Added: 4 years ago
From: WW2GermanNewsreels
Views: 63,648
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (253)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Gott Mit Uns Wore by the Great Germans ... Allies should have wore their Commie brothers Evil Star!

  • Notice how the narrator refers to the partisans as "terrorists", interesting. I wonder who else uses that term to describe enemies.

  • @biggrigga The Germans called us Bandits, not terrorists, it was to try to justify in the heads of the Krauts the Partisans were not a fully fledged army which they in fact were. We all wore (well my father and uncles) at least one piece of uniform. The Dutch appeasers/revionists these days call us Terrorists for the reason you state. The Germans cannot still take it they were beaten by lower trained farmers!!

  • This is very good propaganda. Notice the valor attributed to the SS, who actually did very little of the important work.

  • @P1B1U1H1 Correct! Most units creating atrocities (including rounding up Jews) in Yugoslavia back then were basic Wermacht units which some "crack" troops like the 188th Jaegers attempted to break the partisans but ultimately failed.

  • Lord, Won't Jew Buy Me A Merceded Benz? Under Hitler, the Jews bought it.

  • Look at all the happy Nazis killing people and blowing up stuff.

  • fuck partisans

  • Storm 395: Wishful Thinking...A One on one war was what Hitler has for a couple years with the Soviet Union, and they lost badly...

  • SMASH ALL COMMUNISTS..!!!!!!!!COMMUNISM.­.IS THE ENEMY OF MANKIND..!!!!! ALL ANTI-COMMUNISTS SHOULD TAKE..PRIDE..IN WHO AND WHAT THEY ARE...!!!!PERIOD....VIVA IL DUCE..!!!!!! SEIG HEIL!!!!!

  • most likely marched off to be shot. only partisans in the Warsaw uprising were aloud to surender as soilder's, most likely in fear of war crime convitions in the face of german's inevitable defeat.

  • Mentioned to 1 neo-nazis how the waffen SS bayoneted babies at Distomo. He responded that they were killing partisans. Which, I replied. guess the baibies coud have been partisans. When THEY GREW UP IN 20 YEARS! Other massacres, Oradour-Sur Glane, Puten, Lidice, Wereth, Ascq, Tulle. the list goes on.

  • jest vam se Tito najeb'o majke one švapske

  • @Vertygo2 Jebo ti tito mater!

  • jebem vam mater švabi!!! , fuck u german bastards!!

    slava Slovenskim partizanom!

  • @Bulletproof464 warum so die Kriege gewesen viele Jahre lang jetzt umwirft

  • While the SS units seemed to be kicking arse in Yugo- the bottom line is that they couldn't be sent to where they were really needed- the crumbling Russian front where Army Group Centre was destroyed by Zhukov at this time.In this respect the partisans did achieve something meaningful- though at terrible cost.

  • Ustashe=pussies,Handzar=pussie­s,Partisans=pussies.

  • if it wasn't for this war we wouldn't have all the wonderful things like the internet that was created post ww2 during the cold war for military communication purposes. The germans stimulated the world with their knowledge that was harvested by the americans and soviets. We can hate on the germans for this war but if it wasn't for them we wouldn't have half the googies we have today, military and technology.

  • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!! Fuckin` naziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis !!!!!!!!! VEČNA SLAVA RUSIJI !

  • @kowachinski mrs

  • Germany could have taken on Russia and Uk and won. With United States giving russia and uk equipment and hitler declaring war on united states was a very ignorant move, not to mention supporting italy was a huge downfall on the North African front. Damn worthless Italian military

  • @popper504 Must say that the Italian military was not worthless. Most of its officers were bad, we all know their equipment was old... but they fought on given the odds. I know many Italian veterans of WW-II and they all fought hard and well (Alpini, Bersaglieri, Para, Pilots) My father-in-law fought the entire war, even with the RSI. He was an officer in the Bersaglieri, wounded 4 times and two silver medals for valor. So please do not disrespect Italians from WW-II. Thank you.

