Comet Lovejoy sank G cosmology. Check mate. Mnmeth1 rules, religious dogmatic g cosmologists drool. One of the main things killing the US is the lack of the question why. Asking why until you get the answer is the basis of all knowledge. Why do people accept what they have been told without question ? Why ? Why ? Why ? G is dead ,why do the masses not deal with it ?
I'm going with---you never took post secondary studies in Astronomy/Cosmology/Astrophysics---you have not read the works of the current leading scientists in these fields--you never bothered to look through accurate scientific sites--you don't understand that 'we don't know yet' is an acceptable answer--you don't realize/care how scientifically illiterate and silly you sound in this video. WHY? Go to the library, go to university, take some Astronomy courses, do iin-depth research---WHY NOT?
@doyoulookup I think the point he is trying to get at is that instead of them saying "We don't know yet", they are making assumptions and often running with those assumptions. Then more ideas are built off those assumptions. You know what they say about assumptions right? Ass u me
I got your Jupiter emitting radio waves right here: Jupiter is a brown dwarf star along with Saturn. You're not gonna read THAT in a mainstream journal!
Lol...Wikipedia: ocean tides, and try to find some newtonian or einstein description for why they oscillate... you will understand something is very strange... I smell a scientific revolution... Einstein and Newton and the vast majority of the scientific world are DEAD WRONG concerning gravity.
Simple answer to the fully formed galaxies at the edge of the universe, light can only travel a finite distance. Doesn't mean the universe didn't have a start point, but it's like we can only see to the horizon and if we went over the horizon we would see it would go for billions or even trillions more light years.
Has it ever occurred to you that the scientific community would like to know the answers to some of these questions as well? Unlike you, however, they actually do research into finding the answer. You sit behind your keyboard, trolling.
Science took a wrong turn with the belief in the void. Descartes theory of gravity is the correct theory. But its always describes as "push." People don't realize the implications of a "non-void" universe. its about the push AND pull. It all can be explained with the Bernoulli principle.
Got some to add...Why there is a hexagon in the clouds of Saturn at the North pole? You can't explain it, and yet an alternate explanation that explain it perfectly is ignored. Why?
Explain why sunspots peak at the same latitude as hurricanes form on the Earth, as the great Red Spot of Jupiter, as the bands in the Clouds of Saturn, as the Kilauea volcano, as Olympus Mons, as the spots on Uranus and Neptune. Why? The theory that explains the hexagon also explains this, but your ignore it. Why?
The reason why Hubble Telescope showed the galaxies near the extents of the visible universe to be full grown is because when an EM wave collapses the information of the source(it's appearance) is instantly transmitted to the observer/detector via quantum entanglement. No time takes place from when the observer collapses the wave to when the source is viewed. There is no way to see into the past by looking into space. Light is not a photon, it is an electromagnetic wave to potentially be viewed.
this video is awesome!! I,m glad somebody Finally uploaded this because this is just how I feel! and your right too" these guys just want funding and statist they just want to be IMPORTANT!~and their not!~ their always fighting with religious freaks but their not so different themselfs! & no I,m not at all religious" but the science community is just like religion they keep things in science because their scared to see that it is WRONG! thank you very much for posting this video its GREAT!!!
These scientists need to drop the egos at the door, and man up and get back to doing SCIENCE! These creations of black holes,quasars,neutron stars,ice comets are all nonsense and electric/plasma universe explains what they are observing without creating bosons and the rest of their absurd claims.They need to get rid of this standard model they use because theyre just sinking themselves deeper into mathmatical quicksand.It is completely ridiculous that this is allowed to continue...
Using magnetic fields for energy would be admitting we have infinite free energy and there is no need for "explosion" energy(fossil fuels,nuclear) which is how they control this planet.Using magnetic fields for energy is "Implosion" technology and is free and CLEAN! John Searl created the SEG.Clean safe implosion technology using magnetic fields that generate a continual motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings that in turn produce electrical currents
Hmm, I tried to give straight answers and they were marked as spam. So... do you want to know why or don't you? Do you want to discuss / debate these things or don't you?
