U "cling" to ur NAME so much, U it has DULLED your SENSES.
USE your GOD-given COMMON Sense and at least THINK about ALL this guy is trying to REVEAL about the REAL "Uncle Sam."
The REAL Uncle Sam is a bunch of old WHITE guys, in a cigar-filled Board room, 10 stories underground, somewhere, PLAYING this country like a "fiddle."
U "cling" to ur NAME so much, U alos it to DULL your SENSES.
USE your GOD-given COMMON Sense and at least THINK about ALL this guy is trying to REVEAL about the REAL "Uncle Sam."
The REAL Uncle Sam is a buch of old WHITE guys, in a cigar-filled Board room, 10 stories underground, somewhere, PLAYING this country like a "fiddle." They've been doing it for decades.
More proof that not all Jews are assholes. We need a lot more people like him to stand up or they (the Jews) are all going to pay the price for what Rockafeller and others are doing to us.
Additionally, because the vaccine was oral, it is highly unlikely that infection would have occurred. SIV/HIV does not live long or very well outside of living organisms. Contrary to popular notion, SIV/HIV is difficult to transmit for that very reason. In any case, it is highly suggestive that HIV existed in humans long before the 1950's, since samples that have been sequenced from the early 1960's are highly variable, and thus, must have had ample time to mutate through several generations.
It is highly implausible that infection occurred in the Congo the way you described. The vaccine you are referring to, which was oral, was called "Chat." It was a live attenuated vaccine, and during that time, was cultured in kidney cells of monkeys. I'll let you in on a little fact: SIV and HIV cannot live in kidney cells. What's more, several of the vaccines you refer to are still in existence, and have been tested and scrutinized. Guess what? No SIV or HIV was found in them.
The earliest known cases of AIDS occurred in central Africa, in the same regions where Koprowski's polio vaccine was given to over a million people in 1957-1960. The timing coincides. There is no documented case of HIV infection or AIDS before 1959. Centuries of the slave trade and European exploitation of Africa exposed Africans and others to all other diseases then known; it is implausible that HIV could have been present and spreading in Africa without being recognized.
if any of you are familiar with peer reviewed, scientific papers from accredited scientific journals then check out the papers published by Dr. Gallo in the 70's and you can put your skepticism aside. Wouldn't it be smart to search for facts rather than hear something and automatically assume it's not true or is true?
It's one thing for someone to say "yeah i heard this and that..." with no physical evidence. There is physical evidence of these claims. Research everything you hear.
No, actually there isn't any physical evidence that HIV and Ebola are anthropogenic as Mr. Horowitz claims. He's so full of shit that it's pouring out of his ears. Since you're making that claim, it's your job to support it. Link me to just one peer-reviewed journal article from a reputable source like JAMA, or AMA, or even AAAS that supports any of Horowitz's claims. Let me save you the time, you won't find any because they DON'T exist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There are very simple explanations for the staggeringly unfounded claims make by Mr. Horowitz: he stands to gain financially for perpetuating this nonsense in the form of books he has written, speaking engagements, etc. The fact is that NONE, absolutely none of his claims are supported by any empirical evidence. He presented no such hardcore evidence in the presentation, only information from highly dubious sources. Don't take my word for it, do your own research from reputable sources.
Your response is quite strange. You haven't detailed which sources and allegations are incorrect whereas the sources such as contracts, dates, names, organizations Horowitz mentions can all be referenced.
The experts who forwarded and commented on his book are also quite reputable. Anyone who does an honest days work stands to benefit financially from that work. I don't think its a crime to make a living telling the truth but it is a sin to make a living telling lies and hiding truth!
highscoremedia, your response is typical of the usual ignorance and arrogance of someone who has no clue what they are talking about. In your defense of this video, you supported nothing, and simply attacked my position. I stated that no empirical evidence was presented, which is true (watch the video again, where are the empirical sources???). What's further, if you are making the claim, it is your responsibility to support it, not mine.
While it's healthy to be skeptical, pick one claim purported by, and I stress, "Harvard" Dr. Horowitz. and explain why you remain skeptical.
Please understand that I am in wonder, but I don't wholly embrace what he is saying... But I would like a reasoned response from an opposing viewpoint such as yours.
Claims of financial gain does not satisfy my inquisition into his information. Cause if that were the case, many people should be skeptically scrutinized.
skeptoid1974, he doesn't stand to gain by selling books, he wouldn't be putting videos on here if he did.Dr. Roy Kinard; Dr. Jack Gruber, and Dr Robert Gallo, make money hand over fist for their bullshit created HIV
You really are completely ignorant, and you obviously have not spent any time researching Horowitz. What's further, you have not done your homework on the origins of HIV, because if you had, you would know that HIV existed prior to any research done by the doctors you mentioned. Of course, you will simply modify your conspiracy claim to somehow explain away the fact that prior to the research done by the docs you mentioned, HIV was isolated in preserved human tissue samples as early as 1960.
