I agree 100%. I want to know why Mrs. Clinton went to Africa? Yes, I agree that as a Secretary of State for U.S.A., one is bound by duty, honor, country.
One of my favorite "Behind every great man is a greater woman", I can't imagine the worries that "Chelsea Clinton" is going through.
czlen: How did Obama "indicate his intention" to disregard "failures and successes of history." If you're talking about Obama's position that he will talk to Iran with no preconditions, but with clear issues on the table, you are mistaken. Obama sides with American precedent. Throughout the Cold War, the U.S. had diplomatic relations with a much more dangerous nation: the Soviet Union. Until Bush, the U.S. was on speaking terms with Iran. No commentary, Jack Kelly or no, will change these facts.
czlen: You said, "If you don't stand for something, you stand against it."
That's a rather absurd premise. So people who aren't your friends are your enemies? Good luck getting along with the rest of humanity...wait...I understand now! Your silly black and white view would only make sense if you WERE NOT a human being! I now understand your callous insensitivity and refusals to make any concessions to reason. Here I was getting all riled up when all along I wasn't even addressing a human!
Based on your blog contents, it might be with grave concern to think of you as competent to vote, yet you may actually have supportive arguments with apprehension to voice here, a reason for your frustration. God willing, we'll soon meet to share this great country America's democratic process by casting a hopeful vote, best we can do! FYI, though I wouldn't vote Obama, I support America's President(s), our Majority's will to continue readdressing humanities injustices that rage without reason.
Exactly, we're in this together, regardless of our vote, we need all of American's support to make our future secure! I don't dislike Obama as a person, he's charming and charismatic, nor is ethnicity or gender my barrier; though political agenda and unsupportable rhetoric's potential consequences must be our issues of concern, to gloss over any of these will most certainly have an affect on America, as well as the 'Free World's' future well being! Presdiential Support must be well intentioned!
Agreeably, you said no moment to lose with much to do. Previously posted were past World History highlights and important person's revealing historical consequences of past rhetoric... ie., WWII, Cuban Missle Crisis, The Berlin Wall, Star Wars. Alarmingly, todate we hear Obama's intention to disgard these revealed failures and success of history. Observe and review Jack Kelly's Real Clear Politics revealing Obama's misrepresentation of historical facts to maligin support for his proposed agenda.
Why has Obama's errored recount of history yet been readdressed by the press? Confirm, convince me otherwise, give me something substantial! Neither of us likes the notion of war, losing American lives in a far away land, for that matter any life, albeit better theirs then ours, nor a growing budget deficit, job outsourcing, higher taxation, the devalued dollar, home foreclosures, unaffordable medical insurance. None which can be resolved with encouraging yet unsupportable rhetoric.
Will attempt to bring this full circle with two questions redressing the notion exacerbated by your redress of me as a racist. Though you might think unnoticed the pulling of your own purported 'race card,' such as Asains for Obama, or Asains for Hilary, etc., the irony is white europeans are fast becoming the minority, per UN studies, showing an exact reverse ratio by 2050, with whites an American and world minority. Complicated by my unrevealed raciocity, yet am known as of color... surprise?
Q1a: Will 'affirmative action be desired? Why & for who?'
Q1b: Will people ask for an unspecified 'CHANGE?' From what?
Q1c: Will people ask for special minority considerations? If so, are they the past or new minorites?
Q2: Can you see or realize how this devisive isolation you've been subjected to, and adversely continue to support, which initally I properly addressed, actually polorizes segments of people rather then uniting them to the whole of America?
czlen: You said, "FYI, [bigot] used here as an extremist (which you are, a far left liberal who is fanatical about it), also a diehard (which you are, a reactionary who won't quit)"
I don't appreciate you labeling me or others with other terms either. I've given no indication of my political persuasion; I've just pointed out at how unconvincing your case is. You've strayed so far from the point and the evidence you cite is scanty. It won't do you much good, but why don't you clarify your views?
If you don't stand for something, you stand against it, here you stand for Obama, meaning you took the stand which I accurately described, yet deny having done so. Rather then admit the truth of this political persuasion; you've opted to hide again, this time as an offended victim. Overcome such fear with the truth and courage by changing.
You've not supported your candidate, yet ironically resemble his meaningless empty rhetoric, albeit a type of support. Be sure to Vote! God Bless America!
czlen: There you go again, assuming things that I didn't say or imply. My "expectations" do not "[deny] other Presidential candidates existence." All I am asking is that you state your case coherently and with relevance to the video. Does such a request really limit your ability to voice your opinion?
btw I don't appreciate you calling me or anyone here a "bigot." We don't need your kind of trash talking here.
There you go again, assuming a conclusion without asking what was meant by bigot which references many things, not just racism. Unfortunately the word has been so negatively utilized its other meanings go unheeded. FYI, used here as an extremist (which you are, a far left liberal who is fanatical about it), also a diehard (which you are, a reactionary who won't quit), lets hope this isn't too much a bother, because it describes those who would vote for Obama, Clinton, McCain, or even Alan Keyes.
