Even though this was why people left england to come to the new world to avoid feudalism, it has in some regards returned to this as banks and companies control most of the land in the world. They have forced people to leave areas that are farm-able, claimed emanate domain or jacked interest rates so high to cause foreclosure. Then they don't allow you to hunt or grow food, charge outrageous rents and control armies they are your masters and this will be the case as long as they control armies.
so thatt "they" could organise their lives in the way they think best.. i would gladly hear comments on my theory.. ps collectivism and private property arent clashing terms..
but after i finished reading "intro to anarchism" i think that that would be way far more realistic and viable.. adding a great amount of freedom in society and if in the worst case scenario a "minority" would think that wasnt favoured we could think of physical non violent geographical separation
yeah we could think out about it Texas and California can Legaly secede but the U.S would never let it + with little or no military the U.S could just label it a revolution and enforce martial law
havent you people seen mad max? thats whats going to happen... my proposition is via modern telecomunications technology to organize democracy into a more "direct" form.. where there would be held.. lets say yearly or 6 monthed real time public votes about stuff... selecting/favouring between 4-5 different options per matter.. although i am still trying to figure out what or who determine these pre fixed options and the affected matter and in what order...
Generally it can be explained in a simple diagram. No matter where you begin, it rotates the same. So lets start with a lack of law. Anarchy/Anomy; which soon form into either a democracy or into feudalism/dictatorship; Soon it moves into a tyrannical society; after revolution happens and refreshes the cycle.
Don't fool yourself, Democracy is tyranny on a massive scale. Its not one person controlling others, but the majority controlling the minority.
It still allows more public freedom than some form of dictatorship. Freedom for the majority is a lot more freedom than the freedom of a single powerful individual.
Danke. Jetzt mit dem neuen Rechner hab ich ja kaum mehr eine Ausrede mir die nächste Staatsform vorzunehmen, die ich den Herren hinter dem großen Teich erklären möchte...
eternal fred bob hahahhaha
hnelsonn0123 3 months ago
Any follow up on Feudalism?! Why not Monarchy, Republic, Dictatorship, Communism and Democracy?
muthamid 8 months ago
haha these video are so fun to watch
hatemf23 9 months ago
Funny, informative, stylish - and this stuff works so well in a German accent :)
ashmoonfruit 1 year ago 2
You should make more of these, do one on Demarchy
Gmister2 1 year ago
HA HA! I love these videos.
seanmchughinfo 1 year ago
nice video,man!you make really great videos!please make more
supertsiable 1 year ago
GR8 VIDS KEEP EM COMING YOU COULD DO STUFF ABOUT DIFFRENT RELIGIONS AND POLICAL SYSTEMS
THE RESON WHY YOUR VIDS ARE SO GOOD IS BECUASE THEY CUT THE CRAP AND GET TO THE CORE OF THE SUBJECT LIKE I SIAD KEEP THEM COMING
:>) <-------- HAPPY VIEWER
TheKiemaster 1 year ago
I deared more an individualistic society, not a collective one. you socialized, not unite under a coercive force.
dogsters666 2 years ago
everybody knows this.
GuiMarquito 2 years ago
xD "Edgar Envelope".
PerianArdocyl 2 years ago
Even though this was why people left england to come to the new world to avoid feudalism, it has in some regards returned to this as banks and companies control most of the land in the world. They have forced people to leave areas that are farm-able, claimed emanate domain or jacked interest rates so high to cause foreclosure. Then they don't allow you to hunt or grow food, charge outrageous rents and control armies they are your masters and this will be the case as long as they control armies.
Freethisearth 2 years ago 4
Thats why all authority is bad,whether it is,state or capital
m4trix87 2 years ago
so thatt "they" could organise their lives in the way they think best.. i would gladly hear comments on my theory.. ps collectivism and private property arent clashing terms..
JUSTIFIEDg7 3 years ago
but after i finished reading "intro to anarchism" i think that that would be way far more realistic and viable.. adding a great amount of freedom in society and if in the worst case scenario a "minority" would think that wasnt favoured we could think of physical non violent geographical separation
JUSTIFIEDg7 3 years ago
yeah we could think out about it Texas and California can Legaly secede but the U.S would never let it + with little or no military the U.S could just label it a revolution and enforce martial law
mettle1228 3 years ago
havent you people seen mad max? thats whats going to happen... my proposition is via modern telecomunications technology to organize democracy into a more "direct" form.. where there would be held.. lets say yearly or 6 monthed real time public votes about stuff... selecting/favouring between 4-5 different options per matter.. although i am still trying to figure out what or who determine these pre fixed options and the affected matter and in what order...
JUSTIFIEDg7 3 years ago
Fredbob the eternal!! XD
Lamnont 3 years ago
Awesome Videos, and again.. awesome vioice! :D
HaloMongoose 3 years ago 2
haha, Fred-Bob
blackfireINSANITY 3 years ago
U RULE THESE VID
s ARE AWSOME :D!
marnixblomberg 3 years ago 3
If you were my sociology teacher I would refuse to leave class at the end of the day. You make this all so simple, interesting, and fun.
owentherchaotic 4 years ago 19
Great video.
As were the anarchy and anomie videos, too!
Kostas10 4 years ago 11
very simple to understand,funny but imo also serious.
Much better than the stuff in TV!!
Killer555222 4 years ago 4
Thanks all for the comments!
Druesling 4 years ago
Generally it can be explained in a simple diagram. No matter where you begin, it rotates the same. So lets start with a lack of law. Anarchy/Anomy; which soon form into either a democracy or into feudalism/dictatorship; Soon it moves into a tyrannical society; after revolution happens and refreshes the cycle.
Don't fool yourself, Democracy is tyranny on a massive scale. Its not one person controlling others, but the majority controlling the minority.
slayinggod 4 years ago
It still allows more public freedom than some form of dictatorship. Freedom for the majority is a lot more freedom than the freedom of a single powerful individual.
PlankKydo 3 years ago
yes make more! you do very good videos...I admire the persons like you who think by themselves...waiting for more videos
BLUKBLUK 4 years ago
Excellent!!!!
I Watched all of your videos!
Please make more!!!!
:)
egmont84 4 years ago 3
Thank you. More will follow soon. As soon as I have some more time at my hands.
Druesling 4 years ago
Danke. Jetzt mit dem neuen Rechner hab ich ja kaum mehr eine Ausrede mir die nächste Staatsform vorzunehmen, die ich den Herren hinter dem großen Teich erklären möchte...
dockhoo 5 years ago
Genial :) Ich freu mich auf eine neue Folge mit meinem Lieblingsland Pompelonia
kazum 5 years ago
I love these videos. more more more!
kyhell 5 years ago
cool vid
killahozzy 5 years ago
I've got a cold. Thanks! The other parts do follow maybe...
Druesling 5 years ago
Hey what about the other three country parts and whats wrong with your voice? Swallowed a pumpkin?
Good work.
Kielkenny 5 years ago