There is a big difference on how Horowitz has profited from his BS claims, and how big pharma has. Big pharma has profited because in most cases they have painstakingly developed and tested drugs that improve the lives of billions. That is a worthy endeavor, and therefore they should profit from the massive investment they have had to make. Horowitz simply makes unfounded, ridiculous claims, and because he is a great communicator and salesman, he can convince people to believe in his lies.
Yeah! Like the Hepatitis B vaccine, and the Polio Vaccine. Robert Gallow should be tied up and shot from the feet up, slowly, with low calibre bullets, so the bastard suffers.
Seriously dude. What does your statement mean? Are you arguing some point? If so, you've done a terrible job. Since I'm not a mind reader, why don't you enlighten everyone, including me, and tell what your latest conspiracy theory is relating to the Hep B vaccine and Salk vaccine. Are you saying that both are/were not effective? And I'm not sure you've done your homework on Dr. Gallo. You probably should know that Gallo didn't have anything to do with development of polio vaccine.
Salk vaccine-- during the 50's and 60's millions of people were infected with polio vaccines that were contaminated with a virus undetected in the monkey organs used to prepare the vaccines (called SV-40 virus). SV-40 is said to cause a clinical condition similar to AIDS and has been found in brain tumors, leukemia and other human cancers as well. Researchers consider it to be a cancer-causing virus.
Kanki and Essex (1988) admitted that their monkey virus isolate, STLV4, and their human AIDS virus isolate, HTLV4, were both artefacts due to contamination with another monkey virus, Sn. This
virus, isolated from laboratory-housed monkeys in USA, has been clearly demonstrated to be unrelated
HIV belongs to the lentiviruses and shows great genetic similarity to visna-maedi virus found in sheep. In 1972, a virus similar to this sheep virus was isolated from cattle and named by Van der Maaten as bovine visna virus (BVV). Worryingly, BVV has been shown to be present in 'high proportion of batches of fetal bovine serum for cell culture' by
Georgiades in 1978. The manufacture of vaccines requires the growth of virus in cell cultures using fetal calf serum in the growth medium.
What's further, B1N4RYGH0ST, I read your profile and preferences. You're a little old to be believing in leprauchauns and UFOs, aren't ya?! Looking forward to you further convincing me of your arrogance and ignorance.
skeptoid1974, no you never did, my age isn't on my profile.... foolish person. I'm entitled to believe in anything I choose, You know Gallow poisoned the people. Infact, I don't know how the b*st*rd sleeps at night, you can clearly see it on his face when he was confronted by Len Horowitz. and if Gallow wasn't around for the polio vaccine, it just shows how corrupt the government is. How dare you tell me when I'm too old to believe in anything.
Poisoned who, what people? What are you honestly talking about? You mean he administered them sodium cyanide? I would think that if he poisoned people, there probably would have been a conviction. You think? And additionally, you've proved that you haven't done your homework on any of this. "If Gallo wasn't around for the polio vaccine..." Don't you think it would be a good idea to know that he wasn't, before you imply he had something to do with the development of the Salk vaccine???
I've long smelled the stench of evilness regarding the existence of HIV. Evilness has a particular scent that's unmistakeable.
electronfun 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I dare any of you Len Horowitz Cult members to type LEN HOROWITZ EXPOSED in youtube. Then Go To Iconoclast Radio Website.
IconoclastRocks 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@skeptic107
U "cling" to ur NAME so much, U it has DULLED your SENSES.
USE your GOD-given COMMON Sense and at least THINK about ALL this guy is trying to REVEAL about the REAL "Uncle Sam."
The REAL Uncle Sam is a bunch of old WHITE guys, in a cigar-filled Board room, 10 stories underground, somewhere, PLAYING this country like a "fiddle."
They've been doing it for decades.
AND........"LAUGHING"
Erionnacirema 11 months ago
@skeptic107
U "cling" to ur NAME so much, U alos it to DULL your SENSES.
USE your GOD-given COMMON Sense and at least THINK about ALL this guy is trying to REVEAL about the REAL "Uncle Sam."
The REAL Uncle Sam is a buch of old WHITE guys, in a cigar-filled Board room, 10 stories underground, somewhere, PLAYING this country like a "fiddle." They've been doing it for decades.
AND........"LAUGHING"
Erionnacirema 11 months ago
Comment removed
Erionnacirema 11 months ago
The video quality is very poor. Do you have a better quality video from the same presentation.