Q.1 & 3 - it's never been seriously suggested that frame-dragging or gravitational waves must be visible by these experiments. And they haven't been conclusively seen. Is that unreasonable?
Q.2 The pioneer anomaly has been investigated, openly, in many ways. Question: "it cannot be explained; I'd like to know why." So far science has no definitive answer. If they admit that they don't have a definitive answer to something, what's the sense in demanding to know why and then calling them a liar?
If the questioner is sincere in his questions then there are some good things for serious discussion here.
If he is just smugly and slimily revelling in accumulating accusational rhetoric to use to push his own ideology that scientists are liars, then that's disingenuous and hollow and pretty low.
I'm curious to see why anyone would see anything in the actual content (rather than the tone) of any of these questions that implicates astrophysicists in a coverup.
Excellent analysis brother. My website also debunks all of this quakcademic garbage in great detail: Free energy and Free Thinking
feandft dot com
Quackademia is corporateowned slave psyence and nothing more. The reason being that energy barons, war mongers and central bankers profit grealty from this system of planetary slavery imposed by lying quackademicians!
Thanks for having the courage to stand up to the mind control freaks who run this planetary racket! Much Respect
Google "mainstream cosmology" and see the first search result. The article is titled "Challenging the groupthink of mainstream cosmology". I have mentioned the erroneous concept of magnetic re-connection in there.
Why? why? Why?! you sound like a whiny 7 year old kid. Why don't you get off your ass and do your own research and find out the answers to your questions yourself, instead of inferring that the entire astronomical community is trying to hide these "important" questions from you. geez
@JRCrowley - Do you know 'why' he's asking? Because frankly there are too many rumours out there that mix up all these possibilities (I know hardly anything about astronomy, so don't think I know what I'm talking about ;P). Sometimes it is just easier to ask and wait for knowledgeable people to make feedback.
So when magnetic fields collapse due to the interruption of the currents that produce them, they do not "break" or "merge" and "recombine" as some uninformed astronomers have claimed (e.g., see the quote regarding the mainstream concerns above - in 4. Acceleration of the Solar "Wind" Ions). The field simply collapses (very quickly!). On the Sun this collapse releases a tremendous amount of energy, and matter is thrown out away from the surface - as with any explosively rapid reaction.
Juergens' Electric Sun model - the realization that our Sun functions electrically - that it is a huge electrically charged, relatively quiescent, sphere of ionized gas that supports an electric plasma arc discharge on its surface and is powered by subtle currents that move throughout the now well known tenuous plasma that fills our galaxy.
Stuff like that (and some) is why I didn't go to school. Better to dwell upon my own thought's; being tentative and inquiring from early in life. As a piece of augmented ex stardust you get a gut feeling for these things. A big bang; sure, one of many local events. The big bang; I don't think so. A typical human yearning for another epicycle; a god sized lactating dummy upon which to suck; wanting a definition of an indeteterminate unbound universe.
may i suggest a new name for the dying theory of big bang cosmology? in reference to some of the newer theories intended only to prop up an already horribly flawed theory, i proprose that big bang cosmology shall from this point forward be called "dark theory." all in favor say aye!
While there are certainly many unanswered questions about the universe, and your contention regarding the "science game" probably holds water, I believe there must still be many scientists that are truly concerned about advancing our knowledge and will not compromise their integrity. In addition, whenever we criticize ideas that are in place, we should be prepared to supplant them with others that better explain our observations.
Yeah, it's funny, those pulsar researchers from Princeton won the Nobel Prize in physics (1993?) for discovering gravity waves, but they weren't even empirically verified, ha ha ha! Welcome to prestigious academia!