  • It was part of Sutjeska offensive (after Neretva).. handzar ss did not exist as fighting force at that time...The main axis force were german divisions + mixed croatian/german divisions. On the other side were partisans form Croatia, Bosnia and Montenegro. Ethnically, 50% serbs, 35% croats and remaining moslems and montenegrians.

  • Die Partisanen waren ausser Rechtsschutz von Genfer Konventionen.

  • There was no slovenian chetniks. It is a religion thing. Slovenian ar catholics, chetniks are not. There were traitors called Belagarda during the ww2 in Slovenia. They even took an oath to Hitler in Maribor Slovenija in 1944.

  • The Neretva action prompted the British to seize Vis Island form the Axis and use it as a supply line for Partisans.

  • Mješate komuniste i partizane. To nije isto. Niso svi partizani bili komuniste.

  • @mrSecurityGuardian Still not enough dead nacis.

  • Partisans rules.We will need them again.

  • Partisans kicked nazi ass

  • I'm Serb, Germans were corretc to Serbian people, they saved Serbian population in one town in Srem region who was in Croatia during war. Italians also were correct but croatian ustasha, Handzar SS and albanians are snakes in man's clothes. The only goal of his regime was to kill many people most of them Serbs. Thanks to German and Italian military, Tito and his commies are terrorists

  • @TeramKontru Yes, thanks to Geman and Italian millitary that U speak serbian language.Yes they were correct to its allies. Do U like nazis and fascists ? Tito and partisans made us freedom. Not ustashi, not chetniks ( slaughterers ). Serb is never guilty.

  • @SuperZupy I must remember there were many slovenian chetniks. I don't like communism at all. We could become german allie and it would not be genocide on our people, we could stop croatian satanists. But because of commie scum we had more than 700 000 dead...

  • Sutjeska!!! :-)

    ode Sava Kovacevic u qrac! :-)))

  • @mrSecurityGuardian

    cowards? the SS didnt run from battles, the partisans did.

    The SS didnt take pop shots and run, they advanced right into partisan fire and bayonetted all of them in close quarters.

    no battalion level firefight was ever won by the partisans.

    of those 73,000 , most were wehrmacht and most of them didnt care for politics

  • @SS13E3

    well that's the point of a guerilla organization..It would be suicide to attack a well formed army like that.

  • Mario Roatta, the other 800 Italian Roman Catholic responsible for war crimes in Yugoslavia and their historical memory are too much important for the Counter Reformation, yesterday, today and tomorrow, and for this reason they had to be denied to the justice in Yugoslavia and erased from the European historical memory at any cost, even at the cost of the disappearing of the same Italian presence in Istria and Dalmatia.

  • Germans could defeat every one the only problem, they couldn't defeat every one at once.

  • PARTISANEN FUCK YOUR SS UNITS , PARTISANEN IS FREE PEOPLE

  • @valesrbin

    SS casualties in Yugoslavia: 20,000

    partisan casualties overall: 375,000

  • @storm495 - My friend, 44 division of various German troops entered territory what once was Yugoslavia assisted by various quisling collaborators, and remember barely 2 division escaped in retreat towards Greece at the end of the war !!! So lower your ego be reminded that no one and I repeat NO ONE and NO ARMY has ever nor will ever successfully conquer that region nor defeat any defending group or army of any of various Slavic peoples in Balkans, as it was Partisan's of WW2 in former Yugo!!!

  • Partisans are not combat troops and did not obey the rules of war. Germany was allowed by international law to deal harshly with criminal partisan killers.

  • @taywil64 They become an army in the begin of 1944. They were killing only German and Italian soldiers and traitors. They fought 4 our freedom. For me and all of U.

  • Yes many countries atacked Germany..