Skirting lessons learned from history doesn't exclude responsibility to observe them, nor the contradiction of insisting talk be limited to this shallow video's lead to vote for Obama instead of Clinton while ignoring other dialog. Are you aware my dialog substantiates to not vote for Obama or Clinton, how you have been unable to provide otherwise, or how history points responsible voters concerned for USA's future safety to vote for other then Obama?
czlen: How do your comments relate to the video? What do Ronald Reagan, Alan Keyes, God, WWI, etc. have to do with this video's argument of picking Senator Obama over Clinton? Your mind must be a mixed up pile of loose associations and shattered memories. How often do you invoke stream of consciousness or guilt by association when you 'argue'? Does it take you long to order at the restaurant while you comment on your perceived history of the waiter? You should leave a big tip for that.
Your expectations for this video's critic's response to vote between Obama and Clinton denies other Presidential candidates existence, historical facts, you're shortsighted, limited by your own inner thoughts, the self entrapment of a bigot denying truth and fairness. Not all Asians are for Obama says Michelle Malkin, reknown columnist of Unhinged. My big tip for you is slowly re-read her menu many times over, study before choosing, as a precursor to tasting her fortune cookies.
Obama's rhetoric to demilitarize USA destabilizes world order, history repeating it self. Facts arm an accurate dialog for a safe vote. USA demilitarized after WWI allowed the impunity Japan's Tojo invading Manchuria, Italy's Mussolini invading Ethiopia, and Hitler's invading Europe; their goal was world domination, as tyrants who laughed at USA's sanctions without backing of war machinery there could be no retaliation. So would it be with IRAN, China, Russia, and North Korea without Star Wars.
czlen: Your comments make absolutely no sense. You use big words and sound like you went to school but that doesn't matter because you don't answer my question or create any logical connections between them and the video.
You might be worse than Alan Keyes. At least with him, we know he's a politician and might not believe all of the silly things he says. With you, we can't be so sure.
CM wrote: 'Your comments make absolutely no sense.'
Continuously tripping over facts to then get up while brushing ones self off as if nothing was collected by such encounters isn't senseless, especially when if doing so creates outrageous protest revealing some realization of having tripped, if so, then hope exist in maybe finding what the trouble may be. Try not to lose hope; such bruises are how we learn!
CM wrote: 'You use big words and sound like you went to school but that doesn't matter because you don't answer my question or create any logical connections between them and the video.'
Such as has happened when denouncing the free speech laden with concepts describing what lessons history reveals to those who listen, not necessarily an indication of education, rather what may be discernment of wisdom, where here the question's answers go unheeded.
CM wrote: 'You might be worse than Alan Keyes. At least with him, we know he's a politician'
One of America's greatest Presidents, Ronald Reagan, initiated the Star Wars strategy as a deterrent to war, brought down the Berlin Wall that separated Germans and the world, said Allen Keyes is one of the most American People he knows, yet when anyone discounts these, their subversive agenda has to be questioned as dangerous anti-American rhetoric.
CM wrote: 'and might not believe all of the silly things he says.'
What you refer to as the silly things Allen Keyes says, consider this, they happen to be exactly what God has said to all of us. If you refuse to support God's plan, the only thing you can be sure of is catastrophic failure.
Winning wars often means who was left standing, by inflicting so much pain the opponent gives up the notion, neither indicates right, just a determination of will to proceed or not with an agenda. Right or wrong was predestined to be discerned in humanity's history, if studied might hopefully reveal the difference. Ignoring history is to be ignorant of facts. Try resisting this temptation; it reveals your inability to defend your position.
czlen: Why do you fulfill my prophecies about the irrelevancy of your comments? First you jumped from Asians not being able to change their country. And now you're talking about Native Americans. It's quite hard to see where you are going with this especially with how it relates to the video. But you're purpose isn't to be clear, right? It's to criticize groups of people using race which is a sensitive topic and keep people from being level-headed, right? It's all about assigning blame, right?
Humanity's Cradle originates in Africa, spreading to Asia, more of human heritage more then America. The cultural deliniation problem separates world people, yet an important observation for common ground. I didn't pull the race card, a cheap shot, yet tempermental when responding to those who did in this video or anyone claiming a subculture, not to say they are subversive, but when seeking change under the guise of entitlements is tragic if in doing so changes the foundation's intent.
Here in lies the difference between irrational and relative. Obama spouts relative change without any rational foundation of a workable plan, this is irrational. Those who arbitrarliy vote this way may actually be seeking a moral alternative agenda then what founded the USA, which was not to liscense abortions, homosexuality, or euthanasia to name just a few of which are Obama's retoric that Alan Keyes very elequently nailed to the Cross!
To think the Cradle of Civilization might be the long term unstable IRAN, that Obama would leave IRAQ, as well as leave Israel out in the cold, the last vestige of democrcay in that area, would actually destablize the area, this notion is a rather rank foul fish that stinks, though to do so might make indigestion more palatable with a bit more wasabi or a colosal slather of mustard.
czlen: You must have psychic powers (or you are a stalker). How do you know that anyone in the video left Asia to move to America? What they were born here? In that case, their homeland, would be the United States of America. In that case, you are being inconsiderate and in fact, they are doing something to improve their homeland by participating in the democratic process.
