Added: 4 years ago
From: volamiominipony
Views: 282,149
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (270)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The lightning in the beginning scared the crap out of me! :O

  • I wish I knew what she said in French.

  • @DestinyRoxasSD

    "Arretez!" = Stop!

    "...take this to your queen. 600 mille sous un drapeau français [this wasn't very clear]" = 600 thousand under a french flag.

    "Renvoyez-le à sa reine! Et faites en sort qu'il reste bien vivant." Send him back to his queen! And make sure he stays well alive.

    "Et dites à cette reine bâtarde de ne plus envoyer des enfants pour combattre Marie de Guise!" = And tell that bastard queen never to send children again to confront Marie of Guise!

  • @DestinyRoxasSD (It is quite a shame there's no subs even when you watch the movie without subtitles; whenever a foreign language crops up normally they provide automatic subs. Kind of like watching Dance with Wolves and expecting the spectator to be interested enough in the subject to know the American Indian dialect. xD)

  • @FatherFilipic... Dunno what u meant about the Hitler comment. I evin spelled LORDE backwards and sideways to find if it was a hidden work for racist cunny. Because I get the gardening, I get the vanity, but Hitler can kiss my sun bronzed... foot. And then crawl backwards, on his hands and knees, while my man kicks him in the teeth.

  • myCockizOrange: Your attempt to ascribe human attributes to the Deity must of necesssity fail, as these always will. It would do thee much better to learn all possible usefull domestic arts, such as the indoor and outdoor gardening and the wise use of leisure for learning in the home, rather than gratifying vanity with idleness, fluffing your ivory bosom in the mirror and going clubbing.

    And Adolf Hitler WAS doing the work of the LORDE.

  • @myCockizOrange: What is to be annhilated is also this obstreperous boldness on the part of brazen young white females, which encourages them to miscegenate with prognothuous-jawwed Sub-Saharan semi-simian tropical savage infidel negroes, and to post suggestive pictures of themselves making a "duckface" on the interwebz, gallivanting about in trousers while selfishly refusing their mission in the natural order, which is to fill their wombs with frolicsome and angelic white infants of QUALITY.

  • God has given war its providential character, even though man and his technologies have defied His will that more shall always be affirmed by the struggles of lords temporal than what is destroyed. Like plagues and cataclysms, it is most necessary to thin out the disgusting swarms of infidel and sinful humans. The perfidious and pernicious Jews, Masons, Protestants and Heretics, all those in defiance of monarchy and nobility DO DESERVE EXTIRPATION BY ANY POSSIBLE MEANS. Cursed race of sinners!

  • @FatherFilipic I don't believe that a good god would be so outrageously prejudice against "his children." Therefore I don't believe in god. If i am to be ruled by a supreme being I want them to be gentle, kind, and forgiving. Not spiteful, rude, and vengeful. ^-^ thank ya verrry much

  • bishops are parasites

  • 9:29 omg that was disturbing

  • i don't get it...what's happening?

  • @WorshipInTruth & @bailong329 You two started your silly argument so far back that nobody can tell anymore what revelance it has to a film about Elizabethan England -- not Jews and Nazis. You are a perfect example of the tragic face-saving that is at the core of so much disagreement - and so many wars - in the history of humankind. And may I add... this is a HISTORICALLY INACCURATE film, so get over yourselves.

  • What was it that Mary de Guise said in French?

  • @Lauryne15 she said to "Make sure that this child goes back to England alive an well. That bastard queen shouldn't send children to fight wars".

  • @blackarawak83 Thank you so much! I can't believe that french can make an insult sound so pretty.

  • With all this stress how is a woman suppose to keep a pregnancy?? I mean come on...

  • all woman should be this strong....instead of mopping like a child in need of breast

  • @DRESSMAKERGRACIE all women? every single person!

  • what did she do to her hair?? she looks horrible!

  • Robert Dudley is handsome!

