@IAssemble It is the fastest 7x7x7 cube solver I've ever seen; I was meaning it isn't the fastest solver of cubes in general (like the rubik cube and that 12-sided dodecahedron thing that someone's done a solver of). Cubestormer II (most amazing thing I've ever seen) was the fastest.
@poxonfamily Thanks. I was wondering if there was another 7x7x7 robot solver about which I'm not aware! Yes, I agree that MultiCuber 777 could be faster, but I designed it with function and reliability in mind rather than speed. Maybe I'll work on a faster one sometime ;-) BTW that "someone" is me... there are two videos of my "Megaminxer" 12-sided dodecahedron solver, one on this channel and one on my own. Enjoy :-)
The fact that this is advertising that it's powered by an ARM processor is a little daft. Pretty much any processor could do this, with enough time and memory.
@peterbone Thanks for asking. I developed my own algorithms for all my designs. I just read a few descriptions of reduction and believe it is different. The order in which the puzzle is solved is two centres, edge, centre, two edges, centre, two edges, two corners, two centres, remaining edges, remaining corners. Each centre is solved in rings from the middle out. The edges are solved in place rather than being "paired" first. There is no need for a "solve like a 3x3x3" phase at the end.
@michael1234252 thanks for asking about the app. It is a custom Android application that I wrote and adapted for my whole range of LEGO robotic Rubik's Cube-style puzzle solvers.
@jerry533482 - thanks for asking about layer alignment. There is a link in the description to one of my blog posts that includes some detail of how this was achieved.
@MrGameboy1989 - why not 1 red piece white to be different? ;-) The software checks that the scan returns a cube configuration that can be solved in case colours have been sampled incorrectly, perhaps because of changes in lighting conditions during the scan. One piece being coloured incorrectly would result in this check failing in the same way and It would then request a rescan and wait for the red start button to be pressed again. Not very exciting really! ;-)
Impressive!! I've develop a new puzzle game inspired by Rubik’s Cube. I haven't figure out how to solve some of the higher levels. Maybe your algorithm could help.
@TehZombieSlayer - thanks for the suggestion of solving an 11x11x11. Both the MultiCuber mechanism and the software support cubes with an arbitrary number of layers so it ought to be possible. Do you have one you could lend me? ;-)
@hakansson20 - thanks for asking about the method. I developed the algorithm myself as a generic method for solving cubes of any size. It is unlikely to be the fastest that could be developed for a 7x7x7 cube. If you're interested, there is a link in the description to a blog entry I wrote that has a little more information.
@fuckthelocals - thanks for your question about the use of the cpu and os. The solve algorithm certainly uses the ARM cpu directly but the solution as a whole makes use of the standard camera and Bluetooth APIs provided by Android.
@ifarted96 - yes, you're right. The smartphone uses it's camera to take pictures and analyse each face of the cube and solve the puzzle. It communicates via Bluetooth with the LEGO NXT controller which controls the motors to orientate and manipulate the cube. Perhaps what @Jensrudnick meant was that the choice of phone was irrelevant? To an extent this is also correct, the software ought to run on almost any Android smartphone and similar software has been used on a Nokia N95 for example.
@gnetix1 - thanks!. You asked about the software. I wrote all the software myself using my own algorithms. You may be interested to see my blogs on ARM.com for a little more detail (see the link in the description)
@BluePi1313 - no, the robot would not detect a pop visually since it only "inspects" the cube with the camera at the start. I suspect the relatively low speed and torque (compared with you speedcubers!) means that it will simply jam rather than "pop" :-) There is a jam recovery mechanism in software that uses a timeout to detect the motor stalling and tries turning the layers in the opposite direction instead - as human solvers tend to do if the cube is slightly mis-aligned.
@jeppezon - good observation about the cube on the smartphone display moving horizontally rather than vertically! This seems to be the default orientation for the live camera preview when using the standard Android software API on this phone. Despite several attempts I was unable to determine the required parameters to orientate it vertically. The same app displays the preview vertically as expected on some other devices that I tried during development.