And even if they did come from Asia, they and other Asians are free to choose which country they wish to change.
czlen: Are you trying undermine MccCain's campaign with your ridiculous arguments? I have no idea how you are going to respond to me, but I do know its going to be some convoluted response based off a twisting of reality or a jump to some unrelated topic so far removed from the subject matter of this video. Keep it up. I'm an Obama supporter so when your ilk make foolish statements and then mention you support McCain, it's no wonder we don't have to campaign negatively.
You missed the heritage issue of the first Native Americans. The point was how the first American's lives changed detrimentally when imigrants sought a new life on their land, justified with broken treaties todate that remain denied. Such are the dangers of politics lacking wisdom in foundational heritage, which is not to say the majority wins, just who has most votes. Regardless, we're in this together, fair partisain dialog required.
Translation: If you aren't white you shouldn't speak, because you lack the wisdom to. We built this country. White represents the flag, apple pie, and everything good in America. Asians should only be to happy to be here.
Reality: Bush, white guy,screwed up the country, so if you want to hide behind skin color or use it for subterfuge, do it with people with IQ's less than 80 or Fox news viewers. The problems facing this country are very real and we need all Americans help to deal with it.
Asians with this mentality couldn't change their homelands they left yet ironically propose to change what they came to find as a refuge. How inconsiderate! McCain actually represents the heritage of what Asian's have found as refuge from their unchangeable homelands.
Don't take Asian Americans for granted, "Raining McCain" people. We are becoming more American each generation, and each generation we move to the Democratic party in great numbers. Look it up. In Virginia in 2006, Asian Americans voted 3 to 1 for Jim Webb (D) over George Allen (R). The primary disagreement among Asian Americans today is whether Obama or Clinton is best suited to fix the problems created by the failed Bush administration.
Believe it or not, not all Asian Americans left their "homeland" to come to the United States. There are 5th generation Asian Americans walking around. You don't have to look like McCain to be an American, and you are certainly no MORE American. That is the kind of thinking you got away with last century. Welcome to this century.
What about Asian Homelands and living ancestry, many living under human right's abuse, which is why Asian Americans do not flock to Asia for a better life, they seek America. A mistake to vote liberal as if to resolve heritage dilemmas, history reveals liberals don't intercede where conservatives do, liberals move out of harms way. American Indians first lived in America when immigrants became too liberal with their freedoms that continue to oppress America's first citizens.
She could be Japanese. You have no idea where she comes from.
Translation: How inconsiderate for this person of asian descent to speak about America as if she can claim it. Its only for White European Americans, you are only visiting.
This type of subtle racism has been going on for generations by a few whites. Mccain to you represents white America, his only saving grace is his skin color. Damn the issues even if this Asian woman brings up a good point.
I think the girl make sense,Obama is the turn around for this country and the rest of the world. The color is nothing the man is mix of white and black. The world like him,thinking he will end these hate of color,beliefs,richness and other non senses. Mrs Clinton is a good leader,but she was in the whitehouse for 8 years. Obama is young that dont mean that he know little. NBA players like Labron James he was young in his first year, he was the best of all oldies. Obama is a true change.
Why would an Asian vote Democrat? Because anyone with the capability to think critically would vote democrat and a lot of "very high income" Asians do that very well.
GOP talking points kind of rely on the basic assumption that people don't understand big scary words like "communism." To suggest, seriously, that Obama would tax the upper class into-(gasp!) middle class poverty-is a childish exaggeration.
Republicans? Isn't it the democrats who are always patronizing blacks? repeating over and over how unequal the world is, and how they can never succeed? Obama's taxing sectors are ridiculous. Everyone gets screwed but the poorest of the poor.
She spoke my thoughts in a x10 more definitive manner. Great and educated analysis. I want to be neutral about political videos but this one I feature.
No. Your logic actually goes against your case. You wouldn't hire someone like Obama first of all to be a CEO - let alone with a company that is close to bankruptcy. You'd hire Obama if you had extra funds and were working on a new project.
I will tell you right now if I owned a company there is no way I would have the confidence to make Obama the CEO. That's ridiculous.
So I'm guessing you would want your CEO to embellish and lie about the CEO profits and stick to the old policies that never worked in the first place. So maybe you should check your logic first.
Thank you so much for your eloquence in capturing what is on the minds and hearts of many today. It is so wonderful to hear so many voices but yet One Voice!
Please view my music video Be the Change- Aki Antonia on youtube inspired by Ghandi. " We must be the Change we wish to see in the world."
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) Kansas, on Jan 29th endorsed Obama for President with a highly motivating declaration approaching Obama's inspirational character.
You need to check up on your facts. Obama is WAY AHEAD on ethics, and has passed twice as many legislature into laws than Hillary. He will have 12 years of elected office compared to Hillary's 8 years of electoral office.
Also read his plan to change things in Washington. If you read both their plans, you will see Barack offers more comprehensive detail in matters regarding foreign policy whereas Hillary has given a much broader sense. Also note that his technology policy is much stronger
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Basically the Asian lady on the video is saying, if the ship was in trouble at high seas the experience Captain should hand over command to a less experience vice -captain. I am not sure if that is logical. There is a saying , that it is preferable to have a person with experience who has made a few mistakes in the past than an inexperience person.