NASA.... quote Bob Dean: Never A Straight Answer... how true... but actually they do have the answers.... they are using Taxpayers money and grant funding to explore and travel the universe and work on time travel... and they are using the natural energy sources that the earth has to get what they want... and making Man use carbon based fuels that damage earth so that they can stay powerful in their knowledge leaving the rest of us in the dark.... Sad but True....
If you really want to know why NASA does not study space science very well, look up a video called the Saturnalia Cult Exposed.
The guys are pagans, satanists, and they believe their demon friends are trapped on Saturn, I kid you not. I didn't say I believed in this, I said they believe in this. Saturn is their goal, everything else is moot.
It is really unfortunate that folks like that exist to give plasma cosmology a bad name. Although, it isn't entirely different than some folks that use standard cosmological theory to postulate the existence of alternate universes and time travel. The Saturnalia folks are just plain crazy and shouldn't detract from the rational scientists who actually work on real science in plasma cosmology
5 Gravity reacting to the liquid, highly magnetic photosphere of the sun.
6 5% of visible surface ice is a lot when you think of the powdered ice mixed with nano particle sized dust.
7 magnetic fields are used to do many things look at your speakers. No one would want to go out in space to catch some stray solar plasma when we have enough photons hitting the earth we don't use anyhow.
8 by looking at the age of this photo your guy's science probably didn't include satellites
A comet will eject plasma Because The Denser Elements Will shoot straight to the Center of the sun.
Also our sun is Hotter in the Center Because the Process of fusion is Turning denser and denser objects into New elements Each heavier element requires More Heat and Energy to Fuse
It seems to me that if you really wanted answers to these questions, you'd ask a little more nicely without hurling insults at the very people that can answer them for you by telling them they are fill of horse sh**.
Therefore it seems like more of a rant than a true seeking of knowledge. If you ever rally do decide you want any of these questions answered, you might try asking them a little more nicely next time.
You highlight many agreed cosmological problems. Worth remembering achivment of standard model, there amazing! Keep pointing to it's major problems, where we need to look most. I have respect for most of science and method. Agreed, were all human and blinkered, however, demanding answerers where real confusion exists and conspiracy beliefs etc take from your real issues
2 math error, gas leak, or what I think, since it passed the outer planets, their gravity is now pulling it back towards the sun slightly more than expected.
3 Gravitational waves are a wave they are not an object Just like a wave of water is not a different substance than water. Gravity is a wave of space time. There is no difference between acceleration and gravity.
4 comets getting brighter can only mean that they were being hit by more photons
@GodKillerAtheist No, gravitational lensing is evidence, not proof, thus the satellite experiments. Remember a proof has to be testable & repeatable by experimentation, lensing does not fit that criteria, hence it's not proof of frame dragging. Which then begs the question why the satellite experiments which were designed to prove frame-dragging by experimentation did not test positive?
Remember the michaelson-morley experiment didn't test positive as well & as a result ether physics was dead.
@GodKillerAtheist And? There are also comments as recent as a couple of days old, but if you dont want to comment on the subject any longer that's cool with me.
@ThruTheUnknown you're correct it's evidence and not proof Lensing is repeatable by experimentation I'm doing it now with my drinking glass. Frame dragging is established by the general theory of relativity.The Michaelson-Morley experiment from the 1800's was surpassed by the Gravity Probe B launched in 2004. A simple Wikipedia search would tell you that Michaelson-Morley experiment is also referred to as the Most famous "failed" experiment. Try a simple Google search next time smart ass.
@GodKillerAtheist Ether physics was dead long before probe b & there are inconsistencies with wiki as it says the michaelson-morley experiment wasn't movitation for einstein yet the "failed experiment" reference says at 26 years old it was a basis for his relativity. Kind of funny how for something that was a failed experiment I got taught about it in 1st year university physics & not probe B, oh could it be due to the fact the probe b failed to detect frame-dragging.