@lolipopus - one of the pieces "popped" out of the cube as I was scrambling it in preparation for the solve. This occasionaly happens if the layers aren't quite aligned correctly before turning the next. I've only had this happen when I'm scambling or attempting to solve the puzzle myself - MultiCuber 777 turns the layers more precisely than I can and has not yet caused a piece to "pop" :-)
s**t ><" to bad that the "ARM Powered Android LEGO" needs iPhone 4G..... and yeah that Android is kind of awsome thing but..... it's not awsome as much cause it's like cheats on PC games in other words; HAX ! ! !
haha...NOT THE IPHONE! you know that if it was an iphone everyone would be like..."Ya the iphone rocks" doesnt matter if the phone was doing the work or not. Its not the iphone haha.
So THAT's how you solve one of those. I always thought you had to take the stickers off.
Bizorke 2 days ago
I actually did that faster my first time solving a 7x7x7.
NDawgHoyt 3 days ago
app name? :D
DJBjoerne 6 days ago
@DJBjoerne it is a custom app called "ARM MultiCuber" although it has not been published
IAssemble 1 day ago
not exactly world's fastest but cool
poxonfamily 1 week ago
@poxonfamily do you know of a faster robot that solves the 7x7x7 cube? :-)
IAssemble 1 week ago
@IAssemble It is the fastest 7x7x7 cube solver I've ever seen; I was meaning it isn't the fastest solver of cubes in general (like the rubik cube and that 12-sided dodecahedron thing that someone's done a solver of). Cubestormer II (most amazing thing I've ever seen) was the fastest.
poxonfamily 1 week ago
@poxonfamily Thanks. I was wondering if there was another 7x7x7 robot solver about which I'm not aware! Yes, I agree that MultiCuber 777 could be faster, but I designed it with function and reliability in mind rather than speed. Maybe I'll work on a faster one sometime ;-) BTW that "someone" is me... there are two videos of my "Megaminxer" 12-sided dodecahedron solver, one on this channel and one on my own. Enjoy :-)
IAssemble 1 week ago
Why buy a rubic cube and a machine like this?-.-
siimsimsiim 1 week ago
Fucking impressive. Damn wish i could make that. Was it hard to program?
MONEYBOY512 2 weeks ago
it takes long but don't care becouse IT'S TOTALLY AWESOME!
MikeTaBoy 3 weeks ago
Lazy algorithm.
MrKhacheerio 3 weeks ago
you have to count the scanning time as part of the solve time according to the robot rules
ArmyGuy7630 3 weeks ago
I think that the phone was ready after 3 seconds, but the machine need too much time :D
XenonLightz 4 weeks ago 2
people can do this in less than 7 minutes. suck it computers.
HDHeroTime 1 month ago
@HDHeroTime have you seen CubeStormer II? :-)
IAssemble 4 weeks ago
I win by 13:48
gregslife7 1 month ago
Man.... if this robot had fingers...
izovire 1 month ago
I can solve it like 12 times faster but who gives a shit.
MichalHalczuk 1 month ago 12
Amazing!
g2gcio 1 month ago
Holy crap, i mean Kubik! :D
perjetesi2811 1 month ago
Now you can win a bet with your friends
supermariohunter2001 1 month ago
Hellraiser is in problems
nostradamus302 1 month ago
Comment removed
RandomUserName63 2 months ago
I should make that in my robotics class lol... Although I can solve it faster
Warfang500 2 months ago
Good. Now you can return that horrible horrible rubix cube from hell.
