People talking about if this bullet can reach your heart, etc etc etc, it doesn't matter. Even if you got hit in the hand by this round, you would die from the shock just from the damage output it would create from every one of those lead balls bouncing around.
@Drizztmarco You just don't know what you're talking about. Google "glaser" and "wound" and do an image search, and some of the first pics you'll find are of a guy shot in the arm with a Glaser. He survived. In fact, I've done x-rays on patients with worse wounds from smaller-caliber rounds.
@xmike8259x Anyone who says .40 is weak doesn't know what they're talking about. It's a little bit more powerful than 9mm P, and has similar terminal performance. It's "weak" compared to magnum or rifle loads, but it's pretty solid as a handgun round.
The minimum standard is set not because of the distance to the heart, but because the body is not of uniform density, like the block of gel is. It might only be 6" to someone's heart, but that 6 inches is behind muscle and bone, maybe more than one bone depending on the angle the bullet is coming from. The idea is that if it'll go 12" in gel, it'll go through whatever clothing plus body parts could be in the way .
@roentgen571 You are right, but with Glasers, the water is muddied by the fact that the bullet doesn't act the same hitting bone as it does hitting ballistic gel. I'll never use them, because it seems clear to me that expecting a bullet which is designed for minimal penetration in walls and other barriers to reliably penetrate heavy clothing, bone, and muscle is irrational. This theory is borne out in field reports from shootings, as well as the fact that no major LEO agency uses them.
@derekscammon I totally agree... Glasers and Magsafes are pretty much a gimmick. Lethal? Capable of incapacitating an attacker? Sure...but as reliably as a high-end modern JHP? Not at all.
@roentgen571 You dont seem to understand. if you'd hit someone with a glaser round in the hand they would die from the shock form the sheer damage. It's a fiarly fast death aswell. It's no gimmick it it lethal and dangerous.
Dude, thats what the Glaser SAFETY slug is designed for.... minimum penetration. Its originally designed to be used on commercial airliners, back in the 1970s or something.
@lukethibodaux Of course the FBI is more concerned about shooting through car doors and windows rather than a civilian self defense situation. Would it take 12+" to hit your heart if someone shot you? Shot placement is key, not deep penetration.
@akiratubo Unless you're a huge guy (or talking about the bullet going through your arm first), then that's just not true. I'm a pretty big guy and from my armpit to my heart is 8".
@akiratubo Wouldn't that be best case, though? Lol. Worst-case would be more like contact shot from the front/back with a slightly better case from the side through the armpit.
People talking about if this bullet can reach your heart, etc etc etc, it doesn't matter. Even if you got hit in the hand by this round, you would die from the shock just from the damage output it would create from every one of those lead balls bouncing around.
Drizztmarco 1 week ago
@Drizztmarco You just don't know what you're talking about. Google "glaser" and "wound" and do an image search, and some of the first pics you'll find are of a guy shot in the arm with a Glaser. He survived. In fact, I've done x-rays on patients with worse wounds from smaller-caliber rounds.
roentgen571 1 week ago
at 0:33 it looks like a alien elvis skull
MrGlock55 2 months ago
damn, uhhh they say its a weak round..... well after watching this im thinking of a .40 for a ccw
xmike8259x 3 months ago
@xmike8259x Anyone who says .40 is weak doesn't know what they're talking about. It's a little bit more powerful than 9mm P, and has similar terminal performance. It's "weak" compared to magnum or rifle loads, but it's pretty solid as a handgun round.
roentgen571 2 months ago
Short and weak my ass.
91gt306 3 months ago
best thing out there? no...would i want to be shot with it? no.
Erik0072 3 months ago
@Erik0072 would I want to be shot with any bullet period? nooo.
PresentingHilarious 1 month ago
The minimum standard is set not because of the distance to the heart, but because the body is not of uniform density, like the block of gel is. It might only be 6" to someone's heart, but that 6 inches is behind muscle and bone, maybe more than one bone depending on the angle the bullet is coming from. The idea is that if it'll go 12" in gel, it'll go through whatever clothing plus body parts could be in the way .
roentgen571 3 months ago 2
@roentgen571 You are right, but with Glasers, the water is muddied by the fact that the bullet doesn't act the same hitting bone as it does hitting ballistic gel. I'll never use them, because it seems clear to me that expecting a bullet which is designed for minimal penetration in walls and other barriers to reliably penetrate heavy clothing, bone, and muscle is irrational. This theory is borne out in field reports from shootings, as well as the fact that no major LEO agency uses them.
derekscammon 2 months ago
@derekscammon I totally agree... Glasers and Magsafes are pretty much a gimmick. Lethal? Capable of incapacitating an attacker? Sure...but as reliably as a high-end modern JHP? Not at all.
roentgen571 2 months ago 4
@roentgen571 You dont seem to understand. if you'd hit someone with a glaser round in the hand they would die from the shock form the sheer damage. It's a fiarly fast death aswell. It's no gimmick it it lethal and dangerous.
Drizztmarco 1 week ago
@roentgen571 Even if it doesn't hit the heart, the shock of the damage it puts out to soft tissue even is enough to kill a man fairly quick.
Drizztmarco 1 week ago
thats disgusting.
snooglesnarf 3 months ago
hey bean bags n rubber bullets do it,,,,,do it
coveredindouchbags 3 months ago
hey
coveredindouchbags 3 months ago
i wanna see what the rubber bullets and bean bag shot does to it can u test that?
coveredindouchbags 3 months ago
watch?v=-qB_FALHS4c
Humster 4 months ago
Piss poor penatration, I would never use a load like that, 12" is the FBI minimum spec and that is nowhere close.
lukethibodaux 5 months ago
@lukethibodaux
Dude, thats what the Glaser SAFETY slug is designed for.... minimum penetration. Its originally designed to be used on commercial airliners, back in the 1970s or something.
Humster 4 months ago
@lukethibodaux Of course the FBI is more concerned about shooting through car doors and windows rather than a civilian self defense situation. Would it take 12+" to hit your heart if someone shot you? Shot placement is key, not deep penetration.
devcon67 4 months ago
@devcon67
If that someone had to shoot me from the side, then yeah. It's about 12" to reach my heart.
akiratubo 4 months ago
@akiratubo Unless you're a huge guy (or talking about the bullet going through your arm first), then that's just not true. I'm a pretty big guy and from my armpit to my heart is 8".
ChishioAme 3 months ago
@ChishioAme
Both. I have broad chest and shoulders, and was counting the arm. Worst-case and all that.
akiratubo 3 months ago
@akiratubo Wouldn't that be best case, though? Lol. Worst-case would be more like contact shot from the front/back with a slightly better case from the side through the armpit.
ChishioAme 3 months ago
so how deep was the penetration?
flamedrag18 5 months ago
@flamedrag18 100% energy dump in less than 7 inches, use the blocks underneath as a ruler, they're 1 inch wide, and spaced 1 inch apart.
NinjaRider777R 5 months ago
@NinjaRider777R just insane
flamedrag18 5 months ago
I see a fish.
jollygreenjustin 6 months ago 18