@modst84 I know this is 3 years later, but you may get this, and I may be answering questions that were never answered. Manfred Mann covered For you, Blinded by the Light, and Spirit in the night. This is the only cover I know of of this song. I love David Bowie though so I have genuinely given it a chance as a cover, and I am not disappointed.
I am a huge Bruce fan but I must say this is quite a cool cover
It is not better or worse just different - exactly what a cover is meant to be ppl so no reason to compare. Either you like it or you hate it, simple as that.
I hear some influence of The Who's "Tommy" in the melody on this song. It's much less obvious on the Springsteen version. This version has a lot more showmanship than the more earnest original.
I love Springsteen like I love Bowie, but I think that is better the Springsteen's version, because is the original, and is a classic. I like too Growin' Up, the Bowie version.
i can't stop laughing....there are actually people that think this version is better than springsteen's? it sounds like wm shatner singing tambourine man....ha ha ha ha ha...best laugh in a while....
so i just listened to Springsteens take on this, and to me it felt like All Along The watch tower. Bob Dylan's original was so fantastic, meaning full with power. Then hendrix did it, and it becomes an all time favorite, less powerfull, but faster, and more fun to listen to. Bowie would be hendrix in this situation.... Its all good.
You clearly watched the wrong version of the song...sorry buddy. Try this one instead: watch?v=BktOzc8m93U
Don't get me wrong, I love Bowie, but his version just doesn't compare to Springsteen's original IMO. Springsteen has some unknown quality to his music and performances, an X factor, if you will, that just can't be compared to anyone else. Again, I like Bowie and I don't dislike this version of the song, but Springsteen's version just blows my mind every single time I listen to it.
Agreed. This song has a charm i'm really drawn to though. I think it's that dirty swinging charm with the strings. And Bowie's voice in general. However Bruce's is so intense and powerful. It just hits like a ton of bricks.
Bowie has been candid about the fact that he was high as a motherfucker, on cocaine, when he recorded this. I don't know why, but that fact alone makes this rendition seem more desperate and genuine to me.
if u prefer the bowie version jump off a building or into a lava bed.... this is aweful, bowie needed to stop covering springsteen songs...... bowie's a clown, these are street poet songs, ie growin up as well
@julieinorbit that's the version that got me over here, honestly the version that sticks out is bowies, but obviously mad props to the boss for writing an amazing song. not trying to take away from the man at all but i just prefer bowies version i tiny bit more.
i think nothing (including this version) can compete against the versions bruce did in the late 70s. they were just epic like almost everything he did in that days
I love both versions of this song so much. I fell in love with the Bowie version and tracked down the original =D Bruce's is more fun to rawk to but Bowie pumps so much emotion into it :3
This is a v. good version of Hard To Be A Saint In The City, but not the best. Check out the Hammersmith Odeon '75 Version. It's on YouTube - by a guy called Glammer. It's amazing.
Great cover -- better than Bruce's! Too bad he didn't get Roy Bittan to play piano on here (or is it?), as he did so well on Station to Station! BTW, I wouldn't call this rare - it's on SOUND & VISION compilation. But thanks for posting!
Great song! I don't see many songs of Bowie that I don't like, I've made listen a song of "See Emily play", which wasn't a Bowie song(as nearly the whole album, I say nearly but think the whole album)to a music teacher who, after having analyse the chords,the arrangements, told me "he's fool!"& that's just what I wanted to hear!Awesome Bowie!
When two geniuses meet...
BrianGriffin83 2 weeks ago
@modst84 I know this is 3 years later, but you may get this, and I may be answering questions that were never answered. Manfred Mann covered For you, Blinded by the Light, and Spirit in the night. This is the only cover I know of of this song. I love David Bowie though so I have genuinely given it a chance as a cover, and I am not disappointed.
P2000Camaro 1 month ago
mmmm...
DjBescul 3 months ago
w rock no coment
sicibatman 4 months ago
boss covers are sooo good.
MultiRandom84 5 months ago
Good cover. Huge Springsteen fan
KleWdSide 5 months ago
I love this song, as emerging the essense of 70's Bowie composing method.
This is really cool and "Bowie-like" arrangement compared to original Springsteen's.