@GodKillerAtheist There are inconsistencies with the mainstream scientific theories of phyiscs that are known and up-held I suggest you take a look into them. mnemeth1 own webpage is a good start goo . gl / T3UYz. Further I am not trying to be a smart ass no need for ad-hominems just trying to provide rebutable that all is not necessarily right with physics and to get you to have an open mind about it, that's all.
Well done, bro! And for those of you who DO want some plausible answers rooted in real world physics, search 'cosmology quest 2' right here at YouTube ;)
Comet Lovejoy sank G cosmology. Check mate. Mnmeth1 rules, religious dogmatic g cosmologists drool. One of the main things killing the US is the lack of the question why. Asking why until you get the answer is the basis of all knowledge. Why do people accept what they have been told without question ? Why ? Why ? Why ? G is dead ,why do the masses not deal with it ?
nodice4me 1 month ago
The Electric Universe Rules!
bocin1 3 months ago
I'm going with---you never took post secondary studies in Astronomy/Cosmology/Astrophysics---you have not read the works of the current leading scientists in these fields--you never bothered to look through accurate scientific sites--you don't understand that 'we don't know yet' is an acceptable answer--you don't realize/care how scientifically illiterate and silly you sound in this video. WHY? Go to the library, go to university, take some Astronomy courses, do iin-depth research---WHY NOT?
doyoulookup 3 months ago
@doyoulookup I think the point he is trying to get at is that instead of them saying "We don't know yet", they are making assumptions and often running with those assumptions. Then more ideas are built off those assumptions. You know what they say about assumptions right? Ass u me
jbourg333 3 months ago
I got your Jupiter emitting radio waves right here: Jupiter is a brown dwarf star along with Saturn. You're not gonna read THAT in a mainstream journal!
MrWolynski 4 months ago
Lol...Wikipedia: ocean tides, and try to find some newtonian or einstein description for why they oscillate... you will understand something is very strange... I smell a scientific revolution... Einstein and Newton and the vast majority of the scientific world are DEAD WRONG concerning gravity.
MrWolynski 4 months ago
Awesome video!! Ha..Ha..Funny!!!
bigaltattoo32 6 months ago
Dude, you sound like a complete dick when asking these questions. WHY?
euroq 6 months ago 2
Twin Opposing Vortexes and Misconceptions of Space:
watch?v=v_PQnsxW56Q
Some of the work of Walter Russell, Dewey B Larson, Dr. Keshava Bhat, Ed Leedskalnin, Viktor Schauberger and more.
Einstein never heard of Walter Russell.
Nikola Tesla told him to lock away many of his ideas for the next 1000 years until Humanity was ready.
I personally couldn't wait that long.
:o)
TheRealVerbz 6 months ago
Simple answer to the fully formed galaxies at the edge of the universe, light can only travel a finite distance. Doesn't mean the universe didn't have a start point, but it's like we can only see to the horizon and if we went over the horizon we would see it would go for billions or even trillions more light years.
nekroneko 6 months ago
Has it ever occurred to you that the scientific community would like to know the answers to some of these questions as well? Unlike you, however, they actually do research into finding the answer. You sit behind your keyboard, trolling.
andrewthompson10 6 months ago 2
You captured my feelings 100%, you definitely have you finger on the pulse of the next generation of revolution.
orrerystar 7 months ago 3
I agree 100%.
Science took a wrong turn with the belief in the void. Descartes theory of gravity is the correct theory. But its always describes as "push." People don't realize the implications of a "non-void" universe. its about the push AND pull. It all can be explained with the Bernoulli principle.
thefranciswatts 8 months ago
Got some to add...Why there is a hexagon in the clouds of Saturn at the North pole? You can't explain it, and yet an alternate explanation that explain it perfectly is ignored. Why?
