Get to know yourself first...thats what people on the east knew for a long time.Some answers just become clear when you try too look for them inside :)
Could someone explain to me what the 6bn dollars went on? We already know two ways of converting energy into matter, both of which are extremely inefficient: Accelerating particles past the speed of light is 1 - experiments at the LHC have determined that once you've got protons to 99.9999% of the speed of light, they stop growing in speed but start gaining mass instead. A lot of energy is lost in the process tho. 2nd is black holes, apparently un-tappable sources.
Somebody can explain to me, why some scientists say that our galaxy have a 13-14 bi. years old, but others scientists says that our universe have the same age... If the universe is a big space where have a lot of galaxies?
So, if our galaxy have 14bi yo. what the real age of our universe if the universe is bigger than galaxy? *--*
Most scientists believe that the universe is around 13.7 bn years old. They also believe that the Milky Way is around 13.2 bn years old. Seems like most galaxies were born 'shortly' after the Big Bang. Mind you, 500 million years isn't actually THAT short a time, but you can safely say that the Milky Way is one of the oldest galaxies in the universe.
I personally am a bit perplexed by this question tho, There must've been some srs time dilation going on, how can we rly say 14bn yrs..
@pauloricardosantanna Honestly we can never know for certain. Everything we see is jsut perceved by our brain, time is created by our brain and therefore motion cannot exist either. Pardon my language but life is just one big mind fuck.
No, we know for a fact that the formula e=mc2 checks out. If anything, those particular neutrinos at the LHC traveled back in time. It's a very slim 'if anything' though it's much more likely that the experiment was compromised.
@Daymjo No we dont that is completely false. General relativity has been proven false by many experiements but its still the best theory to date. Its still jsut a theory and also. The law of e=mc2 does not apply to the sub atomic level meaning that overall it cannot be true. None of the formulas we ahve to day will be correct until we can have a formule for consciousness because in the end matter is just perceived by our brain, its really just frequencies of vibrating energy, not matter
@TheTheKRIT For every experiment that has disproven general relativity at least 10 have confirmed it. ur right, the laws of physics break down in extreme conditions, that's hardly argument against them though, they only work in restricted conditions. Its like saying 'quantum physics doesnt work in any level above the sub atomic one so its false'. Formula for consciousness sounds sci-fi.. and no its not, matter is a physical manifestation of energy its not a perception or an interpretation.
@Daymjo Yes thats true but there effects must apply to all objects of any size. Thats why Einstein hoped that quantum physics could not exist. A formula for consciousness sounds si fi, your right but thats only because scientists choose to ignore it. Why do they ignore it, simply because it would make science impossible. It would be way to complicated. "matter is a physical manifestation of energy" That is indeed not true once again your taking consciousness out of the equation that is
@TheTheKRIT not logical in my opinion. YOur saying that what you see and touch is actually out there but in reality neurologists can say thats not true. You are seeing the image in the back of your brain meaning if it was really out there you wouldn't need to create the image in your brain. You know how i know matter does not truly exist? Because when you touch a solid object it feels solid right? but it is not you in fact dont even touch the object your hand is pushed away and you
@TheTheKRIT you create the sense of a solid object. Its not actually solid your mind just creates that sensation. Its only irrational to you and your main stream science because you are to lazy to take in to consideration consciousness. Physics does take into consideration the brain it just looks into what the brain is creating. Science is not going to find the keys to the universe there going to find the laws of our reality.
@TheTheKRIT u know what forget I said anything, I checked you out, your argument is always gonna fall back on 'it's all a form of perception, the brain interprets everything, consciousness is god' well i'm not getting drawn into that argument again.. just don't lie to yourself that it's a rational argument, that's an insult to actual rational thinkers.
@REDDRAKON and also bigotted and blinf faithed superstitious religious dogmas and fanatics who impose their own narrow views on others who are trying to be more free.
Think of matter as a manifestation of energy. Energy itself is intangible, you cannot see or feel it. You could argue temperature is energy, well you could be right but what u feel as temperature is just atomic vibration. Everything, every force, every piece of matter is just a manifestation of energy, and Energy is intangible. Therefore, the only way energy can exist is through manifestation such as light, matter, heat, etc.
... a god who created a god who was created by another god and so on..
The thing is that for you theists is more comfortable to believe how things should be (according to your myths) than to find out how things truly are in reality. Science is the one and only path to truth, deal with it.
I think this is a wonderful experiment but what will it ever achive? we have plenty of matter in our cosmos and we can create plenty of energy using that matter? what is the real purpose or agenda of 6 billion tax payers dollars spent? we all knew matter can create energy clearly it works both ways. why not feed the physically hungry first instead of feeding the intellectually hungry who really at the end of the day spend trillions finding out shit that doesnt help ANYBODY. Fuckin' wankers
@MakeMeMonarch Doesn't help anybody? Oh really? If you open the wikipedia on electricity, you will see that various scientists were dedicating their whole lives to studying electricity since 1600. But the first theoretical useful applications of electricity appeared only in 19-th century! So, what would you be doing now instead of chatting online if the government decided that electricity is useless waste of research money?
@bezmax Your first mistake was taking information from Wikipedia.
Your second mistake was getting angry at someone online.
Your third mistake is assuming that electricity has not had applications until recently. There is rock-hard evidence of ancient batteries made over a thousand years ago and is currently on display in the Baghdad Museum.
Your fourth and most likely not last mistake was asking a question that contradicts itself in a way to implicate that the one it came from is an idiot
@MakeMeMonarch im not sure where you're from, but i live in the USA so it wasn;t my tax dollars going to this, and even if it were. i'd be glad to donate. Keep in mind im not trying to be rude in ANY way at all, but you obviously have no idea what the LHC is actually doing, or how it can help us. so until you do, im just suggesting you hold your ignorant comments to yourself.
@MakeMeMonarch are you even European? lol you seem to be forgetting that it is technology and science that are allowing the human race to evolve and improve its quality of life. Unfortunately not all humans are as intelligent and entrepreneurial... that's one of the reasons why so many are hungry.
I am an Arab, and when I watch things like that it makes me really sad, more like jealous, of how the west has gone to think of amazing science like this and my people are still stuck in middle age religious debates and shallow philosophy, it'll be another century until we catch up again with the rest of the world :(
@Ramox3 what country are you from? because hopefully someday soon, your people will get proper hold of your oil and accelerate in growth as the uae did
@capetorial I am from Kuwait, the UAE isn't doing much too, other than buying buildings with oil money designed by westerners, built by south Asians and education go to hell
@Ramox3 i dont know that much about kuwait other than that, as im told, the u.s. assisted you causing 9/11 (not your fault and its been a while since i read). but i do know you have oil. who cares who built the structures, who designed them, as long as your country's living conditions are good. but i digress, i dont judge you for not wanting to live in luxury, i simply dont understand it.
@capetorial there might have been a Kuwaiti terrorist involved, but the government and the overwhelming majority of the people were against it, Its not about living in luxury, we have lots of luxury here in kuwait too, one of the highest GDP per Capita in the world, highest rates of obesity, highest energy consumption per capita etc.. that wasn't my point, my point is about religion taking over science, for example teaching the theory of evolution is still banned.
