Added: 4 years ago
From: NetPatriot
Views: 6,341
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i have 2 things to say 1, all of those protestors are communists(vinstri grænir og samfilkingin) and 2, if we get out of nato other countries can attack oss and no one needs to help oss if we stay in nato and get attack other nato nations are obligated to help oss. but if we join the EU we will lose our independence and we will allsoe lose it if those communists stay longer in power. dont forget that netherland and luxenburg were neutral during ww2 and they were defeaded.  leingi lifi Ísland!!!

  • @TheIcelandicPatriot Actually joining Nato dramatically increased the probability Iceland would be attacked during the Cold War. The US had a submarine detection centre as well as an airbase located in Iceland. The anti-submarine centre was key to Nato strategy in the North Atlantic. This meant that Iceland would become an obvious target for the Soviets if war broke out. Iceland probably would have been nuked. If Iceland had been neutral, the Soviets would have no reason to attack it.

  • @alieu156 The Soviets were pigs. If Iceland would be a strategic island (it is) and if Nato would not asked oss to join the Soviets would have taken our country. As i inplied in my other comment, Just because your neutural does not make you 100% safe. Only 20% or so. This was a time where we needed to pick a side. And we picked well.

  • @TheIceland Iceland would not have been important if it wasn't for the US base. If war had broke out, Rejkavik probably would have been nuked. There is no way the Soviets would have nuked Iceland if it was neutral. Funny how they always make you afraid of these faraway threats, isn't Britain the only country to have actually occupied Iceland since independence?

  • @alieu156 True the Soviets would propabky nuke oss but if we would be in Nato then Nato countries would have to retaliate, if we would be neutural then no body would have to do a god dam thing. There are two who have, the Americans and the British. But we all welcomed there arival, not a single shot was fired, only few politictians that protested but thats it. They obeyed our laws during there stay, we traded, and we got good friends in the prosess.

    They are our friends, They are our family.

  • i have 2 things to say 1, all of those protestors are communists(vinstri grænir og samfilkingin) and 2, if we get out of nato other countries can attack oss and no one needs to help oss if we stay in nato and get attack other nato nations are obligated to help oss. but if we join the EU we will lose our independence and we will allsoe lose it if those communists stay longer in power. dont forget that netherland and luxenburg were neutral during ww2 and they were defeaded.

  • Anti-NATO and anti-EU?! :-,

    What a refreshment!

    Wanna move to Iceland! :))

  • free iceland !

    no nwo now !

    resistance !

  • ég vil að Ísland fari útúr NATO því við höfum EKKERT að gera inní þessu. Fyrsta lagi átti Ísland að vera NEUTRAL land og í öðru lagi, við erum ekki einu sinni með her..

  • Some farmers here have been fighting the Government for decades and have them force NATO to clean up pollution in old abandoned military installations on theyr land, but the Icelandic governments were bound by this NATO secrecy, some gave false hopes and others just ignored the problem, a American Native would appreciate how much we care about our land but the same can not be said about NATO.

    Plus why pay for a Virtual Protection like that, when other members are actively working against us, UK

  • When our land got independence from Denmark our "founding fathers" stated clearly that we should be a neutral country. Joining and co-founding Nato clearly goes against our neutrality position. Plus why pay for something we don't need?

  • We should always be neutral I believe. Never to participate in wars because wars are always a tragedy and serve the only purpose of making those who sell guns and warfare machines and techology profit from it. The people gain nothing except death and destruction.

  • @ellitho Simple. Neutrality gives very little protection and if it comes to war we will have an army to protect oss.

    Cowards pick neutrality. If we vote for freedom then that side is ours.

  • Hvernig væri að hafa mótmæli hvern einasta 30.mars ??? :P til dæmis næsta 30.mars verða 60 ár síðan ísland gekk í nató.

  • god hugmynd.

  • vill eithver segja mér hvað nató er ???,takk

  • Munaði hársbreidd að valdaránið tækist, þá hefðum við getað fengið sjálfan Jósef í Kreml sem nýjan bestavin Íslands... jeij

    Þorskastríðin hefðu eflaust orðið geggjað blóðug þá... hehe

  • ég held að Táragas er allt of ódýrt! =P

  • Ísland úr djöfuls Nato, [ Þó maðr myndi nú halda þetta löngu dauð mótmæli .. ]

  • Halldór í herinn og herinn burt!

  • Ísland úr NATO!

  • Ísland úr NATO!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more