The only thing that I have every seen first hand to make any difference is cell phones and that's only when I was up front which makes a loud buzzing noise in my headset. Never have I ever had a problem with any other electrical device especially a camera because they do not send nor receive any information.
@jrd1461 Well, they are the same type of plane, landing at the same place, just a couple hundred feet away from each other. They're going to have the same or very similar flight control software and autopilot systems. So they're going to make their approach and landing in a very similar way.
@323tiim Yeah, I was pretty lucky. I took that about 3.5-almost 4 years ago now and haven't in back in the "right place at the right time" to catch anything like it since.
@323tiim Apparently I'm even luckier - the only time I've ever flown in to SFO, I saw this as well. Rather disconcerting to see another plane flying only a few tens of metres away from you...
@rjch0173 Wow, you were lucky to..^^ The only cool thing ive seen was a flight between Barcelona and Copenhagen. I looked out of the window and saw an Air France Embrear 145 1000ft above, it was awsome! I actually still have a picture!
No. They are maintaining proper horizontal separation.
The runways are spaced apart from each other at legal distances. Also at that point in the approach, both planes would be lined up with the runways and Air Traffic Control would keep them far enough apart.
@12345obama: They've been doing this for years at SFO. If you look at an overhead shot of the airport runway configuration, you'll see that it was designed to allow for this. Takeoffs from SFO were a bitch for me though, because they'd have to climb very steeply very fast to clear the hills west of the airport. My head would hurt like hell on the ascent. I live in Chicago now, no hills.
@12345obama At this point, the following aircraft got a pointout for the traffic and were told to maintain visual separation from the other aircraft, and SFO Tower was proving "tower visual separation" confirming they were separated. The runways are spaced far enough apart to allow for parallel approaches. If the following aircraft was larger, it was instructed to not overtake the other aircraft for wake turbulence separation. But this is perfectly legal if the pilots accept.
Those are always fun approaches to fly. Somtimes if your the crew of a much larger aircraft say the 744 or a 777 you see real challenge. In those cases the heavy must follow the smaller one in which means the smallerone must keep their approach speed up while they heavy is usually at about their min safe speed. It is pretty cool to experince.
@cosminx2003 not the same video my man but close! In this video the NWA flight touched down first and was a head, in your video the video plane was behind and touched down after :) Sorry!
you have to only bee a few hundred metres away to be safe even if both are jumbojets. its just the FAAs regulations as its safer and easier for the air traffic controllers to keep track
well you would be keeping pace as the approach speeds are published and are the same for all aircraft of a certain category and 90% of airliners fall into the same category
that´s exactly what i saw 3 weeks ago when i was in SFO departing from there to London, 2 landings at the same time, and another 2 take off´s at the same time too, i have never seen it before in other airports. but some people told me that in atlanta they do the same.
it´s incredible. and i would like to say ¡Only in San Francisco¡
They do this in ATL occasionally. But even when they do, the two runways used for landing are on opposite sides of the main terminals, so it doesn't look this cool. Also, when the landing runway to the south of the terminal and the new fifth runway are both being used for landing at the same time, there is still quite a bit of distance separating the two, so it never looks this close at ATL. :)
I'm sure they're both regular flights, and, as I said earlier, they're both the same kind of plane, flying into the same place, using the same auto-pilot software, so I suspect this happens a lot. I was just lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time to catch it.
FAA rules for minimum horizontal separation on final during VFR conditions(which this was) is 500 ft. However, at SFO, the rules call for 750 feet minimum lateral separation between aircraft.
Only in US can we see scenes like that. Seems the US has a much greater tolerance for small horizontal seperation between 2 planes. Saw that in Seattle, too. In busy airports like Hong Kong, Singapore, Bangkok, even London where there's no shortage of air traffic, I have never seen 2 planes so close in parallel and doing almost simultaneously landing.
I thought about this after it happened and realized that software had a lot to do with it. In fact I think it's a perfect demonstration of flight control software. Two A320s doing approaches on parallel runways with the same heading at the same time are going to have almost identical landing profiles.
Checked 3 times and didn't find the word *dangerous* in my post. Merely stating a fact that PL happens more in US than elsewhere. You must not know what you're criticisin about.
