Im sorry but this is most overated brand in the world, whenever a new product comes out motoring press cant get enough of it. IT IS ABSOLUTE CRAP BUILT BY PEOPLE WHO DONT GIVE A SHIT. Landrover will cost you thousands over other brands as it will in the garage more than on the road.
@DraughtHaze - wht a noob ur ... hahahahah ... its Land Rover and Tata owns i know because I am Indian and work with the Tata group .. go google that!!!
Worst land rover ever it looks like a storm trooper and well from £42,000'i would rather get the range rover I have the 4.2L Supercharged V8 Vouge a proper range rover
I know this will undoubtedly get tared with the WAG Wagon brush but I don't care, its a beautiful car that seem very particle.With the frequency that the UK gets snow nowadays I wouldn't think twice about buying this car. Im a 42 year old bloke btw. Just need to save the penny's.
@SuperRehank nope starting price for the evoque coupe pure cost $43,995, evoque coupe prestige cost 52,395, and evoque coupe dynamic cost $51,495, i think your mistaken for the range rover sport, now does cost start at $80,000 , where you get your information?
@ManOfWealthnTaste What's really sad is that you can't go to any vids on youtube without running into racist BS...for fuck's sake talk about the cars!!!
I wonder what market this "SUV" is supposed to be servicing. Cause I could never see myself buying something like this...even if I could afford it lol
VERY NICE CAR and looks even better in the metal...I saw one all blacked out on the highway and i almost rear ended the car infront of me ...the evoque and the cayenne are the SUV's of my dreams....
@06522111....The 2 door is Ugly but the 4 door is a REAL PEACE of ART?????whats the difference between the 2 door and 4 door in-terms of design...same shit except number of doors...massive contradiction...just close your mouth. You sound stupid!
I seriously thought current kia optima styling when i saw commercial last night. Interior awesome. needs more boost for 300-320hp/trap 1/4 mile 100mph alot more interest
Glad to see companies doing "Sporty" things with their vehicles, just how many people are going to put out the "starting at 50K" to get into one of these vehicles? I am not a fan of SUV's of any size, but really like what they've done with the look here. Still, for my 50K, I'll take a loaded HEMI Challenger SRT over this any day!
I like it. But not at $50,000. You don't have many options these days, for a small SUV that's not really a minivan in disguise. Something that has some off road capability, and some towing capacity.
Zee none WTF why can't you Stupid American retarded yank speaking fuck tards say anything correct? Xen NONE FFS or Zen none! Where the hell do you get a Z from an X?
I despise this car. If there's 1 thing that would put me off buying a car it would be the fact that Victoria Beckham helped with the design. What the Fuck does she know about car design? Gay gay gay
I despise this car. If there is one thing that would put me off buying a car it would be that Victoria Beckham worked on the design. What the Fuck does that stick insect know about designing cars. Totally ruined the brand. Gay gay gay
@superman7890 geez its not the size of the engine its how much power it produces and how well it uses it not everything needs a v6 or v8 and get used to it with companys downsizing engine sizes will be more common its no longer the 1950s
@WellImHereNow I'm aware of everyone downsizing, but for 50k I want something with a little more refinement and swag than a Ford 4 turbo. At least in the American market, ford is a new player with turbo technology.
@superman7890 have you test driven it to know the refinement and "swag" of the engine hmmm reviews can only give so much plus expencive 4 cylinders are common place in europe as most people care about quality of the car rather then getting as much as they can and ford a new player in turbos hahahaha not even close fords been doing them for ages here.
@WellImHereNow I haven't test driven but collected my opinion from reviews of this car and the ford explorer which shares the same engine might I add. i wouldn't care if they gave us a nice turbo diesel to play with here in the states. i'm aware ford has been making turbo diesels for some time. can you please point out direct injected dohc turbo gas motor applications, aka turbo technology? I care about "quality" and i'll take a porsche cayenne.
