Added: 1 year ago
From: gotthegist
Views: 9,109
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Flight of the Valkries" Woohoo! Newton V. Leibniz CAGE MATCH!

  • This video is very understandable and very well explained the dilemma. Great job!

  • Very educational video. Thank you.

  • poor discontinuous function...

  • very interesting thanks

  • very interesting video thanks

  • brilliant video

  • Gottfried Leibniz was the founder of Calculas. He used the signs of integration & Differentiation.

  • Great video, but you left out Newton's invention of the (Newtonian) reflecting telescope which is still the basis of the most powerful telescopes used today.

  • If Barrow provided proof for the fundamental theorem then how is Newton the inventor??

  • Great video!! I've been watching dozens of vids for my math project, but not many had made sense until now. Very clear and easy to understand.

  • @PrinceOfPerelandra ARYAVATTA HAVE SOME WORK ABOUT CALCULUS, BUT HE FAILED TO COMPLETE ERROR FREE CALCULUS INVENTION !

    BHASKARA IS KNOWN FOR BINARY LANGUAGE INVENTOR ,

    BUT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT HIS RELATION WITH CALCULUS !

    BUT MADHAVA IS MAKED GREAT INVENTION ABOUT FIRST ERROR FREE MODERN CALCULUS INVENTION !

  • Respond to this video... BUT HER CALCULUS HAVE ERROR, PROBLEM, AS LIKE GREEK, EGYPTIAN MATHEMATICIAN INVENTED CALCULUS !

    BUT ONLY INDIAN MATHEMATICIAN MADHAVA FIRST INVENTED MODERN CALCULUS,

    WHICH HAVE NO ERROR ,

    YOU CAN TRY ANY MATH FOR FIX,, BUT ONLY TRUE IS TOP WINNER,

    FALSE ARE FALSE OUT AND OUT FROM INVENTION RACE !

    WHICH IS DONE BY MADHAVA !

    SAME LIKE ZERO ALL READY INVENTED IN INDIA , BY ARYAVATTA !

    ZERO IS WORLD TOP INVENTION !

  • Comment removed

  • INDIAN MATHEMATICIAN MADHAVA IS THE REAL INVENTOR OF CALCULUS !

  • Ummm, Newton returned to his farm in 1665, the year of the 'Great Plague,' Not 1666 the year of the Great Fire.

  • Thumbs up if Mrs pierce sent you here!!!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Woooh!!!!! Im pumped for Calculus!!!!

    Go Bruins!!! Rwanda Rules!!!!!! Yayyyyyyyy

  • One thing - Newton's "dot notation" is not the same thing Lagrange's "prime" notation. The dot notation puts dots above the dependent variable instead of using function notation.

  • This is great!!

    Love it!

  • thanx 4 this vid

  • Awesome! Thank you so much! I think Newton's physics is what has made him way more recognized than Leibniz.

  • Thanks for this great bit of history

  • This was great! I'm writing a big essay on Leibniz and his mathematic contributions to the modern world, and this really helped alot!

    Creds to you! :D

  • pride can be vary bad indeed lol great vid

  • Very interesting! Quite enjoyed this.

    I'll have to read more about this controversy, and the associated theories.

    Thanks!!!

    Etranger

  • Great stuff man!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more