Only the big airports (SFO, JFK, ORD, DFW, DTW) with paralell runways allow this...Is one big funnel into the parallel runways due to high volume..Although only in visual flight rules they can do such small horizontal
I miss NWA! :(
Airshowlover100 2 weeks ago
The Airbus Pilot really did a great job! Such a smooth landing :)
ringbuchblock95 2 months ago
Traffic, Traffic, Traffic, 300, Mantain Vertical Speed, Traffic, 200, Traffic, Traffic, Climb, Climb, 100, Traffic, 50, 40, 30 Traffic, 20, 10, Clear Area
JoaoBatist4 3 months ago
isn`t it against the law to use electronic devices while landing and taking off? Don`t they interfere with the altitude reader?
MrCondor007 5 months ago
@MrCondor007
The only thing that I have every seen first hand to make any difference is cell phones and that's only when I was up front which makes a loud buzzing noise in my headset. Never have I ever had a problem with any other electrical device especially a camera because they do not send nor receive any information.
zseartcc25 5 months ago
TRAFFIC TRAFFIC! MONITOR VERTICAL SPEED!
: ) Tcas keeps us safe when everythings allright anyway :P
sonicfan7 6 months ago 5
@sonicfan7 "Minimums...300...200...100..." :)
jetdillo 6 months ago
this is common @ ksfo
boeingdude1 6 months ago
Now the dash for the last parking space begins ;)
flaziola 6 months ago
This is so cool :)
MushroomMan57 6 months ago
That's a beauty.
dwilltheill 6 months ago
nice
oYFOR 6 months ago
does the para runway meet minimum IFR clearance for landing
efastMixer 6 months ago
@efastMixer Alas no, and this can cause quite the delays when the fog rolls in...
jetdillo 6 months ago
@jetdillo so visuals only
efastMixer 6 months ago
@efastMixer Yup. When it's clear here, it's amazingly clear. When it's not, it REALLY isn't :)
jetdillo 6 months ago
Only in san Francisco...
xytsdx2 7 months ago
lol that a319 or a320 on 28r is kind of overkill. That's a long ass runway
cvbcbcmv 8 months ago
I first read your YouTube username as 'jetdildo'.
truthsofwolf 8 months ago
@truthsofwolf LOL!
gramirez72 7 months ago
woooww...it´s really crazy and magic
MrDimaPianist 8 months ago
SFO tower told you to land parrell to each other.
Aviationlover98 9 months ago
That is so cool, sweet vid.
xyira777 9 months ago
miss the red tail
fordairport1 9 months ago
great landing
dillion921 10 months ago
Nice shot, right time right place.
hadibadashi 10 months ago
And that's why I live near SFO. :D
xXShadowLugiaXx 11 months ago
Wait, don't all electronic devices have to be turned off for takeoff and landing?
megarockman 11 months ago
P E R F E C T!!! Thanks for sharing! :)
armandosilvestre 11 months ago
what an awesome video mate, and what an smooth landing by the a319
thelopespilot 1 year ago
Man thats some jealous wife following the husband to work! lol
SomoshiphopRadio 1 year ago 64
@SomoshiphopRadio Ha! LOL
That's one of the funnier comments I've heard about this video.
Thanks for watching!
jetdillo 1 year ago 14
lol haha Good Video man!
SomoshiphopRadio 1 year ago
@SomoshiphopRadio Amazing Comment LOL!
DjMatty2k9 7 months ago
They are spotting each other, why do you think they landed so smoothly?
jrd1461 1 year ago 5
@jrd1461 Well, they are the same type of plane, landing at the same place, just a couple hundred feet away from each other. They're going to have the same or very similar flight control software and autopilot systems. So they're going to make their approach and landing in a very similar way.
jetdillo 1 year ago
@jetdillo I'm aware, I was being sarcastic, I know they aren't really spotting each other.
jrd1461 1 year ago
Would be cool if you could film it when the NWA a320's landing gear came down :D
MusicLover11325 1 year ago
You lucky son of a bitch :)
323tiim 1 year ago
@323tiim Yeah, I was pretty lucky. I took that about 3.5-almost 4 years ago now and haven't in back in the "right place at the right time" to catch anything like it since.
jetdillo 1 year ago
@323tiim Apparently I'm even luckier - the only time I've ever flown in to SFO, I saw this as well. Rather disconcerting to see another plane flying only a few tens of metres away from you...
rjch0173 7 months ago
@rjch0173 Wow, you were lucky to..^^ The only cool thing ive seen was a flight between Barcelona and Copenhagen. I looked out of the window and saw an Air France Embrear 145 1000ft above, it was awsome! I actually still have a picture!