HILLARY a leader who smile where she should appear serious,who want more responsability while she caint express herself,can she talk and make the usa heard? no, she can be a good manager,so its better to go back to WALL MART if she can be hired
Annabel has done a great job here sharing her thoughts with us. There is a real choice to be made here and it's not always easy to decide on Barack or Hillary or Edwards. They all have their merits. But Barack is the future. I was in NV at the rallies and the campaign events and I saw it for myself.
Annabel expressed a lot of what I've been thinking. Imagine if Hilary were elected. The Repubs would spend the next 4 (or 8) years fighting against her. Obama I think has the potential to bring the country together to have us working together. Maybe Congress might not open with a group hug every morning, but I'm convinced that there would be some improvement over how it's been lately.
Hey Kothabyu, I said the same thing in the Kelly Hu video. Are you playing favorites between me and Annabel??? (= We're going to do a sequel soon. I'd be doing more vid's but I'm slammed finishing a "real" movie right now.
If you count the time when George Bush (the father) served as Vice-President and President in the White House, this country has had either a Bush or a Clinton running the Administration for 28 years!!
Do we really need this discordant dynasty to continue for another four (or even eight) years with yet another Clinton??
The time is NOW to effect true, progressive change for a new generation. No one in the race, on either side of the aisle, personifies that better than Barack Obama.
This was one of the most insightful perspectives on these candidates on youtube. This specific message must get out.. Everyone should link this to as many blogs as possible.
Glad you like this one. Will you please watch the two videos that show Obama speaking and Kelly and Annabel on the stage? Seems like people are only watching part one, but the story Obama is telling is worth hearing the end! Also, it shows Kelly and friends after the rally.
I think she would possibly be an okay vice president, but I don't believe she's for the people like Obama is. I really enjoyed the ending of the video with Obama saying "there's no problem WE can't solve."
I can't wait for you to share the ideas of sites such as youtube being a great way of getting out to people. Utilizing the internet for good and productiveness in this world is available and more of us should use it.
That's human nature, but his sincerity in change and being for the people I think will drive him. I know everyone has that this is all about Black/minority vs. Gender, but I don't think Barack has "played the minority card" (if we even want to take a moment to define that!!!) like Hilary has played the "Make me first woman president." I can't imagine her president, (although I couldn't imagine Bush either! Or Gore!)
I agree with everything you say! especially in part about her not being a good collaborator as well as "we" vs "me," along with the fighting. I've been an Obama supporter forever now. Obama's stayed course with everything he's said. Will he have flaws?
Great observation on leadership style - top down hierarchical "I have all the answers" vs. getting people involved and inspired for change. I hope this convinces many people, men and women, to vote for Obama 08!
=) from the back of the line to the stage, and with a reasoned argument regarding the cultural transformation needed in America to begin addressing the political divisions we've suffered through for far too long.
Thanks mazenko! This is Eric replying. Annabel and I did a radio show yesterday and she made the same point only better. I will post the link here as soon as it's available on-line.
I want to watch theses videos in a few years when everyone realizes obama just ruined the country and are future,lol
MyHonourIsLoyalty 1 year ago
Obama's the worst President in my lifetime. Even Hillary would've been better.
DaveD1868 1 year ago
And now you're the "Coffee Party" peepils..??
The range of Epic Lameness is Epic
Pathetic doesn't even begin to describe you peeps..
Word of advice....come Nov. 2010
Avoid your iPhones
Avoid your PC's/laptops
Avoid your TV's
TRUST
stinky125 1 year ago
what a raving useless daft bitch
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
I agree 100%. I want to know why Mrs. Clinton went to Africa? Yes, I agree that as a Secretary of State for U.S.A., one is bound by duty, honor, country.
One of my favorite "Behind every great man is a greater woman", I can't imagine the worries that "Chelsea Clinton" is going through.
"When the going gets tough get going".
letsgo1lasers 2 years ago
the tough gets going .... lol
letsgo1lasers 2 years ago
well put!
illinidem 3 years ago
czlen: How did Obama "indicate his intention" to disregard "failures and successes of history." If you're talking about Obama's position that he will talk to Iran with no preconditions, but with clear issues on the table, you are mistaken. Obama sides with American precedent. Throughout the Cold War, the U.S. had diplomatic relations with a much more dangerous nation: the Soviet Union. Until Bush, the U.S. was on speaking terms with Iran. No commentary, Jack Kelly or no, will change these facts.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
czlen: You said, "If you don't stand for something, you stand against it."
That's a rather absurd premise. So people who aren't your friends are your enemies? Good luck getting along with the rest of humanity...wait...I understand now! Your silly black and white view would only make sense if you WERE NOT a human being! I now understand your callous insensitivity and refusals to make any concessions to reason. Here I was getting all riled up when all along I wasn't even addressing a human!
COLMustard159 3 years ago
Based on your blog contents, it might be with grave concern to think of you as competent to vote, yet you may actually have supportive arguments with apprehension to voice here, a reason for your frustration. God willing, we'll soon meet to share this great country America's democratic process by casting a hopeful vote, best we can do! FYI, though I wouldn't vote Obama, I support America's President(s), our Majority's will to continue readdressing humanities injustices that rage without reason.
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: Uh...ok. I didn't really understand most of what you said there, but I think there was some good sentiment behind all of the rhetoric.
