line. Turning off our brains is a crime against everything this country stands for. 3)Yes, Egypt is a hell-hole, which is why we should stop propping up their corrupt dictatorship as we have for decades. Do you think the Egyptian people are greateful that we supply the weapons that keep them down?
fried2styles 4 years ago
I agree with you on that my good man
TKOtonite 4 years ago
The US took a stand and invoked it's right previously granted by your precious and impotent UN years earlier and chose to actually enforce said treaty as opposed to khofi and pals sending more angry letters to saddam to wallpaper his bathroom with. The US is ACCUSED of doing all those things, and when it is so it is accused from a platform of opinion rather than fact,
wytkracka 4 years ago
and your laughable act of defining WMD's as only "goddamn nukes" shows you know nothing more than what talking point are posted on the "hate america" groups like moveondotorg's websites.
wytkracka 4 years ago
There's more to managing a nation than asking the UN what to do every step you take. The UN had more than a decade to enforce the first Iraqi surrender it's way, and chose to do nothing about the attempted assassination. nations have responsibilities to the UN yes, but more importantly they have to maintain their own sovereignty. Exactly how many decades of angry letter writing is enough before any actual action is taken?
wytkracka 4 years ago
3)Invading a country that has never attacked you has nothing to do with sovereignty and everything to do with criminality. Shall I list all the nations we have invaded illegally or supported dictatorships? Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, Brazil, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Panama, Granada, Libya, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Iran, Iraq, Greece, Turkey, etc. And American like you have the gall the wonder why we are hated? Open your damn eyes man!
fried2styles 4 years ago
3) again, since you have no concept of recent history, iraq invades kuwait, declares intention to own everything from egypt to pakistan, kuwait and others ask for assistance, we give it, surrender agreement reached, surrender agreement breeched, weekend at saddam's II gets underway.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Hitler never (one small instance excepted) invaded the US, were we wrong to help europe then? You're listing of countries is laughable, without even thinking hard I can remember Panama's president waving a machete and declaring war on the US, and Libya firing on USN ships and citizens on airliners.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Your grasp of history is pathetic. 1)Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and declaration of war as part of the Axis powers justified war on Germany. 2) Noriega, another US puppet dictator, waving a machete is grounds for war? The US invasion killed as many civilians as the Chinese killed in Tienanmen Square. 3)The connection between Libya and a bombing was never confirmed. The illegal US attack killed hundreds of civilians in Tripoli.
fried2styles 4 years ago
Are you comparing us with the communist chinese your pathetic.And for your information after pearl harbor hitler declared war on the united states.For you to compare us with the commun ist chinese shows where your coming from
gengrant2 4 years ago
1)The comparison is between two states that engage in the illegal murder of civilians. The Difference is that when the Chinese do it, it's considered a crime, but when we do it a a short time later, it's considered a noble act. For a law or principle to be valid, it must apply to everyone. 2)The validity of WWI is not in question here.
fried2styles 4 years ago
thank you tell it like it is
gengrant2 4 years ago
The international community saw the invasion of Kuwait as naked aggression and authorized an international response. The treaty was not signed with the US but with the Security Council and he was punished accordingly. The fact that you characterize the current invasion as "weekend at Saddam II" absolutely disgusting. What kind of person jokes about the deaths of over 500,000 civilians and 3,000 Americans?
fried2styles 4 years ago
It was the US that asked the UN to "mediate" the matter, with language specifically granting the US the right to enforce it, odd how you're leaving out the willing participation of 3 dozen other countries in both wars, doesn't seem like an illegal incursion would have so many willing participants.
wytkracka 4 years ago
I don't know what's more laughable, you're whining about the US not having cause for war even after war was declared (panama) or acts of war were committed (shipping explosives intended for use against allies and blockading us ships), or the fact that you've been nailed as just another self loathing liberal.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Oh golly, i forgot about the whole rule stating that you can only use humor in describing the iraq war if you're writing doonesbury or an episode of the daily show or some other lowest common denominator lib drivel critical of bush or republicans. Pffft, I don't care how many candle light vigils you attend, you're being hypersensitive on the issue doesn't make you anymore right than my insensitivity makes me wrong.
wytkracka 4 years ago
now quick, run to moveondotorg and cut and paste some more lib talking points. make sure you include some haughty phrases like "your ___ is ____" and mention a line from maya angelou to make you appear more literate, sensitive, enlightened, touchy feely, whatever, then sign of with something like "gefiltefish" to prove your a jew, too.
wytkracka 4 years ago
What, pray tell, does being Jewish have to do with anything, you anti-Semite bastard?! This discussion is over.
