Rocky Anderson also stands for working people, jobs, tax reform, humane immigration and criminal justice reform, ending the drug war and holding the federal reserve accountable, ending torture and rendition and restoring the American dream. Rocky has voted for Ralph in the past and they both have very similar concerns and values. Rocky is a man of principles and values and he is not selling out. Only taking maximum $100 donations. Its time we stand up and change america. voterocky org
Everyone take a look at Rocky Anderson for President. Rocky is the former mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah and a great progressive fighter. He is running against the money in politics and the corporate/wall street interests, He has a long track record fighting for human rights, the environment, against the wars of aggression and for constitution/civil liberties! He stands for Justice has a great record he can get elected with your help. we need you! google him. website is voterocky org
Wow! Nader is actually doing something other than popping up every 4 years to help the Republican? Amazing! Yeah, Ralph, Bush and Cheney did all that, AND YOU HELPED THEM GET TO POWER! You hypocritical freak!
@OhZoneFan Actually Nader is constantly trying to get his voice heard- not just during election season. And if the weak Democratic Party ever actually worked for the good of the people in this country rather than the corporate interests that got them elected in the first place, he wouldn't need to run anyway.
@OhZoneFan Had Gore won his own state of Tennessee OR Clintons home state of Arkansas, Gore would've won the election, not to mention the 8 other Presidental candidates on the Florida ballot whom recieved over 800 votes. Look into who Ralph is and how/why your media has demonized him and you'll change your tone. You're grossly underinformed to comment on this subject.
@OhZoneFan Also, how did Nader help get them into power? By running? Doesn't he have a right to run for President? Talk about an un-American attitude. And don't blame a corrupt Supreme Court, or the fact that Al Gore ran the worst election of all-time. Yup, its Nader's fault. Nader is one of the least hypocritical freaks out there.
@malloymk If he really wanted to be more than a spoiler he would actually work on building whatever party he likes. But, no, he just pops up every four years to help the GOP. He's a either a secret Republican or completely delusional ass, dude. (He's also rich BTW! OHMY!) I don't believe a word he says. If he really believed in his stated views, he would have helped Gore defeat the anti-environmental, anti-middle class Bush ticket. But no, he is forever a spoiler and frankly a liar.
@OhZoneFan My Nader doesn't pop up every four years. The corporate run media only chooses to cover him when they want to feed to America the line that only a Dem or Rep could be President. Of course it is up to the people to change there way of voting for corporate owned politicians. You're right about that. Nader doesn't stand a chance to win. He also knows that. He ran last time in an effort just to open up the debates for independent candidates. And Gore wouldn't have been much better than W.
@OhZoneFan Also, just curious... what does he lie about? I can see not agreeing with his policy. But a liar? But yeah Gore is just outstanding. Or Obama? C'mon, stop kidding yourself.
@malloymk OHMY! He lied about the impact his spoiler candidacy had on the Florida election. Even going back to early Nader, he exaggerated the danger of the Corvair, which was a very innovative car, America's only mass produced rear-mounted air-cooled engine. But, most importantly, CONTINUALLY helping the people who are supposedly diametrically opposed to his belief system, makes him the ** biggest liar in history ** BY HIS ACTIONS! Nade is an evil bastard hypocrite stealth fascist! lulz
@OhZoneFan Watch the You Tube vid "Ralph Nader: The People's Champion" and you will see how wrong you are. I voted for Gore in 2000 and am glad I woke up and am not a Democrat anymore. All they do is blame others and fail to take responsibility.
Why is it that the Democrats lost the House after Obama took the White House. Cuz they're hypocrites who don't do a damn thing! Oh but blame Nader for that too, huh? Wake up...
@TheTruthAboutFloyd Actually, the main reason the Democrats lost the house was voter apathy which is very common in midterms. In fact, the Democrats did better in 2010 than they did in 1994. Your all or nothing attitude just helps the GOP. Keep voting independent and get more Cons. Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.. or in case of Dems, the much better of two evils. Seriously do you think we would be in the horrific mess if Gore's win hadn't been stolen by the Supremes? Oh, well.
@OhZoneFan Actually yes. Gore was more militaristic in his platform than Bush. Was for the death penalty, NAFTA, cut off Aid to Dependent Families, etc. And one of the founding fathers of the Sierra Club said, "The Clinton-Gore administration has done more harm to the environment that Reagan, Bush, and Bush Jr. combined." No wonder the Democrats were lost the 2000 election. If things were so great they should've won in a landslide. But 250,000 registered Democrats voted for Bush instead!