We've got a lot of work ahead of us. Work on being clear and to the point. The task ahead is so great that we don't have time to waste.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
Exactly, we're in this together, regardless of our vote, we need all of American's support to make our future secure! I don't dislike Obama as a person, he's charming and charismatic, nor is ethnicity or gender my barrier; though political agenda and unsupportable rhetoric's potential consequences must be our issues of concern, to gloss over any of these will most certainly have an affect on America, as well as the 'Free World's' future well being! Presdiential Support must be well intentioned!
czlen 3 years ago
Agreeably, you said no moment to lose with much to do. Previously posted were past World History highlights and important person's revealing historical consequences of past rhetoric... ie., WWII, Cuban Missle Crisis, The Berlin Wall, Star Wars. Alarmingly, todate we hear Obama's intention to disgard these revealed failures and success of history. Observe and review Jack Kelly's Real Clear Politics revealing Obama's misrepresentation of historical facts to maligin support for his proposed agenda.
czlen 3 years ago
Why has Obama's errored recount of history yet been readdressed by the press? Confirm, convince me otherwise, give me something substantial! Neither of us likes the notion of war, losing American lives in a far away land, for that matter any life, albeit better theirs then ours, nor a growing budget deficit, job outsourcing, higher taxation, the devalued dollar, home foreclosures, unaffordable medical insurance. None which can be resolved with encouraging yet unsupportable rhetoric.
czlen 3 years ago
Will attempt to bring this full circle with two questions redressing the notion exacerbated by your redress of me as a racist. Though you might think unnoticed the pulling of your own purported 'race card,' such as Asains for Obama, or Asains for Hilary, etc., the irony is white europeans are fast becoming the minority, per UN studies, showing an exact reverse ratio by 2050, with whites an American and world minority. Complicated by my unrevealed raciocity, yet am known as of color... surprise?
czlen 3 years ago
Under the UN's 2050 census:
Q1a: Will 'affirmative action be desired? Why & for who?'
Q1b: Will people ask for an unspecified 'CHANGE?' From what?
Q1c: Will people ask for special minority considerations? If so, are they the past or new minorites?
Q2: Can you see or realize how this devisive isolation you've been subjected to, and adversely continue to support, which initally I properly addressed, actually polorizes segments of people rather then uniting them to the whole of America?
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: You said, "FYI, [bigot] used here as an extremist (which you are, a far left liberal who is fanatical about it), also a diehard (which you are, a reactionary who won't quit)"
I don't appreciate you labeling me or others with other terms either. I've given no indication of my political persuasion; I've just pointed out at how unconvincing your case is. You've strayed so far from the point and the evidence you cite is scanty. It won't do you much good, but why don't you clarify your views?
COLMustard159 3 years ago
If you don't stand for something, you stand against it, here you stand for Obama, meaning you took the stand which I accurately described, yet deny having done so. Rather then admit the truth of this political persuasion; you've opted to hide again, this time as an offended victim. Overcome such fear with the truth and courage by changing.
You've not supported your candidate, yet ironically resemble his meaningless empty rhetoric, albeit a type of support. Be sure to Vote! God Bless America!
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: There you go again, assuming things that I didn't say or imply. My "expectations" do not "[deny] other Presidential candidates existence." All I am asking is that you state your case coherently and with relevance to the video. Does such a request really limit your ability to voice your opinion?
btw I don't appreciate you calling me or anyone here a "bigot." We don't need your kind of trash talking here.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
There you go again, assuming a conclusion without asking what was meant by bigot which references many things, not just racism. Unfortunately the word has been so negatively utilized its other meanings go unheeded. FYI, used here as an extremist (which you are, a far left liberal who is fanatical about it), also a diehard (which you are, a reactionary who won't quit), lets hope this isn't too much a bother, because it describes those who would vote for Obama, Clinton, McCain, or even Alan Keyes.
czlen 3 years ago
Skirting lessons learned from history doesn't exclude responsibility to observe them, nor the contradiction of insisting talk be limited to this shallow video's lead to vote for Obama instead of Clinton while ignoring other dialog. Are you aware my dialog substantiates to not vote for Obama or Clinton, how you have been unable to provide otherwise, or how history points responsible voters concerned for USA's future safety to vote for other then Obama?
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: How do your comments relate to the video? What do Ronald Reagan, Alan Keyes, God, WWI, etc. have to do with this video's argument of picking Senator Obama over Clinton? Your mind must be a mixed up pile of loose associations and shattered memories. How often do you invoke stream of consciousness or guilt by association when you 'argue'? Does it take you long to order at the restaurant while you comment on your perceived history of the waiter? You should leave a big tip for that.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
Your expectations for this video's critic's response to vote between Obama and Clinton denies other Presidential candidates existence, historical facts, you're shortsighted, limited by your own inner thoughts, the self entrapment of a bigot denying truth and fairness. Not all Asians are for Obama says Michelle Malkin, reknown columnist of Unhinged. My big tip for you is slowly re-read her menu many times over, study before choosing, as a precursor to tasting her fortune cookies.
czlen 3 years ago
Obama's rhetoric to demilitarize USA destabilizes world order, history repeating it self. Facts arm an accurate dialog for a safe vote. USA demilitarized after WWI allowed the impunity Japan's Tojo invading Manchuria, Italy's Mussolini invading Ethiopia, and Hitler's invading Europe; their goal was world domination, as tyrants who laughed at USA's sanctions without backing of war machinery there could be no retaliation. So would it be with IRAN, China, Russia, and North Korea without Star Wars.