@OntDinRS ummm, thats nuclear fission. a process that basically breaks apart atomic particles/solid matter and turns it into energy. like.. the atomic bomb, or nuclear reactors like the ones on 3 Mile Island in Pennsylvania
@Positronicity and when the atom is no longer held together it comes apart releasing the energy, and freeing subatomic particles. ergo not material anymore since matter is based off of atoms.
@ItsNotEvenSunny In nuclear fission, a heavy atom, such as uranium-235 is bombarded with a thermal neutron. It then becomes an unstable isotope, uranium-236, briefly before splitting. It takes alot of energy to hold together a large atomic nucleus. Also, the energy released is heat, not subatomic particles, as subatomic particles are still matter.
@Positronicity stick to subjects you understand, subatomic particles are not matter, and when an atom is no longer an atom, it is not matter anymore. and i didn't say the energy released was subatomic particles, i said they're a bi-product of the event. the energy released is the energy stored from the strong nuclear force which binds the atoms. when you unbind the atoms with fission the atoms smash open releasing the particles.
@ItsNotEvenSunny Subatomic particles ARE matter. Muons have mass, there matter. Tau particles have mass they are matter. They are heavier versions of the electron. Protons and neutrons are subatomic particles and they are matter as well. These nucleons are composed of quarks, which are also matter. The particles released from fission include neutrinos, neutrons, which can decay into protons, electrons, and electron antineutrinos. Subatomic particles have mass, and therefore ARE matter.
@Positronicity i could be wrong, but i always thought i had a good understanding.. shows how much i understand when it comes to quantum physics ayy... lol
@ItsNotEvenSunny The thing is, energy itself is intangible, it only exists as manifestations of itself, such as light, temperature, matter, etc. And there are other processes that can liberate energy from matter, such as fusion, and antimatter annihilation.
@ItsNotEvenSunny Just look at the chart of the standard model. All those particles are matter, with the exception of the photon. Then look at the slew of baryons, mesons, and other composite particles of various combinations of quarks. Normal matter is made up of up quarks, down quarks, electrons, and the electron neutrino. Other particles include the charm, strange, top, and bottom quarks, muons, tau particles, mu neutrinos, tau neutrinos, W+, W-, Z bosons, and the gluon.
So that is why CERN was created. A six billion dollar experiment that is used to simplify things. For example, how to create anti-matter? We all know it needs an incredible amount of energy just to produce one. To make sense, it also waste incredible amount of tax-payers money and the rationale behind is still unknown as of this reading.
what is happening now in the universe in the passed time? Is it empty now?
i guess no. maybe all of us are living different lifes in different times in the same earth. what is the fixed thing and what is the variable? mass, time or energy? i think its the energy. if mass is constant and time i variable, that explains why we get older. if time is constant and mass is variable then what will happened if we move backward or move faster? i think E and C almost = ininiti, even if M is very small, :)
Guys listen, if we could fire matter at antimatter at the speed of light enough energy would be created to power all of Europe and brazil , now that is slot so all scientists out there find a way to do that because it would fix all of our energy problems. It is of fundamental importance that we find a way to do that
@obiewan111 The problem with that is in order to control and fire antimatter you need a increadible amount of energy even more that the amount of energy it will produce on a mater antimatter collision, so in the end you will waste more energy that you will produce.
Now tell me why I had my eyes half way shut looking at a candle, and the lines of light from it formed two doors with shadows going past it. looked so vivid, it looked as it it were an elevator .
k please read this and do not make fun of it cuz it will work!!!!!!! think ok something u really really want!!!!!got it????sweet!!!now by the end of this countdown make a wish!!!!! 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 make a wish!!!!!!!!!!!!!now write this 2 ten other videos with in an hour and your dream will come true!!!!!!!!!!!GOOD LUCK
@vancouverdogdowncast Actually, it would be E/M=MCª/M thereby reducing it makes E/M=Cª, right? That's my understanding at least. I may be wrong, but isn't that how it goes?
@l1nkie no, it took six billion dollars to prove it takes six billion dollars, to rearrange a math equation. Now all we have to do is wait 200 or so years until six billion dollars is not so much money, then rearranging math equations will be easy! wait, what?
@vancouverdogdowncast yes but this is dependent on light being the fastest thing in the universe and also this has to mean general relativity is correct but most scientists know it is not
@robweese I never said that it was impossible that god is energy and is unconscious, i was just replying to how ZeroBlitz said that "God must have created 'energy'" by saying that it isn't obvious that a conscious being created energy. I do not believe in a conscious God, but I'm open to the idea. Like you I will continue to believe what I believe until something changes my understanding.
In the same way that everything else - including religion - was "discovered."
These are moreso innate processes of the human psyche; one having a symbolic interpretation, the other having a literal interpretation. Both are in search of the unknowable; both make the unknowable known....two peas in a pod, really.
You know the Einstein quote. He was pretty smart ya know.
@mickleohb What if energy is GOD and is all that exist, and is conscious. That is the answer I find correct, That is until something changes my understanding. I never close myself off to new information.
@DiSoNeNcBoI Oh Science has the answer, I'm sure! LMAO
The all knowing, all wise god, Dorkins! He created all things to obey Him! Thou must not blaspheme by questioning Him, lest Thou feel the wrath of His sarcasm and arrogant self-centred load of bollocks and tripe!
That's what lay beyond! Do not question what thou holiest one says or his You Tube Children wilist abuse you, and might even call you names that will break your bones! LMFAO
BTW U Other Fatheads, I did spell his name correctly!
2. E=MC^2 WORKS, we have made Bombs with it, and its working good.
3. i respect you as a human.
4.completely disrespect your comments and suggest you to study on this to understand how these things work, OR leave this alone completely and let us believe in this "conspiracy" in peace.
the more we find out scientifically... the more esoteric and Divine.. IT all seems to be... the two strains of thought... the phlosophical, spiritual, astrological.. and the didactic results of science are seemingly coming closer and closer to......... well.. that's the paradox! ... I too would like to see us continue to search for whom we are and where we came.. and where we might go..... like Startrek... the universe is our last frontier.. well.. in this dimension....
@mlcucciardi Exactly, that's why it bugs the hell out of me when people (mostly militant atheists, although I use to be one myself) claim that science has made god or the divine obsolete. Anybody that knows about science knows that it constantly changes and that the more we know about the universe, the more it seems like a structure created by something beyond our comprehension.
What a lot of bollocks! If light and radio waves travel at the speed of light then the claims of seeing the big bang is preschool bullshit. No one living has been around for 15 billion years, so can not claim to see an event that occurred 15billion years ago, if at all, It's really that simple! This whole big bang and we come from apes thing is an establishment lie, the greatest one ever told!
@kryckeestrooff because light doesn't travel instantley, but instead takes time to reach our planet from the far reaches of the universe. Basically the further we look into the universe the further back in time we see...