  • @BoSaNaCBeAsT

    bullshit

    idi procitaj malo historiji i vidi da 1944-te samo 2.5% partizana su bili Bosanci

  • The Germans would of won a war with any nation 1 on 1 during this part of history. Germany was always fighting on numerous fronts. Hilter was rushing his plans and had enemies on too many sides. Once his deal/treaty ended with Russia things were doomed. But as said 1 on 1 Germany would be victorous.

  • @storm495 must be amazingly ignorant Ameriqwan!!! Germany owned WHOLE EUROPE and two nations with SUPREME military industry: France and Czechoslovakia. Add Belgium, Hungary, Austria, Holand.. advanced in military. Whole Europe worked for GERMANY but Russia was totally exhausted by bolshevik genocides over Russian population and mismanagement of industry, Russians still won in spite of all odds, in spite of bolshevism. That was the greatest miracle in history of WARS.

  • Germany also fought against most of Europe. I not going to spend a long in an argument about something that didnt happen!!! I just saying that IF WW2 didnt happen and it was just the Germans against Russia in the 1940s Germany would win. But really man it dont matter coz it didnt happen.

    P.s I am not Ameriqwan! I am British dear sir...cups o tea and cricket!!

  • @storm495 lets pretend hitler had been able to repell the Russian advance once it reached his boarders..germany would still LOSE.Lets also pretend they stopped Patton at the Siegfried line. Germany would still LOSE. Any victories they won would mean NOTHING. NONE of them would stop the US from making the A-Bomb.Blast Germany with a flurry of A-Bombs and of course BERLIN killing Hitler.... War over Germany LOSES

  • @shellback1970 lol?A--Bomb?Which the us stole it from germany?!!

  • @2pacSoljah The US didnt steal a fucking thing from Germany...The developer of the A- bomb was an American born Jew you stupid asshole....Learn some history before talking bullshit..

  • @shellback1970 Learn some History?..u Mean ur History?!!UR FAKE SHITY HISTORY?Which UR PPL WHO MADE IT?Want me 2 belive the allied?!!the ppl who won the war??!!MOTHERFUCEKR THE USA TOOK every thing germany had..Even the man who made the A-bomb....YEAH AM Amuslim and am proud...

    Ur country is being ruled by jewsh and lairs...Just SHUT THE FUCK UP..U r the last motherfucker talk..Dont even replay cuz i wont even answer a Dumb ass like u.

  • @2pacSoljah Fuck you . I got a first hand look at how fucking stupid you dune coons are..After smoking dozens of your worthless asses in the Gulf war I went to Dubai, In my hotel I turn on the radio and got to hear the warped BS view of history you shitbags are fed. The muslims won WW2 for the allies????WFT thats the kind of drivel you assclowns get..FUCKING LIES Where were the muslims at Normandy? Iwo? etc...NO WHERE TO BE FUCKING FOUND...

    PUSSIES

  • @storm495 idiot....he was researching nuclear bombs, jet fighters, assault rifles, ballistic missiles and whatnot. if he could have stalled a year, we'd be talking German

  • @storm495 i am not a communist, and im not from Russia, but NO ONE CAN DEFEAT RUSSIA, Napoleon tried, Hitler tried, we don't need any other proof, if Hitler didn't attack Russia he would have been victorious...

  • @Frki2005 Germany defeat Russia in 1917

    In 1941 USSR was prepering for attack ,but Hitler was smarter and hit first !...but he lost the war in the bettle of Pearl Harbour

  • @cata20120 I mean complete victory, and they defeated Russia because Lenjin came to power.

    And i agree that Pearl Harbour had a lot to do with defeat of Germany, but Germany was allied with Russia until 1941, and Stalin didn't want to attack Germany, he wanted to ensure a proper defens if Germans attack, he was building the defensive army, he would have stayed allied with Germany, that's what i think, and Germans were being defeated in 1943, before landing on the Omaha beaches.