JackDander 2 months ago
what if i put a hamster there ?
thecityboy781 2 months ago
what if i pit a hamster there ?
thecityboy781 2 months ago
this shows if you mess up wid your rubik cube even expert will take 39 hours to solve it !!
dhvanilgr8 2 months ago
I'm faster than this robot
DevilOnHog 2 months ago
tuuuuutuuuuuutuuuuut...tuuuutuuuuutuuuut!! xD
HighVoltage18388 2 months ago
38 Minutes!?!?! What a Slow Fuckin Robot!!!
KOartisan 2 months ago
@KOartisan let's see you solve this in less time, mr. slow fuckin' human
lonewolf29079 2 months ago
I think I'll have to buy this to solve my 3x3 cube.....
latte123 2 months ago
i wonder if there were any wasted moves in there... or does it know with the original scan how to solve it in the fewest number of steps?
KillYourTeeVee 2 months ago
38 hours?
stutzedward 2 months ago
@stutzedward minutes
rokusho109 2 months ago
Dear Santa...
RCT3Creations1 2 months ago 4
I used to solve it slower.
FlyTour69 2 months ago
The iPhone 4 can solve it faster :D
jonbenson05 2 months ago
@jonbenson05 highly doubt that, iphone has only 1ghz processor
gwar10ck 2 months ago
yeah i´m faster XD
Frankness9 2 months ago
@Frankness9 no, you aren't ;-P
rough77 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHECK THIS OUT!!!!!!!!!!
/watch?v=_d0LfkIut2M
TheKishxl2 2 months ago
if you had created a robot with multiple handles not just one to make movements more like 4 it would be much less than 38 minutes, thats too much
n1c4nh4ckm3 3 months ago
it ruins the fun
robloxian848 3 months ago
is that 38 minutes or 38 secondes
MrQcomber 3 months ago
@MrQcomber lol idiot
qeuchniot 2 months ago
долго чтото
SheriffakaMax 3 months ago
The fact that this is advertising that it's powered by an ARM processor is a little daft. Pretty much any processor could do this, with enough time and memory.
idiotcorppresident 3 months ago
@idiotcorppresident ARM sponsors projects like this if you advertise them as such, though.
Jibes 2 months ago
ehh, I call it 39:00
godsBIGbrother1 3 months ago
wonderful !
kimai0827 3 months ago
???? *_*
I want also a machine like this
honkyopferus85 3 months ago 18
rise of the machines?
jaychou1994 3 months ago
dun tell me again this is stay tuned = =|||?
RubyTheSpammer 3 months ago
It is doing reduction, isn't it?
pey3b 3 months ago
It's doing reduction?
peterbone 3 months ago 18
@peterbone Thanks for asking. I developed my own algorithms for all my designs. I just read a few descriptions of reduction and believe it is different. The order in which the puzzle is solved is two centres, edge, centre, two edges, centre, two edges, two corners, two centres, remaining edges, remaining corners. Each centre is solved in rings from the middle out. The edges are solved in place rather than being "paired" first. There is no need for a "solve like a 3x3x3" phase at the end.
IAssemble 2 months ago
I saw this in person today :D
GFXZombie 3 months ago
my xphone would do this in about 40secounds!
manhoffentlichgibes 4 months ago
whats the app your using on the android phone?
michael1234252 5 months ago
@michael1234252 thanks for asking about the app. It is a custom Android application that I wrote and adapted for my whole range of LEGO robotic Rubik's Cube-style puzzle solvers.
IAssemble 4 months ago
@IAssemble ok thanks
michael1234252 4 months ago
Where did you get that?
tscholz2001 5 months ago
Oh My F"""""" God! Awsome.
jackmuffin3103 6 months ago
ti do a 3x3 cube
Lespaulguitar10 8 months ago
slow but still amazing, its as fast as me when im trying
Lespaulguitar10 8 months ago
lent mais balèze
slow but good
misieuroo 8 months ago
are you gonna buy a 9x9 or 11x11? maybe I will try to make a 11x11 cube solver
(I just don't know how to make the program -.-
EMI94100 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BEST android app right here! hack wifi networks in like 10 minutes! iwifihack (dot) net
RhetKrenik 9 months ago
Sweet.
ubudog32 10 months ago
How on earth does it deal with layer alignment??
jerry533482 10 months ago
@jerry533482 - thanks for asking about layer alignment. There is a link in the description to one of my blog posts that includes some detail of how this was achieved.