@billybodyboard Are you fucking stupid or what? 186,000 miles per second isn't fast enough for you, care to name something that goes quicker? Maybe your Car or your hand on your dick? Oh Pleazzzzzzzze Don't try to cover up their lies, if what you had stated had any truth at all, it would be possible to see yesterday. Something that is not possible even the theory of quantum mechanics has proven this to be an impossibility! Maybe you have a phone box with a flashing blue light! LMAO
Well. I do beleive in god, but I also beleive that the universe was made by the Big Bang. From what I know, Energy can not be destroyed or created, but our fuking bodies is made from energy. God must have created "energy" and it did a awesome job O_O, our sun is 300.000 bigger than Earth, and it is considered a middle sized star.
Any lightsource emitted at any point in time can be perceptible today, unless ofcourse the lightwaves haven't been given enough time to reach earth. Essentialy,anytime you look to the cosmos you're actualy looking back in time becuase light takes time to travel, so you're seeing it as it was when many years ago.
@SystematicSequence Throw as many insults as you wish, it doesn't make you sound any smarter, you stupid fuck face!
As for your reply and "explanation" What a fucking lot of crap! I too can pluck a figure out of my ass, and say the universe is blahh old! All your education and science will never be able to prove it either way, But seeing how people like you want tangible proof of everything, I'm really surprised that so many of you put so much FAITH in science, which can't prove this! SUCKERZ!
@kryckeestrooff First of all I'm a man of science, yet a devout theist. Im open to everything; but to question or to claim proven tenable facts otherwise is deluding youself from the truth. Your rebellion agianst modern science is your undoing, when your confounds are based off nothing conclusive. Go get educated. and don't mistake Science with pseudo science.
@videosfromderelix Oh But I do understand it, all too well infact! You just keep believing everything that you are told, and you'll be just fine. For me I'll continue to question everything that makes no sense whatsoever, and this is one of those things. But be fore you reply back think about this for a second, "When you went to school they told us it was to prepare you for adult life, nothing was further from the truth!" Yep you just keep doing as your told! There's a good little sheepy! LMAO
@kryckeestrooff BTW I love that you have no evidence to support your theory yet you call us sheep for looking at the evidence.
Again, don't assume it's a conspiracy just because you can't understand it. Keep making your ignorant assumptions about me, your going to die alone anyways. And you deserve it, because your a waste of flesh for this universe. Your gods mistake.
See, I can make assumptions and call people names too. Obnoxious isn't it?
Of course you don't care, your happy to be a mistake.
@kryckeestrooff I don't know if your comment is a troll or not, but to have a look on such video you must first understand the fundamental law of "looking back" in science... For example, the MER-A exploration Rover in Mars takes a few hours to move after the signal from Earth launch, this is due of the effect of the vastness of space, when they say look back in past, they mean the light and sound (more like noise) that coming from stars closer to the "Breaking point" or Big Bang
proof that god exists because god created energy which is everything you see, hear, feel, smell, taste. but nobody ever thinks about why anything is solid because ultimatly it is all energy i think it is because we think it is solid and if we think something is not solid then it is not. it is all our mind fooling us because we have all been fooled by the media and others telling us so for generations.
Energy is what caused the big bang...its the only possible solution and this clip has proved it...If energy can create matter and energy can only be the source for any reaction to take place...thereforeif you believe in god, then that god is energy...but before the big bang it must have been literally just energy itself to create atoms etc.
I am not a physicist but I think it should be possible to create matter from electromagnetic energy. It would be great if we could. We could create anything we wanted.
I like the clip, but it's too short :) . There are many ways for matter to become energy, but the process by which energy becomes matter is a mindbender. I would love to know how to harness all the pure energy we would need to make a glass of water. Star Trek replicators, here we come!
where have you scientists been all this time? of course, energy is matter and matter is energy. take all forms of life as example, we need the light energy to grow. look at photosynthesis. The entire universe is made of 3 elements time, space and matter(energy), as in the first line in the bible. In the beginning, God made the heavens and earth. beginning = time , heavens = space, earth = matter. And yes God exists, if only you knew, the brain is sensor to God, and can be so easily reached.
um im pretty sure mass and energy r 2 different things, otherwise the equation wud be m=e and not e=mc2.. and im also pretty sure that we haven't been able to find extreme amounts of energy in mass alone, are you telling me i can turn a quarter into electricity?? anything can b any energy? they didn't even describe how, they just made the statement, they have no proof its just a theory and these guys buttfuck themselves.
@jarostone Dear god are you an idiot? You know what EQUATION means right? In an equation, both sides are equal. This equation says that mass at a certain state is equal to energy, so energy is equal to mass at a certain state. You would just need to find a way of concentrating the energy back into mass and then remove the c^2 part of it. I don't know the technical details, but in layman's terms what I've said makes sense. If energy can be turned into mass, then mass can be turn into energy.
Wasn't E=mc2 an formula of energy of moving stuff?
Anyway, matter could be different waving of.... umm let's do it like this:
Sun beams and stuff are said to be some waves not particles so let's say everything is same ripples, but in different strenght and volume like vacuum would be the lowest level of ripples and something like table would be stronger ripples.
Living cells can't even be made out of nothing, so evolution doesn't count either. All that is left is believing either evolution or creationism. The one or the other religion.
everything had to come from somewhere, or maybe we are wrong and theres no such thing as nothing. its just a word we use to explain something, and we know space is not empty in the slightest now that we have progressed.
things grow and change, and they come from somewhere in the past that we are not certain of, screw both terms, lets get down to the actual matter at hand and look for clues instead of bickering about something we clearly do not know the answer to.
You cant make any science test with space. So, you cant proof, space expanding or curving.
I have science test and i can proof, photons emit energy and thats why light bending and redshifting with out expanding space and with out curving/bending space!
Etimespace videos and you know how visible Universe born and how visible Universe energy/matter moving in space who already been there!
yes, i am not highly educated but i can see many benefits of this huge proton merry go round....i think it is great...and yes elnerdoloco the good ole USA is definitely in charge of pissing away billions!!!! however, the space shuttle program was built by the lowest bidder.....and it is still flying.
@ppedalen: It hardly matters. This is still pennies as far as government spending goes. I am sure you are familiar with the bailouts, and the US has been spending over 600 billion annually on the military budget alone in the last few years. Over five times the amount China spends. Even if the cost was 60 billion, it was approved 14 years ago. I am sure you would be in favor of cutting less than 1% of one nation's defense budget for 14 short years to fund an experiment like this.
Oh I forgot, besides modest, I would describe you as nice and soft spoken. Im considering starting a religion with you as god or atlest the prefeser of god´s voice and will, dont know what to call it, any suggestions?
I first hypothesized about this back in 2002, m=E/c² or energy transforms into matter at rest. The only way for energy to rest is to slow to a stop relative to the movement of the source, or where it originated. Seeing that electrons are affected by magnetic fields then the logical place to stop the electron is 90° to a magnetic field. That happens to be located right where all matter is found around young suns and radioactive planets like Saturn, Jupiter & Uranus. It explains why new rings..
.. are found the furthest from Saturn's surface. As the magnetic field increases so does the location where elementary particles are produced. This is why the outer rings of Saturn are younger than the inner ones. NASA said it would take them a few years to figure out why because it does not fit current theory. That is because the current Nebula theory is wrong. Matter is created at the extents of the magnetic field along the magnetic equator. Kuiper belt has the youngest objects in our system.