@superman7890 Quality? From what I can tell the Evoque does evoke quality. Doesn't look cheaply built to me at all. Comparing the Porsche Cayenne is a little silly as well. Much larger, heavier, less efficient vehicle (not to mention the cost).
Unsure what you mean by swag. The Evoque isn't some lackluster turd you see on just any streetcorner. I for one prefer it's looks and its size over the Cayenne (although beauty is in the eye of beholder). I'd rather not drive a bloated boat (Cayenne).
@ReticentIndignation I was referring to the quality of the drive-terrain specifically and Land Rover's are notorious for mechanical problems. It isn't silly to compare this vehicle to a Cayenne as they are price competitors (v6 cayenne starting at 48k) and marketed towards similar people. The "bloated boat" of a cayenne could teach the evoque a thing or two both on and off road.
If you want to talk efficiency, the new cayenne's are the most efficient to date with 8 sp autos, auto start stop, and 'lighter' than the previous model. Also don't forget to look at combined mpg between these two vehicles, hardly any difference.
@superman7890 are you kidding? in terms of mpg, cayennes are rated at 15-16/22 (24 for the hybrid). i'm sure these figures factor in stop/start and any fuel-saving measures. the evoque achieves 18/28, which is a pretty substantial difference. the cayenne is nice and all but it is not an efficient car by any standards. the evoque is almost as efficient as a lexus rx hybrid.
@4RINGSS5 C'mon man, the hybrid starts at nearly 70,000$. And the hybrid yeilds 24mpg highway. Is it even fit to be called a hybrid (I understand that it may be due to the drive train)? It's not even a plug in hybrid is it? Doesn't appear to be from what I can tell on Porsche's website. I wonder what the curb weight of the hybrid is.
I'm not downing Porsche or the Cayenne, but for me, the Cayenne is just not what I'm looking for. The size and packaging of the Evoque is what I'm after.
@superman7890 the evoque and cayenne are not price competitors at all. an evoque starts at $43,995. a cayenne starts at $48,300, and add $3,000 for an automatic transmission. and don't even get me started on porsche optional equipment. a well equipped evoque can be had for $50K or less. the evoque competes with Q5s, X3s and GLKs. the cayenne competes with RR Sports, MLs and X5s.
@4RINGSS5 cayenne w/ tiptronic is 16/23 which averages to 19; 18/28 averages to 22 straight from USDOE...Which brings me to Land Rover's "starting price" of 44k for the pure package. Choose either prestige or dynamic and the price balloons to 52k, cayenne territory. At this price point, whats 3mpg?
@superman7890 the combined fuel economy of the evoque is 23mpg and that is directly from LR's website. that's 4mpg more than a cayenne's combined fuel rating. 4mpg is substantial. i don't know how you can say it's not. and with a $52K evoque you get a pretty well, almost fully equipped car. with a $52K cayenne, you get an automatic transmission. add a couple thousand for gps. another couple hundred for a mf steering wheel. another couple hundred for heated seats. you get the point.
@superman7890 The Evoque is not meant to compete with the Porsche Cayenne.
I'm a future prospective buyer of the Evoque. I would not have considered the Porsche simply due to it's size and weight (near 700lbs difference). I like the fact that the Evoque is obviously smaller and drives like a smaller vehicle. The Evoque is more efficient as well as far as MPG. Car and Driver magazine doesn't even list the Cayenne as a direct competitor. New Cayenne's compared to old ones don't concern me.
this does not deserve to have the range rover badge. its even worse than the sport! nothing they do will ever come close to the range rover classic. they should of quit while they were ahead and not disgreased themselves with this pathetic exuse for a 4x4. btw even though the word looks like "chassis" its said like "shassy" (not that im any pro at spelling but you sound like an idiot)
wtf. a land rover should never be this round looking. land rovers are suppose to be boxy and have that commanding presence. the rounder an suv looks, the more effeminent it is.....