IAssemble 10 months ago
@IAssemble now u should make a version that can solve the 17x17 XD
jerry533482 10 months ago
@jerry533482 thanks for your suggestion - do you have a 17x17x17 cube that I could borrow? ;-)
IAssemble 10 months ago
@IAssemble u might want 2 ask oskar or clauswe fo one. XD
jerry533482 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GET`¸THE_-_NEW.-¸DROID~.~PHONE~`FREE`,~
www․GETDROIDFREE․TK
KenethDominguez 10 months ago
I can solve it faster, but still, great work.
Katana221985 10 months ago
now colour 1 white piece red :)
MrGameboy1989 1 year ago
@MrGameboy1989 - why not 1 red piece white to be different? ;-) The software checks that the scan returns a cube configuration that can be solved in case colours have been sampled incorrectly, perhaps because of changes in lighting conditions during the scan. One piece being coloured incorrectly would result in this check failing in the same way and It would then request a rescan and wait for the red start button to be pressed again. Not very exciting really! ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
Type PRIZE before youtube and hit enter
Sporeman58 1 year ago
Amazing video!!
Long live to Milestone!!!!
MarceloTorresPoA 1 year ago
Does anybody know a good tutorial to solve the v-cube 7?
jabbeXD 1 year ago
@jabbeXD check out one of those 5x5 tutorials, The V 7 is actually the same thing:
White center- yellow center- middle center- 4th center between those- last centers- inner edges- outer edges- 3x3.
EMI94100 1 year ago
lol who dislike This, They must just be jealous.
eminemlover141 1 year ago
hm my personal record is 36 minutes.....
MrZauberwuerfel 1 year ago
DAMN I BEEN TRYING TO SOLVE MY RUBIKS CUBE FOR 10 PHUKN YEARS
therealannoyingNPC 1 year ago
awesome !
renanstreetsk8 1 year ago
damn I hope it doesn't evolve to a Centurion Cylon!
bgamap 1 year ago
what about the 9x9x9
slagosligs 1 year ago
@slagosligs - thanks for the idea of solving the 9x9x9 - do you have one I could borrow? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
You're fucking insane.
oOBNOo 1 year ago
wtfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff o.O
android ftw!
xGemingAx 1 year ago
Impressive!! I've develop a new puzzle game inspired by Rubik’s Cube. I haven't figure out how to solve some of the higher levels. Maybe your algorithm could help.
HanWriting 1 year ago
my eyes popped out!!!
intellisaforiginal 1 year ago
now the 11x11 and that is my time on 7x7
michael123425 1 year ago
Now do an 11x11.
TehZombieSlayer 1 year ago
@TehZombieSlayer - thanks for the suggestion of solving an 11x11x11. Both the MultiCuber mechanism and the software support cubes with an arbitrary number of layers so it ought to be possible. Do you have one you could lend me? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
@IAssemble Nope. Sorry.
TehZombieSlayer 1 year ago
is this the fastest method or a original method for solving it?
hakansson20 1 year ago
@hakansson20 - thanks for asking about the method. I developed the algorithm myself as a generic method for solving cubes of any size. It is unlikely to be the fastest that could be developed for a 7x7x7 cube. If you're interested, there is a link in the description to a blog entry I wrote that has a little more information.
IAssemble 1 year ago
A-W-E-S-O-M-E
tedlam168 1 year ago
the video is too fast you can't see what it's doing
AdurianJ 1 year ago
but this must be more work for the cpu, than the os..?
fuckthelocals 1 year ago
@fuckthelocals - thanks for your question about the use of the cpu and os. The solve algorithm certainly uses the ARM cpu directly but the solution as a whole makes use of the standard camera and Bluetooth APIs provided by Android.