Ttssuf 1 year ago
More proof that not all Jews are assholes. We need a lot more people like him to stand up or they (the Jews) are all going to pay the price for what Rockafeller and others are doing to us.
QuarkToo 1 year ago
This is an Excellent presentation!
thanks for posting!
i encountered this video and favorited it 2 years ago, and forgot about it. i'm finally watching it.
Diatonic135 1 year ago
Additionally, because the vaccine was oral, it is highly unlikely that infection would have occurred. SIV/HIV does not live long or very well outside of living organisms. Contrary to popular notion, SIV/HIV is difficult to transmit for that very reason. In any case, it is highly suggestive that HIV existed in humans long before the 1950's, since samples that have been sequenced from the early 1960's are highly variable, and thus, must have had ample time to mutate through several generations.
skeptoid1974 1 year ago
@skeptoid1974- If infection cannot occur through the oral vaccine, then how the hell does the vaccine induce an immune response?
bitterbonker 1 year ago
It is highly implausible that infection occurred in the Congo the way you described. The vaccine you are referring to, which was oral, was called "Chat." It was a live attenuated vaccine, and during that time, was cultured in kidney cells of monkeys. I'll let you in on a little fact: SIV and HIV cannot live in kidney cells. What's more, several of the vaccines you refer to are still in existence, and have been tested and scrutinized. Guess what? No SIV or HIV was found in them.
skeptoid1974 1 year ago
The earliest known cases of AIDS occurred in central Africa, in the same regions where Koprowski's polio vaccine was given to over a million people in 1957-1960. The timing coincides. There is no documented case of HIV infection or AIDS before 1959. Centuries of the slave trade and European exploitation of Africa exposed Africans and others to all other diseases then known; it is implausible that HIV could have been present and spreading in Africa without being recognized.
trinidadman55 2 years ago
wow..your last comment was 5 days ago??? are you monitoring this site?
oam6000 2 years ago
if any of you are familiar with peer reviewed, scientific papers from accredited scientific journals then check out the papers published by Dr. Gallo in the 70's and you can put your skepticism aside. Wouldn't it be smart to search for facts rather than hear something and automatically assume it's not true or is true?
It's one thing for someone to say "yeah i heard this and that..." with no physical evidence. There is physical evidence of these claims. Research everything you hear.
oam6000 2 years ago
No, actually there isn't any physical evidence that HIV and Ebola are anthropogenic as Mr. Horowitz claims. He's so full of shit that it's pouring out of his ears. Since you're making that claim, it's your job to support it. Link me to just one peer-reviewed journal article from a reputable source like JAMA, or AMA, or even AAAS that supports any of Horowitz's claims. Let me save you the time, you won't find any because they DON'T exist.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There are very simple explanations for the staggeringly unfounded claims make by Mr. Horowitz: he stands to gain financially for perpetuating this nonsense in the form of books he has written, speaking engagements, etc. The fact is that NONE, absolutely none of his claims are supported by any empirical evidence. He presented no such hardcore evidence in the presentation, only information from highly dubious sources. Don't take my word for it, do your own research from reputable sources.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
Your response is quite strange. You haven't detailed which sources and allegations are incorrect whereas the sources such as contracts, dates, names, organizations Horowitz mentions can all be referenced.
The experts who forwarded and commented on his book are also quite reputable. Anyone who does an honest days work stands to benefit financially from that work. I don't think its a crime to make a living telling the truth but it is a sin to make a living telling lies and hiding truth!
highscoremedia 2 years ago
highscoremedia, your response is typical of the usual ignorance and arrogance of someone who has no clue what they are talking about. In your defense of this video, you supported nothing, and simply attacked my position. I stated that no empirical evidence was presented, which is true (watch the video again, where are the empirical sources???). What's further, if you are making the claim, it is your responsibility to support it, not mine.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
While it's healthy to be skeptical, pick one claim purported by, and I stress, "Harvard" Dr. Horowitz. and explain why you remain skeptical.
Please understand that I am in wonder, but I don't wholly embrace what he is saying... But I would like a reasoned response from an opposing viewpoint such as yours.
Claims of financial gain does not satisfy my inquisition into his information. Cause if that were the case, many people should be skeptically scrutinized.
