bach's music is not horizontal, it is vertical. ..the emotional/spiritual gesture is transmitted through the harmonic movement of vertical polyphonic harmonic progression
bsch's music is not horizontal, it is vertical. ..the emotional/spiritual gesture is transmitted through the harmonic movement of vertical polyphonic harmonic progression
A Bach's work like that can never be be played too slowly and never too many times. You will find new details for every listening, until you are 100 years. Please, play it slowly. I think you playd beautiful, I really love it!
Bach inscribed his Musical Offering to the king with "Regis Iussu Cantio Et Reliqua Canonica Arte Resoluta" (by the king's command, the song and the remainder resolved in the canonic style).
The 1st letters of the inscription spell out RICERCAR, an older term for fugue, meaning to "seek again".
The 2 ricercars "seak again" the king's theme and are INDISTINGUISHABLE from fugues.
Compare with the fugues from Art of the Fugue, all "seeking again" Bach's theme.
While the ricercars of the Renaissance composer Arian Willaert and his comtemporaries might start out sounding slow and solemn, they get faster and rhythmically complex and dancelike.
Nevertheless he applied the term "ricercar" to the 3-part fugue as well as the 6-part fugue.
There's nothing about the 3-part fugue, or it's subject, that even remotely suggests Renaissance vocal music. It is clearly a very instrumental piece in a keyboard, not a vocal, idiom.
He didn't use the term "ricercar" to suggest that he was writing Renaissance fugues.
These are Baroque fugues in every sense. Compare these ricercars to the fugues from Art of the Fugue.
If the 3-part "ricercar" sounds "remarkably free", i.e, IMPROVISED, this is probably because it is Bach's recollection and reworking of the 3-part fugue he IMPROVISED for the king. The freedom is the result of improvisation, not modernity.
This is in contrast to the 6-parter, which was worked out, not improvised.
Compare the opening of the unfinished 4-part fugue (#14) from Art of the Fugue with the opening of this 6-part ricercar. They are very similar in character.
Bach's "Art of the Fugue" could just have well been "Art of the Ricercar". But in his clever Latin dedication to Musicalisches Opfer, Bach deliberately chose the older term, "RICERCAR", as an acrostic for "Regis Iussu Cantio Et Reliqua Canonica Arte Resoluta" (the theme given by the king, with additions, resolved in the canonic style).
Yes, that's why the "more info" section above warns:
"Disclaimer: condenser microphone on a cheap video camera, not the greatest sound! We used real mikes on the CD recording of this instrument, earlier in 2005. See larips com for details."
Best thing he ever wrote. I used to have a recording with only wind instruments... this captures that haunting quality - it's great. Don't beat yourself up over a couple of 'typos'.
Thanks, Michael! In the info section I've added a link with a photo of this organ. The booklet of the CD set has full specs and more close-ups. Maybe sometime I should take along a cameraman so it's not just the videocam balanced on a chair. I set it up halfway back in the hall, going for hall bloom rather than picture.
wonderful organ, wonderful player.
geberotisabi 1 month ago in playlist J.S. Bach-Ricercare a 6-sort
Well done! Nice playing =)
MistaMasta12 1 year ago
bach's music is not horizontal, it is vertical. ..the emotional/spiritual gesture is transmitted through the harmonic movement of vertical polyphonic harmonic progression
3677peter 1 year ago
bsch's music is not horizontal, it is vertical. ..the emotional/spiritual gesture is transmitted through the harmonic movement of vertical polyphonic harmonic progression
3677peter 1 year ago
bravo ♪♫
7thYang 1 year ago
well done, I like your recording with mistakes. Makes it more human.
zengi7 2 years ago
You could have used some of the louder stops on this instrument but overall your playing is good.
advisorC101 2 years ago
Thanks! I explored all the other stops in my 3-CD set recorded on this organ.
thebpl 2 years ago
A Bach's work like that can never be be played too slowly and never too many times. You will find new details for every listening, until you are 100 years. Please, play it slowly. I think you playd beautiful, I really love it!
Beergoven 3 years ago
Perfect is the slow tempo.
Allows to follow the harmonies and voices.
Only after hearing it several times I would
like a faster version, once I know it well.
Isosphere 3 years ago
The term "ricercar" implies nothing about tempo.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago 5
"Ricercar" vs "fugue".
Bach inscribed his Musical Offering to the king with "Regis Iussu Cantio Et Reliqua Canonica Arte Resoluta" (by the king's command, the song and the remainder resolved in the canonic style).
The 1st letters of the inscription spell out RICERCAR, an older term for fugue, meaning to "seek again".