@imheren0w boxy is old school. round looking means better aerodynamics and structural integrity. You see it in F1 cars and modern Eurocars like BMW's and Porsches. Gone are cars with straight edges cuz computers now design cars to be better and more efficient
@TheBadRespawn Not likely. TopGear is funded by british taxpayers, Motortrend is financed by capitalism and free enterprise. And the best part about Motortrend is that the they speak American English. If TopGear is so wonderful, let's see it survive without the queen's dole. Did you know british citizens have to pay a tax just to watch over the air television?
Car design is best only through the eyes of its creators. It doesn't carry the design taste of the majority consumers. Public needs a car that is smart enough to carry your needs from your home to your destination safely and comfortably. Give us HDDs that carry programs for navigation, music, and the senses of the car itself- user friendly for upgrades and electronic connections. Don't treat public consumers idiots.
Im sorry but this is most overated brand in the world, whenever a new product comes out motoring press cant get enough of it. IT IS ABSOLUTE CRAP BUILT BY PEOPLE WHO DONT GIVE A SHIT. Landrover will cost you thousands over other brands as it will in the garage more than on the road.
nsxjl 8 hours ago
so sick! i dont think i could ever drive that off road though
twizitz 9 hours ago
I like it.
Atheistprimate 6 days ago
the 2012 grand cherokee look a little bit similar
SuperCold20 6 days ago
6 airbags...lol they chevy sonic has 10.
fatty1443 1 week ago
they had to use 6 different cars because they kept breaking down every 10 miles and it was cheaper just to buy a new one...
fatty1443 1 week ago
That's a lot of money for a 4 cyc Ford engine.
Truemoderate 1 week ago
FUGLY
Watermox 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car?
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
so navigation isn't standard for a $50k plus car? what a joke!
mahballzrhari 1 week ago
i don't like it , the previous one is better
Ka3aX111 1 week ago
Meu brother, preciso desse carro!
gaholiveira 1 week ago
I used to think this car was ugly looking on screen, but then I saw one in person and changed my mind. It is freakin sexy up close!
if7ate9 1 week ago
5 Star!!!! till date best video of the range rover evoque...
shisug11 2 weeks ago
Looks over-designed to me.
mozaks80 2 weeks ago
the 2 door looks so fucking sexy. I wish they made the 4 door like an fj cruiser, in that the back doors are smaller, suicide doors (open backwards)
9nosliw 2 weeks ago
really ugly looking
aptsys 2 weeks ago
The best looking range rover ever
nsulademon 3 weeks ago 23
It is a Range Rover not a Land Rover.
DraughtHaze 1 month ago
@DraughtHaze Land rover is the manufacturer for the evoque
syazrinamzar 1 month ago
@syazrinamzar The words RANGE ROVER are stapled to the back and front of the car.
DraughtHaze 1 month ago
@DraughtHaze Land Rover manufactures the discovery, defender, freelander, range rover, range rover sport and the range rover evoque.
syazrinamzar 1 month ago
@syazrinamzar Wikipedia can be altered by anyone who has an account with them. Your reply is invalid.
DraughtHaze 4 weeks ago
@DraughtHaze
If you feel unsafe about Wikipedia, go to the source a tLand Rovers own website
PalleSchultz 3 weeks ago
@DraughtHaze youre the most persistently uninformed person ive seen in a while.
122A7 3 weeks ago
@DraughtHaze goodness me, go for a fucking test drive and u can find a land rover logo at the back of the car. What a tool
syazrinamzar 3 weeks ago
@DraughtHaze So is the Land Rover badge, on the RHS of the tail gate...take a closer look
determinedskeptic 1 week ago
@determinedskeptic I seriously cant believe that im getting replies to that. I WAS TAKING THE PISS I ALREADY KNEW.