  • @WorshipInTruth If you're referring to Hitler as an "atheist communist" you're wrong for two reasons: The first being that he was definitely NOT an atheist. The amount of times he claimed his "racial cleansing" was God's work speaks for itself; Google it buddy. Secondly, he was a fascist, not a communist. Christian apologists only seem to claim that Hitler was an atheist because they cannot handle the idea that a Christian theist would cause so much evil in the name of their God.

  • @elmelify really he was a Christian Thiest. Then why is it there is a document written by a Lt JG Carl Schoroke USNR assigned as an investigator for the Nuremberg Trials it was written to a Major Coogan of the OSS who was in charge of processing all evidence against the Nazis during the trial among the evidence were documents, journal entries by Goerbeles and even writtings from Hitler himself that all led to the conclusion that Hitler used the Church only for his own gains while he slowly_

  • @bailong329 made the religion illigal and replace it with a religion that is pro-nazi such as the Vrill cult. There are even documents that show SS intimidation and even arrest of members of the Clergy who were resistent to the Christian churchs position as a legit religion. Google it yourself its declassified and available for download its called the Nazi master plan to persecute the Christian Church.

  • @bailong329 Well the nazis carried a Christian facade which they planned to eventually shed off for a full blown blood based pagan cult. Still Hitler was a catholic and most of the top nazi's were catholics, the connection is that the catholic church is actually a combination of Christianity and pagan sun worship, this fits in well with the nazi scheme, except of course that the nazi's favored a Germanic as opposed to Latin system.

  • @WorshipInTruth if Hitler was using the religion to win favor then that doesn't make him one. Thats like saying Mussolini was a Trotskyist. In fact even Goerbells own journals showed that Hitler HATED Christianity in secret and wanted nothing more then to openly say it. All the sun worship shit are just tangents.

  • @bailong329 I certainly agree that Hitler wasn't a Christian, he was however a catholic.

  • @WorshipInTruth Now your just splitting hairs. Let me put it to you this way, if a wolf put on the most convincing disguise possible to make himself look like a sheep does that change the fact that he is a wolf in disguise? Do you see my point? Hitler was no more a christian nor a catholic then Pol Pot or Mao. The only difference between this wolf and the others was that in public he always looked like a sheep even among the christians and catholics and in private he always ate the sheep_

  • @bailong329 Christian or Catholic it made no difference ( he even sent priests to concentration camps if you read all of that document I told you about)

  • @bailong329 "Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic Church, died while defending Christianity. It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his death, when so many were found to exalt his life. Over his mortal remains stands his victorious moral figure. With the palm of the martyr, God gives Hitler the laurels of Victory" - Francisco Franco.

  • @bailong329 The priests who were sent to concentration camps were individuals who were caught plotting against the regime, it was never a formal policy of the nazi's to persecute priests.

  • @WorshipInTruth not just them there were also priests who were sent cuz they refused to abide by the regime's policies. And when it comes to formal and informal policies under the Nazi's you have to look at it from this view of if its formal then is it really policy? Likewise informal is it policy? I say that cuz alot of what the Nazis did I will argue was vary informal. The extermination of jews for example although we have documents of the final solution but was it a formal policy?

  • @bailong329 now remember when Germany was liberated the average German had no idea what was really going on in the camps they just know they were there and that was it. Allied forces had to bring them into the camps for them to know what was going on. Although everything formalized to make this happen it was never a formal policy but they did it behind closed doors. My point is that just cuz they didn't make it formal doesn't mean it wasn't policy already.

  • @bailong329 Was the extermination of the jews "formal policy" for the nazi's? Sure it was, it wasnt always completely open but it was still in handwriting and the high ranking nazis were aware of it.

  • @WorshipInTruth It wasn't actually it was written on paper but so was the persecution of christians but neither one was a formal policy cuz of the limited personal attached to them. The extermination of the jews was strictly SS and so was the persecution of Christians. All informal jobs were in fact given to one of two strong arms of Hitler's one was the SS and the other was the Gestapo and who in those documents caused the most grief to Christians? Its the SS and Gestapo.