I am Japanese mid-aged man but I often sing this song when I dirve my car.
ifukube 6 months ago 5
For me, it's gotta be David Bowie : )
Scoobydoonut 7 months ago
I love this version by him
stars7803 9 months ago
David Bowie is "THE KING"
GreveKohlberg 9 months ago 3
I'm fan of Springsteen, not Bowie, but that version sounds funny and fits to lyrics :D
Reddymk 10 months ago
I love Bowie and Springsteen to death, both of them, so I love that Bowie was such an early Bruce fan.. And this cover is way cool
pogopogopogo3 10 months ago
THIS DON'T STINK..........
utubesux691 10 months ago
Barry White meets Scott Walker
desertrun 1 year ago
i love both versions. i love how soulfull the end part of this version sounds.
talkingducksrgreat 1 year ago
Wonderful David version!!
cuoricinaization 1 year ago
BOWIE VERSION IS DA BEST
SuperPoida 1 year ago 2
GREAT! Never knew this existed! Where did you find all the photos of Bowie? Wuld you leave me a note via YouTube mail? Thanks for posting this!!
4rainbowed 1 year ago
A great song, which Bruce still edges.Bowie borrowed Roy Bittan to play keyboards on the Stationto Station album.
garylongden 1 year ago
Comment removed
KleWdSide 1 year ago
I love Bruce Springsteen more than David Bowie... but I admire him and this cover is very good!
ponzus 1 year ago
watch?v=BktOzc8m93U&feature=related
HERES SPRINGSTEEN DOING HIS SONG LIVE IN 1975 (HES 25 YEARS OLD)
DONT MISS THE ENDING, SERIOUSLY !!
youll then understand why they call him the boss.
BLAST IT!
arisbananatwins 1 year ago
HERES SPRINGSTEEN DOING HIS SONG LIVE IN 1975 (HES 25 YEARS OLD)
DONT MISS THE ENDING, SERIOUSLY !!
youll then understand why they call him the boss.
BLAST IT!
arisbananatwins 1 year ago
Freaking CHOICE! Thank you thank you thank you for putting this out there...
MyCatWatchesMe 1 year ago
Comment removed
amymcools 1 year ago
i think this cover is great. he really makes it feel like a bowie tune. totally matches his glam rock style with emphasizing the songs imagery.
ziggystardust3113 1 year ago
I am a huge Bruce fan but I must say this is quite a cool cover
It is not better or worse just different - exactly what a cover is meant to be ppl so no reason to compare. Either you like it or you hate it, simple as that.
pfunkmaster21 2 years ago
doesn't he have a better version of this?
labhrash 2 years ago
well, it sucks. But better than Manfred Man's Blinded by the Light. I cringe when I hear that.
HomeRemedySecrets 2 years ago
i agree i cant believe people fucking like that cheesy shit from Manfred Man
alogan101 2 years ago
shit!shit!shit!
tubestation66 2 years ago
I hear some influence of The Who's "Tommy" in the melody on this song. It's much less obvious on the Springsteen version. This version has a lot more showmanship than the more earnest original.
pnyc1969 2 years ago
I love Springsteen like I love Bowie, but I think that is better the Springsteen's version, because is the original, and is a classic. I like too Growin' Up, the Bowie version.
Rocklyaway 2 years ago
Who else is in that first pic?
BanlieuThug 2 years ago
this is a joke lol i cant stop laughing!!!!
ksmallz 2 years ago
i can't stop laughing....there are actually people that think this version is better than springsteen's? it sounds like wm shatner singing tambourine man....ha ha ha ha ha...best laugh in a while....
skontch1 2 years ago
so i just listened to Springsteens take on this, and to me it felt like All Along The watch tower. Bob Dylan's original was so fantastic, meaning full with power. Then hendrix did it, and it becomes an all time favorite, less powerfull, but faster, and more fun to listen to. Bowie would be hendrix in this situation.... Its all good.
metalgearman242 2 years ago 2
You clearly watched the wrong version of the song...sorry buddy. Try this one instead: watch?v=BktOzc8m93U
Don't get me wrong, I love Bowie, but his version just doesn't compare to Springsteen's original IMO. Springsteen has some unknown quality to his music and performances, an X factor, if you will, that just can't be compared to anyone else. Again, I like Bowie and I don't dislike this version of the song, but Springsteen's version just blows my mind every single time I listen to it.