  • @storm495 actually he could if he listened to his generals, he was after destroying armies instead of capturing important cities

  • @hazemvirus His general were idiots and it should of been the other way around his generals should of listen to him

  • @ostormbringero hell no, he ordered paulas to stick with stalingrad while the red army was circling around the german army which is death trap and manstien said withdraw and regroup with my army to circle the russian army which was brilliant plan but he choose to ignore him and listen to hitler which caused the death of the 6th army, same shit in north africa, rommel said want the supplies to dock in Tobruk which is closer to the front for supplies but hitler ignored him and used tripoli.. far!

  • @hazemvirus Hindsight is 20/20 Hitler was going by past experience of the Demyanskpocket which 90,000 men were supplied by air for months and if Hoth would of listen by bypassing Voronezh in the first place the battle for Stalingrad would of never happen. as for Africa it was Rommel who talked Hitler out of taking Malta . Because he wanted the forces earmarked for it to take Egypt then later he had the audacity to complain he wasn't getting any supplies!!!

  • @storm495 Russia wasn't shit. What truly ended Hitlers dreams of conquest was Americas entry in the war. Without America the best the Russians could hope for was a stalemate even after Stalingrad which I doubt would of ever happened since he could of added another 20 divisions to the eastern front

  • @storm495

    ..ну , это только ты сказал , твоё мнение неинтересно .

  • @storm495 You know sweet f.a about ww2, for six months Hitler directed all his resources to conquering Britain and failed (admittedly cause we had radar, a huge advantage) but your 1 on 1 comment is laughable, how could he have had a 1 on 1 without invading our shores, also 1 on 1 vs Russia was doomed cause of their climate and landscape and as far as 1 on 1 with America goes you are a fucking joke. Agreed German engineering and tech was the best in the world at this time but England had form.

  • @storm495

    Some mistake surely?!

    Germany scored a great victory against England and France in 1940. Then, er, they invaded 4 small countries with whom they were not at war, followed by a 5th country also not at war, (Russia) with an old fashioned and disorganised army. Despite this the Germans failed to take Leningrad, Moscow, or the Russian oil fields, and in a greatly reduced 1942 operation they were defeated at Stalingrad. So where are the 'victories'? In 1943 Germany was losing the war!

  • @storm495 Thanks captain obvious

  • @storm495 I use to think this way. But after being a WW2 nut since High School I've come to realize, as arrogant as it sounds, Germany could not beat United States 1 to 1 for a few key 1# what makes the world go round? what makes thing move in this world? MONEY. The US had a lot more freakin money then the germans had. 2# economic and manufacturing capability. American auto intraindustry was #1 manufacturer pre and during WW2. We could pump out ALOT more planes(which allows ground control)

  • @storm495 What makes the world turn!? MONEY!. the US had a lot more money and economy, more manpower, manufacturing for ships airplanes(which control islands continent's) tanks etc. German equipment while superior and more refined(my preference) was also more costly and had alot more moving parts(jams etc) US also had German scientist Einstein for A Bomb, Germans didn't. Leadership: Roosevelt Harvard grad. Colombia Law, Wall Street Lawyer etc VS Hitler a corporal anti-social. Who u vote 4!?

  • @storm495 You could say the same for any of the powers of those days if they prepared for war as long as `nazi Germany did. Krauts werent supermen...just like Japs they prepared for years. Anyway thank God , aprt from Stalin , all others were decent democracies.

  • @storm495 Germany in 1944 fought against Americans, British, De Gaulle, betraying Romanians, betraying Bulgarians, Soviet Union, betraying Badoglio Italians, Yugoslav communist partisans. American material supply made the difference. Without Soviet men and without American material, Germany could not have been defeated ever.

  • @storm495 IF they had wiped out the english at dunkirk it would have been a good start what ever about fighting on too many fronts listen to what otto kumm had to say it makes an awful lot of sense all in all its a bit late now.

  • @storm495 Germany sucked at diplomacy.

  • @arveduilastking hitler never played risk lol

  • @storm495 so what?

  • @storm495 Except Russia of course!

    Oh, and the UK!

    And preferably, small nations with weak military forces, with whom there was no declared war before the invasion!