  • @bailong329 The Gestapo were the main enforcers of nazi policy and the SS were its elite killers, investigation of jews and others was the job of the Gestapo and the murder of jews was official policy in the SS. Not really sure what your point is.

  • @WorshipInTruth the point is that if it was formal policy it would have been done in the open and all of Germany would be aware of it but if its restricted to a select group/groups then its informal and confidential.

  • @bailong329 It was pretty formally and widely understood in Germany that there was a policy of persecution of the jews although the commoner wasnt aware of the genocide camps. I stick with my previous statement that the high ranking nazis were well aware of the "extermination" policy.

  • @WorshipInTruth if it was widely understood minus the genocide then it wasn't formal.

  • @bailong329 Holy shit, to certain figures within the nazi establishment is was formal written policy. That is what my point was. I never claimed that every Germany citizen was aware that jews (and others) were being murdered by the thousands. Seems like you are trying to get pretty far off topic, nazis were actually banned from laying their hands on priests because Hitler wanted the vatican-reich concordat to go off smoothly, only priests that were arrested were the vocal opponents of Hitler.

  • @WorshipInTruth that was true only to a point. In fact several priests ended up in camps for filing protests with the Vatican and even Bishops got sent for voicing an opinion. And noone said anything the nazis just treated it like a UFO incident. What I am saying isn't off topic but rather demonstrates what formality really was to the party. As far as the party is considered if it requires the people to see it it was formal anything they didn't need to see wasn't.

  • @bailong329 It was pretty well understood in nazi Germany that people who were vocal about opposing the reich would face arrest. You need to look up what the word "formal" means, extermination of the jews was standard procedure for the high ranking nazi's and SS, just because they didnt go around tell everybody that they were killing jews in camps doesnt mean it wasnt formal policy. The American government even has a formal policy of secrecy regarding somethings, secret but still formal policy.

  • @WorshipInTruth I know perfectly well what formal means your just not seeing what I mean by this. What I mean by informal can better be defined with the Greek translation of hypocrites which means to wear a mask. This is what I am getting at. Formally they deceived people informally when they werent wearing any mask of deceit they went after christians and pretty much anyone that disagreed or had the POTENTIAL of creating problems for the Nazis.

  • @bailong329 Yeah you are clearly looking for a different word than "formal", perhaps "overt" and "covert" would be what you are talking about. You really need to expand your vocabulary.

  • @bailong329 He was literally a catholic though, in that he was baptized into the catholic organization and never excommunicated, he was born in Austria which is 99% catholic. It is catholics who disguise themselves as Christians, get my point?? The pope is no more Christian than Stalin.

  • @bailong329 "I am personally convinced of the great power and deep significance of Christianity, and I won't allow any other religion to be promoted. That is why I have turned away from Ludendorff and that is why I reject that book by Rosenberg. It was written by a Protestant. It is not a Party book. It was not written by him as a Party man. The Protestants can be left to argue with him ... As a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the Evangelical Church or its structures."- Adolph Hitler.

  • @bailong329 continued.."As a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the Evangelical Church or its structures. That is why I will have great difficulty if I try to regulate affairs of the Protestant churches. The evangelical people or the Protestants will in any case reject me. But you can be sure: I will protect the rights and freedoms of the churches and not let them be touched, so that you need have no fears about the future of the Church."- Adolph Hitler

  • @bailong329 "As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like. I don't put race above religion, but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service." - Adolph Hitler

  • @elmelify

    Buddy, have you never heard of the term political rhetoric? Saddam Hussein was an atheist, and used Islam as a rallying tool against Israel and the West. Josef Stalin ordered all the churches reopened during World War II, and permitted the distribution of religious literature to marshall popular support against the Germans. (He then ordered a crackdown after the war was over). Hitler did the same thing, and ordered the executions of many priests who opposed Naziism.

  • @elmelify

    The fact remains that the three biggest mass murderers in history have been atheists: Hitler, Mao and Stalin. Stop spreading secularist misinformation.