@TheTruthAboutFloyd That's 250,000 registered Democrats in FLORIDA. Explain that. Oh wait, you can't blame Democrats for anything, huh? That's I left this blind, hypocritical party. Thank God... And look at Obama has done for the country. Just continued the same old policies as Bush. More war, renewing FISA and the Patriot Act, etc., etc. etc. Please spae me. This party ain't shit but running the country further in the ground.
I would've liked to see Obama bring this to Congress, just to see the warmongering neo-cons sweat over having to choose between their two favorite past-times: waging war on something or opposing anything Obama does because he's a "filthy DEMMYCRAT".
That said, I'm uncomfortable with watching a madman slaughter thousands of his own people, so in the choice between "shove thumb up own ass" and "out-bully the bully", I prefer the latter, especially if the UK and France want to do the heavy lifting
@johnnychopsocky You don't actually believe that the "rebels" in Libya are cut from the same cloth as the people who took to the streets in Yemen & Egypt do you? C'mon, you're smarter than that. Most of the "rebels" are mercenaries & paid CIA thugs. And I don't like your use of the term "heavy lifting" for the slaughter & murder of people our (and some other) government thinks are in the way. Watch in the coming weeks how much more concerned the US is for the oil-producing areas. More Oil Wars.
@localhero101 And what about Gadhafi's hired mercenary armies that he used back when it was just protests?
You guys are acting like this is a new thing. This isn't the first time we've piggy-backed into military action with the UN without Congress' say-so. It's not even the fifth time. Presidents both Democrat and Republican have done this before. So why is Obama the one that people scream "IMPEACH HIM" at? I didn't hear this call for Clinton in '99 (Kosovo, not the blowjob).
Nader, you got balls. I now you lean more to the democratic side but damn, this shows you are for the rule of law and that´s what matters, nothing else.
Plenty of dumb dumbs here..charles 17121 you are a brainwashed fool who cannot connect simple dots.Thomaserossi us are wrong Nader is an independent thinker with credibility.
What I would like to ask Mr Nader what would he have done about 911 if not go after the ones responsible for the killing of almost three thousand Americans . President Bush did what the American people expected him to do at the time. As for this illegal sitting in our White House at this time he dose not and should not have the authority to order our military to go anywhere let alone to war .
What I would like to ask Mr Nader what would he have done about 911 if not go after the ones responsible for the killing of almost three thousand Americans . President Bush did what the American people expected him to do at the time. As for this illegal sitting in our White House at this time he dose not and should not have the authority to order our military to go anywhere let alone to war . As far as obama being impeached , Obama should tried in a military court for being an enemy of the US
He is right. The USSA is broke, we have no business in the affairs of other nations per the "Monroe Doctrine". You know what they say, "good fences make good neighbors." We do not have the money nor the moral resolve to be the world's policeman. We SHOULD not have even tried to do that. RN
There is a new High Crime indictment to be brought now. In defiance of the US Constitution and the War Powers Act, Obama has ordered an attack on a foreign state that has not attacked the US and poses no imminent threat. Cruise missiles are exploding in Libya. The US-Libyan war begins on the 8th anniversary of the ill-fated Iraq war, part III.
There is a new High Crime indictment to be brought now. In defiance of the US Constitution and the War Powers Act, Obama has ordered an attack on a foreign state that has not attacked the US and poses no imminent threat. Cruse missiles are exploding in Libya. The US-Libyan war begins on the 8th anniversary of the ill-fated Iraq war, part III.
Democracy Now! is loaded to the hilt with Communist Cranks who want nothing more than the destruction of the Western World. The more I got interested in Nader, the less I like him. He's not only wrong, he's a disaster. He'd be a fine Obama clone.
@thomaserossi You're right. Nader is a principled liberal - but liberalism is a failed ideology. We need LIBERTY - and therefore we need to restore the republic. See - republicfortheunitedstates (dot) org. Join the republic and in the meantime vote Ron Paul 2012.
We would have a much stronger peace movement if DemocracyNow, Veterans for Peace, etc. would embrace libertarian antiwar leaders and supporters as well as only those on the Left. Instead of two parallel efforts we could have a larger, stronger coalition. Antiwar.com covers the whole spectrum.