Explain why sunspots peak at the same latitude as hurricanes form on the Earth, as the great Red Spot of Jupiter, as the bands in the Clouds of Saturn, as the Kilauea volcano, as Olympus Mons, as the spots on Uranus and Neptune. Why? The theory that explains the hexagon also explains this, but your ignore it. Why?
kwyjibo33 8 months ago
Great thank you so much. I hope some astronomers watch this and start rethinking fundamentals such as the standard model. Gluons...funny invention.^^
okuma1618 8 months ago
He's asking excellent questions... many of which might scare some in the astronomical community.
terr547 8 months ago
The reason why Hubble Telescope showed the galaxies near the extents of the visible universe to be full grown is because when an EM wave collapses the information of the source(it's appearance) is instantly transmitted to the observer/detector via quantum entanglement. No time takes place from when the observer collapses the wave to when the source is viewed. There is no way to see into the past by looking into space. Light is not a photon, it is an electromagnetic wave to potentially be viewed.
GateMessenger 8 months ago
this video is awesome!! I,m glad somebody Finally uploaded this because this is just how I feel! and your right too" these guys just want funding and statist they just want to be IMPORTANT!~and their not!~ their always fighting with religious freaks but their not so different themselfs! & no I,m not at all religious" but the science community is just like religion they keep things in science because their scared to see that it is WRONG! thank you very much for posting this video its GREAT!!!
55painterman 8 months ago
These scientists need to drop the egos at the door, and man up and get back to doing SCIENCE! These creations of black holes,quasars,neutron stars,ice comets are all nonsense and electric/plasma universe explains what they are observing without creating bosons and the rest of their absurd claims.They need to get rid of this standard model they use because theyre just sinking themselves deeper into mathmatical quicksand.It is completely ridiculous that this is allowed to continue...
InfiniteNeuron 9 months ago
Using magnetic fields for energy would be admitting we have infinite free energy and there is no need for "explosion" energy(fossil fuels,nuclear) which is how they control this planet.Using magnetic fields for energy is "Implosion" technology and is free and CLEAN! John Searl created the SEG.Clean safe implosion technology using magnetic fields that generate a continual motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings that in turn produce electrical currents
InfiniteNeuron 9 months ago
Nice...time to shatter the beliefs of Psyence! It has become a freakin religion! Nice Vid!
mattpresti 10 months ago 2
Hmm, I tried to give straight answers and they were marked as spam. So... do you want to know why or don't you? Do you want to discuss / debate these things or don't you?
TheBobathon 10 months ago
Comment removed
TheBobathon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Q.1 & 3 - it's never been seriously suggested that frame-dragging or gravitational waves must be visible by these experiments. And they haven't been conclusively seen. Is that unreasonable?
Q.2 The pioneer anomaly has been investigated, openly, in many ways. Question: "it cannot be explained; I'd like to know why." So far science has no definitive answer. If they admit that they don't have a definitive answer to something, what's the sense in demanding to know why and then calling them a liar?
TheBobathon 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lots of good why questions.
If the questioner is sincere in his questions then there are some good things for serious discussion here.
If he is just smugly and slimily revelling in accumulating accusational rhetoric to use to push his own ideology that scientists are liars, then that's disingenuous and hollow and pretty low.
I'm curious to see why anyone would see anything in the actual content (rather than the tone) of any of these questions that implicates astrophysicists in a coverup.
TheBobathon 10 months ago
Answers : in the works of Walter Russell
twohseven 10 months ago
Excellent analysis brother. My website also debunks all of this quakcademic garbage in great detail: Free energy and Free Thinking
feandft dot com
Quackademia is corporateowned slave psyence and nothing more. The reason being that energy barons, war mongers and central bankers profit grealty from this system of planetary slavery imposed by lying quackademicians!
Thanks for having the courage to stand up to the mind control freaks who run this planetary racket! Much Respect
77GSlinger 10 months ago
Google "mainstream cosmology" and see the first search result. The article is titled "Challenging the groupthink of mainstream cosmology". I have mentioned the erroneous concept of magnetic re-connection in there.