  • Mary de Guise has this enviable matronly beauty that I admire in older women. With her pinned up hair in loose unkempt waves and her reddened lips, she looks like a handsome queen in her prime.

  • @jadedlovely818

    you mean QUILF............Queen I would like to F$£@

  • @jadedlovely818

    you mean QUILF............Queen I would like to F***

  • @The8thDOCTOR QUILT. QUEEN I'D LIKE TO TAP.

  • that scene of Henry's picture and her looking at it was pretty powerful

  • So back in the day they really listened to a Queen? like in honesty i think men like to take over and be king themselves how did everyone follow what she said and not take over...its just random in ways good and bad

  • @TheRachaelShow1 Elizabeth listened to her many male advisers. That is one of the reasons she was a good queen. The jesuits and their lot tried to take over the monarchy, they tried to kill Elizabeth many times, their plans were spoiled by her great protectors such as Sir Francis Walshingham.

  • @WorshipInTruth talk about biased views lol

  • @blackarawak83 How are those views biased??? There were no less then 9 assassination attempts carried out by the jesuits against Elizabeth. Learn the history before you lay accusations on people.

  • Comment removed

  • Geoffrey Rush always plays the chill character

  • @bignole7547 Except in Shakespeare In Love lol

  • scottland was another country apart from england? never knew that. so the Mary of scot is different from Mary of England?

  • @Mandinko23 Scotland was it's own kingdom. The Countries united after Elizabeth's death when Mary Queen of Scots son, James I, took the throne.

  • The very first time I saw all those quick successive shots of her practicing her speech, I thought the director had accidently left in the outtakes!

  • I love Mary of Guise

  • When will humanity learn its lesson?

  • each time I see images of war, I lose a little more faith in humanity.

    humans killing humans is just so sad. :(

  • @ritestart

    you mean to say, you have faith remaining to lose?

  • each time I see images of war, I lose a little more faith in humanity.

    humans killing humans is just so sad. :(

  • @fizpopzz

    no, but I studied at alliance française :D

    I'm actualy brazilian

  • OMG ITS FRODO!!

  • @kaibear123 no it's not!! this is alfie allen :D

  • @keilaniangel11 Lmfao xD 

  • it also amazes me how they push marrige in those days (excuse the spelling) but seriously like ur not allowed to fall in love unless its ur husband they pick for ur marrige for political rights

  • its amazing how religion causes all of this i think we are all better off with none it causes less wars less blood shead and less bombings with the whole english thing they braught us into all of this but then again the french have different believes its all about christianity and different types of it better yet you all believe in the same thing just different versions of the story but its all the same in the end

  • @andysixxforeverily I find that religion is the facade people use to go to war, it is very rarely the cause of it. Those who are truly dedicated to their faith seek peaceful action first. And aside from the religious aspect, think of gangs. No religious affiliation and they're killing people left and right.

  • @crosscountrytc That is absolutely corrct crosscountry. The numbskulls of today would blame religion for violence but in fact it is merely that religion (as well as with all ideologies) is merely used as a cover by ambitious power seekers. What athiestical communists murdered some 100 million people in the 20th century yet people still blame "religion" as the root cause of conflict?? Who are they kidding??

  • @WorshipInTruth I know right. People who know nothing about religion just love to criticize it.

  • @crosscountrytc Religion and faith are 2 very diff things. We often forget that and quicky we attack others for thinking one way and not the other. Deep down no one can live a life of faith, to believe in something we can't see or hear or feel, no we can't. Thats why we have mass, "the body of christ" our way to feel god, churches built of wood and gold, our way to 'see' God.

  • wats with her hair

  • @QueenVampireLover the queen has many styles of hair she can change it in and instant most of it are hair ties made from real hair i think but just as u and i change our hair as the style was different then too :)

  • LAWL lord Robert who is he to interfere ?

  • @Div303 Lord Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, was one of the most important men in England at the time.