FireOnHighEldorado 2 years ago 2
wow, that is fantastic! I like that one better...
metalgearman242 2 years ago
Agreed. This song has a charm i'm really drawn to though. I think it's that dirty swinging charm with the strings. And Bowie's voice in general. However Bruce's is so intense and powerful. It just hits like a ton of bricks.
Arseface87 2 years ago
This version rocks just as well IMO, just in its own way.
JeroenK 2 years ago
Bowie has been candid about the fact that he was high as a motherfucker, on cocaine, when he recorded this. I don't know why, but that fact alone makes this rendition seem more desperate and genuine to me.
lesterclaypool1 2 years ago
ok Springsteens is 10x better than this crap versoin so suck it Bowie
timbosoccer1080 2 years ago
if u prefer the bowie version jump off a building or into a lava bed.... this is aweful, bowie needed to stop covering springsteen songs...... bowie's a clown, these are street poet songs, ie growin up as well
jagerjack1 2 years ago
No no no, mejor Bruce en The Hammersmith Odeon, 1975...
Locos!
LosHombresRectos 2 years ago 2
This was also released on the Bruce Springsteen cover album One Step Up/Two Steps back.
brightlitcity 2 years ago
I prefer the bowie version!
rockandrollgun 2 years ago 3
compare it to Bruce's live in london 75 version.
julieinorbit 2 years ago 9
@julieinorbit that's the version that got me over here, honestly the version that sticks out is bowies, but obviously mad props to the boss for writing an amazing song. not trying to take away from the man at all but i just prefer bowies version i tiny bit more.
rickrobertbob 10 months ago
I want my tombstone to say: "It's Hard to be a Saint in the City."
I actually have this song on The Best Of David Bowie 1974 - 1979 so it's not that RARE to find.
WoodRatGirl 2 years ago
Even though Bruce wrote it, I have to say I prefer David's version.
Sorry Bruce!
George12String 2 years ago
Wait... who first made the song: Bruce or Bowie?
ithinksammie 2 years ago
Springsteen
pr0pagandhi 2 years ago
Bowie version > Springsteen version
BanlieuThug 2 years ago
Bowie of course
vin4242 2 years ago
Bruce was living the song and Bowie sounds like some trick singing it that saw these things happen. Definitely not my favorite of Bowie's collection.
Bahnzo99 2 years ago
For that same reason, it IS one of my Bowie favourites. He is at his best when giving us his interpretations of stuff. Think "White Light White Heat"
nedzroz 2 years ago
If that's what you are into, I guess so
Bahnzo99 2 years ago
Bowie's version is really dramatic, i like it a lot, it's less pale than Bruce's original.
maarten35 2 years ago 4
i think nothing (including this version) can compete against the versions bruce did in the late 70s. they were just epic like almost everything he did in that days
MJ2327 2 years ago
Springsteen does it wayyyy better.
weimer495 2 years ago
BB laten nr1!!
Friday!
SkeweD2k 3 years ago
I love this song. It is really hot!
lonelygirll15 3 years ago 2
or maybe it is
mari7891011 3 years ago
This is not the best song from Sound and Vision special pack 3 tape box set though. But I did not know that Brucie baby sang this song.
mari7891011 3 years ago
yay sound and vision I had that! ;P Thanks :)
mari7891011 3 years ago
I think this version is more epic then Springsteen's, and its got as much power.
But I like Springsteen's just raw, lay-your-heart-out-in-the-open sound on his live versions.
May beat the original studio version tho, but I'm still thinking on that
DEADHAWK076 3 years ago
This is ONE of my FAVORITE songs from Bowie :)
stars7803 3 years ago
ma la canzone è di bruce.... sia chiaro!
giubattelli 3 years ago
ohhhh the shot at 1:08.
lioralourie3 3 years ago
You have a nice stash of videos. Thankyou for putting up Uncle Arthur and She's Got Medals.
minutegongcoughs 3 years ago
damn good Springsteen cover. Bowie can make any song sound good....
icu60 3 years ago 4
I love both versions of this song so much. I fell in love with the Bowie version and tracked down the original =D Bruce's is more fun to rawk to but Bowie pumps so much emotion into it :3
Redsrevenge 3 years ago 2
This is what a good cover sounds like. He really captured the essence of the song and still managed to make it sound completely different.