    That seems to leave France!

  • @Bosnianstorm ova je upravu, vidio sam na wikipediji

    samo dva i pola posto

  • @Bosnianstorm

    tvoji komunjarski dokumenti kazu sami.....

    1944-te godine 2.5% Bosanski partizana.

    crvena zvijezda nije bila simbol Bosne niti ce, Handzar je bio davno simbol.

    nemas ti ikakvih dokumenata da dokazes masakre sto je Handschar uradio I sad cu ja tebe blokirat.

  • @Bosnianstorm

    ma cemu seres?

    ko je napravio i stitio Bosnu?????

    gledaju brojeve

    tvoja manjina je bila na strani srbi, kriscana, katolika, hrvata, jevreja i komunist, a moja strana je ustala da stiti Bosanske MUSLIMANE protiv srba i hrvata iz partizana i cetnika

    ti sto podrzavas partizane i komunjare ne podrzavas Bosnu, al srbiju i njihove....zato sto nije bilo Bosanac u partizanima. i to je to.

  • @Bosnianstorm

    slaves to the SS? the SS had a religion and they were willing to fight for God over communism, which had nothing and promised nothing.

    there were no massacres. they were all done by home grown Ustasa, cetniks and partisans.

    you cant win a war, havent you learned that from Bosnia in the 90s? 24 million russians died compared to 3 million germans..

  • @Bosnianstorm

    am I the one who bought into propaganda or are you? child killers, really youre gonna stoop that low?

    it was the SS who fought for BOSNIA.

    not the communists,

    BOSNIAN PRIDE COMES FROM HANDSCHAR, END OF STORY

    the partisans werent Bosnian, get that through your little head.

  • 2.5% of the yugoslav insurgents were Bosnians, yet 60 years later after communist propaganda, they believe the partisan history is theirs.

    grandsons of Wehrmacht, Waffen SS and Ustasa members believe their ancestors fought in the partisans

  • @Bosnianstorm

    funny thing is tough.......

    only 2.5% of the partisans were Bosnians,

    most of the Bosnians joined the Ustasa, Domobrans and Waffen-SS

  • @SS13E3

    DA TI JA MALO NA NAŠKI KAŽEM

    TITO JE USPJEO DA OSTVARI SVOJ CILJ A HITLER GA JE LAGANO POFLAUTO OD PARTIZANA DEBILI JEDNI

  • @valesrbin

    al hitler nije izgubio 375,000 vojnika u u jugoslaviji

    manje of 60,000

  • @SS13E3

    Ma pričaš nešto o čemu veze nemaš.

    Hitler popušio i to je kraj!!1

  • @valesrbin

    20,000 mrtvi SS-ovaca

    375,000 mrtvi srba

  • I bleieve this was the Neretva offensive. The Ustasha and Boznian SS Handzhar also took part in the battle. Tito's forces escaped with heavy casualties.

  • @IanHunedoara8

    no this is battle on Sutjeska

  • @IanHunedoara8 yes,Partisan escape but many partisan die in this bettle

    TITO was great man for me...not chetniks and draza they working for germany,that is why me dont like them!

    Regards from Serbia

  • Indeed, SS-Gebirgsjager divisions Handschar and Prinz Eugen were the most feared insurgent hunters in history.

    Meine Ehre Heisst Treue!

  • no uniforms....no order of battle .

    only ignorance , or cowardice supports such criminal scum

  • this was 7.SS-Prinz Eugen my friend.

    they were SS-Gebirgsjagers, one of the most feared partisan hunters in history.

  • Waffen-SS 1

    Partisans 0

  • @Jotunspor SS won everything. They were running home bare foot. Kill all nazis.

  • @SuperZupy Why dont you start with me?

  • Ovo bi bilo u okviru ili nakon V ofanzive

  • If you consider the butchery systematic of Jasenovac you can conclude the Partisans were not bothered by the niceites of international law. Bandits and subhumans they know their lives were forfeit.