  • Ok can anyone tell me who in the hell walingham was ? He seems very smart and just as a king would but historicaly who was he? can anyone tell me?

  • @Div303 The man was pretty much Elizabeth's right hand man to put it plainly.

  • @Div303 Francis Walsingham was the Queen's Principal Secretary, and her "spymaster".

  • boring as expected in the life of royalty yuck

  • Those bishops are damn scary.

  • Is that little boy elijah wood? because he seems to...

  • A woman in the power of England. Despite it, surrounded by men and by a lot of pression.

  • I love the choral music at the beginning of this clip.... so haunting

  • Comment removed

  • So basically when she lost against Mary De Guise it was due to an inside job. According to Walsingham. Well, you know the saying, a house that does not stand together falls.

    And Mary De guise wants her to marry her nephew? It is like they are backing her into a corner! They pushed her into a war that she did not want to have anything to do with.  And now this female wants to try and pimp her out to her nephew. Jeez. They are intentionally going out of their way to find her unfit

  • Were all of those soldiers at 2:00 killed?

  • @harleyW4eva they were english soldiers there mustve been a fight between the english and scots at edinburgh castle and the scots won :D

  • the Queen....was badass

  • The dress she wears as she speaks to the bishops was reused for the Tudors. It's kind of poetic, to see a dress that was worn on Elizabeth, to be used again for Anne Boleyn.

  • The French woman looks like Patti LuPone, but isnt....

  • what is that pendatif that the Earl of Suffolk wears which we see on Elizabeth's neck in the second movie?

  • It's true...everyone can get this type of nervous...when she was practicing to speak fon the bishops...wonderfull performance

  • Comment removed

  • that boy at 2:51 looks like a young daniel radcliffe, or is that just me?

  • @azndove007 I have to agree he does.

  • @Fallenangelwolf he kind of looks like elijah wood... no?

  • @lvasquez1985 both really.

  • whoahhhhh- major transformation- the lively elizabeth to grumpy-----

  • cate blancett is an awesome actress

  • apparently the parts where she is practising her speech is actually Cate Blanchett remembering her lines and they just kept the camera's rolling

  • riquetrudeau stop im tired of reading that

  • A prince should never flinch from being blamed for acts of ruthlessness which are necessary for safe guarding the state and their own person. You must take these things so much to heart that you do not fear to strike. Even the very nearest that you have if they be implicated.

  • lol, i love it when the queen is trying to get her speech right. its just like me when i'm trying to rehearse a speech myself

  • That is a beautiful lady.

  • The girl at 3:11 was Mary of Guise

  • Mary Guise

  • who is that lady at 3:11 ?

  • i love true french acsents

  • right? so hawtt~

  • 9:29 to 9:30

    lmao

  • there is one thing higher than royalty my lords...and that is........religion...

  • She talk about the hurt boy

  • i'm sorry, but what did the french woman say?

  • she says first "english blood on french flag"

    and then she says "take him back to his queen, and make sure he gets there well alive; and tell that bastard queen to do not send children to fight Mary de Guise"

  • @Fabilicious81 THey should have added subtitles for that, haha.

  • @Fabilicious81

    No worries. OxyClean will get the blood out.

  • shes so pale

  • la pelicula de elizabeth lamentablemente no esta con subtitulo o traducida al español no la encontre

  • I thought Elizabeth was known as the Virgin Queen?

  • She was, but back in those days with women...especially a Queen it was absolutely unthinkable to have sex outside of marriage. Elizabeth never married, therefore the title The Virgin Queen came into play. But nobody knows for sure whether or not she really was a virgin. This film is highly dramatized.

  • Ah thanks for that answer I was just wondering, haha.

  • I have this quote from the Royal Diaries, about Elizabeth: "She finally said to one of her councillors, who was insisting on her marrying, 'I will have here but one mistress and no master.' She indeed became known as the Virgin Queen, who was wedded only to her kingdom, England"

  • wasn't she abducted by one of her uncles (not sure) when she was younger?