fried2styles 4 years ago
yeah, i'm anti-semitic, that's why i subscribe to "theultimatejew", have his vids favorited, and leave comments like "you are my favorite joo, apart from my aunt" on his page, congratulations though, i was expecting the racist accusations to surface long ago, as you libs usually do with any white, male that disagrees with you, especially one from the south.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Again ,you are confused. It's one thing to use humor to criticize an illegal and doomed policy, but it's something else to make jokes about the killing itself, another example of your moral blindness.
fried2styles 4 years ago
or the fact that you dismiss wmd's because "they is old", they were still supposed to be destroyed, and they can still be used to hurt people. I've got a rusty knife from the 1800's, pretty sure it would still be considered a weapon by anyone's standard.
wytkracka 4 years ago
Are you being intentionally stupid? The point was that the (American-supplied) WMD's already there were being MONITORED before the invasion and were subsequently lost afterward. Of course they were dangerous, that's why we needed to keep them under control. God knows who has them now.
fried2styles 4 years ago
thanks for following the lib whiner formula to a "t", complete with third grade insults, condescension, and more manipulation of data for "truthiness", not everything found was on the known list, some of what was on the records was found to be gone upon arrival,
wytkracka 4 years ago
3 dozen is more than just "a few meaningless pacific islands", if any joke i made is about the "killing itself" then so is any other made in opposition (hooray for the lib double standard!). I've tried responding to your arguments, only to receive "but but but but but it was old gas" or "but but but but panama is tiny, we should have ignored the declaration of war" in response.
wytkracka 4 years ago
all of this is moot on this vlog however, cuz nothing here changes the fact that Hillary is nothing more than a carpetbagging snake in the grass and her supporters can succinctly be described as "gullible".
wytkracka 4 years ago
Please try and respond to my arguments and not the voices in your head. 1)If arguing against mass murder and the needless loss of American soldiers is whining, then I guess I'm guilty. 2)I don't loathe myself, I loathe morons like you and Bush who think talking about war makes your "tough" or "manly", without any serious thought to the consequences.
fried2styles 4 years ago
(Once more, with feeling...) The first gulf war was waged on behalf of the Kuwaiti government and was therefore legal, which explains the international cooperation. The current occupation is patently illegal and the UN has said so, which is why we're going it alone, except for a few meaningless pacific islands. The British have pulled out because they have finally realized this as well.
fried2styles 4 years ago
You idiot and when did we annex them?The more you post the more you show your incompatance.And the more you show how much you hate this country.Your list of countries is a joke and so is your intellect
gengrant2 4 years ago
1)it's interesting that you attack my MOTIVES instead of the facts I present. In fact I love this country, which is why I try to speak the truth. 2)The list of countries I offered where we illegally invaded or supported brutal dictatorships is uncontroversial and hardly a secret. Read a book.
fried2styles 4 years ago
2)Define WMD's however you like, but the fact remains that NONE were there, precisely as the UN inspection system predicted. Again, if any had been found Bush would put them on TV morning noon and night. Instead he conveniently changes his justification to "Spreading democracy", all the while Americans die so that EXXON can get oil contracts with the new government, on the orders of the White House.
fried2styles 4 years ago
ok, we'll assume for the sake of argument that there weren't any, no chemicals used for making weapons (which were found), no artillery shells capable of carrying bio/chem weapons (found again) and various other violations, the fact remains that Hussein told everyone he had them, nor would he allow verification either way of their existance.
wytkracka 4 years ago
it's the equivalent of walking into a bank with a backpack full of bacon, claiming it's a bomb, and walking out with money, no you didn't have a bomb, but you still committed a crime.
wytkracka 4 years ago
1) Yes, there were some common chemicals that COULD be used to make weapons in the future, but that wasn't the US claim. 2)There was no nuclear production whatsoever, despite Rice's "mushroom cloud" lie. (You're thinking of North Korea) 2)There was no missile delivery systems. 3)The chemical components were there since the 1980's when Reagan SOLD them to Hussein, so why invade now? 4)Yes,he played briknsmanship, but it was understood that this was bluffing to save face in the Arab world.
fried2styles 4 years ago
yes yes
gengrant2 4 years ago
Your ignorance is truly shocking. 1)"Angry letters"? Since Gulf War I, the UN enacted economic sanctions that crippled the Iraqi economy and rendered it militarily impotent, which is why NONE of his neighbors felt threatened. The "No-Fly-zones" acted as a shield for the Kurds in the north. The UN policy of diplomacy and indirect action was working.
fried2styles 4 years ago
Good lord Jackie, who gives a shit about how phony Hillary is (and she certainly is!) when we are engaged in an illegal occupation that has killed thousands of American patriots and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi women and children. Forest for the trees, my friend. Shalom.
fried2styles 4 years ago
Mark Levin calls her Hillary Rotten Clinton, so I borrowed from him, but from now on I will call her HITLERY. You describe her 100% correctly; she's a shrill, phony, immoral, anti-semitic, socialist, greedy, opportunist.. Furthermore, Hitlery's a carpet bagger scum and needs to be in prison..
