Added: 2 years ago
From: AmericanNewsProject
Views: 7,067
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (68)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love Geithner's face when she keeps on. I would love to know what he was thinking when she kept asking what in the constitution gave him the power.

  • @mystiquie I'm not saying I love the Fed, but it's not unconstitutional. The egislative branch (Congress) legally established it, and they could just as easily abolish it if they wanted to.

  • Barney is a Jewish operative

  • Barney Frank is not in favor of a thorough investigation. His slant towards homosexuality is evident is his abrupt denial of Michelle Bachman's request that Tim Giethner answer her last question. Instead he rambles about rules, for as long as it would have taken Giethner to answer the question. Barney Frank has been bought.

  • Truly a waste of talent.

    Michelle Bachman would have been a great porn star.

  • SMACKDOWN!

    Palin/Bachmann 2012

  • Bachmann for prez!

  • Very well put Michele Bachmann. Thank you for standing up for our freedom & constitution. 40,000 showed up today in Washington DC on Nov. 5th on a work day, at a moments notice, no busing in people and I know dozens more than wished they could be there. So proud. The truth is if we continue to spend, all the people who think they are getting something from this tax & spend will find they are more poor than ever and there will be no rich, no middle class to help them. The dollar will be gone.

  • It was unconstitutional. Most of what government does today is unconstitutional. The constitution gives specific and limited power to do specific activites such as: run a post office, build roads, regulated interstate commerce, etc. This is not within their power. Unfortunately we have not been living within the confines of the constitution for a long period of time. The progressives in the early 1900 had control over all branches of government and alot got though.

  • How can one person be so stupid. Does she even know how this government works??

  • Obviously, the lady understands how this government works. Put your partisan hat off to the side. In fact, over 300 members of the House co-sponsored a bill to audit the Federal Reserve. Since there are only 178 Republicans, CLEARLY there is a great deal of curiosity on both ends of the political spectrum on this and similar issues--such as are discussed in this clip. Try not to be an ass. Try thinking.

  • When she says "What provision in the constitution gives you authority etc.", she shows that she has no understanding of the constitution. One thing it does is give the legislative branch (congress) power to pass law, like The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which gave them the power to do everything they've done thus far.

    Her question is as ridiculous as going up to a police officer and asking him "Officer, what part of provision constitution allows you to give me a speeding ticket?"

  • It is not ridiculous. He takes an oath to the constitution and the congress passes unconstitutional laws all the time. He needs to look to the constitution first and then interpret the law and determine if the law is unconstitutional.

  • @JoF00l The Federal Reserve Act was and is unconstitutional ans this is what she is getting at! The Federal Reserve is owned and controlled by foreign Interest which in itself is Reason to Negate the Fed and all of their past dealing and demand remedy for the Fraud and the continuing Criminal Enterprise (RICO)

  • Congress has the same power to repeal the act and abolish the Federal Reserve if they want to.

    This video shows she's either incredibly ignorant on how our Government functions, or she's just playing to the crowd that wants to use the Federal Reserve and the Secretary as a scape goat for something we all share blame for.

    and for the record, I have no hat to take off, I'm a registered independent.

  • Estevinyo....uh you are wrong. Government always considers the Constitution first and foremost! It is the first thing that has to be considered...always. It is PRIMARY MANDATORY AUTHORITY. If you don't know what that means, then look it up in a legal dictionary.

    And to Link, same answer to you. Also, she wasn't asking a question people, she was backing those dumb fuckers into a corner to see if they knew the correct answer.

    She's one smart cookie, I don't care what anyone thinks!

  • The reason he doesn't seem to understand the question is because our overlords live on a different level, they never consider the Constitution, (ie. limitations on their power). As long as Congress votes for something, it is legally, politically, morally justified. If they do something in the name of the "common good" or "public safety" then the ends always justify the means and everything is irrelevant. These people act with all the impunity of the House of Lords and British Kings.

  • The only thing I agree with his Bernanke's statement "I don't know where 10 trillion dollars comes from". Exactly. Where does it come from? That's the point. What a disaster this administration has become.

  • link, there is no authority in the Constitution that allows Congress to delegate away their powers, nor is there any authority to grants charters of incorporations, and in fact, powers of incorporations had been discussed at the Constitutional Convention and were REJECTED.

    The FED is illegal, unconstitutional, and a failure.

  • Comment removed

  • First off, the Supreme Court is completely fraudulent and should be recognized as such and ignored by the States. 

    Secondly, the States have final say in what is Constitutional, not the federal government.

    Thirdly, discussions for powers of incorporations were discussed at the Constitutional Convention and were REJECTED, hence, they have no power to incorporate in the States.

    And lastly, Mr. John Marshall has made his decision, now lets see him enforce it.

  • Also, in McCullock v. MD.....Marshall used the commerce clause, which says, 'regulate'...it doesn't say provide, it doesn't say force, it says 'regulate'

    Also, Marshall used the necessary and proper clause and said it granted implied powers, which is an extention of Hamiltons implied powers thoery.

    Also, the necessary and proper clause says to carry into the 'foregoing powers' not the 'implied powers'

    So basically, the Supreme Court is completely fraudulent and so is the implied powers

  • We are going to have to undo a great deal of what the activist, uberliberal, freedom-sucking courts have done during the 20th century.

  • Wow I can't believe how uninformed not only she is but also how many fools on here that are just as ignorant. YOU HAVE IT EXACTLY RIGHT! THANK YOU!! THE AUTHORITY OF CONGRESS "The Legislative Branch" or Congress=(THIS MORON IS A PART OF) passed the "Legislation" giving The Fed their authority! So they answer her correctly and she repeats her same question like a broken record. God HELP U.S. I REALLY PRAY! And THANK YOU link5280 for showing me there are some beacons of "INFORMED" HOPE!!

