Policies cannot have "UNINTENDED" consequences.. Most of these policies have the intended consequence of "MONEY ABOVE ALL ELSE." NEVER, I MEAN NEVER, HAVE I HEARD ANY MENTION TO THE ATTEMPT AT SHARED PARENTING. KNOW WHY? BECAUSE IT WOULD ESSENTIALLY ELIMINATE THE COURTS. AND THERE ARE TOO MANY MAKING MONEY OFF OF THIS MISERY!!
I also tried to get food stamps and public assistance (welfare) and guess what????? I made too much money. What a joke! Sorry gonna have to choose jail eventually which will only end any gainful employment I might have and put the cost on the idiots that call us deadbeats. Brilliant threat by Judge Glukowski to me, pay or go to jail today, get a second job! Forget the limited time u get to spend with the child already, forget love, affection and nurturing the father provides. Fuck you Dad! Pay!
The mother of my kids has worked harder at trying to prove she has an illness no doctor will write a note aBOUT THAN SHE HAS AT GETTING A JOB. SHE SAID IN OPEN COURT THAT NO MOTHER SHOULD HAVE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT AND SHE HAS ADMITTED TO DELIBERATELY DEFYING THE COURT ORDER TO PAY. SO WHAT DO YOU DO THEN.
ANOTHER PROBLEM IS THAT CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT HAS A DIFFERENT SET OF RULES FOR THE MOTHER AS OPPOSED TO THE FATHER AND THE WOMAN GETS AWAY WITH NOT PAYING FAR MORE EASIER.
The thing i don't like about these tv debates its that its to short not enough time for a decent rebuttal.The other "guests" can spew so much misinformation and not enough time to slam them on it and doesnt help when the presentator is biased to.
Glenn, I'm sure you're nervous on TV and all, but you're got to watch the interrupting - I've seen it in most of the interviews you. Good point - excellent points - but pace yourself and wait your turn.
@EsqDave On the 5-7 minute segments common on modern TV, if you're the opposition guest and are not agressive about putting forward your position, you end up sitting in silence while the time runs out without having had a chance to make your points. I've seen it many times.
a quote from my ex I KNOW HOW TO HURT YOU MESS WITH YOUR MONEY AND TAKE THE KIDS FROM YOU SMH THATS TERRORISM best purchase ive evermade was nanny cam this was under the advise of a cop they know too whats goin on
LMAO this same county is on youtube in an investigative report they discovered the child support system is ran by a private corp and they were found guilty of fruad in GA and FLORIDA lol its to seperate a fool from his money Most time the woman doesnt desire to make it work and leaves this guy runs to the mother or relatives couch and then to court so now shes nomadicly given up a stable home to prove a point whether you like it or dont im in control the kids and the cash
It is interesting how Glen Sacks was cut off multiple times during his time to talk. Everyone else got to finish making their points. Glenn Sacks speaks from credible and reliable sources. We all know that the DA only told one side of the aspect. Glenn was having to EXPLAIN the OTHER side of what the DA was NOT saying - and STILL trying to express other reasons. Glenn could've taken that DA item by item and refute with credible sources. Liberals don't like the truth.
@NavyOneKC There should be some kind of separate account where child support should go into that can only be accessed for certain things for their children, and not given all too the mother so that she can spend as much of it on herself as she pleases. It's disgusting to think that I would be giving even a PENNY to a woman I divorced to spend on herself.
@unfortunatebeam Exactly! Most of the ordered amounts are set way too high. My example and my ordered support. Gross Income=$39,000yr. Net= 28,500yr. CS=$830mth. Avg. Elec.=180mth. water=65mth. Rent=950mth. car payment=135mth. car insurance=102mth.(spotless record) Heating gas=110mth. car gas to keep my job=140mth. food(whatever I had left) 100mth. No extra for entertainment, CS based on gross not net income, slowly lost everything I owned, denied visits by mother, DO THE MATH U SMUCK JUDGES!