Muzaloth 4 years ago
LOL
Best one yet!
AlKilyu 4 years ago
nakedjanet: I have to hand it to you, that bit about Nalora, Ed Sullivan and the Beatles was a funny line.
brooklyneze 4 years ago
who the hell is advising hillary that these different voices are a good idea? is rosie o'donnell one of her advisors? we'll know next time hillary speaks to an asian crowd with a 'ching chong' accent.
efgumby 4 years ago
hey, cool. I'll be sure to check it out. Jackies' the man.
veriteez 4 years ago
Jackie, alot of credit for being one in Hollywood who doesn't go along with everyone else out there. You need a political anyalysis show of your own. Good job!
veriteez 4 years ago
veriteez: Jackie has his own national talk show every sunday nite 7-9pm est on talk radio network call in at 800 449 8255 or hear it on jackiemasondotcom
TheUltimateJew 4 years ago
Hillary is a very talented voice artist. We should be proud of her! Her elegant hand inside a cheeky chappy, perched on her graceful lap and she'd be unbeatable in variety. What's Tony Blair up to?
jobfromthebible 4 years ago
go hillary
qwerty4197 4 years ago
Hillary Rotten Cuntlick is demented
Muzaloth 4 years ago
And I demand equal rights. LOL
Ovalshine 4 years ago
I'll leave that as it stands. Qwerty, you're on your own.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
Not the point I was trying to make. I wanted to take political party out of the equation. In any case, I was just showing where my logic stood. Nothing more. And as I said, all that should matter to you is that you're happy with how you vote. Pursuit of happiness, after all.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
Hillary is a Black, Jew, White Southern Redneck, Christian / half Pakistani. According to which audience she has. Kudos on the accent, that was great ! LOL :)
mosquewatch 4 years ago
If I was her audience, she'd have to be a intergalactic albino chipmunk with webbed feet and she just doesn't have the talent to pull that off.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
I'm sure there could be some things I could disagree with about Hillary, but since I don't like Hillary either, I don't care to find out what those things could be.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
I was responding to themiles there. Sorry if I confused you.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
He gave me the willies too.
Nalora 4 years ago
Badnarik's a libertarian. But did I really throw my vote away? If the two main people to choose from were Kerry or Hillary and Bush was a small third party member, would you still have voted for Bush? I'll let you settle down from such a scary thought before answering. LOL But that's how I saw Bush v Kerry.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
I voted for Michael Badnarik. But you see, you're proud of your vote and that's how America should work. To vote FOR someone. Someone you want to see lead. It's your voice and you owned it.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
"but i think that nobody voted FOR kerry as much as voted AGAINST the republicans"
That was the Democrats stance for the election. "Vote out Bush". I don't believe Kerry had zero substance, but what difference would've that made? Substance or not, the message was "Vote out Bush". I wanted Bush out, but I wasn't gonna vote for someone that wasn't giving me a reason to vote FOR him.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
pathetic zionist neo-con...tsk tsk
qwerty4197 4 years ago
to qwerty4197: and proud of it
TheUltimateJew 4 years ago
qwerty: Spoken like a true neo-lib.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
freakin awesome!
SwanginBros 4 years ago
Jackie - In plain English,I think you are very sexy. I would like to know what your favorite position is. (smile) All in good fun. You are irresistible! Thanks for the Vlog!
brooklyneze 4 years ago
I love this guy! So funny and so true!
ShoshanaZel 4 years ago
Amen, Jackie!!!!
DallasDiamond 4 years ago
...but nakedjanet, who could vote against a man with the brilliance to invent the internet??!! Nothing any politician says shocks me anymore. Perhaps TRUTH emitting from a politicians lips might do the trick. Apologies for the overt cynicism.
DallasDiamond 4 years ago
ur black accent his so bad ha ha !!!
cobweb1989 4 years ago
YEAH! Preach on Jackie! I'm glad I'm not the only one that feels this way. Hillary is a chameleon that will change to match whatever group she is currently whoring herself to for their votes.
