Why must we trade in video and audio quality in order to get those last 3 seconds? I think I prefer to watch the first video with its full-size picture and stereo sound.
you are wrong, its because of the organs have air blowing and if you make a fast trill it would sound like stiking the two notes at the same time, thats how it is with the old organs i dont know if they can change that now
Im a fellow jerk from Chicago US and honestly when I hear music I shed tears. Former classical clarinetist here from Boston. I could listen all night to youtube. Thanks for the post.
then I am not too sure...but sometimes the difference in sound is really subtle. It may sound the same to you in Youtube, but may make a difference for audience there
Yes Ntalikeris666 - they are off with no noticable sound difference. I did think that this was due to the pedel being uncoupled from the great - but i don't think so. Maybe theres a professional organist on here who might clarify??
It' s basically a categorizing system for the pieces made by Bach - there's a lot. BWV stands for Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis, German for Bach-Works-Catelogue. There is a lot of pieces so this basically categorizes them into his works.
you know...when some is outstanding...and you are just like "ugh why can't i do that?!?". i'm a lover of bach's music...but i get filled with jeaslousy which is later overcome by great joy and astonishment.
I love this a lot! Organs fascinate me, especially when pieces such as this are played really well. But I was wondering why it sounds like it's in A-flat minor when it looks like he's playing in G minor? It doesn't really bother me, but I'm curious: is it the recording equipment, or is it the organ?
historical oragan tuning is not like as modern tuning. it depends on the builder at the time of that partcular organ was assembled. There was no absolute consensus as to i.e. A=440 or anything.
Good call. This organ (Trost organ of Waltershausen) uses a modified meantone temperament with A=466.8 HZ which makes it sound about a semitone higher.
I love this a lot! Organs fascinate me, especially when pieces such as this are played really well. But I was wondering why it sounds like it's in A-flat minor when it looks like he's playing in G minor? It doesn't really bother me, but I'm curious: is it the recording equipment, or is it the organ?
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 week ago
This is BWV 542..not 541..:-S
BAxitorCH 4 months ago 2
around the 4th minute, I had tears...incredible....thank you Bach.
poopingeneral 4 months ago
ummm not to be too picky, but it's Waltershausen, not Waltershousen ;-)
sahandaman 6 months ago
wow, i just stumbled into a goldmine
jojimbo44 9 months ago 3
The organ has a strange arrangement of the stops lol
mo7277 10 months ago
That final G-major chord was positively orgasmic!
BillyRosinet 10 months ago 10
I've been to an organ maker in Utah and seen how intricate and involved the craft is. I can't imagine the man hours put into that masterpiece
TStandsForTrouble 11 months ago
Isnt this BWV 542 not 541?
TheLastMyztery 1 year ago
I ALWAYS mix this video up with lil fugue in g minor...... i feel like i got rickrolled....
brainbasher 1 year ago
i was quite confused until I discovered you mistaked the title: should be 542/2 instead of 541/2
rodstartube 1 year ago
cazzo!poteva tenerlo di più l'ultimo accordo di tonica!
guldalex 1 year ago
@guldalex Pazienza, perchè ho il fiero sospetto che l'esecuzione sia in una sorta di playback!
trenoespresso 1 year ago
Why must we trade in video and audio quality in order to get those last 3 seconds? I think I prefer to watch the first video with its full-size picture and stereo sound.
ccoraxfan 1 year ago
He should wear a real bowtie
maxjamesorgans 1 year ago
Hans Andre Stamm!!!!!!!
engelbertschoormans 2 years ago
At 1:48 you can see a trill in the right hand but no trill in the audio!!!! :-)
friedrichsacher 2 years ago 13
you are mistake, i heard the trill followed by a chord held for full value, you need to watch and listen to it carefully
witchcraftlord 2 years ago
you are wrong, its because of the organs have air blowing and if you make a fast trill it would sound like stiking the two notes at the same time, thats how it is with the old organs i dont know if they can change that now
n00belicious 2 years ago
@friedrichsacher I heard the trill...
Brideshead09 1 year ago 3
@friedrichsacher
Yes, there is.
MoonMankkkkkk 1 year ago
@friedrichsacher I hear the trill.
SuperOldandSlow 7 months ago
@friedrichsacher
it takes a while to let in the air in those pipes...
if you do this with (most) of the lower and even some higher pipes. the finger just isnt pressed on long enough to let the air sound through it.
"The more you know"
bolawarrior 1 month ago
Hermoso
sauterio 2 years ago
Oh my goodness, I love Bach's music. I'm not sure if anybody else will every be able to create such enrapturing music.
robotluvr 2 years ago
Forse 542/2
micangess 2 years ago
This is BWV 542 by the way. ;-)
But as always I enjoy master Stamm's excellent performances.
advisorC101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLL from 0:34( 3 cards) to 1:33 ( 6 cards)
When he did it??????
hmmmm....photo-montage?? :D:D
he plays very good:)
organista03 2 years ago
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLL from 0:34( 3 cards) to 1:33 ( 6 cards)
When he did it??????
hmmmm....photo-montage?? :D:D
he plays very good :)
organista03 2 years ago 4
Yeah, and the coppel attached in first part, and detached in second... ;)
MaxPonuryZniwiarz 2 years ago
I am not quite understand what are you trying to say :D
24161412416141 2 years ago
Comment removed
organista03 2 years ago
Im a fellow jerk from Chicago US and honestly when I hear music I shed tears. Former classical clarinetist here from Boston. I could listen all night to youtube. Thanks for the post.
ggoodo11 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
OK, can anybody tell me why while on 3:55 the lower manual is coupled, whereas on 4:05, (with the same registration) the coupler is off?