@helobelow then you gotta do something about it. show your support for initiatives and bills that people like Glenn Sacks and Ed Holstein fight for. Fight with them, side by side, get out and protest, Don't be afrad to show your face and speak up publically about this matter! You know it's the right thing to do, and what's happpening to you and so many others is the wrong thing.
Wayyyy too short of a discussion. It takes longer to refute a claim than to make the claim, other than just saying "that's not correct" and Sacks didn't even get the opportunity to finish his points. I wish these news shows would do a longer session on subjects like these more often.
Comment removed
VAWAImmigrProstitute 3 months ago in playlist More videos from FathersandFamilies
The Legal System is a Business!
They don't care about Justice!
The more they can get you to appear in court, the more they profit!
They are all Psychopaths: They convict and destroy people for their careers and money!
This applies to Judges, Lawyers, DA, US-Attorney, DOJ.... and anyone else who is a part of the legal system.
VAWAImmigrProstitute 3 months ago in playlist More videos from FathersandFamilies
There are Laws, Court and Police practices that encourage an epidemic of False Accusations of Domestic Violence, Abuse and Rape in this country.
The "Feminist" Ideology that is now Indoctrinated into Politics, the Government, Courts, Police and General Public, that:
- Women are Good, Men are Bad
- Women are helpless Victims, Men are Perpetrators
- Women need Help and Protection, Men must be Restrained, Prosecuted and Jailed!
- Why?
G00gle: Martha Granados Laura Immigration
VAWAImmigrProstitute 3 months ago in playlist More videos from FathersandFamilies
Let's Inform The F.I.B?
ON female's that are CON's
smrfr 6 months ago
Policies cannot have "UNINTENDED" consequences.. Most of these policies have the intended consequence of "MONEY ABOVE ALL ELSE." NEVER, I MEAN NEVER, HAVE I HEARD ANY MENTION TO THE ATTEMPT AT SHARED PARENTING. KNOW WHY? BECAUSE IT WOULD ESSENTIALLY ELIMINATE THE COURTS. AND THERE ARE TOO MANY MAKING MONEY OFF OF THIS MISERY!!
DJSQWYD 7 months ago
Policies cannot have "UNINTENDED" consequences.. Most of these policies have the intended consequence of "MONEY ABOVE ALL ELSE."
DJSQWYD 7 months ago
I also tried to get food stamps and public assistance (welfare) and guess what????? I made too much money. What a joke! Sorry gonna have to choose jail eventually which will only end any gainful employment I might have and put the cost on the idiots that call us deadbeats. Brilliant threat by Judge Glukowski to me, pay or go to jail today, get a second job! Forget the limited time u get to spend with the child already, forget love, affection and nurturing the father provides. Fuck you Dad! Pay!
helobelow 8 months ago
Glenn makes good, and better, points as usual in such arguments.
He looks good too, lost some weight
unfortunatebeam 8 months ago
The mother of my kids has worked harder at trying to prove she has an illness no doctor will write a note aBOUT THAN SHE HAS AT GETTING A JOB. SHE SAID IN OPEN COURT THAT NO MOTHER SHOULD HAVE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT AND SHE HAS ADMITTED TO DELIBERATELY DEFYING THE COURT ORDER TO PAY. SO WHAT DO YOU DO THEN.
ANOTHER PROBLEM IS THAT CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT HAS A DIFFERENT SET OF RULES FOR THE MOTHER AS OPPOSED TO THE FATHER AND THE WOMAN GETS AWAY WITH NOT PAYING FAR MORE EASIER.
allfazeman 8 months ago
The thing i don't like about these tv debates its that its to short not enough time for a decent rebuttal.The other "guests" can spew so much misinformation and not enough time to slam them on it and doesnt help when the presentator is biased to.
werebaka1 8 months ago
Glenn, I'm sure you're nervous on TV and all, but you're got to watch the interrupting - I've seen it in most of the interviews you. Good point - excellent points - but pace yourself and wait your turn.