The 2 ricercars "seak again" the king's theme and are INDISTINGUISHABLE from fugues.
Compare with the fugues from Art of the Fugue, all "seeking again" Bach's theme.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago 2
écoutez l'orchestration de Webern : splendide mise en valeur du contrepoint.
mais la chaleur de l'orgue est aussi appréciable
etiennefleck 3 years ago
What's the difference between a ricercar and a fugue?
impossimadnescyAJ 3 years ago
Ricercars are older, and (as here) tend to have more features resembling Renaissance vocal music: simple rhythms, dense texture, and some solemnity.
But, Bach's other Ricercar in the Musical Offering provides contrast as a remarkably free and modern fugue.
thebpl 3 years ago
exactly, i would call the 3 part one a fugue rather than a ricercare - this one is definitely more old-fashioned in makeup
chrish12345 3 years ago 2
While YOU might call the 3-parter a "fugue", BACH still called it a RICERCAR! LOL
Below I explain why he used the term "ricercar".
The choice of term "ricercar" has absolutely nothing to do with the number of voices, density of sound, rhythms or mood.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Ricercar is simply an older term for fugue.
Below I explain why Bach chose the older term.
The choice had absolutely nothing to do with # of parts, vocal quality, simple rhythms, texture or solemnity.
BOTH of Bach's ricercars are "modern" fugues.
And BOTH are ricercars.
6 parts will tend to sound more dense than 3.
And the 3-part ricercar is no more vocal, no more rhythmically simple and no more solemn than the 3-part triple fugue #8 from Art of the Fugue.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
While the ricercars of the Renaissance composer Arian Willaert and his comtemporaries might start out sounding slow and solemn, they get faster and rhythmically complex and dancelike.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Adrian Willaert
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Nevertheless he applied the term "ricercar" to the 3-part fugue as well as the 6-part fugue.
There's nothing about the 3-part fugue, or it's subject, that even remotely suggests Renaissance vocal music. It is clearly a very instrumental piece in a keyboard, not a vocal, idiom.
He didn't use the term "ricercar" to suggest that he was writing Renaissance fugues.
These are Baroque fugues in every sense. Compare these ricercars to the fugues from Art of the Fugue.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
If the 3-part "ricercar" sounds "remarkably free", i.e, IMPROVISED, this is probably because it is Bach's recollection and reworking of the 3-part fugue he IMPROVISED for the king. The freedom is the result of improvisation, not modernity.
This is in contrast to the 6-parter, which was worked out, not improvised.
Compare the opening of the unfinished 4-part fugue (#14) from Art of the Fugue with the opening of this 6-part ricercar. They are very similar in character.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago 2
Ricercar is simply an older term for fugue.
Bach's "Art of the Fugue" could just have well been "Art of the Ricercar". But in his clever Latin dedication to Musicalisches Opfer, Bach deliberately chose the older term, "RICERCAR", as an acrostic for "Regis Iussu Cantio Et Reliqua Canonica Arte Resoluta" (the theme given by the king, with additions, resolved in the canonic style).
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
...but the sound here on youtube is really awful...
Jafuet 3 years ago
Yes, that's why the "more info" section above warns:
"Disclaimer: condenser microphone on a cheap video camera, not the greatest sound! We used real mikes on the CD recording of this instrument, earlier in 2005. See larips com for details."
thebpl 3 years ago
ah...
Jafuet 3 years ago
Thank you! This is a GREAT music!
voldemar74 3 years ago
Nice big organ you've got there :D. Very good playing.
jannokas85 3 years ago 2
this is a gorgeous piece. and to think he wrote stuff like this fairly quickly.
handelfan610 3 years ago
I like to hear this work perform on the organ.The six parts sound much clearer than it is played on the harpsichord.
canman5060 4 years ago
i really like it, any chance of a view of the hands?
drlawitts 4 years ago
Best thing he ever wrote. I used to have a recording with only wind instruments... this captures that haunting quality - it's great. Don't beat yourself up over a couple of 'typos'.
SmurfBreath 4 years ago 2
Thanks, Michael! In the info section I've added a link with a photo of this organ. The booklet of the CD set has full specs and more close-ups. Maybe sometime I should take along a cameraman so it's not just the videocam balanced on a chair. I set it up halfway back in the hall, going for hall bloom rather than picture.
thebpl 4 years ago
Love it! Do another with tighter shots or tilt up to see the upper organ. Keep 'em coming! Cheers! Michael
michaelsmusicservice 4 years ago
sinuous, mesmerizing, soulful, pure
cembalist 4 years ago