... This would be proven if the age of Mercury is found to be the oldest of all the planets in our solar system. The same mechanism that is causing gravity is also causing the solar system to grow over time. New young objects will be found beyond the Kuiper belt, see Eris UB313. peace.
Because energy or speed of light didn't exist when there was nothing.. just because you don't know where those two came from, doesn't mean that god exists. Ye well, neither do I, but i still want to know the logical answer some day, not just be fine with the supernatural creator of everything.
@ilovetheview47 my proof of there being a God is that without an all powerful creator matter never would have existed because nothing can never make something.
@414dtc12 who said nothing made something. and if you want to use the laws of physics use them correctly. and even if there needed to be a creator dont mean its your, or prove the bible and heaven true
Get to know yourself first...thats what people on the east knew for a long time.Some answers just become clear when you try too look for them inside :)
TheNin0007 6 days ago
Could someone explain to me what the 6bn dollars went on? We already know two ways of converting energy into matter, both of which are extremely inefficient: Accelerating particles past the speed of light is 1 - experiments at the LHC have determined that once you've got protons to 99.9999% of the speed of light, they stop growing in speed but start gaining mass instead. A lot of energy is lost in the process tho. 2nd is black holes, apparently un-tappable sources.
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
Somebody can explain to me, why some scientists say that our galaxy have a 13-14 bi. years old, but others scientists says that our universe have the same age... If the universe is a big space where have a lot of galaxies?
So, if our galaxy have 14bi yo. what the real age of our universe if the universe is bigger than galaxy? *--*
pauloricardosantanna 3 weeks ago
Most scientists believe that the universe is around 13.7 bn years old. They also believe that the Milky Way is around 13.2 bn years old. Seems like most galaxies were born 'shortly' after the Big Bang. Mind you, 500 million years isn't actually THAT short a time, but you can safely say that the Milky Way is one of the oldest galaxies in the universe.
I personally am a bit perplexed by this question tho, There must've been some srs time dilation going on, how can we rly say 14bn yrs..
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
@pauloricardosantanna Honestly we can never know for certain. Everything we see is jsut perceved by our brain, time is created by our brain and therefore motion cannot exist either. Pardon my language but life is just one big mind fuck.
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
i dont really think there is an end to how percise for example, what is a particle made up of. and what is that material made up of.
CooOOookiez 1 month ago
e=mc2i <--------
Muraz72 1 month ago
Amount of energy posessed by a body = Mass of the body x The speed of light squared.
Mass of a theoretical body = Amount of energy intput/The speed of light squared.
:S That sounds like we need more energy than we can produce to make a clump of dirt.
DoubleGlog 2 months ago
Hmmm... vancouverdogdowncast... won't we have to change e=mc2 because of neutrinos?
SaeWoongOh 3 months ago
@SaeWoongOh what do you mean by this ?
MsPrincessCaroline 4 weeks ago
@SaeWoongOh
No, we know for a fact that the formula e=mc2 checks out. If anything, those particular neutrinos at the LHC traveled back in time. It's a very slim 'if anything' though it's much more likely that the experiment was compromised.
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
@Daymjo No we dont that is completely false. General relativity has been proven false by many experiements but its still the best theory to date. Its still jsut a theory and also. The law of e=mc2 does not apply to the sub atomic level meaning that overall it cannot be true. None of the formulas we ahve to day will be correct until we can have a formule for consciousness because in the end matter is just perceived by our brain, its really just frequencies of vibrating energy, not matter
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
@TheTheKRIT For every experiment that has disproven general relativity at least 10 have confirmed it. ur right, the laws of physics break down in extreme conditions, that's hardly argument against them though, they only work in restricted conditions. Its like saying 'quantum physics doesnt work in any level above the sub atomic one so its false'. Formula for consciousness sounds sci-fi.. and no its not, matter is a physical manifestation of energy its not a perception or an interpretation.
Daymjo 1 week ago
@Daymjo Yes thats true but there effects must apply to all objects of any size. Thats why Einstein hoped that quantum physics could not exist. A formula for consciousness sounds si fi, your right but thats only because scientists choose to ignore it. Why do they ignore it, simply because it would make science impossible. It would be way to complicated. "matter is a physical manifestation of energy" That is indeed not true once again your taking consciousness out of the equation that is
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
@TheTheKRIT not logical in my opinion. YOur saying that what you see and touch is actually out there but in reality neurologists can say thats not true. You are seeing the image in the back of your brain meaning if it was really out there you wouldn't need to create the image in your brain. You know how i know matter does not truly exist? Because when you touch a solid object it feels solid right? but it is not you in fact dont even touch the object your hand is pushed away and you
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
@TheTheKRIT you create the sense of a solid object. Its not actually solid your mind just creates that sensation. Its only irrational to you and your main stream science because you are to lazy to take in to consideration consciousness. Physics does take into consideration the brain it just looks into what the brain is creating. Science is not going to find the keys to the universe there going to find the laws of our reality.
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
@TheTheKRIT u know what forget I said anything, I checked you out, your argument is always gonna fall back on 'it's all a form of perception, the brain interprets everything, consciousness is god' well i'm not getting drawn into that argument again.. just don't lie to yourself that it's a rational argument, that's an insult to actual rational thinkers.
Daymjo 1 week ago
could the mormons get off youtube already
REDDRAKON 5 months ago
@REDDRAKON and also bigotted and blinf faithed superstitious religious dogmas and fanatics who impose their own narrow views on others who are trying to be more free.
HalflingShireFolk 1 month ago
try to find e=mc2 in latin.
djpony 5 months ago
Think of matter as a manifestation of energy. Energy itself is intangible, you cannot see or feel it. You could argue temperature is energy, well you could be right but what u feel as temperature is just atomic vibration. Everything, every force, every piece of matter is just a manifestation of energy, and Energy is intangible. Therefore, the only way energy can exist is through manifestation such as light, matter, heat, etc.
Positronicity 6 months ago
... a god who created a god who was created by another god and so on..
The thing is that for you theists is more comfortable to believe how things should be (according to your myths) than to find out how things truly are in reality. Science is the one and only path to truth, deal with it.
ZZzzzzzWhat 6 months ago
okie who created energy :D hmmm
very simple question
voncagnek 6 months ago
@voncagnek Who created (you vergion of) God? is simply has you question.
to brief things up:
you'll then tell me "but god is eternal, he always existed"
and i will answer "If you suppose that god always existed you can also suppose that the universe and energy also are eternal and always existed"
then you'll go "Ho but to start the BB there would have to be an action in the first place"
Yap, there also would have to be a first intention to create god aswell. (...)
ZZzzzzzWhat 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my profile
Tyree365 6 months ago
My fucking gosh. I was blind, but now I can see.