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: Your comments make absolutely no sense. You use big words and sound like you went to school but that doesn't matter because you don't answer my question or create any logical connections between them and the video.
You might be worse than Alan Keyes. At least with him, we know he's a politician and might not believe all of the silly things he says. With you, we can't be so sure.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
CM wrote: 'Your comments make absolutely no sense.'
Continuously tripping over facts to then get up while brushing ones self off as if nothing was collected by such encounters isn't senseless, especially when if doing so creates outrageous protest revealing some realization of having tripped, if so, then hope exist in maybe finding what the trouble may be. Try not to lose hope; such bruises are how we learn!
czlen 3 years ago
CM wrote: 'You use big words and sound like you went to school but that doesn't matter because you don't answer my question or create any logical connections between them and the video.'
Such as has happened when denouncing the free speech laden with concepts describing what lessons history reveals to those who listen, not necessarily an indication of education, rather what may be discernment of wisdom, where here the question's answers go unheeded.
czlen 3 years ago
CM wrote: 'You might be worse than Alan Keyes. At least with him, we know he's a politician'
One of America's greatest Presidents, Ronald Reagan, initiated the Star Wars strategy as a deterrent to war, brought down the Berlin Wall that separated Germans and the world, said Allen Keyes is one of the most American People he knows, yet when anyone discounts these, their subversive agenda has to be questioned as dangerous anti-American rhetoric.
czlen 3 years ago
CM wrote: 'and might not believe all of the silly things he says.'
What you refer to as the silly things Allen Keyes says, consider this, they happen to be exactly what God has said to all of us. If you refuse to support God's plan, the only thing you can be sure of is catastrophic failure.
czlen 3 years ago
CM wrote: 'With you, we can't be so sure.'
Winning wars often means who was left standing, by inflicting so much pain the opponent gives up the notion, neither indicates right, just a determination of will to proceed or not with an agenda. Right or wrong was predestined to be discerned in humanity's history, if studied might hopefully reveal the difference. Ignoring history is to be ignorant of facts. Try resisting this temptation; it reveals your inability to defend your position.
czlen 3 years ago
I'll vote for you.
Bucksin07 3 years ago
czlen: Why do you fulfill my prophecies about the irrelevancy of your comments? First you jumped from Asians not being able to change their country. And now you're talking about Native Americans. It's quite hard to see where you are going with this especially with how it relates to the video. But you're purpose isn't to be clear, right? It's to criticize groups of people using race which is a sensitive topic and keep people from being level-headed, right? It's all about assigning blame, right?
COLMustard159 3 years ago
Humanity's Cradle originates in Africa, spreading to Asia, more of human heritage more then America. The cultural deliniation problem separates world people, yet an important observation for common ground. I didn't pull the race card, a cheap shot, yet tempermental when responding to those who did in this video or anyone claiming a subculture, not to say they are subversive, but when seeking change under the guise of entitlements is tragic if in doing so changes the foundation's intent.
czlen 3 years ago
Here in lies the difference between irrational and relative. Obama spouts relative change without any rational foundation of a workable plan, this is irrational. Those who arbitrarliy vote this way may actually be seeking a moral alternative agenda then what founded the USA, which was not to liscense abortions, homosexuality, or euthanasia to name just a few of which are Obama's retoric that Alan Keyes very elequently nailed to the Cross!
czlen 3 years ago
To think the Cradle of Civilization might be the long term unstable IRAN, that Obama would leave IRAQ, as well as leave Israel out in the cold, the last vestige of democrcay in that area, would actually destablize the area, this notion is a rather rank foul fish that stinks, though to do so might make indigestion more palatable with a bit more wasabi or a colosal slather of mustard.
czlen 3 years ago
czlen: You must have psychic powers (or you are a stalker). How do you know that anyone in the video left Asia to move to America? What they were born here? In that case, their homeland, would be the United States of America. In that case, you are being inconsiderate and in fact, they are doing something to improve their homeland by participating in the democratic process.
And even if they did come from Asia, they and other Asians are free to choose which country they wish to change.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
czlen: Are you trying undermine MccCain's campaign with your ridiculous arguments? I have no idea how you are going to respond to me, but I do know its going to be some convoluted response based off a twisting of reality or a jump to some unrelated topic so far removed from the subject matter of this video. Keep it up. I'm an Obama supporter so when your ilk make foolish statements and then mention you support McCain, it's no wonder we don't have to campaign negatively.
COLMustard159 3 years ago
Col Mustard, you scared czlen away!
UnitedForObama 3 years ago
You missed the heritage issue of the first Native Americans. The point was how the first American's lives changed detrimentally when imigrants sought a new life on their land, justified with broken treaties todate that remain denied. Such are the dangers of politics lacking wisdom in foundational heritage, which is not to say the majority wins, just who has most votes. Regardless, we're in this together, fair partisain dialog required.
czlen 3 years ago
Translation: If you aren't white you shouldn't speak, because you lack the wisdom to. We built this country. White represents the flag, apple pie, and everything good in America. Asians should only be to happy to be here.