323tiim 7 months ago
Now lets see who gets to the gate first!
Toshiboy25 1 year ago
NWA jet: HAHA I BEAT YOU!!!
Toshiboy25 1 year ago
nicee...!!! thnks for 4 sharin...
kfkgj 1 year ago
NWA pilot : I WOOOON !!!!!!!!!!!!
bobduvar 1 year ago
rare video...good job recording and thanks for sharing 5*
piromoretta 1 year ago
how smooth both planes touched ground omg
gillimilli 1 year ago
The nwa had a nice landing, i didnt even see smoke coming from the tires as it touched down!
freeflightsimulator 1 year ago
liked this vid
pacman4988 1 year ago
i imagine atc told your pilots not to overtake the other a320, as thats common procedure on these approaches
:)
willwoodhouse 1 year ago
this is really nice :)
astoniz 1 year ago
Ahh, the good old days when NWA was still in service. Damn Delta!
airbusandmustang 1 year ago
Just think,if this was LasVegas Int how many passengers would be betting on which plane touched down first.
FoulOwl 1 year ago
wow...thumbs up for the landing on your plane!
dinohoo 1 year ago
now thats cool xD
nice vid 5/5
Swissflier101 1 year ago
2 fast 2 furious.......cool
piromoretta 1 year ago
4 u dumb asses that aircaraft was run way 28right arriving at sfo..nothing special
etlaoax 1 year ago
Now that's just.. WOW!!
sarkizmutafyan 1 year ago
i didn't know planes were allowed to fly that close?
PraisedBeAllah 1 year ago
@PraisedBeAllah
As long as they maintain visual separation, it's fine. If this weren't allowed a lot of flights would be delayed, not by much but still.
all4golf 1 year ago
fuck! it's too close
guitarkickspunkkids 1 year ago
Really cool ! I wish I d see it too :-)
Corinne6531 1 year ago
nice vid doc, gg.
rich0319726 1 year ago
I pray that I get to do this one day
germ321 1 year ago
dirty
Mfplaya55 1 year ago
isn't it forbidden to fly that close? looks dangerous.
12345obama 1 year ago
No. They are maintaining proper horizontal separation.
The runways are spaced apart from each other at legal distances. Also at that point in the approach, both planes would be lined up with the runways and Air Traffic Control would keep them far enough apart.
jetdillo 1 year ago 8
thanks for the detailed answer. I will check the SF aiport on Google maps now.
12345obama 1 year ago
P.S. I've done it now. You were correct. I was wrong.
12345obama 1 year ago
@12345obama They are on the ILS, So there being guided down Automaticly, so its safe
umpalumpa101909 1 year ago
@12345obama: They've been doing this for years at SFO. If you look at an overhead shot of the airport runway configuration, you'll see that it was designed to allow for this. Takeoffs from SFO were a bitch for me though, because they'd have to climb very steeply very fast to clear the hills west of the airport. My head would hurt like hell on the ascent. I live in Chicago now, no hills.
dmnddog74 1 year ago
Comment removed
dmnddog74 1 year ago
@12345obama At this point, the following aircraft got a pointout for the traffic and were told to maintain visual separation from the other aircraft, and SFO Tower was proving "tower visual separation" confirming they were separated. The runways are spaced far enough apart to allow for parallel approaches. If the following aircraft was larger, it was instructed to not overtake the other aircraft for wake turbulence separation. But this is perfectly legal if the pilots accept.
Seneca34M 1 year ago
cool
jstuttgart 2 years ago
niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
pilot 1:hey wanna see who lands first?
pilot2:lets do thisssss!
pilot 1 and 2: it was a tie -_-
jjr1123 2 years ago 4
hahahahaha lol nice
ugnut123 2 years ago
Those are always fun approaches to fly. Somtimes if your the crew of a much larger aircraft say the 744 or a 777 you see real challenge. In those cases the heavy must follow the smaller one in which means the smallerone must keep their approach speed up while they heavy is usually at about their min safe speed. It is pretty cool to experince.
Learjetjock 2 years ago
very neat! i wonder how many people from the other plane were looking at this one o.o
randompieceoftoast 2 years ago
OH YEAH REALLY NICE !!!
trimair 2 years ago
it's the best awsome video man!!!!!
niranjan0035 2 years ago
WOW
yoto5951 2 years ago
Awesome.