DraughtHaze 1 week ago
@DraughtHaze For your easiest reference, just go to wikipedia.
syazrinamzar 1 month ago
@DraughtHaze you must be retarded? Land Rover is the company, range rover is a model of land rover dumbass
fearmeyo 4 weeks ago
@DraughtHaze - wht a noob ur ... hahahahah ... its Land Rover and Tata owns i know because I am Indian and work with the Tata group .. go google that!!!
rahulgosh1 3 weeks ago
@TheDevilWearsAdidas If you think that looks gay you must be very very far in the closet.
DraughtHaze 1 month ago
i kinda like it, it reminds me of the range stormer a bit.
MrVanDay 1 month ago
This car is sleek and sexy.
shapery2794 1 month ago
Did he say start 50k for this little car?.No thanks.
miennam8 1 month ago
The only issue is quality problems
Timx4 1 month ago
Love the new futuristic look! Beautiful inside out! I like this look as much as I like the classic look.
moderndesignworks 1 month ago
Worst land rover ever it looks like a storm trooper and well from £42,000'i would rather get the range rover I have the 4.2L Supercharged V8 Vouge a proper range rover
XxAIRSOFTCREWxX 1 month ago
i always wanted this kind of look to a car
francisalec 1 month ago
the engine on the 2011-present Range Rover Evoque
Engine
2.0 L I4 petrol 240 hp (180 kW)
2.2 L I4 diesel 150 hp (110 kW) / 190 hp (140 kW)
Annihilator1111 1 month ago
A fuel efficient Land Rover.... Thats IMPOSSIBLE!!!!
drewolf 1 month ago
I think it's so ugly and incomplete in the back!!
morpheusmann 1 month ago
@morpheusmann Then you must be a little weird, cause the vast majority of people like its looks.
nicknickk 1 month ago
i like it very much......
TheTedscamaro 1 month ago
i like this car very much............
pateldevang1988 1 month ago 17
Este carro é uma jóia rara
Parabéns!!!
mauroadrianoc 2 months ago
I know this will undoubtedly get tared with the WAG Wagon brush but I don't care, its a beautiful car that seem very particle.With the frequency that the UK gets snow nowadays I wouldn't think twice about buying this car. Im a 42 year old bloke btw. Just need to save the penny's.
electrarelic 2 months ago
i like that state farm commercial, made me lol.
MrGipsyking1234 2 months ago
KOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
oh0hMh85 2 months ago
Which interior/exterior colour combination you guys think suits this car best? I really like the FujiWhite exterior with red leather interior!
v1ralsh1t 2 months ago
@v1ralsh1t yup I just personally don't care for the two tone roof option with a different paint color. But to each their own I suppose.
ViolentKisses87 2 months ago
500,000$
amgd70 2 months ago
@amgd70 50,000
MrSaadi100 2 months ago
they need a 4 door version!
xFreshKicks08 2 months ago
@xFreshKicks08 they make one -_______-
sexyboi142 2 months ago
Comment removed
OlliElectro 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xFreshKicks08 2:30 -.-"
OlliElectro 2 months ago
@xFreshKicks08 there is a 4 door version mr troll sir
daibadrumu 2 months ago
v4 ??
are you kedding me :@
5693252 2 months ago
good job mrs. beckham
TheMalilul 2 months ago
About how much does this AWESOME truck cost?
prs1281 2 months ago
@prs1281 $43,000
lveratadeo 2 months ago
@lveratadeo wrong they cost 90-100k
SuperRehank 2 months ago
@SuperRehank nope starting price for the evoque coupe pure cost $43,995, evoque coupe prestige cost 52,395, and evoque coupe dynamic cost $51,495, i think your mistaken for the range rover sport, now does cost start at $80,000 , where you get your information?
lveratadeo 2 months ago
Comment removed
Valerya7777 3 months ago
@ManOfWealthnTaste What's really sad is that you can't go to any vids on youtube without running into racist BS...for fuck's sake talk about the cars!!!
mxzysptlik 3 months ago
I wonder what market this "SUV" is supposed to be servicing. Cause I could never see myself buying something like this...even if I could afford it lol
mxzysptlik 3 months ago
Comment removed
mxzysptlik 3 months ago
Does it only run on premium fuel?
