Added: 5 years ago
From: bazwa
Views: 12,748
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to tell the truth, you did'nt have a very good choice of actors, you did well for the voices and the costumes, but the sizes are wrong, and the people too.

    other then that, good job

  • as if were about to do this at college haha

  • OMG!!! Where can I get this movie? =O lol

    (Really!!!)

  • No need to worry yourself with Nay sayers, The acting looks solid, everything is open to adaptation and working with what you have is what its all about. I've just finished pplaying the Fool in an amature production, was great fun, gonna miss that guy. I think you've fallen foul of a militant Pratchett fan. Never mind.

  • i could immediatly tell witch which was which

    get it? which witch...

  • "Anyone could do that pun, Lucy Warbeck. It's not funny and it's not clever." ~Annagramma from A Hat Full of Sky

    Sorry I just had to LOL

  • XDDD

  • very droll

  • Physicallity is unimportant, it's the acting that counts. I thought it was brilliant, and there's such a thing as diplomacy?

  • it was an amateur student theatre production, we had to work with what we had. Also i wasnt the director, but i assume this was his interpretation.

  • that looks shit for one nanny ogg has to be fat maggrat has to be a hippy and granny weatherwax has to ne an old woman with a crooked nose seriously did you even read the book

  • If it's played right, I guess you don't need the right physiognomy, or whatever it is called in English. I would watch it anyway. As long as they play out the personalities well, the audience might enjoy itself.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more