Ntalikeris666 2 years ago
Comment removed
livinlavida89 2 years ago
because the couplers are controlled by the feet
livinlavida89 2 years ago
yea, but the sound is the same, with or without couplers.
Ntalikeris666 2 years ago
then I am not too sure...but sometimes the difference in sound is really subtle. It may sound the same to you in Youtube, but may make a difference for audience there
livinlavida89 2 years ago
Yes Ntalikeris666 - they are off with no noticable sound difference. I did think that this was due to the pedel being uncoupled from the great - but i don't think so. Maybe theres a professional organist on here who might clarify??
pipeup1 2 years ago
Probably a editing misstake.
You can see these kind of filming errors in many videos on youtube.
tjugofyra 2 years ago
yea thats the most likely.
Ntalikeris666 2 years ago
What exactly does BWV, and the number following it stand for?
schattenseele88 2 years ago
It' s basically a categorizing system for the pieces made by Bach - there's a lot. BWV stands for Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis, German for Bach-Works-Catelogue. There is a lot of pieces so this basically categorizes them into his works.
dave04045 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
More specifically, the BWV categorizes Bach's works by genre, rather than order of composition.
Similar schemes are used for other composers. E.g., HWV for Haendel,
BuxWV for Buxtehude.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
the paper shrinks as he's playing!
susumu07 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fantastic. I love it.
sirjake81 3 years ago 3
As somebody just said, this is BWV 542/2.
541/2 is the G-Major fugue.
Nevertheless, great work!
chrischi19 3 years ago 3
Bach...
seann588 3 years ago
i say that too when i hear pieces like this all the time...with disgust in my voice...cuz it makes me sick how amazing he was...jerk.
handelfan610 3 years ago
What?
PolyphonicSeduction 3 years ago
you know...when some is outstanding...and you are just like "ugh why can't i do that?!?". i'm a lover of bach's music...but i get filled with jeaslousy which is later overcome by great joy and astonishment.
handelfan610 3 years ago 2
In my opinion, J.S. Bach's greatest Organ Fugue ever written. Hooray for Bach! =D
LOVE this fugue. Im trying to memorize it at the moment, and can definitly appreciate technical playing of this magnitude... Wow. Beautiful!
brettmusicfanatic 3 years ago
i say that the fuge from passacaglia in c is his best.
Brandotuomikoski 3 years ago
I wish I'd been there when this piece was being plaid...!
qwertzuiop07 3 years ago
This is the fugue of BWV 542,not BWV 541
EugenioJorge 3 years ago
Bachs best Fuge
praicethelord 3 years ago
Meh, the fugue in BWV 565 is really good.
Gozaburo1 3 years ago
I love this a lot! Organs fascinate me, especially when pieces such as this are played really well. But I was wondering why it sounds like it's in A-flat minor when it looks like he's playing in G minor? It doesn't really bother me, but I'm curious: is it the recording equipment, or is it the organ?
ryuchandoublereeds 3 years ago
historical oragan tuning is not like as modern tuning. it depends on the builder at the time of that partcular organ was assembled. There was no absolute consensus as to i.e. A=440 or anything.
Miyagi1000 3 years ago
Probably 'authentic' temperament and pitch which makes it sound flat to your ears I guess.
biggestelk 3 years ago
Good call. This organ (Trost organ of Waltershausen) uses a modified meantone temperament with A=466.8 HZ which makes it sound about a semitone higher.
angryjalapeno 3 years ago
That's what I was thinking! But why?
advisorC101 2 years ago
I love this a lot! Organs fascinate me, especially when pieces such as this are played really well. But I was wondering why it sounds like it's in A-flat minor when it looks like he's playing in G minor? It doesn't really bother me, but I'm curious: is it the recording equipment, or is it the organ?
ryuchandoublereeds 3 years ago
very well performed fugue BWV 542/2 :-)
tongenerator 4 years ago
ahhhh wow i love this piece!! and he plays it extremely well on a beautiful instrument!! thank you for posting :)
Tuttiplaya 4 years ago
I thought that people wanted to see the full piece rather than the old video which was cut short by 3 seconds at the end. So here is the re-upload.
clashtitans2 4 years ago 22
@clashtitans2 thanks for the correction. I enjoyed it very much!!!
litosvaca7 1 year ago
@clashtitans2 thanks for this. the last 3 seconds of the piece somehow seem most important!
vw1971 4 months ago 2