Travide 3 months ago
0:11 goat also doesnt give a shit about evoque
freakychannel123 3 months ago
أكرمني يارب
Pcsplash 3 months ago
The perfect off-roader for Paris Hilton when she has to go up an unpaved driveway.
JET997u 3 months ago
VERY NICE CAR and looks even better in the metal...I saw one all blacked out on the highway and i almost rear ended the car infront of me ...the evoque and the cayenne are the SUV's of my dreams....
MakeLoveNoBabiez 3 months ago
I Think This 1 is ugly.
Coupe Its soo ugly look at it form the side.
Dusnt make sence at all. The back and the front.
but then i saw the 4 door saloon.
Then i felt in love.
Real Peace of art
06522111 3 months ago
@06522111....The 2 door is Ugly but the 4 door is a REAL PEACE of ART?????whats the difference between the 2 door and 4 door in-terms of design...same shit except number of doors...massive contradiction...just close your mouth. You sound stupid!
MakeLoveNoBabiez 3 months ago
I fell in love with this truck after seeing it in its concept form. This is the truck of my dreams.
DJ100674 3 months ago
the 2wd option is much better if your not going off road because it can return up to 57 mpg
EPIKVip3Zz 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Land Rover:
-Environmentally friendly car. (All parts are reused, and even broken!)
-Sustainable. (80% of all Land Rover as building block is still in use)
-Valuesmost famous off-road car.
Today, Land Rover turns 65. I think that should be celebrated!
please send forward this to other Land Rover movies!
97jocke 3 months ago
I seriously thought current kia optima styling when i saw commercial last night. Interior awesome. needs more boost for 300-320hp/trap 1/4 mile 100mph alot more interest
05EVORS 3 months ago
As nice as it looks, until I see it climb up the side of a mountain and get coated in mud, I don't think it deserves to be called a Land Rover.
NoCashProductions 3 months ago
omg i want it!
connorross28 3 months ago
Glad to see companies doing "Sporty" things with their vehicles, just how many people are going to put out the "starting at 50K" to get into one of these vehicles? I am not a fan of SUV's of any size, but really like what they've done with the look here. Still, for my 50K, I'll take a loaded HEMI Challenger SRT over this any day!
JimMichaels650 3 months ago
I like it. But not at $50,000. You don't have many options these days, for a small SUV that's not really a minivan in disguise. Something that has some off road capability, and some towing capacity.
l008comm 3 months ago
I'M 13 YEARS OLD AND I HOPE THEY STILL HAVE THIS CAR WHEN I AM 18 YEARS OLD!
WHAT AN AWESOME CAR!
beepleboop99 3 months ago
@ManOfWealthnTaste should have been "they're" not "their" the former is a contraction of "they are"
aquilalegis1 3 months ago
Britain is full of Land Rover fanboys so these Evoques are probably going to be everywhere.
NottinghamForest22 3 months ago
Your Motortrend truck of the year!
Illmatic662 4 months ago
Gorgeous!
MrFishCar 4 months ago
ugly
far0ashgar 4 months ago
omg I love it!!!!!
itscodyw 4 months ago
Sorry this car is ugly. It reminds me of the Nissan Juke. They tried to make it look like a mini RR sport which makes the car look odd and bulky.
surrency1992 4 months ago
My dad is gonna buy one of these ;)
TheTugaDude 4 months ago
that's car is mine
ThugInThaFog 4 months ago
Hell yeah go landrover thats a beast and we need more styles like this its so badass
Ghanjaman420 4 months ago
They ruined it.......fuck you land rover
MaxleeClark3 4 months ago
$50k? And a 4 cyl.? You've got to be joking
airs2k 4 months ago
Ma kurtyny la pasazerow z tyłu??? i klime dla pasazerow z tyłu???