ParapaDrifter 2 years ago
skeptoid1974, he doesn't stand to gain by selling books, he wouldn't be putting videos on here if he did.Dr. Roy Kinard; Dr. Jack Gruber, and Dr Robert Gallo, make money hand over fist for their bullshit created HIV
B1N4RYGH0ST 2 years ago
You really are completely ignorant, and you obviously have not spent any time researching Horowitz. What's further, you have not done your homework on the origins of HIV, because if you had, you would know that HIV existed prior to any research done by the doctors you mentioned. Of course, you will simply modify your conspiracy claim to somehow explain away the fact that prior to the research done by the docs you mentioned, HIV was isolated in preserved human tissue samples as early as 1960.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
skeptoid1974 The people making money off the stuff Dr. Len Horowitz, are the American Government, the Pharmacutical companies
B1N4RYGH0ST 2 years ago
There is a big difference on how Horowitz has profited from his BS claims, and how big pharma has. Big pharma has profited because in most cases they have painstakingly developed and tested drugs that improve the lives of billions. That is a worthy endeavor, and therefore they should profit from the massive investment they have had to make. Horowitz simply makes unfounded, ridiculous claims, and because he is a great communicator and salesman, he can convince people to believe in his lies.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
Yeah! Like the Hepatitis B vaccine, and the Polio Vaccine. Robert Gallow should be tied up and shot from the feet up, slowly, with low calibre bullets, so the bastard suffers.
B1N4RYGH0ST 2 years ago
Seriously dude. What does your statement mean? Are you arguing some point? If so, you've done a terrible job. Since I'm not a mind reader, why don't you enlighten everyone, including me, and tell what your latest conspiracy theory is relating to the Hep B vaccine and Salk vaccine. Are you saying that both are/were not effective? And I'm not sure you've done your homework on Dr. Gallo. You probably should know that Gallo didn't have anything to do with development of polio vaccine.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
Salk vaccine-- during the 50's and 60's millions of people were infected with polio vaccines that were contaminated with a virus undetected in the monkey organs used to prepare the vaccines (called SV-40 virus). SV-40 is said to cause a clinical condition similar to AIDS and has been found in brain tumors, leukemia and other human cancers as well. Researchers consider it to be a cancer-causing virus.
bitterbonker 1 year ago
Kanki and Essex (1988) admitted that their monkey virus isolate, STLV4, and their human AIDS virus isolate, HTLV4, were both artefacts due to contamination with another monkey virus, Sn. This
virus, isolated from laboratory-housed monkeys in USA, has been clearly demonstrated to be unrelated
to HIV.
bitterbonker 1 year ago
HIV belongs to the lentiviruses and shows great genetic similarity to visna-maedi virus found in sheep. In 1972, a virus similar to this sheep virus was isolated from cattle and named by Van der Maaten as bovine visna virus (BVV). Worryingly, BVV has been shown to be present in 'high proportion of batches of fetal bovine serum for cell culture' by
Georgiades in 1978. The manufacture of vaccines requires the growth of virus in cell cultures using fetal calf serum in the growth medium.
bitterbonker 1 year ago
What's further, B1N4RYGH0ST, I read your profile and preferences. You're a little old to be believing in leprauchauns and UFOs, aren't ya?! Looking forward to you further convincing me of your arrogance and ignorance.
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
skeptoid1974, no you never did, my age isn't on my profile.... foolish person. I'm entitled to believe in anything I choose, You know Gallow poisoned the people. Infact, I don't know how the b*st*rd sleeps at night, you can clearly see it on his face when he was confronted by Len Horowitz. and if Gallow wasn't around for the polio vaccine, it just shows how corrupt the government is. How dare you tell me when I'm too old to believe in anything.
B1N4RYGH0ST 2 years ago
Poisoned who, what people? What are you honestly talking about? You mean he administered them sodium cyanide? I would think that if he poisoned people, there probably would have been a conviction. You think? And additionally, you've proved that you haven't done your homework on any of this. "If Gallo wasn't around for the polio vaccine..." Don't you think it would be a good idea to know that he wasn't, before you imply he had something to do with the development of the Salk vaccine???
skeptoid1974 2 years ago
Hey, thanx for the vid~
I totally agree with Hororwitz. He brings hard core evidence.
2SweetEyes 3 years ago
I'm glad to see someone post more stuff on Horowitz.He has a lot of good documented information and great books.Thanks.
topher23w 3 years ago 7
Excellent. Very informative. Thank you for posting it.
ouchmycrank 3 years ago 4
awesome
FrnnkEducation 3 years ago 3
Thanks for the video mashj50.
Do you know when was this video filmed?
Or, since when do you have it.
Thanks
MiguelJahTheKid 4 years ago 2
2003
mashj50 4 years ago
Thanks.
MiguelJahTheKid 3 years ago
Fantastic presentation.
emulau 4 years ago 3
yes he truly knows his stuff doesn't he ? so where does that leave us ? i think awake well and truly
mashj50 4 years ago