AviadorLPA 2 years ago
sweet, i never had the chance to be this close yet, hopefully soon!
aviator147 2 years ago
wouldnt that be funny if someone on that NWA flight was taking vid of this jet and uploaded it? haha
dylanhelmer 2 years ago 35
@dylanhelmer it actually happened take a look here : watch?v=hnSN37SaWKI
cosminx2003 1 year ago
@cosminx2003 not the same video my man but close! In this video the NWA flight touched down first and was a head, in your video the video plane was behind and touched down after :) Sorry!
JayPattersonTV 1 year ago
awesome landing from nwa
gillimilli 2 years ago
nice video!
Fumeti 2 years ago
This is a rare video, 5/5
racsito39 2 years ago 3
landing at SFO is always fun. Wouldn't there be turbulence with the 2 planes so close to each other?
kady7869 2 years ago
lol 5/5
thomaskroon97 2 years ago
samething here. o'hare 3 parallel now! 27 L R 29
vjc02s3705 2 years ago
I live right under O'hare's glide slope and they do that all the time. Very cool :)
FlyingWing92 2 years ago
And how are those turbulent flows acting up, I thought there should be an 1-5 km separation from aircraft, but I might be wrong.
roofanhealer 2 years ago
you have to only bee a few hundred metres away to be safe even if both are jumbojets. its just the FAAs regulations as its safer and easier for the air traffic controllers to keep track
ShadowchildCOBHC 2 years ago
Nice one!!!! :) keep em up :)
jef1500 2 years ago
soft landings. these parallel lnadings and takeoffs always amaze me.
deltafan909 2 years ago
well you would be keeping pace as the approach speeds are published and are the same for all aircraft of a certain category and 90% of airliners fall into the same category
pkay098 2 years ago 2
jetdillo what plane were you flying in?
NYIMBOZOKOMA 2 years ago
what airline where u on
moose6692 2 years ago
I think you were keeping pace with them
scaremenga 2 years ago
Brilliant, this is excellent. How often does this happen
kj762aa 2 years ago
it would be funny if someone was filming you guys from the other plane :P
rzeszotary 2 years ago 13
Heh, and then put it on YouTube!
redcarsarasota 2 years ago 5
the NW can be a 320 or a 319
popstreetpilot 2 years ago
it looks like 319
PilotJamesD 2 years ago 2
A319
jezrelnyc2000 2 years ago 2
One of the great reasons to land at SFO!
buybygb 3 years ago 4
what airline were you flying?
andyranger01 3 years ago
I have seen a bunch of parallel landings, espcially at Logan Intl.. but never seen one from inside an aircraft.. great video!
planelover3640 3 years ago
were you on an a320 or were they both a320s. was the nwa an a320?
lawpar79 3 years ago
Yes, yes and yes. :)
jetdillo 3 years ago
@lawpar79 The NWA aircraft is a A319.
maxp0w3r 1 year ago
this happened to me just a week ago in denver
LABRATproductionz 3 years ago
Also common in Seattle
tellsitasitis 3 years ago
Interesting. I didn't know that. I can't say I'm surprised, but I don't get up to SEA all that much these days. Thanks for watching!
jetdillo 3 years ago
@jetdillo you lost the race by 4 seconds lol
tinkandtory 1 year ago
that´s exactly what i saw 3 weeks ago when i was in SFO departing from there to London, 2 landings at the same time, and another 2 take off´s at the same time too, i have never seen it before in other airports. but some people told me that in atlanta they do the same.
it´s incredible. and i would like to say ¡Only in San Francisco¡
ariesenergie 3 years ago
yeah they do the same in altanta but their never this close lol this iz amazing i love seeing seein planes in formation like this its crazy
mylesandpennie 3 years ago
They do this in ATL occasionally. But even when they do, the two runways used for landing are on opposite sides of the main terminals, so it doesn't look this cool. Also, when the landing runway to the south of the terminal and the new fifth runway are both being used for landing at the same time, there is still quite a bit of distance separating the two, so it never looks this close at ATL. :)
dsy108 3 years ago
Really good vid! Very unusual!
Andy200hea 3 years ago
OMG!!!! :O
Fuckdencio 3 years ago
wow , great video man!! i like to give this video 10 starts but the limit is only 5 starts !!!!!!