Thanks Michael for making this important video.
PersianPaladin 10 months ago
Regarding the "Einstein Cross" - anyone seen a "Sun dog" lately?
Fluctuations in the media will account for variations..
Kenzofeis 11 months ago
NASA is busy creating a taxpayer black hole while searching for nonexistent answers to crackpot theories. WHY???
y2knoproblem 11 months ago
Why? why? Why?! you sound like a whiny 7 year old kid. Why don't you get off your ass and do your own research and find out the answers to your questions yourself, instead of inferring that the entire astronomical community is trying to hide these "important" questions from you. geez
JRCrowley 1 year ago
@JRCrowley - Do you know 'why' he's asking? Because frankly there are too many rumours out there that mix up all these possibilities (I know hardly anything about astronomy, so don't think I know what I'm talking about ;P). Sometimes it is just easier to ask and wait for knowledgeable people to make feedback.
AmH032uTuBe 1 year ago
So when magnetic fields collapse due to the interruption of the currents that produce them, they do not "break" or "merge" and "recombine" as some uninformed astronomers have claimed (e.g., see the quote regarding the mainstream concerns above - in 4. Acceleration of the Solar "Wind" Ions). The field simply collapses (very quickly!). On the Sun this collapse releases a tremendous amount of energy, and matter is thrown out away from the surface - as with any explosively rapid reaction.
YouriCarma 1 year ago
@YouriCarma Back EMF in plasma streamers?
Kenzofeis 11 months ago
Juergens' Electric Sun model - the realization that our Sun functions electrically - that it is a huge electrically charged, relatively quiescent, sphere of ionized gas that supports an electric plasma arc discharge on its surface and is powered by subtle currents that move throughout the now well known tenuous plasma that fills our galaxy.
YouriCarma 1 year ago
Also check out the The Electric Sun Hypothesis.
YouriCarma 1 year ago
The Sun is not a solid object but is a plasma in my idea. Check out Paul LaViolette who maybe have some answers.
YouriCarma 1 year ago
Dear Michael
Stuff like that (and some) is why I didn't go to school. Better to dwell upon my own thought's; being tentative and inquiring from early in life. As a piece of augmented ex stardust you get a gut feeling for these things. A big bang; sure, one of many local events. The big bang; I don't think so. A typical human yearning for another epicycle; a god sized lactating dummy upon which to suck; wanting a definition of an indeteterminate unbound universe.
Yours sincerely,
Luke Coulson.
LukeCoulson 1 year ago
Good for you :)
MsPennyDrop 1 year ago
Yes, why to go, Mnemeth! You tell them!
EltonJThe 1 year ago
may i suggest a new name for the dying theory of big bang cosmology? in reference to some of the newer theories intended only to prop up an already horribly flawed theory, i proprose that big bang cosmology shall from this point forward be called "dark theory." all in favor say aye!
mccliffton 1 year ago 3
@mccliffton aye!
niminiminimnim 10 months ago
While there are certainly many unanswered questions about the universe, and your contention regarding the "science game" probably holds water, I believe there must still be many scientists that are truly concerned about advancing our knowledge and will not compromise their integrity. In addition, whenever we criticize ideas that are in place, we should be prepared to supplant them with others that better explain our observations.
balimbula 1 year ago
I agree with mnemeth1.
woodster2k1 1 year ago
Yeah, it's funny, those pulsar researchers from Princeton won the Nobel Prize in physics (1993?) for discovering gravity waves, but they weren't even empirically verified, ha ha ha! Welcome to prestigious academia!