Risulfur 7 months ago
So this is what we spend taxes on.... to waste time creating something that might not even be possible to do fukkkkkk that
ShadowKNighT788 7 months ago
@ShadowKNighT788 Oh, you idiot.
rottenpancakes 6 months ago
I think this is a wonderful experiment but what will it ever achive? we have plenty of matter in our cosmos and we can create plenty of energy using that matter? what is the real purpose or agenda of 6 billion tax payers dollars spent? we all knew matter can create energy clearly it works both ways. why not feed the physically hungry first instead of feeding the intellectually hungry who really at the end of the day spend trillions finding out shit that doesnt help ANYBODY. Fuckin' wankers
MakeMeMonarch 7 months ago
@MakeMeMonarch Doesn't help anybody? Oh really? If you open the wikipedia on electricity, you will see that various scientists were dedicating their whole lives to studying electricity since 1600. But the first theoretical useful applications of electricity appeared only in 19-th century! So, what would you be doing now instead of chatting online if the government decided that electricity is useless waste of research money?
bezmax 7 months ago 17
@bezmax he might know how to socialize properly , or have a healthy life ,, the horror
666is999backwards 6 months ago
@bezmax Your first mistake was taking information from Wikipedia.
Your second mistake was getting angry at someone online.
Your third mistake is assuming that electricity has not had applications until recently. There is rock-hard evidence of ancient batteries made over a thousand years ago and is currently on display in the Baghdad Museum.
Your fourth and most likely not last mistake was asking a question that contradicts itself in a way to implicate that the one it came from is an idiot
MegaSteadfast 4 months ago
@MakeMeMonarch im not sure where you're from, but i live in the USA so it wasn;t my tax dollars going to this, and even if it were. i'd be glad to donate. Keep in mind im not trying to be rude in ANY way at all, but you obviously have no idea what the LHC is actually doing, or how it can help us. so until you do, im just suggesting you hold your ignorant comments to yourself.
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@MakeMeMonarch are you even European? lol you seem to be forgetting that it is technology and science that are allowing the human race to evolve and improve its quality of life. Unfortunately not all humans are as intelligent and entrepreneurial... that's one of the reasons why so many are hungry.
FernPinto 1 month ago
@MakeMeMonarch replicators, some time in the future. end of resource scarcity, end of world hunger? ;)
MidnightSt 1 week ago
I am an Arab, and when I watch things like that it makes me really sad, more like jealous, of how the west has gone to think of amazing science like this and my people are still stuck in middle age religious debates and shallow philosophy, it'll be another century until we catch up again with the rest of the world :(
Ramox3 8 months ago
@Ramox3 what country are you from? because hopefully someday soon, your people will get proper hold of your oil and accelerate in growth as the uae did
capetorial 8 months ago
@capetorial I am from Kuwait, the UAE isn't doing much too, other than buying buildings with oil money designed by westerners, built by south Asians and education go to hell
Ramox3 8 months ago
@Ramox3 i dont know that much about kuwait other than that, as im told, the u.s. assisted you causing 9/11 (not your fault and its been a while since i read). but i do know you have oil. who cares who built the structures, who designed them, as long as your country's living conditions are good. but i digress, i dont judge you for not wanting to live in luxury, i simply dont understand it.
capetorial 8 months ago
@capetorial there might have been a Kuwaiti terrorist involved, but the government and the overwhelming majority of the people were against it, Its not about living in luxury, we have lots of luxury here in kuwait too, one of the highest GDP per Capita in the world, highest rates of obesity, highest energy consumption per capita etc.. that wasn't my point, my point is about religion taking over science, for example teaching the theory of evolution is still banned.
Ramox3 8 months ago
@Ramox3 wow. that sucks. its banned in some states in the u.s., though
capetorial 8 months ago
@capetorial Shows how "secular" our government really is xD
xXL3GITAMACYXx1 8 months ago
Matter is a highly concentrated form of energy.
Can't wait for them to be able to transfer matter into energy, no more waste plants or smoke. It can all be deleted and transformed into energy :D
OntDinRS 8 months ago
@OntDinRS i am sure it would be used as a weapon long before its used for something like that
Darcy137 7 months ago
@Darcy137 unfortunately i think you're right
0pp11 7 months ago
@OntDinRS ummm, thats nuclear fission. a process that basically breaks apart atomic particles/solid matter and turns it into energy. like.. the atomic bomb, or nuclear reactors like the ones on 3 Mile Island in Pennsylvania
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny
I didn't mean it like that, I meant it as in de materialization process.
OntDinRS 6 months ago
@OntDinRS well what do you mean by material, are you referring to solid matter? something with weight?
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny
I shouldn't need to answer that, what with material and matter being derivative.
OntDinRS 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny E=Mc^2 - matter is energy and energy is matter. your thoughts on "materializing" is exactly what i said earlier.
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny Fission/fusion releases energy from a nuclei's binding energy. the energy that holds the nucleons together.
Positronicity 6 months ago
@Positronicity and when the atom is no longer held together it comes apart releasing the energy, and freeing subatomic particles. ergo not material anymore since matter is based off of atoms.
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny In nuclear fission, a heavy atom, such as uranium-235 is bombarded with a thermal neutron. It then becomes an unstable isotope, uranium-236, briefly before splitting. It takes alot of energy to hold together a large atomic nucleus. Also, the energy released is heat, not subatomic particles, as subatomic particles are still matter.
Positronicity 6 months ago
@Positronicity stick to subjects you understand, subatomic particles are not matter, and when an atom is no longer an atom, it is not matter anymore. and i didn't say the energy released was subatomic particles, i said they're a bi-product of the event. the energy released is the energy stored from the strong nuclear force which binds the atoms. when you unbind the atoms with fission the atoms smash open releasing the particles.
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny Subatomic particles ARE matter. Muons have mass, there matter. Tau particles have mass they are matter. They are heavier versions of the electron. Protons and neutrons are subatomic particles and they are matter as well. These nucleons are composed of quarks, which are also matter. The particles released from fission include neutrinos, neutrons, which can decay into protons, electrons, and electron antineutrinos. Subatomic particles have mass, and therefore ARE matter.
Positronicity 6 months ago
Comment removed
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@Positronicity i could be wrong, but i always thought i had a good understanding.. shows how much i understand when it comes to quantum physics ayy... lol
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny The thing is, energy itself is intangible, it only exists as manifestations of itself, such as light, temperature, matter, etc. And there are other processes that can liberate energy from matter, such as fusion, and antimatter annihilation.
Positronicity 6 months ago
@ItsNotEvenSunny Just look at the chart of the standard model. All those particles are matter, with the exception of the photon. Then look at the slew of baryons, mesons, and other composite particles of various combinations of quarks. Normal matter is made up of up quarks, down quarks, electrons, and the electron neutrino. Other particles include the charm, strange, top, and bottom quarks, muons, tau particles, mu neutrinos, tau neutrinos, W+, W-, Z bosons, and the gluon.