Still can't believe he covered a Springsteen song. Is this the only one?
modst84 3 years ago 10
no. I think he has a cover of growing up but it their is another one from his first album.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
*____________________*
Zumpappa1 3 years ago
I'm pro Bowie; have been for a long time. But i gotta' give the superior version of this song to 'The Boss'
starkiller4679 3 years ago
the best version , is that old one from Live 75-85 .. the guitar duet in the end between the boss and little steve gives chills .
theilster 3 years ago
i have a bowie cd with this song *-*
and yeah is really rare....but is my favorite
I LOVEEEE BOWIE
ladylestrange 3 years ago
Bella bella bella bella bella bella bella bella bella bella ...... Divino, Divine, Divin, .... DIVINUS !!!!
moondustx8 3 years ago 3
MERAVIGLIOSOOO!!!!
marilenasonia 3 years ago
its on the best of bowie 74/79
hammbetta 3 years ago
that's the same thing as the platnum collection. it's part 2 of it. part one being 1969 to 1974, part 2 1974 to 1979. part 3 is 1980 to 1987.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
Bowie has a nice sound, but can't come close! I like this poppish cover.
bugattibowler 3 years ago
Sovereign..... voice !!!! je t'aime !!!!
moondustx8 3 years ago 2
This is a v. good version of Hard To Be A Saint In The City, but not the best. Check out the Hammersmith Odeon '75 Version. It's on YouTube - by a guy called Glammer. It's amazing.
jwr5592 3 years ago 10
How many Bruce tunes did this guy do? This makes 2 that I know of including Growing up, anymore.
By the way Manfred Mann did 3 Bruce tunes. Blinded, For You and Spirit in The Night.
Cassidymi 3 years ago
he did 2 and produced one for another band.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
The way Bowie use his voice is worthy of a really great actor,he make this song a masterpiece that Springsteen could never achieve.Wonderful Bowie!!
keith25658 3 years ago
the springsteen version is still awsome though.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
omg great version and great song
springsteens to live and studio
thekey14 3 years ago
hmm now thinking about it I can understand what you mean.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
Great cover -- better than Bruce's! Too bad he didn't get Roy Bittan to play piano on here (or is it?), as he did so well on Station to Station! BTW, I wouldn't call this rare - it's on SOUND & VISION compilation. But thanks for posting!
JasonBNYC 3 years ago
yea but it's only on three releases. non of which are on albums.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
great cover.This would have been perfect for Bowie's "Young American" album....
TVC17 3 years ago
vocal performance .... incredible ! great
moondustx8 3 years ago
...covering Bruce I mean
modst84 3 years ago
Yea.
Bowiefanperson 3 years ago
Unexpected cover to say the least....but it works. He does alot better job than Manfred man.
modst84 3 years ago 2
manfred man did blinded by the light, not saint in the city..
sandycrack96 3 years ago
I meant covering Bruce, not the song.
As far as I know Manfred man covered Blinded by the light and For you, and they changed them completely.
This cover however is is exactly as it was intended even though its done differently.
modst84 3 years ago
they did saint in the city too. blinded by the light was their single.
vampwizzard 3 years ago
wow! nice!
Earthling14 4 years ago
ô Je n'avais jamais entendu Bowie chanter cela, J'adore tout simplement ! ô oui!!!!! Merci Bowiefanperson !
Vinca66 4 years ago
Incredible!
fionalawsonstalksme 4 years ago
Thanks!
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
Great song! I don't see many songs of Bowie that I don't like, I've made listen a song of "See Emily play", which wasn't a Bowie song(as nearly the whole album, I say nearly but think the whole album)to a music teacher who, after having analyse the chords,the arrangements, told me "he's fool!"& that's just what I wanted to hear!Awesome Bowie!
lorenzino1 4 years ago
Funny.
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
Relatively rare, I guess. This was on the Springsteen covers compilation "One Step Up, Two Steps Back, from 1997, I believe.
Great cover. Sounds like something Bowie would write. Sound and style wise.
TigresDelEste 4 years ago
U know the Picture at 1 minute 32 seconds was originally the cover for Diamond Dogs. Just thought I'd give u a little fun fact if u didn't know it.
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
Yes, I knew that.
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
Oh, well I bet a few people here didn't. My twin person from an alternate universe has infiltrated my universe.
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
Our battle shall continue.
Bowiefanperson 4 years ago
wat
PompadourSamurai 3 years ago