AntimatterRadio 1 year ago
NASA.... quote Bob Dean: Never A Straight Answer... how true... but actually they do have the answers.... they are using Taxpayers money and grant funding to explore and travel the universe and work on time travel... and they are using the natural energy sources that the earth has to get what they want... and making Man use carbon based fuels that damage earth so that they can stay powerful in their knowledge leaving the rest of us in the dark.... Sad but True....
trishanne1 1 year ago
Video sent to AndromedasWake the "big" youtube cosmologist
colloredbrothers 1 year ago
Holy shit, if this isn't pwnage to the fullest!
colloredbrothers 1 year ago 6
3:38 owns.
eskuAdradit0 1 year ago
If you really want to know why NASA does not study space science very well, look up a video called the Saturnalia Cult Exposed.
The guys are pagans, satanists, and they believe their demon friends are trapped on Saturn, I kid you not. I didn't say I believed in this, I said they believe in this. Saturn is their goal, everything else is moot.
Nyhee7 1 year ago
@Nyhee7
It is really unfortunate that folks like that exist to give plasma cosmology a bad name. Although, it isn't entirely different than some folks that use standard cosmological theory to postulate the existence of alternate universes and time travel. The Saturnalia folks are just plain crazy and shouldn't detract from the rational scientists who actually work on real science in plasma cosmology
0rthogonal 1 year ago
5 Gravity reacting to the liquid, highly magnetic photosphere of the sun.
6 5% of visible surface ice is a lot when you think of the powdered ice mixed with nano particle sized dust.
7 magnetic fields are used to do many things look at your speakers. No one would want to go out in space to catch some stray solar plasma when we have enough photons hitting the earth we don't use anyhow.
8 by looking at the age of this photo your guy's science probably didn't include satellites
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
A comet will eject plasma Because The Denser Elements Will shoot straight to the Center of the sun.
Also our sun is Hotter in the Center Because the Process of fusion is Turning denser and denser objects into New elements Each heavier element requires More Heat and Energy to Fuse
lollipopbrigade 2 years ago
It seems to me that if you really wanted answers to these questions, you'd ask a little more nicely without hurling insults at the very people that can answer them for you by telling them they are fill of horse sh**.
Therefore it seems like more of a rant than a true seeking of knowledge. If you ever rally do decide you want any of these questions answered, you might try asking them a little more nicely next time.
acegregory 2 years ago
uh what a poor excuse PLEASE please me first because i am the important one BULLSHIT they get payed answer
jokinaroun100 2 years ago
could you please answer these questions?
mccliffton 2 years ago
I give you answers: we have no clue but nobody is interested in admitting our ignorance. It would generate doubts.
You know "Minority report"? Same...
Oh you forgot, among unproven theories, the accretion disk. It's just a theory.
Congratulations for your work and thanks! Keep in touch!
fabbio8888 2 years ago
You highlight many agreed cosmological problems. Worth remembering achivment of standard model, there amazing! Keep pointing to it's major problems, where we need to look most. I have respect for most of science and method. Agreed, were all human and blinkered, however, demanding answerers where real confusion exists and conspiracy beliefs etc take from your real issues
insectboy0 2 years ago
Nice one!!!
ukandrius 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololyousuck
TwingeckoPPTP 2 years ago
1 Gravitational lensing proves frame dragging.
2 math error, gas leak, or what I think, since it passed the outer planets, their gravity is now pulling it back towards the sun slightly more than expected.
3 Gravitational waves are a wave they are not an object Just like a wave of water is not a different substance than water. Gravity is a wave of space time. There is no difference between acceleration and gravity.
4 comets getting brighter can only mean that they were being hit by more photons
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist fake
nevertodienever 1 year ago
@nevertodienever fake what? Fake questions? fake who?
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist im sorry i meant the answers are correct
nevertodienever 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist No, gravitational lensing is evidence, not proof, thus the satellite experiments. Remember a proof has to be testable & repeatable by experimentation, lensing does not fit that criteria, hence it's not proof of frame dragging. Which then begs the question why the satellite experiments which were designed to prove frame-dragging by experimentation did not test positive?
Remember the michaelson-morley experiment didn't test positive as well & as a result ether physics was dead.