Positronicity 6 months ago
So that is why CERN was created. A six billion dollar experiment that is used to simplify things. For example, how to create anti-matter? We all know it needs an incredible amount of energy just to produce one. To make sense, it also waste incredible amount of tax-payers money and the rationale behind is still unknown as of this reading.
pogpog28 8 months ago
what is happening now in the universe in the passed time? Is it empty now?
i guess no. maybe all of us are living different lifes in different times in the same earth. what is the fixed thing and what is the variable? mass, time or energy? i think its the energy. if mass is constant and time i variable, that explains why we get older. if time is constant and mass is variable then what will happened if we move backward or move faster? i think E and C almost = ininiti, even if M is very small, :)
superherob12 8 months ago
Guys listen, if we could fire matter at antimatter at the speed of light enough energy would be created to power all of Europe and brazil , now that is slot so all scientists out there find a way to do that because it would fix all of our energy problems. It is of fundamental importance that we find a way to do that
obiewan111 9 months ago
@obiewan111 The problem with that is in order to control and fire antimatter you need a increadible amount of energy even more that the amount of energy it will produce on a mater antimatter collision, so in the end you will waste more energy that you will produce.
rayyvnzla 8 months ago
@obiewan111 How would you collect that energy? Would matter and anti-matter been shot inside some kind of reactor or acelerator?
fyal69 8 months ago
Now tell me why I had my eyes half way shut looking at a candle, and the lines of light from it formed two doors with shadows going past it. looked so vivid, it looked as it it were an elevator .
Williammoon1995 9 months ago
I believe energy is not infinite in this universe and everything will eventually revert back to its original form as it was before the Big Bang.
crazymonkeyx 9 months ago
k please read this and do not make fun of it cuz it will work!!!!!!! think ok something u really really want!!!!!got it????sweet!!!now by the end of this countdown make a wish!!!!! 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 make a wish!!!!!!!!!!!!!now write this 2 ten other videos with in an hour and your dream will come true!!!!!!!!!!!GOOD LUCK
SuperDuperGameJunkie 9 months ago
keep that weird lookin dude out of this
555loker 10 months ago
a replicator would be nice
paronfisk 10 months ago
e = mc^2 therefore m = e/c^2
vancouverdogdowncast 11 months ago 15
@vancouverdogdowncast Energy = Matter times a really big number.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@vancouverdogdowncast
This only applies to resting masses, therefore not energy
3200manpro 5 months ago
@3200manpro ...resting masses do have energy. its called potential energy.
vancouverdogdowncast 5 months ago
@vancouverdogdowncast Actually, it would be E/M=MCª/M thereby reducing it makes E/M=Cª, right? That's my understanding at least. I may be wrong, but isn't that how it goes?
threehead99 4 months ago
@vancouverdogdowncast it took six billion dollars to rearrange a math equation.
l1nkie 3 months ago 2
@l1nkie no, it took six billion dollars to prove it takes six billion dollars, to rearrange a math equation. Now all we have to do is wait 200 or so years until six billion dollars is not so much money, then rearranging math equations will be easy! wait, what?
GodlessMartyr666 1 week ago
@vancouverdogdowncast yes but this is dependent on light being the fastest thing in the universe and also this has to mean general relativity is correct but most scientists know it is not
TheTheKRIT 1 week ago
Justin Bieber.
heymangone 1 year ago
OF COURSE ENERGY AND MATTER ARE CONSERVED! How could you simply create something out of nothing, or make something disappear?
Medditerranean 1 year ago
@Medditerranean
Say there is infinite energy in infinite other universerses? We can grab something from there.
YellowMagi 1 year ago
@Medditerranean if that was true, then we wouldn't be here...
vancouverdogdowncast 11 months ago
@robweese I never said that it was impossible that god is energy and is unconscious, i was just replying to how ZeroBlitz said that "God must have created 'energy'" by saying that it isn't obvious that a conscious being created energy. I do not believe in a conscious God, but I'm open to the idea. Like you I will continue to believe what I believe until something changes my understanding.
mickleohb 1 year ago
Religion is man made as opposed to science
motokev 1 year ago
@motokev
Dude....science is quite obviously man made as well. Science is one of mankind's tools to understand the universe. It's inherently untilitarian.
TheDreamMechanic 11 months ago
@TheDreamMechanic Wrong, science was not made by man, it was discovered.
fireIIC 9 months ago
@fireIIC
In the same way that everything else - including religion - was "discovered."
These are moreso innate processes of the human psyche; one having a symbolic interpretation, the other having a literal interpretation. Both are in search of the unknowable; both make the unknowable known....two peas in a pod, really.
You know the Einstein quote. He was pretty smart ya know.
TheDreamMechanic 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a good spot
sites.google.com/site/physicsphilosophyscience/home
Stupefience 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
E=mc2
So then energy is moving mass, and moving mass has energy?
kurtnelle 1 year ago
E=mc2
So then energy is moving mass, and when you move mass you get energy?
kurtnelle 1 year ago
well, I've been reading Angels and Demons and there ARE alot of things we really don't know. About energy, religion, matter & anti-matter.
freiheit1102 1 year ago
@freiheit1102 dont put religion a part of the equation
AF1J 1 year ago
@AF1J I am not putting Religion here. But Religion is a part of Science. nd Science is a part of Religion. They're not different methodology.
freiheit1102 1 year ago
@freiheit1102 Haha! No... Science is explaining things trough observation. Religion isn't.
TheTymera 1 year ago
@freiheit1102 verry correct.. !! infact, the big bang theory proves the bible right !!!
harshdoshi18 1 year ago
@harshdoshi18 Okay then, so who created "GOD" then =)
yxrcbszg 1 year ago
@harshdoshi18 In no way shape or form, does it do that.
CTU4105 10 months ago
@freiheit1102 xactly !! ive read it and love it !!! :D evryone shud know abt some things in it ~!!!!
harshdoshi18 8 months ago
Star Trek has been doing it for ages. What took us so long?
zollen123 1 year ago
Energy creates matter? Great! Thats what every fantasy mage, wizard and warlock has tried to tell you.But YOU DIDNT LISTEN!!!
And now that you know the secret to my fireball spells i must flee your world
Cya
LongviewGD182 1 year ago
@ZeroBlitz36 why must God have created energy? What if "God" is unconscious Energy?
mickleohb 1 year ago
@mickleohb What if energy is GOD and is all that exist, and is conscious. That is the answer I find correct, That is until something changes my understanding. I never close myself off to new information.
robweese 1 year ago
@DiSoNeNcBoI Oh Science has the answer, I'm sure! LMAO
The all knowing, all wise god, Dorkins! He created all things to obey Him! Thou must not blaspheme by questioning Him, lest Thou feel the wrath of His sarcasm and arrogant self-centred load of bollocks and tripe!
That's what lay beyond! Do not question what thou holiest one says or his You Tube Children wilist abuse you, and might even call you names that will break your bones! LMFAO
BTW U Other Fatheads, I did spell his name correctly!
kryckeestrooff 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff First of all 13.7 NOT 15 Billion.
2. E=MC^2 WORKS, we have made Bombs with it, and its working good.
3. i respect you as a human.