Reality: Bush, white guy,screwed up the country, so if you want to hide behind skin color or use it for subterfuge, do it with people with IQ's less than 80 or Fox news viewers. The problems facing this country are very real and we need all Americans help to deal with it.
Bucksin07 3 years ago
ughhhhhhhhhhhh whatttt is thiss stuffffffffffffffffffffffffff ugghhhhhhh
nikesk8r15 3 years ago
Asians with this mentality couldn't change their homelands they left yet ironically propose to change what they came to find as a refuge. How inconsiderate! McCain actually represents the heritage of what Asian's have found as refuge from their unchangeable homelands.
czlen 3 years ago
Don't take Asian Americans for granted, "Raining McCain" people. We are becoming more American each generation, and each generation we move to the Democratic party in great numbers. Look it up. In Virginia in 2006, Asian Americans voted 3 to 1 for Jim Webb (D) over George Allen (R). The primary disagreement among Asian Americans today is whether Obama or Clinton is best suited to fix the problems created by the failed Bush administration.
9500Liberty 3 years ago
Believe it or not, not all Asian Americans left their "homeland" to come to the United States. There are 5th generation Asian Americans walking around. You don't have to look like McCain to be an American, and you are certainly no MORE American. That is the kind of thinking you got away with last century. Welcome to this century.
UnitedForObama 3 years ago
What about Asian Homelands and living ancestry, many living under human right's abuse, which is why Asian Americans do not flock to Asia for a better life, they seek America. A mistake to vote liberal as if to resolve heritage dilemmas, history reveals liberals don't intercede where conservatives do, liberals move out of harms way. American Indians first lived in America when immigrants became too liberal with their freedoms that continue to oppress America's first citizens.
czlen 3 years ago
She could be Japanese. You have no idea where she comes from.
Translation: How inconsiderate for this person of asian descent to speak about America as if she can claim it. Its only for White European Americans, you are only visiting.
This type of subtle racism has been going on for generations by a few whites. Mccain to you represents white America, his only saving grace is his skin color. Damn the issues even if this Asian woman brings up a good point.
Bucksin07 3 years ago
I think the girl make sense,Obama is the turn around for this country and the rest of the world. The color is nothing the man is mix of white and black. The world like him,thinking he will end these hate of color,beliefs,richness and other non senses. Mrs Clinton is a good leader,but she was in the whitehouse for 8 years. Obama is young that dont mean that he know little. NBA players like Labron James he was young in his first year, he was the best of all oldies. Obama is a true change.
nyarkowak 3 years ago
Oh and why would an Asian vote Democrat?
Asians have very high income...why would they elect a communist?
Do they want to continue to Live under a system of Affirmative action that excludes them?
Tuftaffety 3 years ago
Tuff:
Why would an Asian vote Democrat? Because anyone with the capability to think critically would vote democrat and a lot of "very high income" Asians do that very well.
Vaansen 3 years ago
Oh, you democrats are so condescending.
If they thought critically, they'd realize that a marxist like obama would tax their "very high income"d asses into the middle class.
Tuftaffety 3 years ago
GOP talking points kind of rely on the basic assumption that people don't understand big scary words like "communism." To suggest, seriously, that Obama would tax the upper class into-(gasp!) middle class poverty-is a childish exaggeration.
Vaansen 3 years ago
Republicans? Isn't it the democrats who are always patronizing blacks? repeating over and over how unequal the world is, and how they can never succeed? Obama's taxing sectors are ridiculous. Everyone gets screwed but the poorest of the poor.
Tuftaffety 3 years ago
OMG I was TOTALLY at this event and got interviewed!!!
Hopefully they'll quote me!
Tuftaffety 3 years ago
She spoke my thoughts in a x10 more definitive manner. Great and educated analysis. I want to be neutral about political videos but this one I feature.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
No. Your logic actually goes against your case. You wouldn't hire someone like Obama first of all to be a CEO - let alone with a company that is close to bankruptcy. You'd hire Obama if you had extra funds and were working on a new project.
I will tell you right now if I owned a company there is no way I would have the confidence to make Obama the CEO. That's ridiculous.
shonester 3 years ago
So I'm guessing you would want your CEO to embellish and lie about the CEO profits and stick to the old policies that never worked in the first place. So maybe you should check your logic first.
bigsexijoe 3 years ago
But Obama lies too.
I'd rather have a capable liar than someone who is not capable and also lies.
shonester 3 years ago
Thank you so much for your eloquence in capturing what is on the minds and hearts of many today. It is so wonderful to hear so many voices but yet One Voice!
Please view my music video Be the Change- Aki Antonia on youtube inspired by Ghandi. " We must be the Change we wish to see in the world."
Bluemusica 3 years ago
Very well said by Annabel Park.
hraban77 3 years ago 3
Ron Paul and Ralph Nader all the rest are Illiminati's Communists bastards. Sheeple do your research!!!! WTF ????wake the fuck up!!!
FEMA CAMPS,Blackwater,Skull&bones,Loose change final cut, NWO,American Union blah blah blah stupid braiwashed fox lovers wake up wake up!!!!!!
angelhour11 3 years ago
This girl really analysed the feeling, the aura that these 2 candidates exude. She's got my respect.
