Dude Why would The U.S risk getting rid of it's nukes you must have a wish for the U.S to Fall. I see what your saying but there won't be world peace until all nations drop their weapons. It's just foolish to say that we should drop our own nuckes.
great video, if you need any help getting your video/channel exposed i use a site called mytubeviews . com It has helped 5 of my videos get ranked on the first pages.
Would you not agree that trying to prevent a war in that area of the world is a good thing?? Get realistic. The past 10 years the U.S Has been trying to negotiate with these lunatics in North Korea and it CLEARLY hasn't done anything.
This is by far the most ignorant video post I have ever seen. Study your history my friend. Do you know nothing about the Korean war? I guess not. Well, and the boarder that divides Korea and south korea there is a vast difference in society. South Korea is a free state, and an Ally of the United States. North Korea, is a Throw back communist countrty that oppreses it's people. If North Korea flexes such military muscle, it could ignite a war in that area of the world
thewastedlife.. i don't think arming with nukes is the answer to any problem. the more nukes there are the more chances for catastrophe not the other way around and you don't have to be in the country stricken to suffer health / economic effects. it goes beyond personal defense and just because Bush was the lamest president to serve doesn't mean after he's gone it gives excuse to continue to make retarded world decisions that effect innocent. lets not make the problem bigger than it is.
no offense but i don't think you looked into the matter enough. i partially agree with you but i don't know all sides of the issue myself. if the launch is to build up militarily it's subject to objection by any country not just the US. personally i'm against iraq war because of the cost and the US is doing too much world policing at cost of citizens. here we have a drug war just south of us with violence above what iraq had and we have our military engaged there. makes no sense.
Authority is derived from the 'barrel of a gun'. You often hear Americans refer to gun ownership as necessary to keep authority over their government from becoming tyranical against them yet these same people can't accept the rality that other countries feel the same way about that same government. I'm not saying N.K are nice guys, but those who go unprotected end up with bombs in their asses. ask the Iraqis. The attack on Iraq proved you better arm yourself with nukes, or else.
Dude Why would The U.S risk getting rid of it's nukes you must have a wish for the U.S to Fall. I see what your saying but there won't be world peace until all nations drop their weapons. It's just foolish to say that we should drop our own nuckes.
Powerlaws48 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great video, if you need any help getting your video/channel exposed i use a site called mytubeviews . com It has helped 5 of my videos get ranked on the first pages.
Thomas, Snellville, Ga
Drakedfzgfg 2 years ago
Would you not agree that trying to prevent a war in that area of the world is a good thing?? Get realistic. The past 10 years the U.S Has been trying to negotiate with these lunatics in North Korea and it CLEARLY hasn't done anything.
IslandersMets10 2 years ago
This is by far the most ignorant video post I have ever seen. Study your history my friend. Do you know nothing about the Korean war? I guess not. Well, and the boarder that divides Korea and south korea there is a vast difference in society. South Korea is a free state, and an Ally of the United States. North Korea, is a Throw back communist countrty that oppreses it's people. If North Korea flexes such military muscle, it could ignite a war in that area of the world
IslandersMets10 2 years ago
You can start with this if you like. Just wiki "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty"
shaybshay 2 years ago
thewastedlife.. i don't think arming with nukes is the answer to any problem. the more nukes there are the more chances for catastrophe not the other way around and you don't have to be in the country stricken to suffer health / economic effects. it goes beyond personal defense and just because Bush was the lamest president to serve doesn't mean after he's gone it gives excuse to continue to make retarded world decisions that effect innocent. lets not make the problem bigger than it is.
satanic6ritual 2 years ago
no offense but i don't think you looked into the matter enough. i partially agree with you but i don't know all sides of the issue myself. if the launch is to build up militarily it's subject to objection by any country not just the US. personally i'm against iraq war because of the cost and the US is doing too much world policing at cost of citizens. here we have a drug war just south of us with violence above what iraq had and we have our military engaged there. makes no sense.
satanic6ritual 2 years ago
shut up
jhumada 2 years ago
Authority is derived from the 'barrel of a gun'. You often hear Americans refer to gun ownership as necessary to keep authority over their government from becoming tyranical against them yet these same people can't accept the rality that other countries feel the same way about that same government. I'm not saying N.K are nice guys, but those who go unprotected end up with bombs in their asses. ask the Iraqis. The attack on Iraq proved you better arm yourself with nukes, or else.
thewastedlife 2 years ago