  • Link, you're clearly a lemming. Get the facts before making a comment.

  • Clearly, you are not bright. Get the facts before making a comment.

  • Comment removed

  • i love his face! constitution? whats that? the congress said i could do it i don't have to obey the constitution

  • suddenly everything has to pass some imaginary constitutional test.

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

    i cant believe this woman is anything more than a mcdonalds cashier.

  • Must you be so vitriolic? The Constitution is the supreme law of our land and the charter for the powers of the Federal Government. Is asking honest questions about how what the Federal Government is doing relates to the Constitution a bad thing, somehow--much less something to insult the Congresswoman over?

  • owned

  • none of these loons in the obama administration know what the fuck they're doing...barney frank is the perfect example of a typical radical left-wing hypocrite who makes me ashamed of being gay...the end is near y'all (hint hint global currency)

  • Tax cheat Geithner completely contradicts himself in his first sentence and can't answer her Constitution question. Where did the 10 Trillion come from? These morons aren't even keeping track.

  • I love how she takes off her glasses...You GO, girl ! Barney Frank had to come in to save the day. When is he, Chris Dodd and the others going to get grilled for being the overseers of this financial mess?

  • Barney Frank is a stupid fuck

  • That seems like a stupid rule--you can't get your answer?

  • I strongly suspect that if Nero sounded like Elmer Fudd he would be a dead ringer for Barney Frank....

  • Watch Bernanke's eyes when he says he is against a global currency.

    Lieing scum bag.

  • I noticed that as well, he would make a horrible poker player

  • @mnemeth1 Listen to the question again! She is asking both of them if they would reject going to an international currency and away from the dollar, not if they are in favor of staying with the dollar. The Fed's object is to destroy the dollar by transferring its worth to the banks. Since 1913, 96% of the value of the dollar has been lost to inflation. Things are not getting expensive, it's the value of the dollar that is dropping. Open your eyes! See the Fall of the Republic on UTube.

  • Barney is a disgusting creature the needs to be removed. Sick creation running our country.

    Barney should have shout his mouth and let the little boy G try an answer. Though if he did you would have heard more grap out of Geitner's mouth. Stuff the Obama people love to hear

  • Thomas Jefferson said national banks are more dangerous than a standing army. Geithner look on his face when she said the Constitutional. " What is the Constitution a thought we got rid of that pesky thing a long time ago when Obama was elected." To devalue the American dollar was their plan all along. One world currency is their goal even if they say it or not.

  • Elmer Fudd there sticks up for his partners in crime every time...that wascally sthnake...

  • Barney Frank is an ass. Dethpite the time exthpiring, he thould have allowed for anthering the quethtion.

  • Geithner doesn't even understand the Constitutional question - "the laws of the land"? What is that? A second grade civics class answer?

  • Notice, at around 3 minutes in he says "YOUR government was left with no options". He isn't apart of OUR government? Also, nice job flip-flopping on the whole renouncing an international currency, you traitor.

  • Your right and bernake has repeatedly stated before this hearing that he was against it.. obama... the antichrist lol

  • Antichrist? Heavens, no--I'm a Christian and I think that's impossible. The book of Revelations says that the Antichrist would be Roman--I.E. he would be from some place that was once in the Roman Empire. Obama is an American.

    Is Obama a scumbag? Can't say for sure. So far, looks like it. Either that or he's just a Machiavellian who earnestly and foolishly believes he's doing the right thing.

  • It's sad , even the dumbest can interpret sarcasm. Why do you talk? Even still, im doubtful you actually read the bible. Its clear you haven't , to me , it looks as though you watch youtube videos about revelations and than post stupid comments.

  • I have read Revelations, actually--and no, I do not watch youtube videos about revelations as you say. Forgive me for not being able to tell sarcasm over the internet where I cannot pick up on subtle hints such as inflection of voice and such, but I've actually heard too many people seriously saying that Obama was the Antichrist so I thought you were doing the same.

    Must you be so condescending, though? Even if I did err, what does insulting me help?

  • Wow. Why is this nitwit on a committtee?

  • Hey Barney you thief. I wanted an answer to that question.

  • Bachmann, you don't know Jack. You're about to.

    You can't handle the truth.

    Who's gonna fix this, you? George bomb camel jockeys Bush? Barney give away mortgages Frank?

    I have neither time nor temerity, to explain myself to people whose fortunes rise & fall on my ability to print money & get banks lending, & then criticize the very Congressionally granted program I am executing. I would just rather you said thank you & moved on. In the meantime, I don't care WHAT you think."

  • Astoundingly stupid question. She clearly knows nothing about the power provided to Congress (of which she is a member!) under Article I of the Constitution, such as the power to spend under the spending clause and to regulate interstate commerce under the commerce clause. It's not enough to just vent public rage; politicians should be expected to actually KNOW something. What a dope.

  • She didnt vote for any of this..

  • What makes you think she doesn't know the answer to her own question?????

    She wanted to see if the elf knew it.

  • Geithner said "no" to world currency here but said today that he would consider it. He needs to go!

  • does anyone notice that everyone there has had botox

  • Yeah - hit 'em in the head with The Constitution, hold a Tea Party and start the Revolution.

  • OH MY GOD!!! I did not get to the end before commenting! I was not ready for that... Very upsetting.

  • "Stigma" is a problem you lying cheat!!!

  • time was up! ya right!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more