IAssemble 1 year ago
Now lets see Windows Mobile do it, lol
NightshotBR 1 year ago
Genial!! justo cuando creía que era mas listo que un montón de Legos....
bidamand 1 year ago
MADE OF LEGO HAHAHAHHAA LMAO ._.
19f97 1 year ago
@19f97 Yes : Lego is meant to be more than a toy!
MennoGorter 1 year ago
@MennoGorter i knoooow :P
19f97 1 year ago
i like the ending :p
ApprovalJunkie 1 year ago
sick sick sick... .nice work keep it going, next time build one who can drop chicks underwear without them knowing. :)
cahpee 1 year ago
Det är vackert att se!!
Zolmyr 1 year ago
Wow
DoctorJ3kyll 1 year ago
@ifarted96 - yes, you're right. The smartphone uses it's camera to take pictures and analyse each face of the cube and solve the puzzle. It communicates via Bluetooth with the LEGO NXT controller which controls the motors to orientate and manipulate the cube. Perhaps what @Jensrudnick meant was that the choice of phone was irrelevant? To an extent this is also correct, the software ought to run on almost any Android smartphone and similar software has been used on a Nokia N95 for example.
IAssemble 1 year ago
Android just did
RarewareLover 1 year ago
Android or iPhone...who will prevail in the end?
trobbins43 1 year ago
Stuff like this is why i learned how to solve a regular rubik's cube.
MiniMaxis468 1 year ago
iPhone fanboys... your turn.
miljaker 1 year ago
and the purpose of this?
Danerd9 1 year ago
@Danerd9 thats just stupid question. of cource its just for show. but its cool as hell.
JURPO90 1 year ago 20
give it a human genome! lets see whit it does!
gamerx129 1 year ago
Sweet!!
Cube Explorer 5.0 or another program?
gnetix1 1 year ago
@gnetix1 - thanks!. You asked about the software. I wrote all the software myself using my own algorithms. You may be interested to see my blogs on ARM.com for a little more detail (see the link in the description)
IAssemble 1 year ago
That's Useful !
Aelkamal 1 year ago
amazing~~~~~
smartxueqi 1 year ago
Awesome robot and software.... the phone ... is irrelevant.
Jensrudnick 1 year ago
@Jensrudnick I think it helps the robot calculate
vidirg 1 year ago
This is just astonishing!
2FTurbo 1 year ago 2
.....thumbs up if you can do this but you don't wanna
roscosity 1 year ago
Pas facile cette histoire... Merci LEGO ...
avec un peu d'entrainement ... faut voir !
emrodis 1 year ago 9
@emrodis no hable
radar465 1 year ago
@emrodis this comment looks funny
MrKampfemu 1 year ago
vihor772 nice
vihor772 1 year ago
1 idiot disliked it >.> he died 1 min after
gampanat 1 year ago
if it ever pops, can it detect it?
BluePi1313 1 year ago
@BluePi1313 - no, the robot would not detect a pop visually since it only "inspects" the cube with the camera at the start. I suspect the relatively low speed and torque (compared with you speedcubers!) means that it will simply jam rather than "pop" :-) There is a jam recovery mechanism in software that uses a timeout to detect the motor stalling and tries turning the layers in the opposite direction instead - as human solvers tend to do if the cube is slightly mis-aligned.
IAssemble 1 year ago
@jeppezon - good observation about the cube on the smartphone display moving horizontally rather than vertically! This seems to be the default orientation for the live camera preview when using the standard Android software API on this phone. Despite several attempts I was unable to determine the required parameters to orientate it vertically. The same app displays the preview vertically as expected on some other devices that I tried during development.
