Aaaaaand... I know sometimes the conversion from metric to standard is a sumbitch, but 1.3 tons, or 2600 lbs does not equal 14 kilonewtons, it equals about eleven and a half kilonewtons. Other than that, it really is a good presentation on how good cams hold in good rock.
@wburgboy75 If they're going by the UK definition of a ton, it's about 2,240 lbs. So this 1.3 Ton rock is probably closer to 13kN, though still not 14kN.
@pigvarley I didn't know that the British ton was more than a kN more than the US ton. Sooo... fair enough. Less inaccurate than I thought. You learn something new every day I suppose.
@EdMajinLee199999 Weight is a force, it's mass that is not. Per the physics definition, Force = Mass x Acceleration. In SI units 9.81 Newtons (N) = 1 kg x 9.81 m/s^2. For American units this translates to Pounds Force ( weight) = Pounds Mass x Gravity, or 32.2 lbs-f = 1 lbs-m x 32.2 ft/s^2. Since gravity is constant on Earth, Mass and Force are interchangeable, as with 2.2 lbs-f = 1 kg. So with that, 1.3 tons x 2,240 lbs-f/ton x (1kg / 2.2 lbs-f) x 9.81 N/kg x (1 kN / 1000 N) = 12.98 kN.
@pigvarley No, we are talking about peak forces over a time period, so the mass of the boulder is not interchangeable with the force the boulder exerts on the cam.
@EdMajinLee199999 You're right, the cam is experiencing a force greater than the weight of the boulder while it is accelerating upwards. I was using a simplified static model, as I figured they were simply swapping weight for exerted force.
Rizias is exactly right. The key to the power of cams is the placement. First, rarely will you find a perfectly parallel crack such as the synthetic one shown here (with the exception of a few hundred desert splitters), which is of course what you're looking for when placing cams. Second, and not to knock the people at DMM, but there are a lot of newbs that watch these vids to get an idea of what climbing protection is all about, and that cam was too small for that placement. Tippedoutlobes!
the secret is not in the milk, but in the rock....if the rock structure is not solid and hard, it will crumble...resulting in release of those tools and a fall....
Does this prove that the cam can pull a boulder out of the wall and onto the climber?
gryphontaboo 3 months ago
That explains how they set a boulder on the pallet...
mxhost1 5 months ago
Aaaaaand... I know sometimes the conversion from metric to standard is a sumbitch, but 1.3 tons, or 2600 lbs does not equal 14 kilonewtons, it equals about eleven and a half kilonewtons. Other than that, it really is a good presentation on how good cams hold in good rock.
wburgboy75 8 months ago
@wburgboy75 If they're going by the UK definition of a ton, it's about 2,240 lbs. So this 1.3 Ton rock is probably closer to 13kN, though still not 14kN.
pigvarley 7 months ago
@pigvarley I didn't know that the British ton was more than a kN more than the US ton. Sooo... fair enough. Less inaccurate than I thought. You learn something new every day I suppose.
wburgboy75 7 months ago
@pigvarley kN is a measure of force, not weight.
EdMajinLee199999 4 months ago
@EdMajinLee199999 Weight is a force, it's mass that is not. Per the physics definition, Force = Mass x Acceleration. In SI units 9.81 Newtons (N) = 1 kg x 9.81 m/s^2. For American units this translates to Pounds Force ( weight) = Pounds Mass x Gravity, or 32.2 lbs-f = 1 lbs-m x 32.2 ft/s^2. Since gravity is constant on Earth, Mass and Force are interchangeable, as with 2.2 lbs-f = 1 kg. So with that, 1.3 tons x 2,240 lbs-f/ton x (1kg / 2.2 lbs-f) x 9.81 N/kg x (1 kN / 1000 N) = 12.98 kN.
pigvarley 4 months ago
@pigvarley No, we are talking about peak forces over a time period, so the mass of the boulder is not interchangeable with the force the boulder exerts on the cam.
EdMajinLee199999 4 months ago
@EdMajinLee199999 You're right, the cam is experiencing a force greater than the weight of the boulder while it is accelerating upwards. I was using a simplified static model, as I figured they were simply swapping weight for exerted force.
pigvarley 4 months ago
Rizias is exactly right. The key to the power of cams is the placement. First, rarely will you find a perfectly parallel crack such as the synthetic one shown here (with the exception of a few hundred desert splitters), which is of course what you're looking for when placing cams. Second, and not to knock the people at DMM, but there are a lot of newbs that watch these vids to get an idea of what climbing protection is all about, and that cam was too small for that placement. Tippedoutlobes!
wburgboy75 8 months ago
streaky, matee you have a little too much spare time on your hands. any news on ice screws?
nategod 9 months ago
That's awesome. Definitely a unique way to show how strong these things are!
nuclearhudson 1 year ago
Not a very good placement either. The cam was a bit small. It was a bit to open.
Well cool video though!
michdudeada 1 year ago
the secret is not in the milk, but in the rock....if the rock structure is not solid and hard, it will crumble...resulting in release of those tools and a fall....
rizlas2 1 year ago
That's pretty impressive... Can't say that means anything to CLIMB with but impressive nevertheless :p
UndeadSpider 1 year ago
Woah, that is pretty impressive! I'm gonna have to get me some of these...
EricCant0na 1 year ago