szakalakaka 4 months ago
It's not based on the LR2 (it only shares two bolts with the LR2 that's it) and the motor is not a Ford motor.
keske968 4 months ago
@keske968 Are you sure? I've read and heard from multiple sources that it's the same turbo4 that's in the new Explorer.
wil48823 4 months ago
looks great but seems slow
uptownblk 5 months ago
@uptownblk its not built for speed..
xipartyhardx 4 months ago
great look!
arguemental 5 months ago
...why range rover why,... the style is clearly a rip off from the Infinity jeep car... it has lost all its purpose...
hopplacowboy 5 months ago
Zee none WTF why can't you Stupid American retarded yank speaking fuck tards say anything correct? Xen NONE FFS or Zen none! Where the hell do you get a Z from an X?
sw1000xg 5 months ago
Sorry, but I can't find any excuse not to hate this car.
madcreator12 5 months ago 2
land rover not you tooo!!! noooo its ugly!!!!!!
Inklebonker1 5 months ago
I dono what other ppl say about it, but i like it, especially the roof glass. I like this Rover!
skodia 5 months ago
stay with the LR2 never stop making it!!!!!!!!!!!!
AvatarJizz 5 months ago
this car is elegant!
fdjw88 5 months ago
the leather looks so cheap so a range
boycharger1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thumbs up if you would love it with a full size engine
dodgedakotafan 5 months ago
$50.000 + for a 4 cylinder,no thanks.
But for fags this is the perfect poser car.
johnvanos250 5 months ago
@johnvanos250 What a stupid comment. As if being gay impairs a person's ability to see a piece of crap for what it is. FAIL.
wil48823 4 months ago
damn, one day i will have enough money to buy a range rover. theyre too many nice
Nequetrefi11 5 months ago
ridiculous. more bling for jersey shore trash.
uwdan 5 months ago
Sweet car but 50 large? That's tuff.
badopinion 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like a cross over is a ladies car lol loooks like the gay ford explorer thank god for GM going for denali
cholodesanfe87 5 months ago
Love the sheep walking through the camera view at 0:14
teakbridge101 5 months ago
i'm in love...
back2back22 5 months ago
Y THAT HAPPEN TO ROVER !!!
DEVIL1001111 5 months ago
Did he really jus say $50k?? Sure it's loaded BUUUT.......
enriquepaz7 5 months ago
I like the look alot but how are you supposed to see out the back? And no the cameras are not a solution.
onishchuk4 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Looks stupid
woofdawgg69 5 months ago
I've sat in one of these.
Carbon fibre inside!
hamham500 5 months ago
mom i already know what i want 4 christmas :D
NUNOPITBULL9 5 months ago
I despise this car. If there's 1 thing that would put me off buying a car it would be the fact that Victoria Beckham helped with the design. What the Fuck does she know about car design? Gay gay gay
spencer19811 5 months ago
nice goat...GODZILLA APPROVES!!! of the goat
godzillasballs 5 months ago
nice goat...GODZILLA APPROVES!!!
godzillasballs 5 months ago
@ManOfWealthnTaste Or if they are making an accurate observation.
Anavengertg 5 months ago
This thing is ugly! Fake. And Gay.
presas95 5 months ago
I despise this car. If there is one thing that would put me off buying a car it would be that Victoria Beckham worked on the design. What the Fuck does that stick insect know about designing cars. Totally ruined the brand. Gay gay gay
spencer19811 5 months ago
starting at 50k?? 4 cyl for 50k???
superman7890 5 months ago
@superman7890 geez its not the size of the engine its how much power it produces and how well it uses it not everything needs a v6 or v8 and get used to it with companys downsizing engine sizes will be more common its no longer the 1950s
WellImHereNow 3 months ago
@WellImHereNow I'm aware of everyone downsizing, but for 50k I want something with a little more refinement and swag than a Ford 4 turbo. At least in the American market, ford is a new player with turbo technology.
superman7890 3 months ago
@superman7890 have you test driven it to know the refinement and "swag" of the engine hmmm reviews can only give so much plus expencive 4 cylinders are common place in europe as most people care about quality of the car rather then getting as much as they can and ford a new player in turbos hahahaha not even close fords been doing them for ages here.