IAssemble 1 year ago
So cool :D
I lol'd at the pop at the end
Sa967St 1 year ago
@Sa967St -yes it was very funny at the time! Does this ever happen to you when you solve the 7x7x7? :-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
@IAssemble, of course, I'd be surprised if there was someone with a V-cube7 that hasn't experienced pops :)
Sa967St 1 year ago
1 disslike uses iPhone
Stabiloten 1 year ago
What just happend in the end? A piece fell off?
lolipopus 1 year ago
@lolipopus - one of the pieces "popped" out of the cube as I was scrambling it in preparation for the solve. This occasionaly happens if the layers aren't quite aligned correctly before turning the next. I've only had this happen when I'm scambling or attempting to solve the puzzle myself - MultiCuber 777 turns the layers more precisely than I can and has not yet caused a piece to "pop" :-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
This is why ANDROID is the best..
Stabiloten 1 year ago
V-CUBES ARE FREAKING AWESOME!!!!!
JustSolveIt 1 year ago
to slow :(
entertement 1 year ago
That dealt a huge "blow" to "Jobs".
verx666 1 year ago
@verx666 Hehehe!
Legojogge 1 year ago
oh god its the robot aliens ahahahaha!
duhhh187 1 year ago
it's allmost impossble to believe ;D
Pero1107 1 year ago
Nerdgasm!
bossbower 1 year ago 2
Two of my favorite things combined, LEGOs and the Motorola Droid
ChoPiGu 1 year ago
How far is this really from AI?
Sayankomaster 1 year ago
THAT IS SO AWESOME!!
Stabiloten 1 year ago
It's so cool!
RockYou1990 1 year ago
I just had na geekgasm.
Jelenij 1 year ago 2
Beat that iPhone!! Android RULES!!
kennyJRT 1 year ago
amazing
lobler 1 year ago
s**t ><" to bad that the "ARM Powered Android LEGO" needs iPhone 4G..... and yeah that Android is kind of awsome thing but..... it's not awsome as much cause it's like cheats on PC games in other words; HAX ! ! !
max787844 1 year ago
Lol 38:53.44......i can do it faster
qpaker 1 year ago
@qpaker prove it
XXXgot2bmeXXX 1 year ago
@qpaker :P me 2 my pb is like 10 min or something
JustSolveIt 1 year ago
Wow, amazing.
BrandonToddCarr 1 year ago
This is just effin awesome.
brandonaliwarga 1 year ago 27
This has been flagged as spam show
free-apple-iphone-4.posterous[dot]com
ruezyonot 1 year ago
Doesn't exactly solve it in the conventional human-style. Now go for under 6 minutes.
thejerrymobile 1 year ago
and it can be used to?oh solving this puzzle? well thats useful...
pgf95 1 year ago
haha...NOT THE IPHONE! you know that if it was an iphone everyone would be like..."Ya the iphone rocks" doesnt matter if the phone was doing the work or not. Its not the iphone haha.
EazyE6793 1 year ago
@EazyE6793 its not a iphone cause they are all sold out bitch!!!!! JK
reviewthis1 1 year ago
@reviewthis1 hahahaha that was good. haha touche
EazyE6793 1 year ago
Congratulations for solving the rounded cube problem. Guess next up is a non-cubic puzzle.
artman40 1 year ago
@artman40 - thanks for appreciating the "rounded cube problem".... a non-cubic puzzle.... what do you suggest?!? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
@IAssemble Maybe prism-shaped things first because making a Square-1 or Teraminx-solving machine would be rather difficult.
artman40 1 year ago
@artman40 splutters!?!?! ;-) Teraminx - yes, a little ambitious.... Square-1... can't think how to start on that one.... how about a Megaminx? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
@IAssemble Megaminx sounds about right. Maybe Flowerminx is even easier to pull off.
artman40 1 year ago
@artman40 hmmmm.... a Flowerminx..... yes, that gives me something to think about! Thanks for the suggestion ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
that was cool nice job
hardcoregamer16 1 year ago
Oh yeah, and you don't have to worry about dropped calls as much.
AyNoobyNoobers 1 year ago
Take that Mr Jobs!
zahtmi 1 year ago
Awesome job. Using an android based smartphone is a real eye opener. Lot of potential in that combination if you ask me.
nielsww 1 year ago
Awesome :D
preedalist 1 year ago