4.completely disrespect your comments and suggest you to study on this to understand how these things work, OR leave this alone completely and let us believe in this "conspiracy" in peace.
msgol1 1 year ago
the more we find out scientifically... the more esoteric and Divine.. IT all seems to be... the two strains of thought... the phlosophical, spiritual, astrological.. and the didactic results of science are seemingly coming closer and closer to......... well.. that's the paradox! ... I too would like to see us continue to search for whom we are and where we came.. and where we might go..... like Startrek... the universe is our last frontier.. well.. in this dimension....
mlcucciardi 1 year ago
@mlcucciardi Exactly, that's why it bugs the hell out of me when people (mostly militant atheists, although I use to be one myself) claim that science has made god or the divine obsolete. Anybody that knows about science knows that it constantly changes and that the more we know about the universe, the more it seems like a structure created by something beyond our comprehension.
videosfromderelix 1 year ago
What a lot of bollocks! If light and radio waves travel at the speed of light then the claims of seeing the big bang is preschool bullshit. No one living has been around for 15 billion years, so can not claim to see an event that occurred 15billion years ago, if at all, It's really that simple! This whole big bang and we come from apes thing is an establishment lie, the greatest one ever told!
kryckeestrooff 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff because light doesn't travel instantley, but instead takes time to reach our planet from the far reaches of the universe. Basically the further we look into the universe the further back in time we see...
billybodyboard 1 year ago
@billybodyboard Are you fucking stupid or what? 186,000 miles per second isn't fast enough for you, care to name something that goes quicker? Maybe your Car or your hand on your dick? Oh Pleazzzzzzzze Don't try to cover up their lies, if what you had stated had any truth at all, it would be possible to see yesterday. Something that is not possible even the theory of quantum mechanics has proven this to be an impossibility! Maybe you have a phone box with a flashing blue light! LMAO
kryckeestrooff 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff
Well. I do beleive in god, but I also beleive that the universe was made by the Big Bang. From what I know, Energy can not be destroyed or created, but our fuking bodies is made from energy. God must have created "energy" and it did a awesome job O_O, our sun is 300.000 bigger than Earth, and it is considered a middle sized star.
ZeroBlitz36 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff You are a highly miseduacted person.
Any lightsource emitted at any point in time can be perceptible today, unless ofcourse the lightwaves haven't been given enough time to reach earth. Essentialy,anytime you look to the cosmos you're actualy looking back in time becuase light takes time to travel, so you're seeing it as it was when many years ago.
SystematicSequence 1 year ago
@SystematicSequence Throw as many insults as you wish, it doesn't make you sound any smarter, you stupid fuck face!
As for your reply and "explanation" What a fucking lot of crap! I too can pluck a figure out of my ass, and say the universe is blahh old! All your education and science will never be able to prove it either way, But seeing how people like you want tangible proof of everything, I'm really surprised that so many of you put so much FAITH in science, which can't prove this! SUCKERZ!
kryckeestrooff 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff First of all I'm a man of science, yet a devout theist. Im open to everything; but to question or to claim proven tenable facts otherwise is deluding youself from the truth. Your rebellion agianst modern science is your undoing, when your confounds are based off nothing conclusive. Go get educated. and don't mistake Science with pseudo science.
SystematicSequence 1 year ago
@SystematicSequence You know what? Do tell me how you concieve these preposterous assuptions of youres; sincerely.
SystematicSequence 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff Sure, you don't understand it so it must be some kind of conspiracy.
All of us are just sheep for seeing the evidence, your much smarter and free spirited for believing everything your told.
videosfromderelix 1 year ago
@videosfromderelix Oh But I do understand it, all too well infact! You just keep believing everything that you are told, and you'll be just fine. For me I'll continue to question everything that makes no sense whatsoever, and this is one of those things. But be fore you reply back think about this for a second, "When you went to school they told us it was to prepare you for adult life, nothing was further from the truth!" Yep you just keep doing as your told! There's a good little sheepy! LMAO
kryckeestrooff 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff Your clearly an asshole.
I'm not a sheep, and you don't really question everything you just believe what whores like Alex Jones tell you.
Yes that's a good little sheepy, keep insulting me for pursuing the truth myself. Stay asleep little sheepy.
videosfromderelix 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff BTW I love that you have no evidence to support your theory yet you call us sheep for looking at the evidence.
Again, don't assume it's a conspiracy just because you can't understand it. Keep making your ignorant assumptions about me, your going to die alone anyways. And you deserve it, because your a waste of flesh for this universe. Your gods mistake.
See, I can make assumptions and call people names too. Obnoxious isn't it?
Of course you don't care, your happy to be a mistake.
videosfromderelix 1 year ago
@kryckeestrooff I don't know if your comment is a troll or not, but to have a look on such video you must first understand the fundamental law of "looking back" in science... For example, the MER-A exploration Rover in Mars takes a few hours to move after the signal from Earth launch, this is due of the effect of the vastness of space, when they say look back in past, they mean the light and sound (more like noise) that coming from stars closer to the "Breaking point" or Big Bang
Pappyroys 1 year ago
proof that god exists because god created energy which is everything you see, hear, feel, smell, taste. but nobody ever thinks about why anything is solid because ultimatly it is all energy i think it is because we think it is solid and if we think something is not solid then it is not. it is all our mind fooling us because we have all been fooled by the media and others telling us so for generations.
QAIS2415 1 year ago
Yea man, anything to do with creation is a great leap for mankind. Wonder how God feels about that?
carbonsteelz 1 year ago
this reminds of that anime i watched where the guy can make weapons out of anything when he draws a circle and then clap his hands.
ThreesiXtydegreeS 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomlaughingman 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomlaughingman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just as i suspected
WolfClant 1 year ago
but then what created energy? What does energy consist of?
waanta44 1 year ago
Energy is what caused the big bang...its the only possible solution and this clip has proved it...If energy can create matter and energy can only be the source for any reaction to take place...thereforeif you believe in god, then that god is energy...but before the big bang it must have been literally just energy itself to create atoms etc.
waanta44 1 year ago
I am not a physicist but I think it should be possible to create matter from electromagnetic energy. It would be great if we could. We could create anything we wanted.
RobDeManc 1 year ago
I like the clip, but it's too short :) . There are many ways for matter to become energy, but the process by which energy becomes matter is a mindbender. I would love to know how to harness all the pure energy we would need to make a glass of water. Star Trek replicators, here we come!
marasu66 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomlaughingman 1 year ago
Comment removed
randomlaughingman 1 year ago
@marasu66 Annihilation is how matter becomes energy (a particle and its anti-particle collide producing large amounts of energy)
Pair production is the reverse (energy in the form of a gamma ray spontaneously forms into a particle and its antiparticle)
So no star trek tech just yet...
sgtdiddle 1 year ago
where have you scientists been all this time? of course, energy is matter and matter is energy. take all forms of life as example, we need the light energy to grow. look at photosynthesis. The entire universe is made of 3 elements time, space and matter(energy), as in the first line in the bible. In the beginning, God made the heavens and earth. beginning = time , heavens = space, earth = matter. And yes God exists, if only you knew, the brain is sensor to God, and can be so easily reached.
Revelation47 1 year ago
um im pretty sure mass and energy r 2 different things, otherwise the equation wud be m=e and not e=mc2.. and im also pretty sure that we haven't been able to find extreme amounts of energy in mass alone, are you telling me i can turn a quarter into electricity?? anything can b any energy? they didn't even describe how, they just made the statement, they have no proof its just a theory and these guys buttfuck themselves.
jarostone 1 year ago
@jarostone Dear god are you an idiot? You know what EQUATION means right? In an equation, both sides are equal. This equation says that mass at a certain state is equal to energy, so energy is equal to mass at a certain state. You would just need to find a way of concentrating the energy back into mass and then remove the c^2 part of it. I don't know the technical details, but in layman's terms what I've said makes sense. If energy can be turned into mass, then mass can be turn into energy.
