same thing to the depth. That wave will have to be in a funnel aiming at the hotel to keep its height and its force. But doesn't that wave remind you of preparing to "take off" prior to your surfboard riding descent?
Starting over. A wave of that sort does not take place in knee deep water. You are "extrapolating" that wave from surfing at Sunset Beach. You already know that a wave of that configuration is 30 - 40 feet deep underneath. When you KICK up the proportions, you also have to do the
Another possibility is if the geological plate on which the island sits sinks for some reason that techtonic plates sink, then a wave of that magnitute is possible. But waikiki would be underwater to begin with.
unencumbered, meaning not tripped up by coral buttheads and deflection of the sea floor turning the wave away. The twenty story height of the wave needing a forty story foundation depth requires that the swimable part of the beach be forty stories deep. Notice that a tsunami wave does not look surfable in shape but rather like a huge massive bed matress, and offers no rideable configuration. A constant and building force is another possibility to create that ideal wave height.
miles above. Next. The visible wave height is based on a 1 to 3 part ratio. Meaning that for the wave to cover a 20 floor hotel, there has to be a 40 story depth beneath to support that wave. The ocean bottom is on a gradually sloping plane 40-50 feet at its deepest ending at 4-5 feet at the beach. That 1 to 3 ratio tells you that a wave may only be 15-20 feet
Do the math. Part of what pulls the wave up to those heights is the gravitational pull of the sun or the moon. The moon would have been complicit in this scenario, because if the sun was involved, there would be no water to tsunami with. Okay, for the moon to do something like that, would mean that the moon needs to be within a hundred
soooo fake!
DrJewish 1 year ago
I apologize if you had such a horrible time in Waikiki. Now I understand.
HPPC 2 years ago
This tidal wave would be very effective over your high school, even if it is in Utah or Dakota
HPPC 2 years ago
This scenario would be better fitting with Capitol Hill and the Congressional District.
HPPC 2 years ago 3
I saw this on the Discovery Channel and went ballistic.
HPPC 2 years ago
Isn't cut and pasting wonderful?
You cut and pasted this scenario, without actually being in that kind of wave. In realistic proportional time.
HPPC 2 years ago
same thing to the depth. That wave will have to be in a funnel aiming at the hotel to keep its height and its force. But doesn't that wave remind you of preparing to "take off" prior to your surfboard riding descent?
HPPC 2 years ago
Starting over. A wave of that sort does not take place in knee deep water. You are "extrapolating" that wave from surfing at Sunset Beach. You already know that a wave of that configuration is 30 - 40 feet deep underneath. When you KICK up the proportions, you also have to do the
HPPC 2 years ago
Another possibility is if the geological plate on which the island sits sinks for some reason that techtonic plates sink, then a wave of that magnitute is possible. But waikiki would be underwater to begin with.
HPPC 2 years ago
unencumbered, meaning not tripped up by coral buttheads and deflection of the sea floor turning the wave away. The twenty story height of the wave needing a forty story foundation depth requires that the swimable part of the beach be forty stories deep. Notice that a tsunami wave does not look surfable in shape but rather like a huge massive bed matress, and offers no rideable configuration. A constant and building force is another possibility to create that ideal wave height.
HPPC 2 years ago
miles above. Next. The visible wave height is based on a 1 to 3 part ratio. Meaning that for the wave to cover a 20 floor hotel, there has to be a 40 story depth beneath to support that wave. The ocean bottom is on a gradually sloping plane 40-50 feet at its deepest ending at 4-5 feet at the beach. That 1 to 3 ratio tells you that a wave may only be 15-20 feet
HPPC 2 years ago
Do the math. Part of what pulls the wave up to those heights is the gravitational pull of the sun or the moon. The moon would have been complicit in this scenario, because if the sun was involved, there would be no water to tsunami with. Okay, for the moon to do something like that, would mean that the moon needs to be within a hundred
HPPC 2 years ago
no, really this is real. i remember this was back in 1960 or so if i'm not mistaken.
DoneWrongType 2 years ago
this is fake cuz the tsunami was 1 m high good try though
249pinkrose 2 years ago
dodo
haocio 2 years ago
Something doesn't look right with this video.....
It almost looks fake.
CatsLairArchives 2 years ago
no way
AshleyAbiva 2 years ago
fake video. looks like its from a movie.....
MischievousD33ds 2 years ago