This has been flagged as spam show
Rocky Anderson also stands for working people, jobs, tax reform, humane immigration and criminal justice reform, ending the drug war and holding the federal reserve accountable, ending torture and rendition and restoring the American dream. Rocky has voted for Ralph in the past and they both have very similar concerns and values. Rocky is a man of principles and values and he is not selling out. Only taking maximum $100 donations. Its time we stand up and change america. voterocky org
georgia4rocky 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone take a look at Rocky Anderson for President. Rocky is the former mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah and a great progressive fighter. He is running against the money in politics and the corporate/wall street interests, He has a long track record fighting for human rights, the environment, against the wars of aggression and for constitution/civil liberties! He stands for Justice has a great record he can get elected with your help. we need you! google him. website is voterocky org
georgia4rocky 1 week ago
Yeah, you tell it like it is Ralph!!!!!!!!!!!!
leftistlisa 11 months ago
IMPEACH OBAMA NOW! /watch?v=30JjhH0_fds
ThirdPartyGuiltTrip 11 months ago
Andrew Napolitano is not a Republican, Ralph. Everything else he said he is correct in.
rmccay88 11 months ago
Where is the Democratic challenger to Obama in 2012?
rg0057 11 months ago
ron paul 2011 instead of 2012
gonadcancervictim 11 months ago
Wow! Nader is actually doing something other than popping up every 4 years to help the Republican? Amazing! Yeah, Ralph, Bush and Cheney did all that, AND YOU HELPED THEM GET TO POWER! You hypocritical freak!
OhZoneFan 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan Actually Nader is constantly trying to get his voice heard- not just during election season. And if the weak Democratic Party ever actually worked for the good of the people in this country rather than the corporate interests that got them elected in the first place, he wouldn't need to run anyway.
malloymk 11 months ago 2
@OhZoneFan Had Gore won his own state of Tennessee OR Clintons home state of Arkansas, Gore would've won the election, not to mention the 8 other Presidental candidates on the Florida ballot whom recieved over 800 votes. Look into who Ralph is and how/why your media has demonized him and you'll change your tone. You're grossly underinformed to comment on this subject.
ostifari 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan Also, how did Nader help get them into power? By running? Doesn't he have a right to run for President? Talk about an un-American attitude. And don't blame a corrupt Supreme Court, or the fact that Al Gore ran the worst election of all-time. Yup, its Nader's fault. Nader is one of the least hypocritical freaks out there.
malloymk 11 months ago 2
@malloymk If he really wanted to be more than a spoiler he would actually work on building whatever party he likes. But, no, he just pops up every four years to help the GOP. He's a either a secret Republican or completely delusional ass, dude. (He's also rich BTW! OHMY!) I don't believe a word he says. If he really believed in his stated views, he would have helped Gore defeat the anti-environmental, anti-middle class Bush ticket. But no, he is forever a spoiler and frankly a liar.
OhZoneFan 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan My Nader doesn't pop up every four years. The corporate run media only chooses to cover him when they want to feed to America the line that only a Dem or Rep could be President. Of course it is up to the people to change there way of voting for corporate owned politicians. You're right about that. Nader doesn't stand a chance to win. He also knows that. He ran last time in an effort just to open up the debates for independent candidates. And Gore wouldn't have been much better than W.
malloymk 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan Also, just curious... what does he lie about? I can see not agreeing with his policy. But a liar? But yeah Gore is just outstanding. Or Obama? C'mon, stop kidding yourself.
malloymk 11 months ago
@malloymk OHMY! He lied about the impact his spoiler candidacy had on the Florida election. Even going back to early Nader, he exaggerated the danger of the Corvair, which was a very innovative car, America's only mass produced rear-mounted air-cooled engine. But, most importantly, CONTINUALLY helping the people who are supposedly diametrically opposed to his belief system, makes him the ** biggest liar in history ** BY HIS ACTIONS! Nade is an evil bastard hypocrite stealth fascist! lulz
OhZoneFan 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan Watch the You Tube vid "Ralph Nader: The People's Champion" and you will see how wrong you are. I voted for Gore in 2000 and am glad I woke up and am not a Democrat anymore. All they do is blame others and fail to take responsibility.
Why is it that the Democrats lost the House after Obama took the White House. Cuz they're hypocrites who don't do a damn thing! Oh but blame Nader for that too, huh? Wake up...