  • Very fucking false.

  • @IanHunedoara8 Why call someone bandit if only wants to fight with aggressor who takes your freedom in your land. Russians has partisan, there were italian partisans, french partisans, Greek partisans. Americans and english pilots who was shot down in Yugoslavia join partisans and they fought on their side. Someone until the end of the ww2.

  • @SuperZupy Wasn't me

  • 1:20 t/m 1:25 awesome.

  • @Bosnianstorm I happen to know alot more than you

    SS13E3 is my other account

  • most of the yugoslav partisans were serbs...they would force people to help them

    they didnt spare civilians....they would also murder thousands and claim the germans did it

  • @Bosnianstorm yea and dont forget Bosnians were fascist

  • This propaganda is basicly the same as afghanstan footage today

  • That is a very good observation.

  • who won this war anyways??? Oh yeah, not the SS lol

  • A partisan is a criminal not a soldier. In WW II such types of criminal deserved their fate ie execution.

  • nope, parisan isnt criminal, dont you mean guerilla?

  • No with all due respect. Those who wore a uniform against their enemy were combatants under international law. Also, they too had to respect the rules of war. Partisans, like the IRA, used civilian clothes to cover their illegal acts and incite retaliation, as allowed by law, against civilians in areas where illegal acts took place.

  • but partisans cooperate with civils and guerilla is just plundering, that says terminus technicus

  • Partisans are not freedom fighters. For instance, in the USSR partisans acted inhumanely against Axis forces and local people. They acted to incite Axis retaliation against civilian populations as Tito did in Yugoslavia. Partisans also had no democratic mandate.

  • they can call theyselves "partisans" but it was guerilla style of fight, in Slovak National Uprising was partisan soldier loved and supported by people

  • Partisans entice reprisals and attacks against civilian populations. The last thing civilians want is Partisan activity, as Iraqi's dont want al Queda. Partisans are bad news and act contrary to the rules of war.

  • i think that conversation will not have satisfying result, we are talking about different cases. Yes you are right but, it depends on wieving angle.

  • @taywil64 - yes, and the nazi were good guys -.-'.. you should shout up: "partisans" have liberated my country by their own forces during the World War II

    These "criminals" were composed by young adults who wanted one thing: To live in peace an take back the land that was ocupied by axis forces.

    "Death to fascism, freedom to the People!!!! from Slovenski partizani

  • Its interesting how the truth HURTS ,,, Serbs who now have only their memories to keep them going.. hhehehhhhe, NEVER again GAMAD Srpska cete imat ono sto ste htjeli,,, vasu VELIKU SRBIJU,, manji ste od makovog zrna... hehehehehhe

  • Yugoslavia didnt exist in 1941 But for the SERBS who killed and pillaged all other nations that made up this entity, thats OK hey?? they dont want to talk about it.... Thank GOD the Serbs finally got what they deserved,,,, a land without an admiral ,, heheheh todays serbis,,,

  • perhaps serbs killed themselves in jasenovac?

    perhaps serbs bombed themselves 1941?

    perhaps serbs bombed themselves 1999?

    before you start talking something make sure that you have facts to cover your speech.

    Serbs created Yugoslavia. It was croatia who needed it to become independant. it was slovenia who was part of austria who needed serbia.

    a mislim da ces me i ovako razumeti. pobegao si u australiju i sad pricas o nekoj istoriji svog velikog hrvatskog naroda.

    imbecilu...

  • @karloman1

    that's nonsense.. The serbs was slaughtered by the uastase in WW2. and were SALUGHTERED in the balkan wars by American/British backed separatists.. You idiot.. More serbs died than all the other groups combined in the wars of 90s perpetuated by NATO bombings and its separatist/fascist(tudjman and izetbegovic) and terroists(kla).. Do you know real history or are you just spouting the nATO propaganda line.. Western powers supported same fascistic movements in 90s as hitler in WW2..