WellImHereNow 3 months ago
@WellImHereNow I haven't test driven but collected my opinion from reviews of this car and the ford explorer which shares the same engine might I add. i wouldn't care if they gave us a nice turbo diesel to play with here in the states. i'm aware ford has been making turbo diesels for some time. can you please point out direct injected dohc turbo gas motor applications, aka turbo technology? I care about "quality" and i'll take a porsche cayenne.
superman7890 3 months ago
@superman7890 Quality? From what I can tell the Evoque does evoke quality. Doesn't look cheaply built to me at all. Comparing the Porsche Cayenne is a little silly as well. Much larger, heavier, less efficient vehicle (not to mention the cost).
Unsure what you mean by swag. The Evoque isn't some lackluster turd you see on just any streetcorner. I for one prefer it's looks and its size over the Cayenne (although beauty is in the eye of beholder). I'd rather not drive a bloated boat (Cayenne).
ReticentIndignation 2 months ago
@ReticentIndignation I was referring to the quality of the drive-terrain specifically and Land Rover's are notorious for mechanical problems. It isn't silly to compare this vehicle to a Cayenne as they are price competitors (v6 cayenne starting at 48k) and marketed towards similar people. The "bloated boat" of a cayenne could teach the evoque a thing or two both on and off road.
superman7890 2 months ago
If you want to talk efficiency, the new cayenne's are the most efficient to date with 8 sp autos, auto start stop, and 'lighter' than the previous model. Also don't forget to look at combined mpg between these two vehicles, hardly any difference.
superman7890 2 months ago
@superman7890 are you kidding? in terms of mpg, cayennes are rated at 15-16/22 (24 for the hybrid). i'm sure these figures factor in stop/start and any fuel-saving measures. the evoque achieves 18/28, which is a pretty substantial difference. the cayenne is nice and all but it is not an efficient car by any standards. the evoque is almost as efficient as a lexus rx hybrid.
4RINGSS5 2 months ago
@4RINGSS5 C'mon man, the hybrid starts at nearly 70,000$. And the hybrid yeilds 24mpg highway. Is it even fit to be called a hybrid (I understand that it may be due to the drive train)? It's not even a plug in hybrid is it? Doesn't appear to be from what I can tell on Porsche's website. I wonder what the curb weight of the hybrid is.
I'm not downing Porsche or the Cayenne, but for me, the Cayenne is just not what I'm looking for. The size and packaging of the Evoque is what I'm after.
ReticentIndignation 2 months ago
@superman7890 the evoque and cayenne are not price competitors at all. an evoque starts at $43,995. a cayenne starts at $48,300, and add $3,000 for an automatic transmission. and don't even get me started on porsche optional equipment. a well equipped evoque can be had for $50K or less. the evoque competes with Q5s, X3s and GLKs. the cayenne competes with RR Sports, MLs and X5s.
4RINGSS5 2 months ago
@4RINGSS5 cayenne w/ tiptronic is 16/23 which averages to 19; 18/28 averages to 22 straight from USDOE...Which brings me to Land Rover's "starting price" of 44k for the pure package. Choose either prestige or dynamic and the price balloons to 52k, cayenne territory. At this price point, whats 3mpg?
superman7890 2 months ago
@superman7890 the combined fuel economy of the evoque is 23mpg and that is directly from LR's website. that's 4mpg more than a cayenne's combined fuel rating. 4mpg is substantial. i don't know how you can say it's not. and with a $52K evoque you get a pretty well, almost fully equipped car. with a $52K cayenne, you get an automatic transmission. add a couple thousand for gps. another couple hundred for a mf steering wheel. another couple hundred for heated seats. you get the point.
