Added: 5 years ago
From: SecretJeevas
Views: 8,333
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ShaktipatSeer is quite feeble minded, he is very naive. If you look at his favourites you will see he is more of a New Ager than a devotee.

  • @Siva3Enthroned agreed 100%

  • That dress is not authorized anywhere in any scripture for Sanyasa's to wear.Only saffron dodhi.

  • @TwiztedTurbo Raganuga Bhaktas are not regulated by scriptures and they are beyond Paramhamsa level =]

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 How can you say he was Raganuga Bhakta? Are you pure? 

  • @TwiztedTurbo ["'I am not a brahmana, I am not a ksatriya, I am not a vaisya or a sudra. Nor am I a brahmacari, a householder, a vanaprastha or a sannyasi. I identify Myself only as the servant of the servant of the servant of the lotus feet of Lord Sri Krsna, the maintainer of the gopis. He is like an ocean of nectar, and He is the cause of universal transcendental bliss. He is always existing with brilliance.'"(Caitanya-caritam­rta Madhya-lila 13.80)]

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 lol anyone can copy and paste some scripture.

  • @TwiztedTurbo Here is a direct disciple of Prabhupada who influenced many of the most saintly people on the planet, and devoted his entire existence to spontaneously serving Krishna.. He had performed Sadhana for many many years.. "As raga (attachment to Krsna) is the occupation of the mind, so also simultaneously must be smarana (remembering Krsna); therefore smarana is the main limb of sadhana for the

    practioner of raganuga-bhakti."

    How can you say he is not a Raganuga Bhakta?

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 But Prabhupada named no successors because there was corruption. Yet he claims guruhood? What a devil!

  • @Siva3Enthroned You are another deluded monkey with no brain. How many times must I go over this ritvik argument with those whose intelligence has been stolen so utterly by sentamentalism and fear? One of the CORNERSTONES of Prabhupada's teaching was that the Acharya is SELF-EFFULGENT. Prabhupada did not need to give his disciples permission to become Gurus if they already posessed all of the prerequisites, which are merely that they are able to repeat the instructions of Krishna. Simple as that

  • @Siva3Enthroned How DARE you call any Vaishnava a devil. You need to stop participating in whatever internet forums or corrupted malevolent hate speech you are listening to and come back to the purity of what it is to be a Vaishnava. Vaishnavas are not in the business of going around finding faults like a fly seeking out shit to suck on, especially not with OTHER VAISHNAVAS. I know it sucks what happened to ISKCON, it's no ONE PERSON's FAULT.

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 Wow, how aggressive and untoward of you. A devotee of the Lord right? I doubt it. How DARE you throw the word "guru" around cheaply.

  • @Siva3Enthroned I'm not perfect, and I don't throw it around cheaply, I'm only referring to what Srila Prabhupada said himself about the qualification of a Guru. All he has to do is repeat Krsna's order, that's it.

  • @Siva3Enthroned Lol and who are you exactly anyway?

  • @TwiztedTurbo It's not for you or me to be judging this person, let him dress however he wants to dress Raganuga or otherwise. Have a little respect for a Vaishnava instead of just fault finding and fault finding like flies on shit.

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 lol so do you think its ok for the old New Vrindavan devotees to wear monks robes? smh

  • @TwiztedTurbo Were the neophytes at New Vrindavan raganuga bhaktas? .. No .. for initiates I would say that it's necessary to fall this Vaidhi Bhakti in the way that it has been implemented .. Bhaktipada's attempts to change the whole way that they were practicing Gaudiya Vaishnavism shouldn't be accepted.. but if someone is a genuine pure devotee they aren't bound by convention.. they aren't a Sannyasi they are Krsna Dasa.

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 Exactly so whos to say if someone is Krsna Das? And this "supposed" "Swami" took sanyasa from "Bhaktipada" therefore making it null and void meaning he was not "Sanyasa" at all.And was certainly not Krsna Das.

    This "Bhakti Tirtha" character was caught up on the bodily concept of thining he was "African american" and thinking he was therfeore somehow "empowered" to help other so-called "african americans" which is all bogus and mayavada.

  • @TwiztedTurbo Hey, asshole, why don't you spend more time serving Krishna and less time finding faults with Vaishnavas?

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 WOW !! Seriously? Some devotee you are.using profanity.I will pray for you.

    And True Vaisnavas are not on the bodily concept as this person was.HARI BOL !!

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 lol ok neophyte

  • @TwiztedTurbo lol okay you pharisee

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 Im no wasting any more time on you.Obviously you are of a feeble mind and have no real taste for devotional life or pure bhakti.

  • @ShaktipatSeer2 Moron,since you are so ignorant on what you just called me.Let me inform you're feeble mind.

    Pharisee, member of a Jewish religious party that flourished in Palestine during the latter part of the Second Temple period (515 bc–ad 70).

    So are you saying Im from 515bc? lol IDIOT !!

  • Comment removed

  • Swami Ji is so right! My Pranama to the atman of HH Bhakti Tirtha Swami.

  • Does any one know how can i download bhakti tirtha maharaj's video?? plz help.

  • Thank you for posting trhis video. Bhakti Thirta Swami says some beautiul things. perhaps, we should listen more and learn from

    his teachings.

  • God bless you...

  • Thats great! thanks so much, if only You tube would feature this video!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more