Added: 2 years ago
From: trethousandgt
Views: 20,032
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great informative video man I appreciate it. About to cop these and I wanted to have a good look before I pulled the trigger... Awesome vid

  • Nice video, do you know where I can get a pair of the retro 5 2000? I can't stand the jump man on the back or the 23 on the side. Thanks.

  • @corso0331 Niketalk, ISS, and eBay are pretty good but with eBay you have to use caution you don't get stuck with fakes

  • @trethousandgt Thanks for the fast reply, I'll be sure to check them out. Ever have any dealings with FlightClub in NY? Thanks again!

  • @corso0331 Yea, I've bought and sold through flight club since they opened in 2005. Although people complain about their prices YOU KNOW what your buying is legit. Good people.

  • Damn it I want these to come out maybe one more time and the red and white 5's

  • Yo I saw the pics of your 89 Fire Reds...you have a video !?

  • @jstforkicks22 Yea i have a video for them if you you do a search on my channel just type in nike air jordan iv 1989 it should come up

  • @trethousandgt will do mate..its pretty hard to get em especially here in australia..annoys the crap out of me..thanks bro

  • @trethousandgt thanks bro..glad to know i got authentic OG's and im keepin em on ice..Im tryin to cop more V's OG's and grapes..thanks again..

  • @naj14gomez Well the ones you have are the first retro's the OG's release in 1990. Once you get your hands on some grapes make sure and keep me posted :)

  • i got a pair of these ones as well..awesome shoe but im not too sure bout my one..coz the tag inside says that mine was made 10-24-99 does that mean its fake? check out my vid when u can bro..thanks

  • @naj14gomez Hey I checked out your video and you'll be happy to know they are authentic. The production date is in 1999 but the actual release date was march 15th 2000. 

  • Thanx Bro

  • Hii bro i just got mine but i wanna noe if is fake or real can u help me out thenx just look at my vid

  • just got these today and found out they are 300 and up on ebay and i like them better then the 2011 ones id rather have nike on them and it makes them more rare the fit is more better too i tryed both i got these on now and they are amazing fit. good video man.

  • @dragonbleachZ15

    Go bigger

  • @DragonBleachZ18 go with the bigger size always

  • can you get rid of the yellowing on the netting?

  • @kefkapalazzo1 You can but have to use caution, most people use sea glow

  • @trethousandgt thanks i was going to get some sea glow anyways. i was going to sell these because i got them as part of a deal but theyre way too nice

  • Jordans losing their touch . The material is off and no Nike Air on the back . only thing good abt em is the icy sole . I been Jordans all mi life n really losing interest in them . Their are a few that I'm looking to cop n their mostly being release next year but for the meantime Ima just stick with mi home shoe . Nike Air Foamposite

  • Actually these were released in late 1999 (November,December) and ran through 2000 so they were considered a 2000 release, but there really 1999.

  • @LordDankusDominus You are VERY INCORRECT. The first color way of the V's to Retro was the white black fire red v's in january of 2000. The black silver V's in this video released in March 2000. Not sure where your getting your information from.. Need more proof? Go to solecollectorDOTcom/shoes/?pag­e_id2344 all release dates are there. Please people if you don't know something for fact, don't post it.

  • @trethousandgt Actually if they were made in 2000 then they would have the jump-man in the back instead of Nike Air, asshole.

  • @LordDankusDominus I REALLY hope your not serious. The Black/silver V's didn't have the Jumpman on the back until 2007.

  • where would i find these? the ones without the 23 logo on the sides??

  • @oDDmahnsta at this point eBay or any of the major message boards like niketalk and ISS are your best bet, but be cautious, especially on eBay as their are a lot of fakes out there.

  • how much?

  • Ok thanks bro nice shoes! :D

  • Yo bro they only released these in 2000!?

  • @loes347 Only with "Nike Air" on the back 1990 and 2000. After that they switched to the jumpman logo

  • i like the jumpman on the back better, but these seem nice in quality even from just the video.

  • @Skaterboi. Ur retarded know your color ways before you comment.

  • @townbidnez510 I just realized that comment wasn't removed, that same person is spreading his stupidity on everyones video's. Can't even pay mind to that type of person they obviously have some serious issues.

  • I swear nothing is better looking then the Nike Air on the back or on the insole!

  • @crooklynbanger No, the 2000 release of the Jordan V in black and silver says "Nike Air" on the insole so does the 2000 release of the white black fire red. The 2007 black silver retro has a jumpman on the insole.

  • Comment removed

  • @trethousandgt I wanna cop these I found them for a steal on eBay I'm just afraid of people thinking their fake?

  • @UNCbball2350 people that know the deal will know whether they are fake or not. Don't stress it, to many people (especially newer "collectors") swear they are experts just brush it off their usually the ones that wind up getting stuck with fakes.

  • Those are 1 of my top 3 fave J's

    I like those in Black Suade & White Leather

    &

    Leather 6's are da bomb aswell

    All gotta say NIKE AIR on the back !

  • the point of ziplocking the bag shut is to keep air/oxygen out of the bag from gettin to the shoe. Oxygen makes soles yellow.

  • where can i get a pair of these but for women ?

  • @hdestany The style or the color way for this style? They made a few womans colors for the Jordan V but none of them with Nike Air on the back. feel free to message me thanks.

  • 2003 was when they started retroing and taking out the Nike on the back right?

    these are sick tho! one of my favorite Js

  • @ILOVEVAIO150 Hey no the last year they used Nike air on a Jordan was 2001 after that they put "Nike" on the back of the retro 2"s but that's as close.