4RINGSS5 2 months ago
@superman7890 The Evoque is not meant to compete with the Porsche Cayenne.
I'm a future prospective buyer of the Evoque. I would not have considered the Porsche simply due to it's size and weight (near 700lbs difference). I like the fact that the Evoque is obviously smaller and drives like a smaller vehicle. The Evoque is more efficient as well as far as MPG. Car and Driver magazine doesn't even list the Cayenne as a direct competitor. New Cayenne's compared to old ones don't concern me.
ReticentIndignation 2 months ago
this does not deserve to have the range rover badge. its even worse than the sport! nothing they do will ever come close to the range rover classic. they should of quit while they were ahead and not disgreased themselves with this pathetic exuse for a 4x4. btw even though the word looks like "chassis" its said like "shassy" (not that im any pro at spelling but you sound like an idiot)
andrewbthomson 5 months ago
Look and see what happens 0:11, LOL :)
mxaxh1 5 months ago 27
crack pipe
OTKSenior 5 months ago
wtf. a land rover should never be this round looking. land rovers are suppose to be boxy and have that commanding presence. the rounder an suv looks, the more effeminent it is.....
imheren0w 5 months ago
@imheren0w boxy is old school. round looking means better aerodynamics and structural integrity. You see it in F1 cars and modern Eurocars like BMW's and Porsches. Gone are cars with straight edges cuz computers now design cars to be better and more efficient
AccordGTR 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheBadRespawn 5 months ago
@TheBadRespawn Not likely. TopGear is funded by british taxpayers, Motortrend is financed by capitalism and free enterprise. And the best part about Motortrend is that the they speak American English. If TopGear is so wonderful, let's see it survive without the queen's dole. Did you know british citizens have to pay a tax just to watch over the air television?
order9066 5 months ago
Car design is best only through the eyes of its creators. It doesn't carry the design taste of the majority consumers. Public needs a car that is smart enough to carry your needs from your home to your destination safely and comfortably. Give us HDDs that carry programs for navigation, music, and the senses of the car itself- user friendly for upgrades and electronic connections. Don't treat public consumers idiots.
cass2chk 5 months ago
The global economy is strong
carbonunit 5 months ago
uCantSeeMyComment 5 months ago
Wait, land rover? I thought this was a BMW x6
SN0PEA 5 months ago
@SN0PEA finally i was bitching this for a while a lot of car are doing this
KITARO 4 months ago
the indians took over the range rover and now look how they have daMAGED IT-THIS car is so so ugly now
goldenboyi1989 5 months ago
Everybody knows Range Rovers are shit.
They do nothing but break down.
Hoslehk1337 5 months ago
man i hope thats not what theyre gonna do to the other rovers.. peace \|||/
shine77777 5 months ago
Flashy on the outside and cheap interior.
Bobby0345 5 months ago
WHAT should I say 2get you to give my GREAT HD Music Video a chance? Youtube/reggiewriteous
ReggieWriteous 5 months ago
A vehicle for middle aged women..
drsta84 5 months ago
@ManOfWealthnTaste cuz ur white neighborhood lost its value in houses, either tht or there're rlly rich
AznKoolAidxx 5 months ago
So gay... So shit off road.
brindabellaoffroad 5 months ago
@ManOfWealthnTaste Why are cowardly morons posting online instead of saying stuff in public?
Anavengertg 5 months ago
7 seconds to reach 60mph? A $5k 250 Kawasaki Ninja reaches 60mph in 6 seconds.
Anavengertg 5 months ago
@Anavengertg and weighs like 500 pounds. Why are you comparing a small SUV to a motorcycle?
Transam941 5 months ago