TheTruthAboutFloyd 11 months ago
@TheTruthAboutFloyd Actually, the main reason the Democrats lost the house was voter apathy which is very common in midterms. In fact, the Democrats did better in 2010 than they did in 1994. Your all or nothing attitude just helps the GOP. Keep voting independent and get more Cons. Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.. or in case of Dems, the much better of two evils. Seriously do you think we would be in the horrific mess if Gore's win hadn't been stolen by the Supremes? Oh, well.
OhZoneFan 11 months ago
@OhZoneFan Actually yes. Gore was more militaristic in his platform than Bush. Was for the death penalty, NAFTA, cut off Aid to Dependent Families, etc. And one of the founding fathers of the Sierra Club said, "The Clinton-Gore administration has done more harm to the environment that Reagan, Bush, and Bush Jr. combined." No wonder the Democrats were lost the 2000 election. If things were so great they should've won in a landslide. But 250,000 registered Democrats voted for Bush instead!
TheTruthAboutFloyd 11 months ago
@TheTruthAboutFloyd That's 250,000 registered Democrats in FLORIDA. Explain that. Oh wait, you can't blame Democrats for anything, huh? That's I left this blind, hypocritical party. Thank God... And look at Obama has done for the country. Just continued the same old policies as Bush. More war, renewing FISA and the Patriot Act, etc., etc. etc. Please spae me. This party ain't shit but running the country further in the ground.
TheTruthAboutFloyd 11 months ago
First time in a LONG time I've agreed with this fuck-twit.
xsploitedsecurity 11 months ago
Well, we all know that Obama will never be held to the same standard Bush was.
Difference between Bush & Obama? Skin color... period.
jbpnw 11 months ago
I would've liked to see Obama bring this to Congress, just to see the warmongering neo-cons sweat over having to choose between their two favorite past-times: waging war on something or opposing anything Obama does because he's a "filthy DEMMYCRAT".
That said, I'm uncomfortable with watching a madman slaughter thousands of his own people, so in the choice between "shove thumb up own ass" and "out-bully the bully", I prefer the latter, especially if the UK and France want to do the heavy lifting
johnnychopsocky 11 months ago
@johnnychopsocky You don't actually believe that the "rebels" in Libya are cut from the same cloth as the people who took to the streets in Yemen & Egypt do you? C'mon, you're smarter than that. Most of the "rebels" are mercenaries & paid CIA thugs. And I don't like your use of the term "heavy lifting" for the slaughter & murder of people our (and some other) government thinks are in the way. Watch in the coming weeks how much more concerned the US is for the oil-producing areas. More Oil Wars.
localhero101 11 months ago
@localhero101 And what about Gadhafi's hired mercenary armies that he used back when it was just protests?
You guys are acting like this is a new thing. This isn't the first time we've piggy-backed into military action with the UN without Congress' say-so. It's not even the fifth time. Presidents both Democrat and Republican have done this before. So why is Obama the one that people scream "IMPEACH HIM" at? I didn't hear this call for Clinton in '99 (Kosovo, not the blowjob).
johnnychopsocky 11 months ago
Impeach Ralph Nader!
fred9099 11 months ago
obama...lol whatta joke he is
if he wasn't destroying the country his presidency would be laughable
FuckMeBlind69 11 months ago
YES WE CON!
YES WE CON!
YES WE CON!
glenwood183 11 months ago
Not the first time Obama has violated our constitutional processes. Let's stand together and make sure it will be his last!!!!!!!
66kelnel 11 months ago
IMpeach Obama!! Ilegal War!!! At least Bush got bipartisan Congressional Approval!!! Obama is FAIL!!!
MikeDothan 11 months ago 2
0bama has surpassed Bush as Warmonger-In-Chief
ObaManure 11 months ago 5
Nader, you got balls. I now you lean more to the democratic side but damn, this shows you are for the rule of law and that´s what matters, nothing else.