  • @xMaXiMuSx Either you are a real joker or a complete RETARD... i think the latter is true; serbs started 5 wars during the 90's and LOST each one.... NOW THEY ARE CRYING FOUL. Well thats serbs for you... I wonder would they be complaining if they took over Croatia ( Their REAL OBJECTIVE) for a greater Serbia??????.... You are a real sad bunch thats why you are where you are today...... You arse enders of Europe.....

  • @karloman1

    That's nonsense.. The Serbs did NOT start anything. .The wars were started by western backed NATO puppets like IAzetbegovic, Tudjman, the terrorist KLA you idiot.. They were the ones who fought to seccede from Yugoslavia.. You're just spouting NATO propaganda.. Greater Serbia?? Wthat the hell?? There is no such thing, the bosnian serb part of Bosnia refused to break up from Yugoslavia after the non-serb part did ILLEGALLY without consolting the Bosnian Serbs over it/

  • Justice for Hungary Vesszen TRIANON  1920.06.04

  • And yes you last phrase was hilarious germans didnt wanted all the world with bule eyes snowy skin blond hair etc must of peoples think that traits as atractive and beutifull thats a big reason why germans saw that as ideal but they didnt wanted all peole blonde and the res killed must of germans had dark hair! Himmler and HItler had dark hair!

  • SS you mean Waffen SS pretty much participed in military actions in Yugoslavia apart from that also is funny you mention they did in Yugoslavia Croatians suport Germans Slovenians also Bosniaks and other groups so the ocupation was realy harsh the people that suffer the must was serbian and it was the chetniks and not Titos men that were the real ressitance communists shoud took advantge of situation realy you can not compare?! Of course not communists was lot worst it trys to destroy peoples

  • history culture religion realy what good it brings corrupt men into power?! While the peopel is starving and in lines for food with ticket! I hate communism false socialism your guys will never be socialists! IN fact communists even cooparete with capitalism like in China comom communist hipocrasy

  • You just describe what soviets did in Eastern Euroep

    LOL the last phrase is just stupid steryotype that I think no comment

  • Heil Heil Hitler~

  • This vid was taken in June 43. The turning point for Tito's Partisans was around December 43 when the fire was put back onto the occupying German and collaborating forces till their retreat back to Germany in April 45.

  • Incorrect! ALL Partisans wore a uniform, even one piece of a uniform, A hat, shirt etc.....We were a proper army, made up of amateurs who kicked the butts of a bigger better trained military force.

  • hahah that's such fucking bullshit it's not even funny. what you just described are regular civilian clothes. and it's real brave attacking soldiers when they're least expecting it, especially in fucking civilian clothes and behind their back. and you didn't kick any ass....dumb fucking faggot. the only reason the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS retreated was because the commie scum was coming from the east in huge numbers, which massively outnumbered the Germans

  • whos we...Klaw? You were there? I think youre just a " think you know it all computer pussy" that likes to come on here and pretend youre an historian, but i think the raging mass's know better, you kicked no ones ass.

  • Klaw..No...you fuck off you maggot eating, grandma underwear licking, grandpa ball licking, vermin screwing, test tube baby that survived the flush, semen tasting piece of shit that you are. Next time you see your mother slap her in the face for me, for not swallowing you...instead of ingesting you at conception. The rest of you, have a nice day :) Now Klaw, go back yo your neighbourhood game of " Pin the Balls On Your Chin"

  • because life is not a card game and when you tired of or messed up something, just drop you cards and start deal new pocket...and those scumbags took (or caused loss) so many ppls lifes all over the world

  • all those scumbags were only a year after crying like babies, begging for life when partisans kicked their stinky asses

  • So are the fortunes of war flankingtiger. Why can't you take a less emotional attitude, so long after the war has ended?

  • i hate kiaras mustache

  • dont remember the days!!!

    dont remember the jears!!!

    remember only the nummber of germans you are killed!!!

    kill the germans!!!

    kill the krouts!!!