TheBreadMakerMan 1 year ago
Tell Me Something I dont know PLEASE dam it!
00Avenger17 1 year ago
Wasn't E=mc2 an formula of energy of moving stuff?
Anyway, matter could be different waving of.... umm let's do it like this:
Sun beams and stuff are said to be some waves not particles so let's say everything is same ripples, but in different strenght and volume like vacuum would be the lowest level of ripples and something like table would be stronger ripples.
Starioshka 1 year ago
Fuck you idiot cock-smotherer.
corruptorCEREBRUM 1 year ago
Dr. Jonathan Reed Uses The Link Bracelet - Alien Technology - On Camera. Odisealink. Watch here ___
watch?v=-Jmm2SaAbJo
ReedLinkFootage 1 year ago
energy and matter are the same
GentillAbdulla 1 year ago
Lol if you learn to operate this this you will have the ultimate party trick.
myndziuss 1 year ago
if the energy can produce mass then it must be reversible. The mass is producing energy.
So when the flesh is dying, it is producing energy which is the soul
tranceceiver 1 year ago
@tranceceiver NO!!! your body does not use Nuclear fission to decompose.
skwisgaar451 1 year ago
@skwisgaar451 lol at the thought of that though
sgtdiddle 1 year ago
universe is 14 billion years old , when we make a machin that is 14 biilion dollars costs that when we will understand the universe .
So i guess over 2000 years more and the truth about our universe will be answered . I sure of it
system0system0 1 year ago
So are we the product of a black hole from a different universe.
If energy and matter are the same then...
And/If all matter/time/light is sucked into a black hole, then could the BIG BANG just be a landfill site?
Just like we fill a trash bag at 1 location, knowing its contents will spew out at another location, are we the wrong side of a Black Hole?
This isnt a joke question so if anyone has any link pls send. Or just tell me how stupid I am.
MrSuperanon2010 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrSuperanon2010 1 year ago
Living cells can't even be made out of nothing, so evolution doesn't count either. All that is left is believing either evolution or creationism. The one or the other religion.
royalsteven 1 year ago
everything had to come from somewhere, or maybe we are wrong and theres no such thing as nothing. its just a word we use to explain something, and we know space is not empty in the slightest now that we have progressed.
things grow and change, and they come from somewhere in the past that we are not certain of, screw both terms, lets get down to the actual matter at hand and look for clues instead of bickering about something we clearly do not know the answer to.
@everyone.
KKinsane2009 1 year ago
@royalsteven
Living cells are not made out of nothing.
That part of your remark is right.
Your conclusions however are wrong.
Cars are not made out of nothing so car sciense doesnt count? Car Science and religion are all that is left? Car Science is a religion?
What you are saying is that every study of the material world is a religion?
vdv69 1 year ago
You would be amazed how some people consider cars (technology) to be a religion also ahah
royalsteven 1 year ago
I hope this "form-answer" is not your best.
I'm interested in your "content-answer".
vdv69 1 year ago
@royalsteven I believe you are referring to abiogenisis, not evolution. evolution has nothing to do with creation of anything.
iclash 1 year ago
@royalsteven lol, funny
ilovetheview47 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Big bang theory is religion!
You cant make any science test with space. So, you cant proof, space expanding or curving.
I have science test and i can proof, photons emit energy and thats why light bending and redshifting with out expanding space and with out curving/bending space!
Etimespace videos and you know how visible Universe born and how visible Universe energy/matter moving in space who already been there!
Etimespace 2 years ago
yes, i am not highly educated but i can see many benefits of this huge proton merry go round....i think it is great...and yes elnerdoloco the good ole USA is definitely in charge of pissing away billions!!!! however, the space shuttle program was built by the lowest bidder.....and it is still flying.
rongenman 2 years ago
this cost far more that 6billion dollars...They dont dare admit how expensive this was.
Storstrømsbridge in denmark was more expensive but smaller??? And not filled with latest tech, and cooled by floating helium 27km round LOL
They never dare admit the cost's
ppedalen 2 years ago
@ppedalen: It hardly matters. This is still pennies as far as government spending goes. I am sure you are familiar with the bailouts, and the US has been spending over 600 billion annually on the military budget alone in the last few years. Over five times the amount China spends. Even if the cost was 60 billion, it was approved 14 years ago. I am sure you would be in favor of cutting less than 1% of one nation's defense budget for 14 short years to fund an experiment like this.
ElNerdoLoco 2 years ago 9
Oh I forgot, besides modest, I would describe you as nice and soft spoken. Im considering starting a religion with you as god or atlest the prefeser of god´s voice and will, dont know what to call it, any suggestions?
zzzbbb123456 2 years ago
I first hypothesized about this back in 2002, m=E/c² or energy transforms into matter at rest. The only way for energy to rest is to slow to a stop relative to the movement of the source, or where it originated. Seeing that electrons are affected by magnetic fields then the logical place to stop the electron is 90° to a magnetic field. That happens to be located right where all matter is found around young suns and radioactive planets like Saturn, Jupiter & Uranus. It explains why new rings..
GateMessenger 2 years ago
.. are found the furthest from Saturn's surface. As the magnetic field increases so does the location where elementary particles are produced. This is why the outer rings of Saturn are younger than the inner ones. NASA said it would take them a few years to figure out why because it does not fit current theory. That is because the current Nebula theory is wrong. Matter is created at the extents of the magnetic field along the magnetic equator. Kuiper belt has the youngest objects in our system.
GateMessenger 2 years ago
... This would be proven if the age of Mercury is found to be the oldest of all the planets in our solar system. The same mechanism that is causing gravity is also causing the solar system to grow over time. New young objects will be found beyond the Kuiper belt, see Eris UB313. peace.
GateMessenger 2 years ago
Do you really believe in what you just write??? Seems to me you're guessing when you don't have any insight..
supergiuovane 2 years ago
and i still have proof of God
414dtc12 2 years ago
Either that is sarcasm or a lie.
MoZeZ92 2 years ago
its niether there must be a God because energy and the speed of light didnt exist when there was nothing
414dtc12 2 years ago
Because energy or speed of light didn't exist when there was nothing.. just because you don't know where those two came from, doesn't mean that god exists. Ye well, neither do I, but i still want to know the logical answer some day, not just be fine with the supernatural creator of everything.
MoZeZ92 2 years ago
that is not a good reason to believe in god LOL
RockTheStones 1 year ago
@414dtc12 then either did god
ilovetheview47 1 year ago
@414dtc12 u would be the 1st
ilovetheview47 1 year ago
@ilovetheview47 my proof of there being a God is that without an all powerful creator matter never would have existed because nothing can never make something.
414dtc12 1 year ago
@414dtc12 who said nothing made something. and if you want to use the laws of physics use them correctly. and even if there needed to be a creator dont mean its your, or prove the bible and heaven true
ilovetheview47 1 year ago
@ilovetheview47 um... I'm pretty sure there called scientist's also what do you mean use the laws correctly
414dtc12 1 year ago
@414dtc12 dont use them against the big bang and not god
ilovetheview47 1 year ago