Keep it up!!!
alaqmar1992 3 years ago
:)
Thanks for the compliment and for watching. I'm glad you liked it.
jetdillo 3 years ago
im sorry , its 5 stars , i wrote it 5 starts* by mistake!
alaqmar1992 3 years ago
a little bit shaky but still very nice to watch! thanks for sharing it :)
NicoTien96 3 years ago
very cool
martyallthatime1 3 years ago
AWESOME!!!
tsakogiannis 3 years ago
Ah ok i got ya, i was gonna say cause we were on an NWA A320 landing 28R with a US Airways A320 landing parallel to us when we went Cool vid man.
duk309 3 years ago
Heh, neat!
So you were getting the opposite view :)
That's pretty cool.
I'm sure they're both regular flights, and, as I said earlier, they're both the same kind of plane, flying into the same place, using the same auto-pilot software, so I suspect this happens a lot. I was just lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time to catch it.
jetdillo 3 years ago
Yup, its pretty common at KSFO, thats why i love that airport. Great vid!
duk309 3 years ago
maybe it was that same day when you met up with jetdillo.
lawpar79 3 years ago
When was this? and what airline were you on?
duk309 3 years ago
late May 2007, shortly before noon. I was on a USAir flight coming from LAS.
jetdillo 3 years ago
i see this all the time cuz i live in sf but still cool
tigeri8 3 years ago
WOW, SO COOL!!
tonyojules 3 years ago
Thanks! I'm glad you liked it. I took that over 1.5 years ago and haven't run into anything like it since.
jetdillo 3 years ago
Wow Men Coooooooooooooooooooooooool Video, congratulation. i like the Aviation.
Manu2455 3 years ago
an air to air video
sarkizmutafyan 3 years ago
hey cul video!
Tomtheflyboy 3 years ago
Thanks!
Glad you liked it...
jetdillo 3 years ago
IT'S A RACE, WHO WILL WIN?!?!
SaPrepPride 3 years ago 2
jajaja nice!
manfco 3 years ago
its cool to see these from a different perspective
clearancedelivery 3 years ago
That was very cool!
th992000 3 years ago
That was cool to watch.
ihavepsychicpowers 3 years ago
at first i thought it was a flight simulator :S
prjeo 4 years ago
last one to land is a rotten egg
pega57 4 years ago 4
good take
hkproperty 4 years ago
Excellent footage! I wonder what the distance between the two planes are?
Krulle27 4 years ago
FAA rules for minimum horizontal separation on final during VFR conditions(which this was) is 500 ft. However, at SFO, the rules call for 750 feet minimum lateral separation between aircraft.
Thanks for watching!
I'm glad you liked it.
jetdillo 4 years ago
wow did the other airplane landed at the same time thats cool!
Penguinzcanfly 4 years ago
Very rare and nice footage! :)
Tuckie 4 years ago
Only in US can we see scenes like that. Seems the US has a much greater tolerance for small horizontal seperation between 2 planes. Saw that in Seattle, too. In busy airports like Hong Kong, Singapore, Bangkok, even London where there's no shortage of air traffic, I have never seen 2 planes so close in parallel and doing almost simultaneously landing.
trent8002003 4 years ago
I thought about this after it happened and realized that software had a lot to do with it. In fact I think it's a perfect demonstration of flight control software. Two A320s doing approaches on parallel runways with the same heading at the same time are going to have almost identical landing profiles.
Thanks for watching and for the comment.
jetdillo 4 years ago
theres nothing dangerous about em, im on SOIA's daily. on a clear day theres nothing dangerous about them. you must not know what your talkin about
clearancedelivery 4 years ago
Checked 3 times and didn't find the word *dangerous* in my post. Merely stating a fact that PL happens more in US than elsewhere. You must not know what you're criticisin about.
trent8002003 4 years ago
Only the big airports (SFO, JFK, ORD, DFW, DTW) with paralell runways allow this...Is one big funnel into the parallel runways due to high volume..Although only in visual flight rules they can do such small horizontal
atenco01 4 years ago
u forgot ATL
killa704 3 years ago
They will at Heathrow, but it's just incredibly rare because you're always in a bloody holding pattern before landing.
Slashfan90210 4 years ago
heathrow use one runway for take off and the other for landings hence the landing holding patterns,
BrummieNeil89 3 years ago
Good old SFO! Nice video.
ChasenSFO 4 years ago 2
what were you flying?
Chengsta92 4 years ago
I was on a USAirways A320 coming in from LAS.
jetdillo 4 years ago
Dude great video, quite hard to have that happen.
A A320 crashed kiling 199 people here in Brazil 2 weeks ago. Flight 3054
economistBR 4 years ago