RonPaulSwede 11 months ago
Plenty of dumb dumbs here..charles 17121 you are a brainwashed fool who cannot connect simple dots.Thomaserossi us are wrong Nader is an independent thinker with credibility.
eleikamextreme you can go to hell
IntellectualHeros 11 months ago
What I would like to ask Mr Nader what would he have done about 911 if not go after the ones responsible for the killing of almost three thousand Americans . President Bush did what the American people expected him to do at the time. As for this illegal sitting in our White House at this time he dose not and should not have the authority to order our military to go anywhere let alone to war .
charles17121 11 months ago 2
@charles17121 You need to drink less and think more. Bush had to lie to get Americans to support his cause for war.
carefulcarpenter 11 months ago
@carefulcarpenter Seems like you're the one who needs to quit drinking. I guess peelouzzzzeee & reid were victims of a lie too.
theonlywesttexasmare 11 months ago
@theonlywesttexasmare All corrupt minds lie for power.
carefulcarpenter 11 months ago
What I would like to ask Mr Nader what would he have done about 911 if not go after the ones responsible for the killing of almost three thousand Americans . President Bush did what the American people expected him to do at the time. As for this illegal sitting in our White House at this time he dose not and should not have the authority to order our military to go anywhere let alone to war . As far as obama being impeached , Obama should tried in a military court for being an enemy of the US
charles17121 11 months ago
Fuck you ralph
elieakaMrextreme 11 months ago
Wars become "humanitarian missions" when warmongering Democrats get on power.
thrillseekersforever 11 months ago
19 March 2003 - "Shock and Awe" begins in Iraq.
19 March 2011 - "Shock and Awe" begins in Libya.
How's that Hope and Change working out?
America, for fucks sake, snap out of it!
You got it wrong in 2008.
Get it right in 2012 before it's too late.
Ron Paul 2012
AntiFederalist1 11 months ago
@AntiFederalist1 Now we have Operation Odyssey Dawn. Just give it a cool name and that makes the killing ok. Didn't you know?
WreakingHavoc1 11 months ago
He is right. The USSA is broke, we have no business in the affairs of other nations per the "Monroe Doctrine". You know what they say, "good fences make good neighbors." We do not have the money nor the moral resolve to be the world's policeman. We SHOULD not have even tried to do that. RN
Angryrnmedic 11 months ago
To bad about that stroke, he probably dribbles semen out of his mouth when he sucks off his boyfriend.
liberalguy513 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a new High Crime indictment to be brought now. In defiance of the US Constitution and the War Powers Act, Obama has ordered an attack on a foreign state that has not attacked the US and poses no imminent threat. Cruise missiles are exploding in Libya. The US-Libyan war begins on the 8th anniversary of the ill-fated Iraq war, part III.
JiveDadson 11 months ago
There is a new High Crime indictment to be brought now. In defiance of the US Constitution and the War Powers Act, Obama has ordered an attack on a foreign state that has not attacked the US and poses no imminent threat. Cruse missiles are exploding in Libya. The US-Libyan war begins on the 8th anniversary of the ill-fated Iraq war, part III.
JiveDadson 11 months ago
@JiveDadson typo - read it "cruise missiles."
JiveDadson 11 months ago
Democracy Now! is loaded to the hilt with Communist Cranks who want nothing more than the destruction of the Western World. The more I got interested in Nader, the less I like him. He's not only wrong, he's a disaster. He'd be a fine Obama clone.
thomaserossi 11 months ago
@thomaserossi You're right. Nader is a principled liberal - but liberalism is a failed ideology. We need LIBERTY - and therefore we need to restore the republic. See - republicfortheunitedstates (dot) org. Join the republic and in the meantime vote Ron Paul 2012.
WreakingHavoc1 11 months ago
We would have a much stronger peace movement if DemocracyNow, Veterans for Peace, etc. would embrace libertarian antiwar leaders and supporters as well as only those on the Left. Instead of two parallel efforts we could have a larger, stronger coalition. Antiwar.com covers the whole spectrum.
leafwatch 11 months ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
"Occupy Wall Street"people warned not to let their efforts get hijacked (like the GOP hijacked the Tea Party)
Napolitano suggests common goals.
End the Fed
End the wars
End the income tax
/watch?v=nF30eMuWFHI
vechorik 4 months ago
Stop the wars!
Stop the killing!
Free Bradley Manning!
info at Liberty Poet & Daily Paul
websites
campaign4liberty 11 months ago 30
Good for Ralph. Maybe this will get somewhere.
answerman1949 11 months ago 2
I love DemNow! Nader is a true patriot unlike Obama/Bush.
joe3t 11 months ago 3
My first reaction when I saw this was, "WOW! What the hell happened to Ralph?"
Then I realized the old guy at the start wasn't him after all.
SpitfireOFatj 11 months ago 2
@SpitfireOFatj haha me too.
highway234 11 months ago
Brilliant men !!!
oceanbound222 11 months ago