Climate Change-04 Elizabeth May Opening Remarks

[ager74]

Science should always be led with the evidence as that is the only representation of the truth. And the obvious lack of credible evidence is why you have activists and lawyers spouting absolute nonscence. It really is a sad day for science when retorick replaces evidence, as the public are not stupid, they see right through the lies of these filth hungry for ego and tax payers money disgrace

[ager74]

Look at them lie, absolutley amazing, your carbon share scheme is screwed and you know it, so get a refund from Al Gore.

[magnusea]

We can't definitely say she's lying, but it's true that there is no consensus on climate whatsoever (Elisabeth May imply this).

.

Also May says IPCC is the scientific authority, but IPCC exclude Svensmarks research. He has proved that the sun via a cosmic ray "umbrella" control clouds and thus the temperature. Also the CO2 levels was 1000 ans 2000 ppm some millions of years ago which didn't caused run away warming. IPCC has an issue to prove man is the cause. They filter facts and tell a story.

[ager74]

It is a great shame these radicals have hijacked thequiet nature of science, such a shame. She is by trade a Laywer, and if you watch the whole debate you shall see she never sits down and dosent yeild even when wrong. The dabate also cuts her mic, as she wont shut up, these are all the actions of an extremist with a very selfish rule, her body language is that of attack. Science could really do without these ill informed idiots, contolled by ego. The epople desere the truth