ThruTheUnknown 10 months ago
@ThruTheUnknown Old thread friend over 1 year old now.
GodKillerAtheist 10 months ago
@GodKillerAtheist And? There are also comments as recent as a couple of days old, but if you dont want to comment on the subject any longer that's cool with me.
ThruTheUnknown 10 months ago
@ThruTheUnknown you're correct it's evidence and not proof Lensing is repeatable by experimentation I'm doing it now with my drinking glass. Frame dragging is established by the general theory of relativity.The Michaelson-Morley experiment from the 1800's was surpassed by the Gravity Probe B launched in 2004. A simple Wikipedia search would tell you that Michaelson-Morley experiment is also referred to as the Most famous "failed" experiment. Try a simple Google search next time smart ass.
GodKillerAtheist 10 months ago
@GodKillerAtheist Ether physics was dead long before probe b & there are inconsistencies with wiki as it says the michaelson-morley experiment wasn't movitation for einstein yet the "failed experiment" reference says at 26 years old it was a basis for his relativity. Kind of funny how for something that was a failed experiment I got taught about it in 1st year university physics & not probe B, oh could it be due to the fact the probe b failed to detect frame-dragging.
ThruTheUnknown 10 months ago
@GodKillerAtheist There are inconsistencies with the mainstream scientific theories of phyiscs that are known and up-held I suggest you take a look into them. mnemeth1 own webpage is a good start goo . gl / T3UYz. Further I am not trying to be a smart ass no need for ad-hominems just trying to provide rebutable that all is not necessarily right with physics and to get you to have an open mind about it, that's all.
ThruTheUnknown 10 months ago
@ThruTheUnknown I have an open mind. I also have a search engine I can confirm data with instead of just being credulous. Peace
GodKillerAtheist 10 months ago
Woops I didn't mean to reply to you HAHA sry
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
Your comet into the sun question... very stupid... Those two videos you showed... Notice same location? Maybe it's just a different camera!!!!!
In fact it is. LOOK IT UP! Go to soho's website and look for other comets...
The sun is very active too ya know!
alphatelescopii 2 years ago
Nice.
marneedear 2 years ago
look up "Astrotometry" here on youtube for some very in depth analysis of the CME / Sun grazing comet event.
lmaines 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
paranoia will destroy ya
CallahanSFPD 2 years ago
You accept what we dont know, and go back to a mud hut.
The answering of these questions are going to take us to another level of tec,
Tzunamii777 2 years ago
Comment removed
mkleban 2 years ago
Well done, bro! And for those of you who DO want some plausible answers rooted in real world physics, search 'cosmology quest 2' right here at YouTube ;)
mharratsc 2 years ago 4
I didn't know any of this and this has really made me think, the one that most interested me was the comet and the ejection one.
joecool280 2 years ago 3
Give them some pepper ^^
Kenzofeis 2 years ago
Great questions....Communicated very well.... when you get answers post them!
OtterPops22 2 years ago 2
Communicated very well? Why?
Do you always end your questions with the word "Why"? Why?
How old is your mother? Why?
Do you get the picture? Why?
WayneEdwardFrancis 2 years ago
Why is the most dangerous question.
Tzunamii777 2 years ago 4
Good point, but he didn't say why for 10 and 11 (which actually have answers)
alphatelescopii 2 years ago
@WayneEdwardFrancis
I may not be a genius, but even I know that Science's question is "Why?".
eskuAdradit0 1 year ago
Well put.
valeagrl1 2 years ago
What is NGC7603?
valeagrl1 2 years ago
you wont get any explanations because they have none, or rather they have none that they are willing to consider.
mccliffton 2 years ago 15
At the top, they have answers they dont want to share.
Tzunamii777 2 years ago 2
@mccliffton or to share with the group.
Deavitas 1 year ago
@Deavitas
what?
mccliffton 1 year ago