  • No she was "seduced" by Thomas Seymour, her guardian when she was 14, for which Seymour was tried and convicted of Treason under Edward VI's reign and was therefore beheaded. She was never abducted.

  • @MitchPR08

    She did have sex trust me, she ain't no virgin. She really wasn't supposed to be queen her so-called "claim to the throne" was through Katherine of Valois who had Elizabeth's ancestor out of wedlock with her Welsh servant. Nothing good has come from the Tudor family and thank God they're gone

  • @B3Ger dude u know u are hating on people who r long gone. trust u really were u there? hmm no

  • @MitchPR08 soo did she even have kids before she past away ??/

  • @lisamarie72ful No, she never had children, she was the last monarch of the Tudor dynasty. She lived into her 70's. Which, back then would be like living into your 90's these days...people back then didn't have very long life expectancies.

  • i was asking myself that one too....

  • She may have been, but I think the virgin image was largely adopted by her to garner respect and attention from the noblemen and councilors she had to work with (and was often at odds with). It also made her very, very popular with the common people.

  • It is highly doubtful that Elizabeth would have sex outside of marriage because it would jepardize her crown. But that doesn't meant hat she didn't have men in her company.

  • @LauraluXoX

    that's because she never got married

  • 2:26 - 3:19 : Fanny Ardant, wonderful woman!

  • @ 2:55 Mary of Guise, queen consort of James V of Scotland, his second wife.

    After the death of her two son's and husband she was Regent for her daughter Queen Mary I.

    Mary of Guise died of dropsy (whatever that is) in 1560.

  • 2:50 he's only a boy

  • Elijah Wood?

  • no his brother

  • @DIsillusionedCupOTea i think it is

  • I would have had the bishops reputations smeared in the eyes of the people and then had them beheaded. Afterwards I would send a real army to slaughter the french troops.

    PS, Love the horny girl in the see through night gown.

  • I knew robert was going to have some problem. First thing he said was "when can I see you in private?" Driven by lust now he suffers from jelousy, anger, and hate. Remember this seen and you can pick the thugs from the guys who are worth a damn.

  • Who is the woman at 2:55? Not in real life but in the movie :)

  • She is the mother to mary, Queen of scotts

  • Thank you :)

  • she should have refused to see the duke and married francis walsingham and restored the catholic church and then she may of been secured.

  • Walsingham wasn't Catholic.. he had no title.. to be married to him would have given her no advantage but would have driven her further from the papacy.

  • @faithoffaith Why would Elizabeth have 'restored the catholic church'??? That's what she meant when she says early in the movie that "I will rule as my concience dictates". Elizabeth was a dedicated Protestant all her life. Mary on the other hand was a very pious Catholic, a trait which she obviously inherited from her mother Katherine of Aragon.

  • @jlalewicz  her mother was anne boleyn

  • @jlalewicz Cathrine with a c not a k thats Katherine Parr

  • i love this movie! this mary of guise scene is my favorite, there is no way i can describe how awesome this movie is!!!!

  • looove her dress at 9:45!

  • im not sure i understand what is happening in the beginning...anyone? care to explain??

  • so both Mary and Elizabeth fought to keep their father's crown in the house of tudor. But Edward VI invited Mary to court on christmas where he embarassed her and reduced her to tears. But if you remember Edward VI had installed Protestant religious beliefs and had disregarded his father's catholic laws and worship.

  • it was because of Elizabeth's half brother Edward VI that Elizabeth couldn't inherit her father's crown. And, even though Mary and King Henry reconciled both girls were still considered to be legally illegitimate and unfit to rule.

  • @edemoness No. Henry VIII restored both Mary and Elizabeth to the line of succession before his death.

  • lily alln is in this shes one of the ladies in waiting

  • I love the part where she was practicing to speak in front of the bishops(?). Just shows how even a ruler of a country can get nervous just like everyone else. :P

  • Indeed. I couldn't agree more.

  • @Serenity113

    Haha. D'ya reckon Cameron/Brown does/did

    the same?