AllhailtheUS 4 years ago
Wow. This guy is good at rambling on and on, pulling accusations out of his tuckus. He makes a lot of deragatory statements about Hillary and her personality and record, expecting you to take his word for it without facts to back it up. His excuse could be that it is comedy, but that would imply his efforts were to be funny. What's his motive? There are bigger phonies who commit worse crimes than the dems he lambasts. Like Bush and his Co. Just saying.
theemiles 4 years ago
You might try doing a search of Jackie Mason (google, wiki, etc.) He is an OLD SCHOOL comedian on par with some of the greats-- He is the ORIGINAL "politically incorrect" comedian, and gave Ed Sullivan the finger in 1962. (before such things were common on Television)
Nalora 4 years ago
To Nalora: Jackie Mason did NOT give Ed Sullivan the finger. Jackie Mason is not a vulgar person. He seems to me to be a gentleman.
brooklyneze 4 years ago
I concede he did not actually give the finger to Ed Sullivan, but we all knew what he meant, and WE knew it was a joke, too bad Ed did not, would have saved Jackie Mason a lawsuit over it.
Nalora 4 years ago
"There are bigger phonies who commit worse crimes than the dems he lambasts."
So, are you saying you're jealous of the Repubs for being able to commit crimes better than your party? To justify your own party's misdeed like this, it's kinda like Bush and Co are your role models.
Ovalshine 4 years ago
Janet you nailed it. Can you imagine if Rudy Giuliani started affecting a southern accent when in S. Carolina? The media would eviscerate him!
ladypn 4 years ago
Well Janet, this is one time when I do hope I am VERY wrong! I didn't think Kerry had a PRAYER's chance, yet it really was a very close race! So if nearly ONE HALF of the country was stupid enough to elect that phony, it doesn't portend well for the 08 election.
ladypn 4 years ago
Thanks Jackie! As we get closer to 2008 who knows what new strategies politicians are going to drum up. It's like watching a circus clowns with mediocre talent.
commentate 4 years ago
Great, Jackie, just great. You've really got her pegged. Incisive and very very funny. Hilary is an embarrassment to every self respecting New Yorker.
brooklyneze 4 years ago
You're right there! I didn't think she had a prayer's chance of winning the NY Senate seat, I was wrong there, twice! And an embarrassment to any New Yorker all the more as she WASN'T a New Yorker to begin with!
ladypn 4 years ago
To ladypn: Right you are. Talk about an opportunist! Anyone with clear vision can see that.
brooklyneze 4 years ago
Hey Yankel,
Maybe you can give her some Chazon lessons eh?
Jacksamuelz 4 years ago
If you want to do some research in order to blast the global warming myth, check out youtuber "bumpy111", an Ohio State professor; and/or the BBC movie "The Great Global Warming Swindle"
mr1user 4 years ago
Absolutely fantastic.
mr1user 4 years ago
Great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MorganBucks 4 years ago
Hillary says what EVER is politically expedient. If she THINKS it will serve her political ambitions, she'll say it. Re her many war positions, early on she said, & I quote, that the intel her husband got was the same that Bush had, that it was NECESSARY. How she can now say anything different is laughable at best, & frankly, tragic at the worst. Tragic to think she actually has a good shot at getting in the white house.
ladypn 4 years ago
LMAO @ the jewish man doing an indian. Sorry Jackie but the new york and the hebrew can't be buried in any accent you try. Peace.
brendafohio 4 years ago
Will there be a Caddyshack 3? Please reply.
johnnysmooth 4 years ago
they are talking about it and will keep you posted
TheUltimateJew 4 years ago
and...you are just now figuring this out about politicians? very good stuff, do more.
hoomelemele 4 years ago
You are giving away your broadway act for free.
nyimages 4 years ago
this won't be in my new broadway show but i will have plenty of other hillary material
TheUltimateJew 4 years ago
Love the book! Great stuff on Hillari...very funny!
Methos1966 4 years ago
i luv you man//
docivy 4 years ago
I LOVE YOU JACKIE MASON!!!!
islandGAL7 4 years ago
Great choice of music for the intro!
Dick Dale Rocks!
Also, Jackie, YOU ROCK!
harryogre 4 years ago
Nu? Did you take over for Belle Barth? A shondeh fer da Goyim,mit curveh this and curveh that!Feh! You can do much better!
Groovin2DaMusic 4 years ago
Congrats on the success of your book, Jackie! Yeah, Hillary and her positions--LOL :D
katalina2007 4 years ago
the diff position of hillary lol lol
bill didn`t like any of them lol
what position on hillary does jackie like lol lol
bend over cookin position
bring me some eggs position
you`re kool jackie
thejakester1 4 years ago
well said.
hootie1233 4 years ago
hav'ent seen enough of the ladie, but i will take your word for it. i liked your other blogs. the one i agreed with was the one about gun control. keep well
turnermedman 4 years ago