cutegumbygirl: no need to ever rag(i'm 54 and WAY beyond putting someone else's car down) your Balt sounds terrific. enjoy your car and be safe,as for me still have the need for speed since i was racing back in 1974,back then in my 1970 340 small block Duster !!!
this is why my 17 yr old 93 Formula LT1 with 121,000mi has yet to lose to a cobalt
ss/sc. i have I/E CHIP 160 STAT and 373's. i think the torque is the ultimate factor, my LT1 came with 325 from the factory,with bolt-ons it's obviously more. i'm sure more upgrades on the cobalt like stage III will make better #'s anyway not ragging on anyones car just stating my experience with stage 1 and 2 cobalts
i'm a GM man. they need to give the balt more torque !
@use2slam2 i believe u. A thanks for not ragging on the cobalt. lol lots of people do. my stage cobalt ( which is not gm one part lol) puts down 290whp. but i have a good setup for it. u have to adit mit 205 to 290 thats a big big difference to the wheels.
My homie went to get his 2010 Cobalt/tc tuned but HP tuner said the car was too new and didnt have the program for it suckkkks. They put the car on the dyno and he made 273 HP and 307 torque they guys at the shop were impressed lol.
Does that air intake make a big difference as far as cramming more air in to the engine. What I'm trying to say is did you dyno with stock intake and then the upgrade.
cutegumbygirl: no need to ever rag(i'm 54 and WAY beyond putting someone else's car down) your Balt sounds terrific. enjoy your car and be safe,as for me still have the need for speed since i was racing back in 1974,back then in my 1970 340 small block Duster !!!
use2slam2 9 months ago
nice vid man my blue 06 ss/sc puts down about the same hp, a little more cause i have exhaust, with my stg 2 and intake, but sounds good man!
98montecarloz34 1 year ago
this is why my 17 yr old 93 Formula LT1 with 121,000mi has yet to lose to a cobalt
ss/sc. i have I/E CHIP 160 STAT and 373's. i think the torque is the ultimate factor, my LT1 came with 325 from the factory,with bolt-ons it's obviously more. i'm sure more upgrades on the cobalt like stage III will make better #'s anyway not ragging on anyones car just stating my experience with stage 1 and 2 cobalts
i'm a GM man. they need to give the balt more torque !
use2slam2 1 year ago
@use2slam2 i believe u. A thanks for not ragging on the cobalt. lol lots of people do. my stage cobalt ( which is not gm one part lol) puts down 290whp. but i have a good setup for it. u have to adit mit 205 to 290 thats a big big difference to the wheels.
cutegumbygurl 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My homie went to get his 2010 Cobalt/tc tuned but HP tuner said the car was too new and didnt have the program for it suckkkks. They put the car on the dyno and he made 273 HP and 307 torque they guys at the shop were impressed lol.
fightnight909 1 year ago
i love this vid!!!
09BertoSS 1 year ago
hey did u ever had any problems with this car?
beacuse i'm getting it soon with 89000km for $8500.00
vintimv001 1 year ago
you my friend... need better engine mounts :P
dw4lubu 2 years ago
where did you get the headlights???
berto0991 2 years ago
Nice run. Now i know "somewhat" my numbers should be. GM hickuped on the stg 2 hp #'s. 242hp they said?
banshee107 2 years ago
damn look at that engine shake from that shock load....get a dampener and some stiffer bushings. youre gonna break something
bboySTOICone 2 years ago
smooth ass curve
macgolfracer 4 years ago
my vid tells my mods.
JBP 3.0 inch cold air intake, and Stage II supercharger kit. everything else is stock
5150studios 4 years ago
Does that air intake make a big difference as far as cramming more air in to the engine. What I'm trying to say is did you dyno with stock intake and then the upgrade.
shbfd 4 years ago
What are your mods ?? ALL OF THEM jeje
EfrommelSS 4 years ago
very nice
mr2021 4 years ago