EsqDave 8 months ago
@EsqDave On the 5-7 minute segments common on modern TV, if you're the opposition guest and are not agressive about putting forward your position, you end up sitting in silence while the time runs out without having had a chance to make your points. I've seen it many times.
FathersandFamilies 8 months ago 3
GO GLENN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EsqDave 8 months ago
a quote from my ex I KNOW HOW TO HURT YOU MESS WITH YOUR MONEY AND TAKE THE KIDS FROM YOU SMH THATS TERRORISM best purchase ive evermade was nanny cam this was under the advise of a cop they know too whats goin on
jnixongo00 8 months ago
LMAO this same county is on youtube in an investigative report they discovered the child support system is ran by a private corp and they were found guilty of fruad in GA and FLORIDA lol its to seperate a fool from his money Most time the woman doesnt desire to make it work and leaves this guy runs to the mother or relatives couch and then to court so now shes nomadicly given up a stable home to prove a point whether you like it or dont im in control the kids and the cash
jnixongo00 8 months ago
You are not obliged to pay child support. You are not required to have a licence to travel in your car.
peternolan1109 8 months ago
@peternolan1109 smh your the only one awake
jnixongo00 8 months ago
@jnixongo00 check my channel and google Crimes Against Fathers. We have set up a global resource for fathers who are victims of crimes to come to.
peternolan1109 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@peternolan1109 check out peternolanpsychopath.blogspot.com - google tobin wotring to get the full story!
IlluminatiIngrid 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@peternolan1109 check out peternolanpsychopath.blogspot.com - google tobin wotring to get the full story!
IlluminatiIngrid 8 months ago
It is interesting how Glen Sacks was cut off multiple times during his time to talk. Everyone else got to finish making their points. Glenn Sacks speaks from credible and reliable sources. We all know that the DA only told one side of the aspect. Glenn was having to EXPLAIN the OTHER side of what the DA was NOT saying - and STILL trying to express other reasons. Glenn could've taken that DA item by item and refute with credible sources. Liberals don't like the truth.
Timmmay33 8 months ago
Why not have Shared Parenting? Why setup it up so that one parent is kicked out of the kids life just to send a check to the other parent?
NavyOneKC 8 months ago 7
@NavyOneKC There should be some kind of separate account where child support should go into that can only be accessed for certain things for their children, and not given all too the mother so that she can spend as much of it on herself as she pleases. It's disgusting to think that I would be giving even a PENNY to a woman I divorced to spend on herself.
unfortunatebeam 8 months ago
@unfortunatebeam Exactly! Most of the ordered amounts are set way too high. My example and my ordered support. Gross Income=$39,000yr. Net= 28,500yr. CS=$830mth. Avg. Elec.=180mth. water=65mth. Rent=950mth. car payment=135mth. car insurance=102mth.(spotless record) Heating gas=110mth. car gas to keep my job=140mth. food(whatever I had left) 100mth. No extra for entertainment, CS based on gross not net income, slowly lost everything I owned, denied visits by mother, DO THE MATH U SMUCK JUDGES!
helobelow 8 months ago
@helobelow then you gotta do something about it. show your support for initiatives and bills that people like Glenn Sacks and Ed Holstein fight for. Fight with them, side by side, get out and protest, Don't be afrad to show your face and speak up publically about this matter! You know it's the right thing to do, and what's happpening to you and so many others is the wrong thing.
unfortunatebeam 7 months ago
Wayyyy too short of a discussion. It takes longer to refute a claim than to make the claim, other than just saying "that's not correct" and Sacks didn't even get the opportunity to finish his points. I wish these news shows would do a longer session on subjects like these more often.
f16weapons 8 months ago
Give women money or the government will destroy you.
"Land of the free"
Jmnzz 8 months ago