  • @trethousandgt ohh 2001 lol that makes more sense. "Nike Air" really makes the shoe look better though, not just the concept that its OG or first retros! i switch some of my Js insole to Nike just for the hell of it haha , it looks really good

  • @ILOVEVAIO150 i like the nike on the back anyways,whered you cop them my sight stopped working and now im fuked i need some playboy

  • @GUCCIMANEAJ i got a DS pair size 10.5 if youre interested...check the channel!

  • ill ass pick Upp.i like This i wanted this instead of the black and red 2000s.But what ever.They Both retros with The old JB manufacture..nice review and check out my channel.comment.rate.and sub.and ill return the love..thankx Broo

  • nice retro broo people are stupid these days because they think if they have the nike air on the back that means there fake but nice retro from your other videos

  • man i miss when Jordans were made like these...it's just a completely different brand now.

  • I had the same retro in 2000 but I was in 6th grade then.

  • where u order these from???

  • Is everything on ISS legit?

  • wudup with all the lack of knowledge? true Jordan V's got the NIKE AIR on the back , people need to chill and stop beastin! screw those new "jumpman" retros , i fuckin hate them! props for your collection! keep bringin some more reviews! peace!

  • i havent seen so many morons commenting in a while. They are real!! any1 who thinks otherwise needs to look at the jordan archives

  • These are from 1999

  • @calos925 No, they are from 2000, the Jordan V retro DID NOT RELEASE IN 1999. The first Jordan V retro Dropped in january of 2000.

  • @trethousandgt Of course they have 1999 date codes, the company isn't going to date manufactured goods based on when they might be sold. I'm sure he is aware that the shoe was not released for purchase until 2000.

  • @calos925

    Some ppl r selling 5's on Ebay and listing the year as 1999. I think they r mistaking them with 4's. They retroed in 1999. 2000 was 5's and 6's.

  • 1. Real Box

    2. those shoes r real, the net turnes yellow with the souls

    3. that nike air is rare asfuck

    Its sad ppl say there fake but that obv bec those are a rare shoe to see.....

    only thing i could c ish was the toung, is it high enough ..... but other than that u still rock them?

  • FUCK FUSIONS frankinestine shoes

  • why do people try to say stuff is fake if its fake itl be really obvious

  • Comment removed

  • @LilxFlyBoy401 Listen, for now on if anyone doesn't know what they are talking about please refrain from making a comment. If you don't know something just ask a question instead of leaving ridiculous comments. I'm giving you a pass because its obvious you have not been into sneakers that long if you think this shoe should have a jumpman on the back. The Originals from 1990 DID NOT have a jumpman on the back and neither did the 2000 Release. You are thinking about the 2006 release.

  • true the ones without the jumpman are way better. i just copped these they are excellent

  • @airxmitch05 Congrats, the 2000 release is better looking these people saying the retros with the jumpman just like them because its all they know, once again congrats on a good pickup :)

  • Comment removed

  • they are very much authentic the ones without the jumpman are way better

  • these are fusiioNz riiqHt??..ii HavE tHE SamE cOlOR

  • @StAcKZDaDoN1 Hi, no these are not fusions, they did not make fusions in 2000

  • @StAcKZDaDoN1

    lol

  • I've got a guy who wants 150 for his 2000 retro Vs, they look legit and they have yellowing on the sole. Do you think its a good deal?

  • hot

  • like i said the jordan 14 was not the jordan out when the jordan v retroed like u said to try to justify that retro cardthe 14s are the 1999 release n 15s are the 2000 release any questions

  • my son was born in 2000 n the 15s were out if those are real they were retroed in 1999 so u got yo years mixed up trusr me

  • @dedrickb09 I love it when people pretend they know things they don't. You are VERY wrong. First off, the Jordan IV's retro'd in may 1999 NOT the Jordan V. The first colorway of the Jordan V that was retro'd was in January of 2000 in white,black, fire red. The black silver came in March of 2000. People Please do your research before pretending your an expert it only discredits you.

  • @trethousandgt yuuup , i got my 1999 white cement 4s =D

  • the fake ones bbeza24 got look exactly like these

  • @TrunksSSJ23  You must not be familiar with Jay's then, because the soles on his V's, the squared off tongue, the chunky midsole, its all a dead give away of a fake. Also, its hard to see in his video because the lighting is dim, but the nubuck on the fake V's is usually not as nice as it is on the Real V's.

  • Fake or real? I think real..

  • completely real get the fuck outta here..

  • my 1st pair of jays in 1990&i got these killed them and all i have is the 06 retro my favorate pair of all time since they were my first pair

  • any one interested i got this pair for sale in a size 10.5 im in san francisco PM me if you want more info. also got some jordan space jam 11 size 9.5 bought them back in 2000.

  • damn those r more icey than my 07's but i am gnna try 2 restore

  • good stuff man its all about nike air...check part 24 of my videos i have 8 pair with nike air on the back...1994 white cement 3s 2001 black cement 3s, 1989 fire red 4s 1999 white cement 4s 1999 black cement 4s 2000 fire red 5s 2000 black metallic 5s and 2000 black infrared 6s...

  • Aye nice shoes man but i got fake ones of those and they look the same but always better to have the real ones if you want to see my vid about my fakes just type in bbeza24 in the search bar

  • Yea yours look similar but i would have been able to see they were fake the minute i took a look at them, all the fakes have a jacked up sole, its usually cloudy, and chunkier also the stitching and coloring are usually off, to the average person on the street they won't know but I'll know and thats bad enough. If i can't afford the real deal for whatever it may be i just wont buy but thats me atleast you acknowledged the ones you bought were fake.

  • @bbeza24 haha put em side by side then say that again

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more