  • lol did u know that on 1 dead nazi were 23 dead allys ?

  • Bold words for someone from Austria, if Germans today still have blood on their hands so do you being an Austrian!

  • Yeah! Long live Baltian AntiCommie Partisans! Since 1939-1941 and 1945-1991!

  • Anton 1941 Wo waren denn diese "Werwolf" Leute nach 1945?Die existierten nur als Hirngespinst der "Allierten" aka "Befreier".Solche imaginaere Gestalten waren vonnoeten um den glorreichen SIeg ueber die deutschen "Bestien" um so groesser dar zu stellen.Alles andere ist Quatsch!

  • Long live the citizen soldiers.

  • HANDZAR DIVISION IS BACK.......

  • it's spelt "garand" you retard

  • Partisanen sind Verbrecher keine Patrioten!Basta!

  • thats not really true. both sides shot each other... but the nazis defiantly shot more jews...

  • Shoot the Concentration camp trash SS, Respect the Waffen SS. I like the Garand but would prefer the GEW 43, the latter is simpler. I'd prefer an M1 carbine to both!

    Stuhrmann(SP?) I have to buy you a diet mtn. dew dome day.

    You don't worship Hitler, to respect and honorable and humane officers like Rommel. AS a general rule the Japanese treated U.S. prisoners far worse the the Germans. The former shot U.S. wounded, the latter took them to German hospitals.

  • man... u must have been living in a barrel. Your M1 was impractical when compared to G43 or STV40 because of it's clip/magazine system. M1 and kar98 are completely different types of weapons. Oh and btw. U-boat were state of the art submarines back then and no allied submarine could not match them. And if you really want to declare someone a winner in that war, it would have been the soviets.

  • man to man german soldiers were far better than americans.U were just lucky german best troops were fihting out numbered against russians

  • @willysant25 It was also true of the Japanese soldiers. That the Allies won is a miracle. The difference can be readily appreciated by the Axis:Allied kill ratio.

  • @willysant25 your full of shit..The Americans won because they were better across the board. You logic is flawed if the germans were better man to man the groups of these BETTER men would have made a BETTER ARMY.With the tank being the ONLY area germany was better equiped the US outclassed them in every aspect.Better rifles, pistols,etc.

  • @shellback1970 Why dont u shut ur mouth .u cocksucker...the pussies americans wont even dare to attack if they were alone....U try to change the facts and the truth with ur hollywood shit....LOSSER

  • @2pacSoljah Hey there a girl over there learning you better go slap her....HAHAHAHAHA you fucking retarded shitskin...Do you know how much money it costs to wage a war with a millitary like ours? why fit the bill all by ourselves we have allies for that...They help us and we help them i wouldnt expect a stupid assed muslim fucktard to understand that...Id slap you in the mouth but your dads dick is in the way...

  • sieg heil!

  • OgPsQd my grandfather was in the ss 17th grenadier division he told me stories and he said in war were all as bad as each other it makes you do crazy stuff no matter what country your from.look at the russian how many did they "execute"?He told me about Americans in France (normady) executing surrendering ss troops just for fucking souvenirs to send back home"FACT".so dont come on here preaching ALL SS soldiers were bad.you "are narrow minded".

  • Waffen SS Eastern Europe 1942-45 US Marines Afganistan 2003-2008

    Counter Insurgency history repeating itself

  • Actually-crazymrlee- the Russians fell far behind China during the first world war.

    somewhere close to 60million

  • I can not understand how anybody can defend the SS.I am a lot older than you are and I have seen what the SS did too so many first hand and I have seen war all I can say is if anybody can say good things about the SS or war you know nothing.

  • youre a friggin baby boomer who was born after the war wtf are you talking about

    SS defended alot of eastern European countries against the commies

    i have no time for your biased american ass that thinks its knows everything

  • Dude, if you are going to use an ethnic slur, at least spell it correctly. Oh, I forgot, supermen don't need to spell, they have their slave races do all that for them.