FalconX2000 4 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Barack Obama / Kathleen Sebelius ticket?
That would be UNSTOPPABLE.
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) Kansas, on Jan 29th endorsed Obama for President with a highly motivating declaration approaching Obama's inspirational character.
Wondering what YOU can do?
Wondering how to make YOUR voice heard?
Visit Obama's website and DONATE your support.
Let's get it RIGHT this time.
YES WE CAN
Obama/Sebelius 08
mesh69hotmailcom 4 years ago
Very good to see progressive people talking.
hiriumi 4 years ago 3
You need to check up on your facts. Obama is WAY AHEAD on ethics, and has passed twice as many legislature into laws than Hillary. He will have 12 years of elected office compared to Hillary's 8 years of electoral office.
Also read his plan to change things in Washington. If you read both their plans, you will see Barack offers more comprehensive detail in matters regarding foreign policy whereas Hillary has given a much broader sense. Also note that his technology policy is much stronger
jennavuong 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Basically the Asian lady on the video is saying, if the ship was in trouble at high seas the experience Captain should hand over command to a less experience vice -captain. I am not sure if that is logical. There is a saying , that it is preferable to have a person with experience who has made a few mistakes in the past than an inexperience person.
Confuses, Ancient chinese saying?
doctorpatil007 4 years ago
HILLARY a leader who smile where she should appear serious,who want more responsability while she caint express herself,can she talk and make the usa heard? no, she can be a good manager,so its better to go back to WALL MART if she can be hired
kicuville 4 years ago
Annabel has done a great job here sharing her thoughts with us. There is a real choice to be made here and it's not always easy to decide on Barack or Hillary or Edwards. They all have their merits. But Barack is the future. I was in NV at the rallies and the campaign events and I saw it for myself.
AmynKaderali 4 years ago 8
Annabel expressed a lot of what I've been thinking. Imagine if Hilary were elected. The Repubs would spend the next 4 (or 8) years fighting against her. Obama I think has the potential to bring the country together to have us working together. Maybe Congress might not open with a group hug every morning, but I'm convinced that there would be some improvement over how it's been lately.
kothabyu 4 years ago 7
Hey Kothabyu, I said the same thing in the Kelly Hu video. Are you playing favorites between me and Annabel??? (= We're going to do a sequel soon. I'd be doing more vid's but I'm slammed finishing a "real" movie right now.
EricByler52 4 years ago
I thought you were just busy on the road singing that "Oh Bama" song. The gig money is good, but the road takes a lot out of you.
kothabyu 4 years ago
Annabel Park speaks the truth! Well done!
Obama 08!
orpheusking 4 years ago 9
If you count the time when George Bush (the father) served as Vice-President and President in the White House, this country has had either a Bush or a Clinton running the Administration for 28 years!!
Do we really need this discordant dynasty to continue for another four (or even eight) years with yet another Clinton??
The time is NOW to effect true, progressive change for a new generation. No one in the race, on either side of the aisle, personifies that better than Barack Obama.
Genkimark 4 years ago 2
This was one of the most insightful perspectives on these candidates on youtube. This specific message must get out.. Everyone should link this to as many blogs as possible.
Immutef 4 years ago 4
Glad you like this one. Will you please watch the two videos that show Obama speaking and Kelly and Annabel on the stage? Seems like people are only watching part one, but the story Obama is telling is worth hearing the end! Also, it shows Kelly and friends after the rally.
EricByler52 4 years ago 2
I think she would possibly be an okay vice president, but I don't believe she's for the people like Obama is. I really enjoyed the ending of the video with Obama saying "there's no problem WE can't solve."
I can't wait for you to share the ideas of sites such as youtube being a great way of getting out to people. Utilizing the internet for good and productiveness in this world is available and more of us should use it.
Siksikorean 4 years ago 2
That's human nature, but his sincerity in change and being for the people I think will drive him. I know everyone has that this is all about Black/minority vs. Gender, but I don't think Barack has "played the minority card" (if we even want to take a moment to define that!!!) like Hilary has played the "Make me first woman president." I can't imagine her president, (although I couldn't imagine Bush either! Or Gore!)
Siksikorean 4 years ago 2
I agree with everything you say! especially in part about her not being a good collaborator as well as "we" vs "me," along with the fighting. I've been an Obama supporter forever now. Obama's stayed course with everything he's said. Will he have flaws?
Siksikorean 4 years ago 2
Great observation on leadership style - top down hierarchical "I have all the answers" vs. getting people involved and inspired for change. I hope this convinces many people, men and women, to vote for Obama 08!
rchandra2006 4 years ago
=) from the back of the line to the stage, and with a reasoned argument regarding the cultural transformation needed in America to begin addressing the political divisions we've suffered through for far too long.
tnaka83 4 years ago
that was so good analysis you did there between the managment skills and on how you get out from bankrupcy .. love your analysis
oo before i go vote for barack obama !!
mazenkoko 4 years ago
Thanks mazenko! This is Eric replying. Annabel and I did a radio show yesterday and she made the same point only better. I will post the link here as soon as it's available on-line.
UnitedForObama 4 years ago